1
|
Nguyen JK, Harik LR, Klein EA, Li J, Corrigan D, Liu S, Chan E, Hawley S, Auman H, Newcomb LF, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR, Filson CP, Simko JP, Nelson PS, Tretiakova MS, Troyer D, True LD, Vakar-Lopez F, Weight CJ, Lin DW, Brooks JD, McKenney JK. Proposal for an optimised definition of adverse pathology (unfavourable histology) that predicts metastatic risk in prostatic adenocarcinoma independent of grade group and pathological stage. Histopathology 2024; 85:598-613. [PMID: 38828674 PMCID: PMC11365761 DOI: 10.1111/his.15231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Histological grading of prostate cancer is a powerful prognostic tool, but current criteria for grade assignment are not fully optimised. Our goal was to develop and test a simplified histological grading model, based heavily on large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma, with optimised sensitivity for predicting metastatic potential. METHODS AND RESULTS Two separate non-overlapping cohorts were identified: a 419-patient post-radical prostatectomy cohort with long term clinical follow-up and a 209-patient post-radical prostatectomy cohort in which all patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic disease. All prostatectomies were re-reviewed for high-risk histological patterns of carcinoma termed 'unfavourable histology'. Unfavourable histology is defined by any classic Gleason pattern 5 component, any large cribriform morphology (> 0.25 mm) or intraductal carcinoma, complex intraluminal papillary architecture, grade 3 stromogenic carcinoma and complex anastomosing cord-like growth. For the outcome cohort, Kaplan-Meier analysis compared biochemical recurrence, metastasis and death between subjects with favourable and unfavourable histology, stratified by pathological stage and grade group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated adding unfavourable histology to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) post-prostatectomy nomogram and stratification by percentage of unfavourable histology. At 15 years unfavourable histology predicted biochemical recurrence, with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 88%, metastatic disease at 100 and 48% and death at 100 and 46%. Grade group 2 prostate cancers with unfavourable histology were associated with metastasis independent of pathological stage, while those without had no risk. Histological models for prediction of metastasis based on only large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma or increasing diameter of cribriform size improved specificity, but with lower sensitivity. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated that unfavourable histology significantly improved discriminatory power of the MSKCC post-prostatectomy nomogram for biochemical failure (likelihood ratio test P < 0.001). In the retrospective review of a separate RP cohort in which all patients had confirmed metastatic disease, none had unequivocal favourable histology. CONCLUSIONS Unfavourable histology at radical prostatectomy is associated with metastatic risk, predicted adverse outcomes better than current grading and staging systems and improved the MSKCC post-prostatectomy nomogram. Most importantly, unfavourable histology stratified grade group 2 prostate cancers into those with and without metastatic potential, independent of stage. While unfavourable histology is driven predominantly by large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma, the recognition and inclusion of other specific architectural patterns add to the sensitivity for predicting metastatic disease. Moreover, a simplified dichotomous model improves communication and could increase implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane K. Nguyen
- Robert J. Tomsich Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lara R. Harik
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jianbo Li
- Lerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Dillon Corrigan
- Lerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shiguang Liu
- Department of Pathology, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Emily Chan
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sarah Hawley
- Canary Foundation, Palo Alto, CA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Lisa F. Newcomb
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Jeff P. Simko
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter S. Nelson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Maria S. Tretiakova
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Dean Troyer
- Department of Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Lawrence D. True
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Daniel W Lin
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - James D. Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Jesse K. McKenney
- Robert J. Tomsich Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, Eberli D, De Meerleer G, De Santis M, Farolfi A, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Henry AM, Lardas M, van Leenders GJLH, Liew M, Linares Espinos E, Oldenburg J, van Oort IM, Oprea-Lager DE, Ploussard G, Roberts MJ, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Schouten N, Smith EJ, Stranne J, Wiegel T, Willemse PPM, Tilki D. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2024; 86:148-163. [PMID: 38614820 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines provide recommendations for the management of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). This paper aims to present a summary of the 2024 version of the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised PCa. METHODS The panel performed a literature review of all new data published in English, covering the time frame between May 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated, and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is considered, a combination of targeted and regional biopsies should be performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging is the most sensitive technique for identifying metastatic spread. Active surveillance is the appropriate management for men with low-risk PCa, as well as for selected favourable intermediate-risk patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A recommendation to consider hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term intensified hormonal treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. PATIENT SUMMARY This article is the summary of the guidelines for "curable" prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is "found" through a multistep risk-based screening process. The objective is to find as many men as possible with a curable cancer. Prostate cancer is curable if it resides in the prostate; it is then classified into low-, intermediary-, and high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. These risk classes are the basis of the treatments. Low-risk prostate cancer is treated with "active surveillance", a treatment with excellent prognosis. For low-intermediary-risk active surveillance should also be discussed as an option. In other cases, active treatments, surgery, or radiation treatment should be discussed along with the potential side effects to allow shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Julie Darraugh
- European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, USI, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Nikolaos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jan Oldenburg
- Akershus University Hospital (Ahus), Lørenskog, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inge M van Oort
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Department of Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, UFR Lyon-Est, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emma J Smith
- European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sushentsev N, Hamm G, Flint L, Birtles D, Zakirov A, Richings J, Ling S, Tan JY, McLean MA, Ayyappan V, Horvat Menih I, Brodie C, Miller JL, Mills IG, Gnanapragasam VJ, Warren AY, Barry ST, Goodwin RJA, Barrett T, Gallagher FA. Metabolic imaging across scales reveals distinct prostate cancer phenotypes. Nat Commun 2024; 15:5980. [PMID: 39013948 PMCID: PMC11252279 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50362-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Hyperpolarised magnetic resonance imaging (HP-13C-MRI) has shown promise as a clinical tool for detecting and characterising prostate cancer. Here we use a range of spatially resolved histological techniques to identify the biological mechanisms underpinning differential [1-13C]lactate labelling between benign and malignant prostate, as well as in tumours containing cribriform and non-cribriform Gleason pattern 4 disease. Here we show that elevated hyperpolarised [1-13C]lactate signal in prostate cancer compared to the benign prostate is primarily driven by increased tumour epithelial cell density and vascularity, rather than differences in epithelial lactate concentration between tumour and normal. We also demonstrate that some tumours of the cribriform subtype may lack [1-13C]lactate labelling, which is explained by lower epithelial lactate dehydrogenase expression, higher mitochondrial pyruvate carrier density, and increased lipid abundance compared to lactate-rich non-cribriform lesions. These findings highlight the potential of combining spatial metabolic imaging tools across scales to identify clinically significant metabolic phenotypes in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Sushentsev
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Gregory Hamm
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lucy Flint
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel Birtles
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Aleksandr Zakirov
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jack Richings
- Predictive AI & Data, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephanie Ling
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jennifer Y Tan
- Predictive AI & Data, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mary A McLean
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vinay Ayyappan
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ines Horvat Menih
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cara Brodie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jodi L Miller
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian G Mills
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Vincent J Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon T Barry
- Bioscience, Early Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard J A Goodwin
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sasaki T, Kobayashi I, Uchida K, Higashi S, Masui S, Nishikawa K, Tsuzuki T, Watanabe M, Sassa N, Inoue T. Cribriform pattern 4/intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and persistent prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:709-717. [PMID: 39022662 PMCID: PMC11250726 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives The objective of this study is to identify the effect of cribriform pattern 4 carcinoma/intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (CC/IDCP) on persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and Methods This retrospective study included 730 consecutive patients with localized PCa who underwent RARP at Mie University (n = 392) and Aichi Medical University (n = 338) between 2015 and 2021. Patients with clinically metastatic PCa (cN1 and cM1) and those who received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy before biochemical recurrence were excluded. We evaluated the effects of CC/IDCP on persistent PSA levels after RARP. Persistent PSA was defined as PSA level ≥0.2 ng/mL at 1 month postoperatively and consecutively thereafter. Using factors from logistic regression analysis, models were developed to predict persistent PSA levels. Results Approximately 6.3% (n = 46) of the patients had persistent PSA levels. Patients with biopsy CC/IDCP (bCC/IDCP) and pathological CC/IDCP (pCC/IDCP) based on RARP specimens were 11.6% (85/730) and 36.5% (267/730), respectively. Multivariate analysis of the prediction of persistent PSA levels using preoperative factors revealed that PSA density, percentage of positive cancer cores, biopsy grade group and bCC/IDCP were independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, multivariate analysis of the prediction of persistent PSA levels using postoperative factors, excluding pN1, revealed that pathological grade group, pCC/IDCP, seminal vesicle invasion and lymphovascular invasion were independent prognostic factors. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for predicting persistent PSA after RARP, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model with preoperative factors, postoperative factors, including pN1, and postoperative factors, excluding pN1, were 0.827, 0.833 and 0.834, respectively. Conclusions bCC/IDCP predicted persistent PSA after RARP in the overall population, while pCC/IDCP predicted persistent PSA only when the pN1 population was excluded. This may be useful for predicting susceptible patients with worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Nephro‐Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Graduate School of MedicineMie UniversityTsuJapan
| | - Ikuo Kobayashi
- Department of UrologyAichi Medical UniversityNagakuteJapan
| | - Katsunori Uchida
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Graduate School of MedicineMie UniversityTsuJapan
| | - Shinichiro Higashi
- Department of Nephro‐Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Graduate School of MedicineMie UniversityTsuJapan
| | - Satoru Masui
- Department of Nephro‐Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Graduate School of MedicineMie UniversityTsuJapan
| | - Kouhei Nishikawa
- Department of Nephro‐Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Graduate School of MedicineMie UniversityTsuJapan
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical PathologyAichi Medical UniversityNagakuteJapan
| | - Masatoshi Watanabe
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Graduate School of MedicineMie UniversityTsuJapan
| | - Naoto Sassa
- Department of UrologyAichi Medical UniversityNagakuteJapan
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Nephro‐Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Graduate School of MedicineMie UniversityTsuJapan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leung D, Castellani D, Nicoletti R, Dilme RV, Sierra JM, Serni S, Franzese C, Chiacchio G, Galosi AB, Mazzucchelli R, Palagonia E, Dell'Oglio P, Galfano A, Bocciardi AM, Zhao X, Ng CF, Lee HY, Sakamoto S, Vasdev N, Rivas JG, Campi R, Teoh JYC. The Oncological and Functional Prognostic Value of Unconventional Histology of Prostate Cancer in Localized Disease Treated with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: An International Multicenter 5-Year Cohort Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:581-588. [PMID: 38185614 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The impact of prostate cancer of unconventional histology (UH) on oncological and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) receipt is unclear. We compared the impact of cribriform pattern (CP), ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC), and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) in comparison to pure adenocarcinoma (AC) on short- to mid-term oncological and functional results and receipt of aRT after RARP. METHODS We retrospectively collected data for a large international cohort of men with localized prostate cancer treated with RARP between 2016 and 2020. The primary outcomes were biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, erectile and continence function. aRT receipt was a secondary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were performed. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 3935 patients were included. At median follow-up of 2.8 yr, the rates for BCR incidence (AC 10.7% vs IDC 17%; p < 0.001) and aRT receipt (AC 4.5% vs DAC 6.3% [p = 0.003] vs IDC 11.2% [p < 0.001]) were higher with UH. The 5-yr BCR-free survival rate was significantly poorer for UH groups, with hazard ratios of 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.40; p = 0.005) for DAC, 5.22 (95% CI 3.41-8.01; p < 0.001) for IDC, and 3.45 (95% CI 2.29-5.20; p < 0.001) for CP in comparison to AC. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of UH doubled the risk of new-onset erectile dysfunction at 1 yr, in comparison to AC (grade group 1-3), with hazard ratios of 2.13 (p < 0.001) for DAC, 2.14 (p < 0.001) for IDC, and 2.01 (p = 0.011) for CP. Moreover, CP, but not IDC or DAC, was associated with a significantly higher risk of incontinence (odds ratio 1.97; p < 0.001). The study is limited by the lack of central histopathological review and relatively short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS In a large cohort, UH presence was associated with worse short- to mid-term oncological outcomes after RARP. IDC independently predicted a higher rate of aRT receipt. At 1-yr follow-up after RP, patients with UH had three times higher risk of erectile dysfunction post RARP; CP was associated with a twofold higher incontinence rate. PATIENT SUMMARY Among patients with prostate cancer who undergo robot-assisted surgery to remove the prostate, those with less common types of prostate cancer have worse results for cancer control, erection, and urinary continence and a higher probability of receiving additional radiotherapy after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Leung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Division of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carmine Franzese
- Division of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Chiacchio
- Division of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Division of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Roberta Mazzucchelli
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Erika Palagonia
- Urology Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Urology Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Urology Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Xue Zhao
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Chi Fai Ng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Shinichi Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, East and North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miyajima K, Sato S, Uchida N, Suzuki H, Iwatani K, Imai Y, Aikawa K, Yanagisawa T, Kimura S, Tashiro K, Tsuzuki S, Honda M, Koike Y, Miki J, Miki K, Shimomura T, Yuen S, Yamada Y, Aoki M, Takahashi H, Urabe F, Kimura T. Clinical Significance of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate After High-Dose Brachytherapy With External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Single Institution Series and an Updated Meta-Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:149-156.e1. [PMID: 38007354 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared oncological outcomes between prostate cancer (PCa) patients with and without intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 138 patients with clinically high-risk, very high-risk, or locally advanced PCa who received HDR-BT with EBRT. Of these, 70 (50.7 %) patients were diagnosed with IDC-P; 68 (49.3 %) patients with acinar adenocarcinoma of prostate. The oncological outcomes, including biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and clinical progression-free survival (CPFS), were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Additionally, Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify significant prognostic indicators or biochemical recurrence (BCR). Meta-analysis of existing literatures was performed to evaluate the risk of BCR in patients with IDC-P after radiation therapy, compared to those without IDC-P. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly inferior BCRFS and CPFS in patients with IDC-P. Multivariate analysis revealed that IDC-P and Grade Group 5 status were associated with increased BCR risk. in our meta-analysis, IDC-P was associated with BCR (HR = 2.13, P = .003). CONCLUSION Amongst the patients who received HDR-BT, patients with IDC-P displayed significantly more rapid disease progression, compared with patients who did not have IDC-P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Miyajima
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shun Sato
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Uchida
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Suzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwa, Chiba
| | - Yu Imai
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Aikawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwa, Chiba
| | - Kojiro Tashiro
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Honda
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Koike
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwa, Chiba
| | - Kenta Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Shimomura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Steffi Yuen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Yuta Yamada
- Department of Urology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manabu Aoki
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takahashi
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Greenland NY, Cowan JE, Stohr BA, Simko JP, Carroll PR, Chan E. Large cribriform glands (> 0.25 mm diameter) as a predictor of adverse pathology in men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer. Histopathology 2024; 84:614-623. [PMID: 38012532 DOI: 10.1111/his.15102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
AIMS A recent outcome-based, radical prostatectomy study defined > 0.25 mm diameter to distinguish large versus small cribriform glands, with > 0.25 mm associated with worse recurrence-free survival. This study evaluates whether identification of > 0.25 mm cribriform glands in Grade Group 2 patients at biopsy is associated with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND RESULTS Tumours containing biopsy slides for 133 patients with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with subsequent radical prostatectomy were re-reviewed for large cribriform glands (diameter > 0.25 mm). The primary outcome was adverse pathology (Grade Groups 3-5; stage pT3a or greater, or pN1). The secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival. Cribriform pattern was present in 52 of 133 (39%) patients; of these, 16 of 52 (31%) had large cribriform glands and 36 of 52 (69%) had only small cribriform glands. Patients with large cribriform glands had significantly more adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy compared to patients with small cribriform glands and no cribriform glands (large = 11 of 16, 69%; small = 12 of 36, 33%; no cribriform = 25 of 81, 31%; χ2 P-value 0.01). On multivariate analysis, large cribriform glands were also associated with adverse pathology, independent of age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA)/PSA density at diagnosis, year of diagnosis and biopsy cores percentage positive (global P-value 0.02). Large cribriform glands were also associated with increased CAPRA-S surgical risk score (Kruskal-Wallis P-value 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Large cribriform glands using a diameter > 0.25 mm definition in Grade Group 2 patients on biopsy are associated with increased risk of adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy. The presence of large cribriform histology should be considered when offering active surveillance for those with Grade Group 2 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Y Greenland
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, UCSF-Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Janet E Cowan
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, UCSF-Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bradley A Stohr
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, UCSF-Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffry P Simko
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, UCSF-Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, UCSF-Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emily Chan
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, UCSF-Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kroon LJ, Remmers S, Hollemans E, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, van Leenders GJLH. Does prostate cancer without cribriform pattern have metastatic potential? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00802-6. [PMID: 38341462 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00802-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa J Kroon
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Hollemans
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique J Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert J L H van Leenders
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Naito Y, Kato M, Nagayama J, Sano Y, Matsuo K, Inoue S, Sano T, Ishida S, Matsukawa Y, Tsuzuki T, Akamatsu S. Recent insights on the clinical, pathological, and molecular features of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Urol 2024; 31:7-16. [PMID: 37728330 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, a unique histopathologic entity that is often observed (especially in advanced prostate cancer), is characterized by the proliferation of malignant cells within normal acini or ducts surrounded by a basement membrane. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is almost invariably associated with an adjacent high-grade carcinoma and is occasionally observed as an isolated subtype. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate has been demonstrated to be an independent poor prognostic factor for all stages of cancer, whether localized, de novo metastatic, or castration-resistant. It also has a characteristic genetic profile, including high genomic instability. Recognizing and differentiating it from other pathologies is therefore important in patient management, and morphological diagnostic criteria for intraductal carcinoma of the prostate have been established. This review summarizes and outlines the clinical and pathological features, differential diagnosis, molecular aspects, and management of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, as described in previous studies. We also present a discussion and future perspectives regarding intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yushi Naito
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masashi Kato
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Jun Nagayama
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuta Sano
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kazuna Matsuo
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Satoshi Inoue
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Sano
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shohei Ishida
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shusuke Akamatsu
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bernardino RM, Sayyid RK, Lajkosz K, Al-Daqqaq Z, Cockburn JG, Chavarriaga J, Abedi S, Leão R, Berlin A, van der Kwast T, Fleshner NE. Limitations of Prostate Biopsy in Detection of Cribriform and Intraductal Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:146-153. [PMID: 37696743 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of cribriform morphology and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) in prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens is an adverse prognostic feature that can be used to guide treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE To assess how accurately biopsies can detect cribriform morphology and IDC cancer by examining matched biopsy and prostatectomy samples. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between January 2015 and December 2022 and had cribriform morphology and/or IDC in the surgical specimen were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We used detection sensitivity to evaluate the level of agreement between biopsy and prostatectomy samples regarding the presence of cribriform morphology and IDC. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of the 287 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, 241 (84%) had cribriform morphology and 161 (56%) had IDC on final pathology. The sensitivity of prostate biopsy, using radical prostatectomy as the reference, was 42.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-49%) for detection of cribriform morphology and 44.1% (95% CI 36-52%) for detection of IDC. The sensitivity of prostate biopsy for detection of either IDC or cribriform morphology was 52.5% (95% CI 47-58%). Among patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies, the sensitivity was 54% (95% CI 39-68%) for detection of cribriform morphology and 37% (95% CI 19-58%) for detection of IDC. CONCLUSIONS Biopsy has low sensitivity for detecting cribriform morphology and IDC. These limitations should be incorporated into clinical decision-making. Biomarkers for better detection of these histological patterns are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate biopsy is not an accurate method for detecting two specific types of prostate cancer cells, called cribriform pattern and intraductal prostate cancer, which are associated with unfavorable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui M Bernardino
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Computational and Experimental Biology Group, NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rashid K Sayyid
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Katherine Lajkosz
- Department of Statistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zizo Al-Daqqaq
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jessica G Cockburn
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Julian Chavarriaga
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shideh Abedi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ricardo Leão
- Hospital CUF, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Neil E Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Russo GI, Soeterik T, Puche-Sanz I, Broggi G, Lo Giudice A, De Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Marra G, Gandaglia G. Oncological outcomes of cribriform histology pattern in prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:646-654. [PMID: 36216967 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00600-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes applied to the Prostate cancer (PCa) histopathology grading, where patients with cribriform patterns (CP) may be categorized as grade group 2 and could hypothetically be surveilled. However, CP has been associated with worse oncological outcomes. The aim of our study is to systematically review and meta-analyze the available evidence on CP in PCa patients. METHODS This analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022298473). We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) indexes, keyword searches, and publication types until December 2021. The search terms included: "prostate", "prostate cancer" and "cribriform". We also searched reference lists of relevant articles. Eligible studies included published journal articles that provided quantitative data on the association between cribriform patterns at radical prostatectomy and the presence of extra-prostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), positive surgical margins (PSM), biochemical recurrence (BCR) or cancer specific mortality (CSM). RESULTS Overall, 31 studies were included for the quantitative analysis. All articles have been published during a span of 11 years (2011-2022) with a mean month of follow-up of 62.87 months. The mean quality of these studies, assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale was 6.27. We demonstrated that CP was associated with greater risk of EPE (odds ratio [OR] 1.96; P < 0.0001), SVI (OR: 2.89; p < 0.01), and PSM (OR: 1.88; p < 0.0007). Our analyses showed that CP was associated with greater risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.14; p < 0.01) and of CSM (HR: 3.30, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION The presence of CP is associated with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy and worse biochemical recurrence and cancer specific mortality. These results highlight the importance of a better pathologic report of CP to advise clinician for a strict follow-up in PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timo Soeterik
- Department of Urology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves (HUVN). Department of Urology. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Broggi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Catania, Italy
| | | | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, "Sant'Andrea" Hospital, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Lombardo
- Department of Urology, "Sant'Andrea" Hospital, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Belue MJ, Blake Z, Yilmaz EC, Lin Y, Harmon SA, Nemirovsky DR, Enders JJ, Kenigsberg AP, Mendhiratta N, Rothberg M, Toubaji A, Merino MJ, Gurram S, Wood BJ, Choyke PL, Turkbey B, Pinto PA. Is prostatic adenocarcinoma with cribriform architecture more difficult to detect on prostate MRI? Prostate 2023; 83:1519-1528. [PMID: 37622756 PMCID: PMC10840859 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cribriform (CBFM) pattern on prostate biopsy has been implicated as a predictor for high-risk features, potentially leading to adverse outcomes after definitive treatment. This study aims to investigate whether the CBFM pattern containing prostate cancers (PCa) were associated with false negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and determine the association between MRI and histopathological disease burden. METHODS Patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), combined 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided systematic (SB) and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy were retrospectively queried for the presence of CBFM pattern at biopsy. Biopsy cores and lesions were categorized as follows: C0 = benign, C1 = PCa with no CBFM pattern, C2 = PCa with CBFM pattern. Correlation between cancer core length (CCL) and measured MRI lesion dimension were assessed using a modified Pearson correlation test for clustered data. Differences between the biopsy core groups were assessed with the Wilcoxon-signed rank test with clustering. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2022, a total of 131 consecutive patients with CBFM pattern on prostate biopsy and pre-biopsy mpMRI were included. Clinical feature analysis included 1572 systematic biopsy cores (1149 C0, 272 C1, 151 C2) and 736 MRI-targeted biopsy cores (253 C0, 272 C1, 211 C2). Of the 131 patients with confirmed CBFM pathology, targeted biopsy (TBx) alone identified CBFM in 76.3% (100/131) of patients and detected PCa in 97.7% (128/131) patients. SBx biopsy alone detected CBFM in 61.1% (80/131) of patients and PCa in 90.8% (119/131) patients. TBx and SBx had equivalent detection in patients with smaller prostates (p = 0.045). For both PCa lesion groups there was a positive and significant correlation between maximum MRI lesion dimension and CCL (C1 lesions: p < 0.01, C2 lesions: p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in CCL between C1 and C2 lesions for T2 scores of 3 and 5 (p ≤ 0.01, p ≤ 0.01, respectively) and PI-RADS 5 lesions (p ≤ 0.01), with C2 lesions having larger CCL, despite no significant difference in MRI lesion dimension. CONCLUSIONS The extent of disease for CBFM-containing tumors is difficult to capture on mpMRI. When comparing MRI lesions of similar dimensions and PIRADS scores, CBFM-containing tumors appear to have larger cancer yield on biopsy. Proper staging and planning of therapeutic interventions is reliant on accurate mpMRI estimation. Special considerations should be taken for patients with CBFM pattern on prostate biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mason J. Belue
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Zoë Blake
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Enis C. Yilmaz
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Yue Lin
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie A. Harmon
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Daniel R. Nemirovsky
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jacob J. Enders
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alexander P. Kenigsberg
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Neil Mendhiratta
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael Rothberg
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Antoun Toubaji
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Maria J. Merino
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sandeep Gurram
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Bradford J. Wood
- Center for Interventional Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter L. Choyke
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter A. Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Van der Kwast TH. Proliferative cribriform prostate cancer: a new opportunity for 'promising' marker KI-67? Histopathology 2023; 83:850-852. [PMID: 37927179 DOI: 10.1111/his.15060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Theodorus H Van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bernardino R, Sayyid RK, Leão R, Zlotta AR, van der Kwast T, Klotz L, Fleshner NE. Increasing trend of utilising active surveillance for Gleason Score 7 (3 + 4) prostate cancer. BJU Int 2023; 132:638-640. [PMID: 37606994 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Bernardino
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Computational and Experimental Biology Group, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rashid K Sayyid
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Seyrek N, Hollemans E, Schoots IG, van Leenders GJLH. Association of quantifiable prostate MRI parameters with any and large cribriform pattern in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur J Radiol 2023; 166:110966. [PMID: 37453276 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cribriform pattern has recently been recognized as an important independent risk factor for prostate cancer (PCa) outcome. This study aimed to identify the association of quantifiable prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters with any and large cribriform pattern at radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS Preoperative prostate MRI's from 188 men undergoing RP between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively acquired. RP specimens of the patients were revised for Gleason score (GS), and presence of any and large cribriform pattern. MRI parameters such as MRI visibility, PI-RADS score, lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, lesion size, and radiologic extra-prostatic extension (EPE) were reviewed. The association of prostate MRI parameters for presence of any and large cribriform pattern at RP was analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS 116/188 (61.7%) PCa patients had any cribriform and 36/188 (19.1%) large cribriform pattern at RP. 171/188 (91.0%) men had MRI-visible lesions; 111/116 (95.7%) tumours with any and 36/36 (100%) with large cribriform pattern were visible at MRI. PCa with any and large cribriform pattern both had lower ADC values than those without (p < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, lowest ADC value was as an independent predictor for any cribriform (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.2, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.1-0.8; p = 0.01) and large cribriform pattern (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.7; p = 0.01), while other parameters were not. CONCLUSIONS The majority of PCa with cribriform pattern at RP were visible at MRI, and lowest ADC value was an independent predictor for both any and large cribriform pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neslisah Seyrek
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Eva Hollemans
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert J L H van Leenders
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Heetman JG, Versteeg R, Wever L, Paulino Pereira LJ, Soeterik TFW, Lavalaye J, de Bruin PC, van den Bergh RCN, van Melick HHE. Is cribriform pattern in prostate biopsy a risk factor for metastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT? World J Urol 2023; 41:2165-2171. [PMID: 37330440 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04467-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cribriform growth pattern (CP) in prostate cancer (PCa) has been associated with different unfavourable oncological outcomes. This study addresses if CP in prostate biopsies is an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on PSMA PET/CT. METHODS Treatment-naive patients with ISUP GG ≥ 2 staged with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT diagnosed from 2020 to 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. To test if CP in biopsies was an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, regression analyses were performed. Secondary analyses were performed in different subgroups. RESULTS A total of 401 patients were included. CP was reported in 252 (63%) patients. CP in biopsies was not an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (p = 0.14). ISUP grade group (GG) 4 (p = 0.006), GG 5 (p = 0.003), higher PSA level groups per 10 ng/ml until > 50 (p-value between 0.02 and > 0.001) and clinical EPE (p > 0.001) were all independent risk factors. In the subgroups with GG 2 (n = 99), GG 3 (n = 110), intermediate-risk group (n = 129) or the high-risk group (n = 272), CP in biopsies was also not an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. If the EAU guideline recommendation for performing metastatic screening was applied as threshold for PSMA PET/CT imaging, in 9(2%) patients, metastatic disease was missed, and 18% fewer PSMA PET/CT would have been performed. CONCLUSION This retrospective study found that CP in biopsies was not an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G Heetman
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - R Versteeg
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - L Wever
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L J Paulino Pereira
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - T F W Soeterik
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sint Antonius Hospital, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - J Lavalaye
- Department of Pathology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - P C de Bruin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sint Antonius Hospital, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - R C N van den Bergh
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - H H E van Melick
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Takeshita N, Sakamoto S, Yamada Y, Sazuka T, Imamura Y, Komiya A, Akakura K, Sato N, Nakatsu H, Kato T, Sugimoto M, Tsuzuki T, Ichikawa T. Detection of intraductal carcinoma in prostate cancer patients with small tumor volume. Prostate 2023; 83:580-589. [PMID: 36762419 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (intraductal carcinoma) and significant cancer (SC) in patients with small tumor volume (<0.5 cm3 ) in prostatectomy specimens. METHODS Data from 639 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between April 2006 and December 2017 at Chiba University Hospital and 2 affiliated institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor volume in prostatectomy specimens was measured, and with a tumor volume of less than 0.5 cm3 , the presence of intraductal carcinoma and SC was examined. SC was defined as one that did not meet the definition of pathological insignificant cancer (organ-confined cancer, Grade Group 1, tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 ). The number of patients who met four active surveillance (AS) protocols was also examined. RESULTS A total of 83 patients with tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 were identified in this study population (SC: 43 patients [52%], intraductal carcinoma: 5 patients [6%]). The median follow-up was 34.6 months (range: 18-57 months). Four (5%) developed biochemical recurrence. The number of positive biopsy cores ≥ 2 was an independent predictor of SC in patients with tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 (hazard ratio: 4.39; 95% confidence interval: 1.67-11.56; p = 0.003). In tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 , tumor volume was significantly correlated with the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (1 vs. 4-5, p = 0.002) and the presence of intraductal carcinoma (p = 0.004). In intraductal carcinoma-positive cases, four of five patients (80%) had the predictor of SC, which was two or more positive biopsy cores. Of the four AS protocols, the criteria for Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance were met most frequently in 46 cases (55%) of tumor volume less than 0.5 cm3 if targeted biopsy by magnetic resonance imaging was available. CONCLUSION The results of the present study suggest that intraductal carcinoma was present even in cases with small tumor volumes. Grade Group and intraductal carcinoma showed a positive correlation with tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobushige Takeshita
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinichi Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Yamada
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Sazuka
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yusuke Imamura
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akira Komiya
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Koichiro Akakura
- Department of Urology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuo Sato
- Department of Urology, Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Takuma Kato
- Department of Urology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Mikio Sugimoto
- Department of Urology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Ichikawa
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tohi Y, Ishikawa R, Kato T, Miyakawa J, Matsumoto R, Mori K, Mitsuzuka K, Inokuchi J, Matsumura M, Shiga K, Naito H, Kohjimoto Y, Kawamura N, Inoue M, Kinoshita H, Hashimoto K, Goto K, Haba R, Kakehi Y, Sugimoto M. Clinical outcomes of intraductal carcinoma or cribriform in radical prostatectomy specimens of men opting for active surveillance: data from the PRIAS-JAPAN study. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:299-305. [PMID: 36472710 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02277-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among early stage prostate cancer patients, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) and invasive cribriform are key prognostic factors; however, their presence and clinical significance following active surveillance (AS) are unknown. In men who opted for AS, we aimed to examine the presence and impact of IDC-P or cribriform, utilizing radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS We re-reviewed 137 RP specimens available in the PRIAS-JAPAN prospective cohort between January 2010 and September 2020. We assessed the presence of IDC-P or cribriform, and compared the patients' characteristics and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence-free survival after RP between groups with and without IDC-P or cribriform. In addition, we examined the predictive factors associated with IDC-P or cribriform. RESULTS The percentage of patients with IDC-P or cribriform presence was 34.3% (47 patients). IDC-P or cribriform pattern was more abundant in the higher Gleason grade group in RP specimens (P < 0.001). The rates of PSA recurrence-free survival were significantly lower in the IDC-P or cribriform groups than in those without them (log rank P = 0.0211). There was no association between IDC-P or cribriform on RP with the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4,5 score on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before RP even with adjustments for other covariates (OR, 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.511-3.980, P = 0.497). CONCLUSIONS IDC-P or cribriform comprised approximately one-third of all RP specimens in men who underwent RP following AS, confirming their prognostic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichiro Tohi
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan.
| | - Ryou Ishikawa
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Takuma Kato
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan
| | - Jimpei Miyakawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuji Matsumoto
- Department of Renal and Genito-Urinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Mitsuzuka
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Junichi Inokuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masafumi Matsumura
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan
| | | | - Hirohito Naito
- Department of Urology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasuo Kohjimoto
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Norihiko Kawamura
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaharu Inoue
- Department of Urology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Kinoshita
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Medical Center, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kohei Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Keisuke Goto
- Department of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Reiji Haba
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kakehi
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan
| | - Mikio Sugimoto
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pahouja G, Patel HD, Desai S, Rac G, Cheng T, Okabe Y, Gorbonos A, Quek ML, Flanigan RC, Picken MM, Gupta GN. The rising incidence of ductal adenocarcinoma and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: Diagnostic accuracy of biopsy, MRI-visibility, and outcomes. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:48.e11-48.e18. [PMID: 36441068 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ductal adenocarcinoma (DA) and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) of the prostate are associated with higher stage disease at radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated diagnostic accuracy of biopsy, MRI-visibility, and outcomes for patients undergoing RP with DA/IDC histology compared to pure acinar adenocarcinoma (AA) of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study of men receiving RP between 2014 and 2021 revealing AA, DA, or IDC on final pathology was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed. RESULTS A total of 609 patients were included with 103 found to have DA/IDC. Patients with DA/IDC were older and had higher PSA, biopsy grade group (GG), RP GG, and other pathologic findings (extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, pN stage) compared to AA patients (all P < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, higher age, RP GG, and pT3a were associated with DA/IDC on RP (all P < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity of biopsy compared to RP for diagnosis of DA/IDC was 29.1% (16.7% DA, 27.8% IDC) and 96.6% (99.3% DA, 96.6% IDC), respectively. In a subset of 281 men receiving MRI, PI-RADS distribution was similar for patients with DA/IDC vs. AA (90.7% vs. 80.7% with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, P = 0.23) with slightly higher biopsy sensitivity (41.9%). DA/IDC was associated with worse BCR (HR = 1.77, P = 0.02) but not biopsy DA/IDC (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS Sensitivity of prostate biopsy was low for detection of DA/IDC histology at RP. Patients with DA/IDC histology had unfavorable pathologic features at RP and worse BCR. Of patients with DA/IDC at RP, 90.7% were categorized as PI-RADS 4 to 5 on preoperative MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Pahouja
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.
| | - Hiten D Patel
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Shalin Desai
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Goran Rac
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Teresa Cheng
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Yudai Okabe
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | | | - Marcus L Quek
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Robert C Flanigan
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Maria M Picken
- Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Gopal N Gupta
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wong HY, Sheng Q, Hesterberg AB, Croessmann S, Rios BL, Giri K, Jackson J, Miranda AX, Watkins E, Schaffer KR, Donahue M, Winkler E, Penson DF, Smith JA, Herrell SD, Luckenbaugh AN, Barocas DA, Kim YJ, Graves D, Giannico GA, Rathmell JC, Park BH, Gordetsky JB, Hurley PJ. Single cell analysis of cribriform prostate cancer reveals cell intrinsic and tumor microenvironmental pathways of aggressive disease. Nat Commun 2022; 13:6036. [PMID: 36229464 PMCID: PMC9562361 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33780-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Cribriform prostate cancer, found in both invasive cribriform carcinoma (ICC) and intraductal carcinoma (IDC), is an aggressive histological subtype that is associated with progression to lethal disease. To delineate the molecular and cellular underpinnings of ICC/IDC aggressiveness, this study examines paired ICC/IDC and benign prostate surgical samples by single-cell RNA-sequencing, TCR sequencing, and histology. ICC/IDC cancer cells express genes associated with metastasis and targets with potential for therapeutic intervention. Pathway analyses and ligand/receptor status model cellular interactions among ICC/IDC and the tumor microenvironment (TME) including JAG1/NOTCH. The ICC/IDC TME is hallmarked by increased angiogenesis and immunosuppressive fibroblasts (CTHRC1+ASPN+FAP+ENG+) along with fewer T cells, elevated T cell dysfunction, and increased C1QB+TREM2+APOE+-M2 macrophages. These findings support that cancer cell intrinsic pathways and a complex immunosuppressive TME contribute to the aggressive phenotype of ICC/IDC. These data highlight potential therapeutic opportunities to restore immune signaling in patients with ICC/IDC that may afford better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Yuen Wong
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Quanhu Sheng
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Amanda B. Hesterberg
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Sarah Croessmann
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Brenda L. Rios
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Khem Giri
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Jorgen Jackson
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Adam X. Miranda
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Evan Watkins
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Kerry R. Schaffer
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Meredith Donahue
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Elizabeth Winkler
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - David F. Penson
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Joseph A. Smith
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - S. Duke Herrell
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Amy N. Luckenbaugh
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Young J. Kim
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.418961.30000 0004 0472 2713Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Diana Graves
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Giovanna A. Giannico
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Jeffrey C. Rathmell
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA ,Vanderbilt Center for Immunobiology, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Ben H. Park
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Jennifer B. Gordetsky
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Paula J. Hurley
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
de Barros HA, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Poel HG. Author Reply. Urology 2022; 168:163-164. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.04.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
22
|
Chan E, McKenney JK, Hawley S, Corrigan D, Auman H, Newcomb LF, Boyer HD, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR, Klein E, Fazli L, Gleave ME, Hurtado-Coll A, Simko JP, Nelson PS, Thompson IM, Tretiakova MS, Troyer D, True LD, Vakar-Lopez F, Lin DW, Brooks JD, Feng Z, Nguyen JK. Analysis of separate training and validation radical prostatectomy cohorts identifies 0.25 mm diameter as an optimal definition for "large" cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:1092-1100. [PMID: 35145197 PMCID: PMC9314256 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01009-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Cribriform growth pattern is well-established as an adverse pathologic feature in prostate cancer. The literature suggests "large" cribriform glands associate with aggressive behavior; however, published studies use varying definitions for "large". We aimed to identify an outcome-based quantitative cut-off for "large" vs "small" cribriform glands. We conducted an initial training phase using the tissue microarray based Canary retrospective radical prostatectomy cohort. Of 1287 patients analyzed, cribriform growth was observed in 307 (24%). Using Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free survival curves (RFS) that were stratified by cribriform gland size, we identified 0.25 mm as the optimal cutoff to identify more aggressive disease. In univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses, size >0.25 mm was a significant predictor of worse RFS compared to patients with cribriform glands ≤0.25 mm, independent of pre-operative PSA, grade, stage and margin status (p < 0.001). In addition, two different subset analyses of low-intermediate risk cases (cases with Gleason score ≤ 3 + 4 = 7; and cases with Gleason score = 3 + 4 = 7/4 + 3 = 7) likewise demonstrated patients with largest cribriform diameter >0.25 mm had a significantly lower RFS relative to patients with cribriform glands ≤0.25 mm (each subset p = 0.004). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in outcomes between patients with cribriform glands ≤ 0.25 mm and patients without cribriform glands. The >0.25 mm cut-off was validated as statistically significant in a separate 419 patient, completely embedded whole-section radical prostatectomy cohort by biochemical recurrence, metastasis-free survival, and disease specific death, even when cases with admixed Gleason pattern 5 carcinoma were excluded. In summary, our findings support reporting cribriform gland size and identify 0.25 mm as an optimal outcome-based quantitative measure for defining "large" cribriform glands. Moreover, cribriform glands >0.25 mm are associated with potential for metastatic disease independent of Gleason pattern 5 adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Chan
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Jesse K McKenney
- Robert J. Tomsich Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Dillon Corrigan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Lisa F Newcomb
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hilary D Boyer
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ladan Fazli
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Jeffry P Simko
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter S Nelson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Dean Troyer
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
- Department of Pathology, UT Health, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel W Lin
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Ziding Feng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jane K Nguyen
- Robert J. Tomsich Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Predictive value of Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma for the Nomogram-Based Selection of Prostate Cancer Patients for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. Urology 2022; 168:156-164. [PMID: 35803346 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the predictive value of biopsy-identified cribriform carcinoma and/or intraductal carcinoma (CR/IDC) within the Briganti and MSKCC nomograms predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS We retrospectively included 393 PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection at three tertiary referral centers. We externally validated two prediction tools: the Briganti 2012 nomogram and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram. Both nomograms were augmented with CR/IDC. The original model was compared with the CR/IDC-updated model using the likelihood ratio test. The performance of the prediction tools was assessed using calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility. RESULTS Overall, 109 (28%) men were diagnosed with LNM. Calibration plots of the Briganti and MSKCC nomograms demonstrated an underestimation of the LNM risk across clinically relevant thresholds (≤15%). The addition of CR/IDC to the Briganti nomogram increased the fit of the data (χ2(1)=4.30, p=0.04), but did not improve the area under the curve (AUC) (0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.75 vs. 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.75). Incorporation of CR/IDC in the MSKCC nomogram resulted in an increased fit on the data (χ2(1)=10.04, p<0.01), but did not increase the AUC (0.66, 95% CI 0.60-0.72 vs 0.68, 95% CI 0.62-0.74). The addition of CR/IDC to the Briganti and MSKCC nomograms did not improve the clinical risk prediction. CONCLUSIONS Incorporation of CR/IDC into the two clinically most used pre-radical prostatectomy nomograms does not improve LNM prediction in a multinational, contemporary PCa cohort.
Collapse
|
24
|
Gordetsky JB, Schaffer K, Hurley PJ. Current conundrums with cribriform prostate cancer. Histopathology 2022; 80:1038-1040. [PMID: 35592932 DOI: 10.1111/his.14665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer B Gordetsky
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kerry Schaffer
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paula J Hurley
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Aizawa R, Tsuzuki T, Haga H, Nakamura K, Ogata T, Inoue T, Kobayashi T, Akamatsu S, Goto T, Ogawa O, Mizowaki T. Clinical significance of IDC-P as predictive factor after intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Cancer Sci 2022; 113:2425-2433. [PMID: 35514196 PMCID: PMC9277254 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The clinical significance of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC‐P) in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with high‐dose external‐beam radiation therapy remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of IDC‐P in men who received intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nonmetastatic PCa. All patients with high‐risk (H‐R) and very high–risk (VH‐R) PCa who received IMRT between September 2000 and December 2013 at our institution were analyzed retrospectively. We re‐reviewed biopsy cores for the presence of IDC‐P. Treatment consisted of IMRT (median: 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction) plus 6‐month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT). In total, 154 consecutive patients with H‐R and VH‐R PCa were analyzed. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate was present in 27.9% (n = 43). The median follow‐up period was 8.4 years. The 10‐year PCa‐specific survival, biochemical failure (BF), clinical failure, and castration‐resistant PCa rates were 90.0%, 47.8%, 27.5%, and 24.5% in patients with IDC‐P, and 96.6%, 32.6%, 10.8%, and 7.0% in those without IDC‐P, respectively (p = 0.12, 0.04, 0.0031, and 0.012, respectively). In multivariable analysis, IDC‐P was not identified as an independent predictive factor for BF (p = 0.26). The presence of IDC‐P was correlated with a significantly higher incidence of disease progression in men with H‐R and VH‐R PCa who received IMRT, although it was not identified as an independent predictive factor for BF. Further investigations are needed to determine the significance of IDC‐P as an independent predictive factor for survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rihito Aizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hironori Haga
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kiyonao Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogata
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shusuke Akamatsu
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takayuki Goto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Osamu Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan.,Division of Urology, Otsu Redcross Hospital, 1-1-35 Nagara, Otsu-shi, Shiga, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rijstenberg LL, Hansum T, Kweldam CF, Kümmerlin IP, Remmers S, Roobol MJ, van Leenders GJLH. Large and small cribriform architecture have similar adverse clinical outcome on prostate cancer biopsies. Histopathology 2022; 80:1041-1049. [PMID: 35384019 PMCID: PMC9321809 DOI: 10.1111/his.14658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Aims Invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) are associated with adverse outcome in prostate cancer patients, with the large cribriform pattern having the worst outcome in radical prostatectomies. Our objective was to determine the impact of the large and small cribriform patterns in prostate cancer biopsies. Methods and results Pathological revision was carried out on biopsies of 1887 patients from the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. The large cribriform pattern was defined as having at least twice the size of adjacent benign glands. The median follow‐up time was 13.4 years. Hazard ratios for metastasis‐free survival (MFS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Any cribriform pattern was found in 280 of 1887 men: 1.1% IDC in grade group (GG) 1, 18.2% in GG2, 57.1% in GG3, 55.4% in GG4 and 59.3% in GG5; the large cribriform pattern was present in 0, 0.5, 9.8, 18.1 and 17.3%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, small and large cribriform patterns were both (P < 0.005) associated with worse MFS [small: hazard ratio (HR) = 3.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.93–4.78; large: HR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.68–5.99] and DSS (small: HR = 4.07, 95% CI = 2.51–6.62; large: HR = 4.13, 95% CI = 2.14–7.98). Patients with the large cribriform pattern did not have worse MFS (P = 0.77) or DSS (P = 0.96) than those with the small cribriform pattern. Conclusions Both small and large cribriform patterns are associated with worse MFS and DSS in prostate cancer biopsies. Patients with the large cribriform pattern on biopsy have a similar adverse outcome as those with the small cribriform pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Lucia Rijstenberg
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tim Hansum
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte F Kweldam
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Intan P Kümmerlin
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique J Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern. World J Urol 2022; 40:2723-2729. [PMID: 36190529 PMCID: PMC9617947 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04161-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify parameters to predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group (GG) 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform and intraductal carcinoma (CR/IDC) on biopsy. METHODS Preoperative biopsies from 657 men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer were reviewed for GG, presence of CR/IDC, percentage Gleason pattern 4, and tumor length. In men with biopsy GG2 without CR/IDC (n = 196), clinicopathologic features were compared between those with GG1 or GG2 without CR/IDC on RP (GG ≤ 2-) and those with GG2 with CR/IDC or any GG > 2 (GG ≥ 2+). Logistic regression analysis was used to predict upgrading in the biopsy cohort. RESULTS In total 283 men had biopsy GG2 of whom 87 (30.7%) had CR/IDC and 196 (69.3%) did not. CR/IDC status in matched biopsy and RP specimens was concordant in 179 (63.3%) and discordant in 79 (27.9%) cases (sensitivity 45.1%; specificity 92.6%). Of 196 biopsy GG2 men without CR/IDC, 106 (54.1%) had GG ≥ 2+ on RP. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age [odds ratio (OR): 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI)1.09-3.20; p = 0.025], percentage Gleason pattern 4 (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.17-2.07; p = 0.003), PI-RADS 5 lesion (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.03-4.70; p = 0.045) and clinical stage T3 (OR 3.60; 95% CI 1.08-14.50; p = 0.049) were independent parameters to predict upgrading to GG ≥ 2+ on RP in these men. CONCLUSIONS Age, clinical stage T3, percentage Gleason pattern 4 and presence of PI-RADS 5 lesions are independent predictors for upgrading in men with biopsy GG2 without CR/IDC. These findings allow for improved clinical decision-making on surveillance eligibility in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
|
28
|
van der Kwast TH, van Leenders GJ, Berney DM, Delahunt B, Evans AJ, Iczkowski KA, McKenney JK, Ro JY, Samaratunga H, Srigley JR, Tsuzuki T, Varma M, Wheeler TM, Egevad L. ISUP Consensus Definition of Cribriform Pattern Prostate Cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:1118-1126. [PMID: 33999555 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The presence of a cribriform pattern is now recognized as a clinically important, independent adverse prognostic indicator for prostate cancer. For this reason the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recently recommended its inclusion in standard reporting. In order to improve interobserver agreement as to the diagnosis of cribriform patterns, the ISUP assembled an international panel of 12 expert urogenital pathologists for the purpose of drafting a consensus definition of cribriform pattern in prostate cancer, and provide their opinions on a set of 32 images and on potential diagnostic criteria. These images were selected by the 2 nonvoting convenors of the study and included the main categories where disagreement was anticipated. The Delphi method was applied to promote consensus among the 12 panelists in their review of the images during 2 initial rounds of the study. Following a virtual meeting, convened to discuss selected images and diagnostic criteria, the following definition for cribriform pattern in prostate cancer was approved: "A confluent sheet of contiguous malignant epithelial cells with multiple glandular lumina that are easily visible at low power (objective magnification ×10). There should be no intervening stroma or mucin separating individual or fused glandular structures" together with a set of explanatory notes. We believe this consensus definition to be practical and that it will facilitate reproducible recognition and reporting of this clinically important pattern commonly seen in prostate cancer. The images and the results of the final Delphi round are available at the ISUP website as an educational slide set (https://isupweb.org/isup/blog/slideshow/cribriform-slide-deck/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Geert J van Leenders
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Brett Delahunt
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Andrew J Evans
- Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network
| | | | | | - Jae Y Ro
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Department of Pathology, University of Queensland School of Medicine, and Aquesta Uropathology, Queensland, Australia
| | - John R Srigley
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Toyo Tsuzuki
- Department of Pathology and Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Japan
| | | | - Thomas M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lawrence MG, Porter LH, Clouston D, Murphy DG, Frydenberg M, Taylor RA, Risbridger GP. Knowing what's growing: Why ductal and intraductal prostate cancer matter. Sci Transl Med 2021; 12:12/533/eaaz0152. [PMID: 32132214 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz0152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy, but only some tumors are lethal. Accurately identifying these tumors will improve clinical practice and instruct research. Aggressive cancers often have distinctive pathologies, including intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) and ductal adenocarcinoma. Here, we review the importance of these pathologies because they are often overlooked, especially in genomics and preclinical testing. Pathology, genomics, and patient-derived models show that IDC-P and ductal adenocarcinoma accompany multiple markers of poor prognosis. Consequently, "knowing what is growing" will help translate preclinical research to pinpoint and treat high-risk prostate cancer in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell G Lawrence
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.,Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Laura H Porter
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | | | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.,Australian Urology Associates, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Department of Urology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC 3144, Australia
| | - Renea A Taylor
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.,Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Gail P Risbridger
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia. .,Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hesterberg AB, Gordetsky JB, Hurley PJ. Cribriform Prostate Cancer: Clinical Pathologic and Molecular Considerations. Urology 2021; 155:47-54. [PMID: 34058243 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Intraductal cribriform (IDC) and invasive cribriform morphologies are associated with worse prostate cancer outcomes. Limited retrospective studies have associated IDC and cribriform morphology with germline mutations in DNA repair genes, particularly BRCA2. These findings, which prompted the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for Prostate Cancer and Genetic/Familial High- Risk Assessment to consider germline testing for individuals with IDC/cribriform histology, have been questioned in a recent prospective study. A deepened understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving disease aggressiveness in cribriform morphology is critical to provide more clarity in clinical decision making. This review summarizes the current understanding of IDC and cribriform prostate cancer, with an emphasis on clinical outcomes and molecular alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer B Gordetsky
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Paula J Hurley
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hesterberg AB, Rios BL, Wolf EM, Tubbs C, Wong HY, Schaffer KR, Lotan TL, Giannico GA, Gordetsky JB, Hurley PJ. A distinct repertoire of cancer-associated fibroblasts is enriched in cribriform prostate cancer. J Pathol Clin Res 2021; 7:271-286. [PMID: 33600062 PMCID: PMC8073007 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer vary widely, with some men effectively managed without treatment on active surveillance, while other men rapidly progress to metastatic disease despite curative-intent therapies. One of the strongest prognostic indicators of outcome is grade groups based on the Gleason grading system. Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer with cribriform morphology is associated with adverse outcomes and can be utilized clinically to improve risk stratification. The underpinnings of disease aggressiveness associated with cribriform architecture are not fully understood. Most studies have focused on genetic and molecular alterations in cribriform tumor cells; however, less is known about the tumor microenvironment in cribriform prostate cancer. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are a heterogeneous population of fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment that impact cancer aggressiveness. The overall goal of this study was to determine if cribriform prostate cancers are associated with a unique repertoire of CAFs. Radical prostatectomy whole-tissue sections were analyzed for the expression of fibroblast markers (ASPN in combination with FAP, THY1, ENG, NT5E, TNC, and PDGFRβ) in stroma adjacent to benign glands and in Gleason grade 3, Gleason grade 4 cribriform, and Gleason grade 4 noncribriform prostate cancer by RNAscope®. Halo® Software was used to quantify percent positive stromal cells and expression per positive cell. The fibroblast subtypes enriched in prostate cancer were highly heterogeneous. Both overlapping and distinct populations of low abundant fibroblast subtypes in benign prostate stroma were enriched in Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer with cribriform morphology compared to Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer with noncribriform morphology and Gleason grade 3 prostate cancer. In addition, gene expression was distinctly altered in CAF subtypes adjacent to cribriform prostate cancer. Overall, these studies suggest that cribriform prostate cancer has a unique tumor microenvironment that may distinguish it from other Gleason grade 4 morphologies and lower Gleason grades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brenda L Rios
- Department of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Elysa M Wolf
- Department of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Colby Tubbs
- Department of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Hong Yuen Wong
- Department of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Kerry R Schaffer
- Department of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Tamara L Lotan
- Department of PathologyJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Giovanna A Giannico
- Department of PathologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
- Department of UrologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Jennifer B Gordetsky
- Department of PathologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
- Department of UrologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Paula J Hurley
- Department of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
- Department of UrologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
- Vanderbilt‐Ingram Cancer CenterVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Iczkowski KA, van Leenders GJLH, Tarima S, Wu R, Van der Kwast T, Berney DM, Evans AJ, Wheeler TM, Ro JY, Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Srigley J, Varma M, Tsuzuki T, Egevad L. Cribriform prostate cancer: Morphologic criteria enabling a diagnosis, based on survey of experts. Ann Diagn Pathol 2021; 52:151733. [PMID: 33780691 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Among four sub-patterns of Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer, voluminous evidence supports that the cribriform pattern holds an unfavorable prognostic impact, as compared with poorly-formed, fused, or glomeruloid. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recommends specifying whether invasive grade 4 cancer is cribriform. Recently, ISUP experts published a consensus definition of cribriform pattern highlighting criteria that distinguish it from mimickers. The current study aimed to analyze morphologic features separately to identify those that define the essence of the cribriform pattern. Thirty-two selected photomicrographs were classified by 12 urologic pathologists as: definitely cribriform cancer, probably cribriform, unsure, probably not cribriform, or definitely not cribriform. Consensus was defined as 9/12 agree or disagree, with ≤1 strongly supporting the opposite choice. Final consensus was achieved in 21 of 32 cases. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model with logit link was fitted to estimate effect of multiple morphologic predictors. Fisher exact test was used for categorical findings. Presence of intervening stroma precluded calling cribriform cancer (p = 0.006). Mucin presence detracted (p = 0.003) from willingness to call cribriform cancer (only 3 cases had mucin). Lumen number was associated with cribriform consensus (p = 0.0006), and all consensus cases had ≥9 lumens. Predominant papillary pattern or an irregular outer boundary detracted (p = NS). Invasive cribriform carcinoma should have absence of intervening stroma, and usually neither papillary pattern, irregular outer boundary, nor very few lumens. Setting the criteria for cribriform will help prevent over- or undercalling this important finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth A Iczkowski
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
| | | | - Sergey Tarima
- Department of Biostatistics and Ethics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| | - Ruizhe Wu
- Department of Biostatistics and Ethics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| | | | - Daniel M Berney
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS TRUST, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Evans
- Department of Pathology, Mackenzie Health, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Jae Y Ro
- Department of Pathology & Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Department of Pathology, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Aquesta Uropathology, Queensland, Australia
| | - Brett Delahunt
- Pathology and Molecular Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - John Srigley
- Trillium Health Partners Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Japan
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Troyer D. Blood Test for Cancer: Are We There Yet? Eur Urol 2021; 79:772-773. [PMID: 33674181 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dean Troyer
- Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology and Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA; Department of Pathology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schiavina R, Droghetti M, Novara G, Bianchi L, Gaudiano C, Panebianco V, Borghesi M, Piazza P, Mineo Bianchi F, Guerra M, Corcioni B, Fiorentino M, Giunchi F, Verze P, Pultrone C, Golfieri R, Porreca A, Mirone V, Brunocilla E. The role of multiparametric MRI in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: The ROMAS randomized controlled trial. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:433.e1-433.e7. [PMID: 33191117 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aim to evaluate the impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion-target biopsy for early reclassification of patients with low-risk Prostate Cancer in a randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2015 and 2018, patients diagnosed with Prostate Cancer after random biopsy fulfilling PRIAS criteria were enrolled and centrally randomized (1:1 ratio) to study group or control group. Patients randomized to study group underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3 months from enrollment: patients with positive findings (PIRADS-v2>2) underwent fusion-target biopsy; patients with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging or confirmed ISUP - Grade Group 1 at fusion-target biopsy were managed according to PRIAS schedule and 12-core random biopsy was performed at 12 months. Patients in control group underwent PRIAS protocol, including a confirmatory 12-core random biopsy at 12 months. Primary endpoint was a reduction of reclassification rate at 12-month random biopsy in study group at least 20% less than controls. Reclassification was defined as biopsy ISUP Grade Group 1 in >2 biopsy cores or disease upgrading. RESULTS A total of 124 patients were randomized to study group (n = 62) or control group (n = 62). Around 21 of 62 patients (34%) in study group had a positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and underwent fusion-target biopsy, with 11 (17.7%) reclassifications. Considering the intention-to-treat population, reclassification rate at 12-month random biopsy was 6.5% for study group and 29% for control group, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The early employment of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for active surveillance patients enrolled after random biopsy consents to significantly reduce reclassifications at 12-month random biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Schiavina
- Department of Urology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Department of Urology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Giacomo Novara
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology - Urology Clinic University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Department of Urology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Caterina Gaudiano
- Department of Radiology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Marco Borghesi
- Department of Urology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Department of Urology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Mineo Bianchi
- Department of Urology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Guerra
- Department of Urology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Beniamino Corcioni
- Department of Radiology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michelangelo Fiorentino
- Department of Pathology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Giunchi
- Department of Pathology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Cristian Pultrone
- Department of Urology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Department of Radiology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Urology, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Department of Urology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PPM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2020; 79:243-262. [PMID: 33172724 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1527] [Impact Index Per Article: 381.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2020 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and local treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The panel performed a literature review of new data, covering the time frame between 2016 and 2020. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. Risk-adapted screening should be offered to men at increased risk from the age of 45 yr and to breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers, who have been confirmed to be at risk of early and aggressive disease (mainly BRAC2), from around 40 yr of age. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is performed, a combination of targeted and systematic biopsies must be offered. There is currently no place for the routine use of tissue-based biomarkers. Whilst prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography is the most sensitive staging procedure, the lack of outcome benefit remains a major limitation. Active surveillance (AS) should always be discussed with low-risk patients, as well as with selected intermediate-risk patients with favourable International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the AS journey and the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A strong recommendation to consider moderate hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term hormonal treatment. CONCLUSIONS The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. The 2020 EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and advice for their use in clinical practice. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. PATIENT SUMMARY Updated prostate cancer guidelines are presented, addressing screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. These guidelines rely on the available scientific evidence, and new insights will need to be considered and included on a regular basis. In some cases, the supporting evidence for new treatment options is not yet strong enough to provide a recommendation, which is why continuous updating is important. Patients must be fully informed of all relevant options and, together with their treating physicians, decide on the most optimal management for them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France.
| | | | | | | | | | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Caulfield North, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Thomas B Lam
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Malcolm D Mason
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Downes MR, Xu B, van der Kwast TH. Cribriform architecture prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies is a strong independent predictor for lymph node metastases in radical prostatectomy. Eur J Cancer 2020; 148:432-439. [PMID: 33077335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Lymph node metastases (pN1) at prostatectomy are infrequent but impact prognosis. Traditional prostate nomograms assess age, serum prostatic-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and biopsy parameters to inform decisions on pelvic lymph node dissection. The impact of intraductal carcinoma (IDC) and cribriform pattern 4 (CC) on nodal metastases has yet to be explored. METHODS Five hundred forty three radical prostatectomy cases were reviewed for International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, CC/IDC, T- and N-stage. Two hundred seventy five cases had matched biopsies with age, serum PSA, CC/IDC and ISUP grade recorded. The association of CC/IDC with pN1 in both prostatectomy and biopsy settings was assessed using Fisher's exact test, as well as univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression. RESULTS In 543 men in whom a prostatectomy was performed, a nodal dissection was also available in 340 (63%), and 37 (10.9%) of them had pN1 disease. ISUP grade, stage and CC/IDC were significantly associated with pN1 (p < 0.001). UVA regression showed grade (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR]: 5.85), CC/IDC (p = 0.003, OR: 14.06) and T stage (p = 0.004, OR: 61.94) associated with pN1 as did MVA regression: grade (p = 0.010, OR: 2.81), CC/IDC (p = 0.015, OR: 5.12) and T stage (p = 0.016, OR: 30.38). In 275 patients with matched biopsies, a nodal dissection was performed in 197 (71.6%) and 20 (10.2%) patients had pN1 disease. On UVA regression, grade (p < 0.001, OR: 6.33), CC/IDC (p = 0.013, OR: 3.28), serum PSA (p = 0.001, OR: 1.08) and age (p = 0.047, OR: 1.07) were significant for pN1 at prostatectomy. All parameters including specifically grade (p = 0.007, OR: 5.35) and CC/IDC (p = 0.018, OR: 4.42) on biopsies predicted for pN1 by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION CC/IDC in prostatectomy and biopsy significantly associates with pN1. Incorporation of CC/IDC status into preoperative nomograms may optimize patient selection for pelvic nodal dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Downes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Flammia S, Frisenda M, Maggi M, Magliocca FM, Ciardi A, Panebianco V, De Berardinis E, Salciccia S, Di Pierro GB, Gentilucci A, Del Giudice F, Busetto GM, Gallucci M, Sciarra A. Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e22156. [PMID: 32957339 PMCID: PMC7505347 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to correlate cribriform pattern (CP) with other parameters in a large prospective series of Gleason score ≥7/ISUP grade ≥2 prostate cancer (PC) cases undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS This is a prospective single-center study on 210 consecutive patients. Gleason pattern 4 and individual tumor growth patterns determination were performed either in biopsy or in surgical specimens for all patients. RESULTS At multiparametric magnetic resonance, a higher percentage of PI-RADS 5 was associated to CP (53.3% vs 17.7%, P = .038). CP was significantly and inversely (r = -0.261; P = .001) correlated with perineural invasion (PNI) but not with other pathological parameters. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that mean biochemical (Bp) and radiological (Rp) progression-free survival were similar (Bp = χ 0.906; P = .341; Rp = χ 1.880; P = .170) independently to CP. In PNI positive cases, Bp-free survival was higher (χ = 3.617; P = .057) in cases without CP. CONCLUSIONS In a homogeneous population excluding ISUP 1 cases, CP showed limited prognostic value. We first described an association with PNI and a prognostic value influenced by PNI status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences
| | - Fabio Massimo Magliocca
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Ciardi
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
van Leenders GJLH, Verhoef EI, Hollemans E. Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading. Histopathology 2020; 77:850-861. [PMID: 32683729 PMCID: PMC7756302 DOI: 10.1111/his.14214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The Gleason grading system is one of the most important factors in clinical decision‐making for prostate cancer patients, and is entirely based on the classification of tumour growth patterns. In recent years it has become clear that some individual growth patterns themselves have independent prognostic value, and could be used for better personalised risk stratification. In this review we summarise recent literature on the clinicopathological value and molecular characteristics of individual prostate cancer growth patterns, and show how these, most particularly cribriform architecture, could alter treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esther I Verhoef
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Hollemans
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Troyer D. High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Are Not All Alike. Eur Urol 2020; 78:333-334. [PMID: 32605857 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dean Troyer
- Departments of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology and Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA; Department of Pathology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is a diagnostic entity characterized by architecturally or cytologically malignant-appearing prostatic glandular epithelium confined to prostatic ducts. Despite its apparent in situ nature, this lesion is associated with aggressive prostatic adenocarcinoma and is a predictor for poor prognosis when identified on biopsy or radical prostatectomy. This review discusses diagnosis, clinical features, histogenesis, and management of IDC-P, as well as current research and controversies surrounding this entity.
Collapse
|