1
|
Sherif A. Don't throw out the baby with the bath water! Scand J Urol 2024; 59:117-118. [PMID: 38769693 DOI: 10.2340/sju.v59.40629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Sherif
- Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fujiwara M, Tanaka H, Kobayashi M, Nakamura Y, Fan B, Ishikawa Y, Fukuda S, Toda K, Yoshida S, Yokoyama M, Yoshimura R, Fujii Y. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Efficacy and Safety in 119 Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:193-200.e1. [PMID: 38000954 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy is recommended as neoadjuvant treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) before radical cystectomy (RC). However, clinical challenges include the possibility of primary chemoresistance and limited feasibility in patients with renal impairment. This study investigated the efficacy and safety profiles of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by RC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 119 patients with nonmetastatic MIBC, who were pathologically diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma and underwent NCRT before RC. The pathological response to NCRT was evaluated using RC specimens. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared according to pathological responses to NCRT. RESULTS Of the 119 patients, 111 (93%) underwent RC; ypT0 and downstaging to ≤ypT1 were observed in 42 (38%) and 76 (68%) patients, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, smaller tumor size was independently associated with ypT0. During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 28 (25%) patients developed recurrence and 22 (20%) died of bladder cancer after RC. The 5-year RFS and CSS rates were 75% and 80%, respectively. The 5-year RFS rates in patients with ypT0, ypTa/is/1, and ≥ypT2 were 87%, 87%, and 46%, respectively. Similarly, patients with ypT0 and ypTa/is/1 had more favorable CSS (90% and 87% at 5 years, respectively) than those with ≥ypT2 (60%, P = .001). None of the patients experienced ≥grade 4 adverse events related to NCRT or ≥grade 4 complications of RC. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated sufficient efficacy and safety profile of NCRT followed by RC. Chemoradiotherapy may be a helpful alternative for neoadjuvant treatment before RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motohiro Fujiwara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hajime Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Masaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Nakamura
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Bo Fan
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yudai Ishikawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shohei Fukuda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuma Toda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minato Yokoyama
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
von Deimling M, Mertens LS, Furrer M, Li R, Tendijck GAH, Taylor J, Crocetto F, Maas M, Mari A, Pichler R, Moschini M, Tully KH, D'Andrea D, Laukhtina E, Del Giudice F, Marcq G, Velev M, Gallioli A, Albisinni S, Mori K, Khanna A, Rink M, Fisch M, Minervini A, Black PC, Lotan Y, Spiess PE, Kiss B, Shariat SF, Pradere B. The optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles in clinically lymph node-positive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38470089 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles needed to achieve a pathological response in patients with clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa) who received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 388 patients who received three or four cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine or (dose-dense) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), followed by consolidative RC for cTanyN1-3M0 BCa. We compared pathological complete (pCR = ypT0N0) and objective response (pOR = yp ≤T1N0) between treatment groups. Predictors of pCR and/or pOR were assessed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The secondary endpoints were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). We evaluated the association between the number of induction chemotherapy cycles administered and survival outcomes on multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS Overall, 101 and 287 patients received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy, respectively. Of these, 72 (19%) and 128 (33%) achieved pCR and pOR response, respectively. The pCR (20%, 18%) and pOR (40%, 31%) rates did not differ significantly between patients receiving three or four cycles (P > 0.05). The number of cycles was not associated with pCR or pOR on multivariable logistic regression analyses. The 2-year OS estimates were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74) and 63% (95% CI 0.58-0.7) for patients receiving three or four cycles, respectively. Receiving three vs four cycles was not associated with OS and CSS on uni- or multivariable Cox regression analyses. CONCLUSION Pathological response and survival outcomes did not differ between administering three or four induction chemotherapy cycles in patients with cN+ BCa. A fewer cycles (minimum three) may be oncologically sufficient in patients with cN+ BCa, while decreasing the wait for definitive local therapy in those patients who end up without a response to chemotherapy. This warrants further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Furrer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Kantonsspital Olten and Bürgerspital Solothurn, Switzerland
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Guus A H Tendijck
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob Taylor
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Moritz Maas
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Karl H Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, CHU Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Lille, France
- CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Maud Velev
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bernhard Kiss
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Urosud, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Y, Song Y, Qin C, Zhang C, Du Y, Xu T. Three versus four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med 2023; 55:2281654. [PMID: 37963224 PMCID: PMC10871138 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2281654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The optimal cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of three and four cycles of NAC in the treatment of MIBC through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Relevant studies were systematically collected and reviewed in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science Databases, and the Cochrane Library. Relative ratios (RRs), Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate outcome measures. Studies comparing the pathological response and prognosis of three versus four cycles of NAC for MIBC were included. RESULTS Five studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 2190 patients, of whom 1016 underwent three cycles of NAC and 1174 underwent four cycles of NAC. All studies were retrospective cohort studies. We found that 4 cycles of NAC had significantly better cancer-specific survival than 3 cycles (HR = 1.31, 95%CI,1.03-1.67, p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients who received 3 and 4 cycles of chemotherapy (HR = 1.18, 95%CI = 0.83-1.69, p = 0.345). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in pathological objective response (RR = 0.95, 95%CI= 0.81-1.11, p = 0.515) and complete response rates (RR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.69-1.11, p = 0.256) in MIBC after 3 or 4 cycles of NAC. CONCLUSIONS Three and four cycles of NAC had similar pathological responses and prognosis for MIBC, although the cancer-specific survival rate of four cycles was better than that of three cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulong Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxuan Song
- Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Caipeng Qin
- Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chunlong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yiqing Du
- Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lu L, Chen C, Cheng H, Ding H, Tian J, Wang H, Wang Z. Comparison of 3 and 4 cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1066. [PMID: 37932689 PMCID: PMC10626748 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11572-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with radical cystectomy (RC) is critical in reducing disease recurrence, with GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin) being one of the most commonly used NACs. Different GC schedules have been used, but the best neoadjuvant regimen is still unknown. The clinical outcomes of 3 and 4 cycles of neoadjuvant GC are compared in this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine which is best for patients with MIBC. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WAN FANG DATA, and meeting abstracts to identify relevant studies up to March 2023. Studies that compared 3 and 4 cycles of neoadjuvant GC for MIBC were included. The primary outcomes were pCR, pDS, OS, and CSS. The secondary outcome was recurrence and SAEs. RESULTS A total of 3 studies, with 1091 patients, were included in the final analysis. Patients that received 4 cycles of GC had a higher pCR (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87; p = 0.003) and pDS (OR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.84; p = 0.002) than those who received 3 cycles. Regarding recurrence rate (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.91-1.65; p = 0.18), there were no appreciable differences between the 3 and 4 cycles of GC. Survival parameters such as OS (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.86-2.12; p = 0.19) and CSS (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38; p = 0.20) were similar. Only one trial reported on the outcomes of SAEs. And there were no statistically significant differences in thrombocytopenia, infection rate, neutropenic fever, anemia, or decreased renal function between patients. The neutropenia of patients was statistically different (OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION The 4-cycle GC regimen was superior to the 3-cycle regimen in only the pCR and pDS results. Survival and recurrence rates were similar between the two regimens. In both treatment regimes, the toxicity profile was manageable. However, due to the inherent drawbacks of retrospective research, this should be regarded with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lanpeng Lu
- Institute of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Gansu Province for Urological Diseases, Lanzhou, China
| | - Chaohu Chen
- Institute of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Gansu Province for Urological Diseases, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hui Cheng
- Institute of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Gansu Province for Urological Diseases, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hui Ding
- Institute of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Gansu Province for Urological Diseases, Lanzhou, China
| | - Junqiang Tian
- Institute of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Gansu Province for Urological Diseases, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hanzhang Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UConn Health Farmington, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Zhiping Wang
- Institute of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
- Key Laboratory of Gansu Province for Urological Diseases, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hu J, Chen J, Ou Z, Chen H, Liu Z, Chen M, Zhang R, Yu A, Cao R, Zhang E, Guo X, Peng B, Deng D, Cheng C, Liu J, Li H, Zou Y, Deng R, Qin G, Li W, Wang L, Chen T, Pei X, Gong G, Tang J, Othmane B, Cai Z, Zhang C, Liu Z, Zu X. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and combination therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A multi-center real-world retrospective study. Cell Rep Med 2022; 3:100785. [PMID: 36265483 PMCID: PMC9729796 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
To parallelly compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (tislelizumab), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin), and neoadjuvant combination therapy (tislelizumab + GC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and explore the efficacy predictors, we perform a multi-center, real-world cohort study that enrolls 253 patients treated with neoadjuvant treatments (combination therapy: 98, chemotherapy: 107, and immunotherapy: 48) from 15 tertiary hospitals. We demonstrate that neoadjuvant combination therapy achieves the highest complete response rate and pathological downstaging rate compared with neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemotherapy. We develop and validate an efficacy prediction model consisting of pretreatment clinical characteristics, which can pinpoint candidates to receive neoadjuvant combination therapy. We also preliminarily reveal that patients who achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatments plus maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumor may be safe to receive bladder preservation therapy. Overall, this study highlights the benefit of neoadjuvant combination therapy based on tislelizumab for MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiao Hu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jinbo Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhenyu Ou
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Haige Chen
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Minfeng Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ruiyun Zhang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Anze Yu
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Cao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Enchong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xi Guo
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Bo Peng
- Department of Urology, Zhangjiajie People’s Hospital, Zhangjiajie, China
| | - Dingshan Deng
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chunliang Cheng
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jinhui Liu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Huihuang Li
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yihua Zou
- Department of Urology, the First People’s Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, China
| | - Ruoping Deng
- Department of Urology, the Central Hospital of Yongzhou, Yongzhou, China
| | - Gang Qin
- Department of Urology, the Central Hospital of Yongzhou, Yongzhou, China
| | - Wenze Li
- Department of Urology, the First People’s Hospital of Xiangtan City, Xiangtan, China
| | - Lue Wang
- Department of Urology, Huarong People’s Hospital, Yueyang, China
| | - Tao Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Xiangyang, China
| | - Xiaming Pei
- Department of Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Guanghui Gong
- Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiansheng Tang
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, China
| | - Belaydi Othmane
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhiyong Cai
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chunyu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhi Liu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiongbing Zu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China,Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aydin AM, Cheriyan SK, Reich R, Hajiran A, Peyton CC, Zemp L, Yu A, Li R, Poch MA, Spiess PE, Jain R, Zhang J, Sexton WJ, Gilbert SM. Comparative analysis of three vs. four cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:453.e19-453.e26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|