A Multicenter Study on the Utility of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA in the Diagnosis of Mediastinal Lymphoma

A Review of Endobronchial-Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Intranodal Forceps Biopsy and Cryobiopsy

Benign and malignant mediastinal lesions are not infrequently encountered in clinical practice. Mediastinoscopy has long been considered the gold standard in evaluating mediastinal pathology. Since its introduction into clinical practice, endobronchial-ultrasonography-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has replaced mediastinoscopy as the initial procedure of choice to evaluate mediastinal lesions and to stage lung cancer. Its diagnostic yield in benign mediastinal lesions and less common malignancies, however, has remained limited. This has led different proceduralists to investigate additional procedures to improve the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA. In recent years, different published reports concluded that the addition of EBUS-guided intranodal forceps biopsy (IFB) and transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) to EBUS-TBNA increases the diagnostic yield especially in benign mediastinal lesions and uncommon mediastinal malignancies. The purpose of this review is to describe how EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TBCB are performed, to compare their diagnostic yields, and to discuss their limitations and their potential complications. In addition, the review will conclude with a proposed algorithm on how to incorporate EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TBCB into clinical practice.

EBUS-guided cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of thoracic disorders

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) has emerged as a crucial tool for diagnosing intrathoracic disorders, particularly in the staging of lung cancer. However, its diagnostic capabilities in the context of benign and rare diseases remain a subject of debate.

AIM

to investigate the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC) in comparison to EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) for a broad spectrum of intrathoracic diseases.

METHODS

a single-centre retrospective observational study conducted on 48 patients who underwent both EBUS-TBNA and endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC) in the same procedure between August 2021 and October 2023.

RESULTS

The overall diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC surpassed that of EBUS-TBNA (95.8% vs 54.1 %), notably excelling in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis (92.8% vs 78.5 %), rare mediastinal disorders (100% vs 0 %), hyperplastic lymphadenopathy (100% vs 0 %), and lymphoproliferative disease (100% vs 0 %). No significant differences were observed in the diagnosis of NSCLC and SCLC. Samples obtained through EBUS-TMC facilitated the acquisition of NGS and immunohistochemical analyses more readily.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TMC may contribute to the precise diagnosis and subtyping of mediastinal diseases, especially lymphomas and rare mediastinal tumors, thereby reducing the number of non-diagnostic procedures.

Ultrasound in the Study of Thoracic Diseases: Innovative Aspects

Thoracic ultrasound (TU) has rapidly gained popularity over the past 10 years. This is in part because ultrasound equipment is available in many settings, more training programmes are educating trainees in this technique, and ultrasound can be done rapidly without exposure to radiation. The aim of this review is to present the most interesting and innovative aspects of the use of TU in the study of thoracic diseases. In pleural diseases, TU has been a real revolution. It helps to differentiate between different types of pleural effusions, guides the performance of pleural biopsies when necessary and is more cost-effective under these conditions, and assists in the decision to remove thoracic drainage after talc pleurodesis. With the advent of COVID19, the use of TU has increased for the study of lung involvement. Nowadays it helps in the diagnosis of pneumonias, tumours and interstitial diseases, and its use is becoming more and more widespread in the Pneumology ward. In recent years, TU guided biopsies have been shown to be highly cost-effective, with other advantages such as the absence of radiation and the possibility of being performed at bedside. The use of contrast in ultrasound to increase the cost-effectiveness of these biopsies is very promising. In the study of the mediastinum and peripheral pulmonary nodules, the introduction of echobronchoscopy has brought about a radical change. It is a fully established technique in the study of lung cancer patients. The introduction of elastography may help to further improve its cost-effectiveness. In critically-ill patients, diaphragmatic ultrasound helps in the assessment of withdrawal of mechanical ventilation, and is now an indispensable tool in the management of these patients. In neuromuscular patients, ultrasound is a good predictor of impaired lung function. Currently, in Neuromuscular Disease Units, TU is an indispensable tool. Ultrasound study of the intercostal musculature is also effective in the study of respiratory function, and is widely used in Respiratory Rehabilitation. In Intermediate Care Units, thoracic ultrasound is indispensable for patient management. In these units there are ultrasound protocols for the management of patients with acute dyspnoea that have proven to be very effective.

[Complicated hematomediastinum in a 76-year-old patient after performing an endosonographically guided transbronchial cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBCB) with suspected lymphoma]

We present the case of a patient with severe complications from mediastinal bleeding after endosonographically guided transbronchial cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBKB) with suspected advanced lymphoma. The EBUS-TBKB is a new effective examination method in interventional pneumology for the diagnosis of diseases with mediastinal lymph node enlargement and intrathoracic tumors, with which large tissue cylinders in the mediastinum can be obtained. Due to the high diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the clarification of lymphadenopathy, the examination should not be carried out as a routine application. Indications for a primary EBUS-TBKB arise when there is a suspicion of intrathoracic malignant lymphomas or other rare tumors in which extensive unfragmented tissue material is required for diagnosis. A rare complication that has not yet been described in the literature is a hematomediastinum, so that a careful risk assessment of possible bleeding complications should be carried out before intervention and the more invasive mediastinoscopy can be a safer examination method.

[The role of endoscopy in exploration of the mediastinum, indications and results]

Since 2005, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as a standard pulmonological tool. The procedure is safe and well tolerated by patients, with minimal morbidity and almost no mortality. A previous review on the technique was published in 2012. However, over the last ten years, a number of new studies have been published on "benign" (sarcoidosis, tuberculosis…) as well as "malignant" diseases (lung cancer, metastases of extra-thoracic cancers, search for mutations and specific oncogenic markers…). These developments have led to expanded indications for EBUS-TBNA, with which it is indispensable to be familiar, in terms of "staging" as well as "diagnosis". In view of optimizing lymph node sampling, several publications have described and discussed EBUS exploration by means of newly available tools (biopsy forceps, larger needles…), and proposed interpretation of the images thereby produced. Given the ongoing evolution of linear EBUS, it seemed indispensable that information on this marvelous tool be updated. This review is aimed at summarizing the novel elements we have found the most important.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in intrathoracic lymphadenopathy with extrathoracic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph is poorly studied in patients with extrathoracic malignancies.

AIM

To evaluate the value of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of enlarged intrathoracic lymph nodes in patients with extrathoracic malignancies.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with extrathoracic malignancies who were referred to Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 for EBUS-TBNA due to intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. The specimens were defined as positive for malignancy, negative for non-malignancy (tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, etc.), and without a definitive diagnosis. Sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) for malignancy, and overall accuracy were calculated. Complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA and had a final diagnosis, among which 50 (62.5%) were diagnosed with extrathoracic malignancy with intrathoracic lymph nodes metastasis, 14 (17.5%) were diagnosed with primary lung cancer with nodal involvement, and 16 (20.0%) exhibited benign behavior including tuberculosis, sarcoidosis and reactive lymphadenitis or who had benign follow-up. The diagnostic sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA for intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in patients with extrathoracic malignancy were 93.8% (n = 60/64), 80.0% (n = 16/20), and 95.0% (n = 76/80), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, longer short axis of the lymph node (OR: 1.200, 95%CI: 1.024-1.407; P = 0.024) and synchronous lung lesion (OR: 19.449, 95%CI: 1.875-201.753; P = 0.013) were independently associated with malignant intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. No characteristics of the lymph nodes and EBUS-TBNA were associated with the location of malignant intrathoracic lymphadenopathy, and no major complication was observed.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA is a simple and accurate procedure for the diagnosis of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy with extrathoracic malignancy.

Transesophageal Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Mediastinal Masses: A Retrospective Real-World Analysis

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) plays an important role in the diagnosis and staging of thoracic disease. Our report studies the diagnostic performance and clinical impact of EUS fine needle aspiration (FNA) in a homogenous cohort of patients according to the distribution of the enlarged MLNs or pulmonary masses. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the diagnostic performance of 211 EUS-FNA in 200 consecutive patients with enlarged or PET-positive MLNs and para-mediastinal masses who were referred to our oncological center between January 2019 and May 2020. Results: The overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 85% with a corresponding negative predictive value (NPV) of 56% and an accuracy of 87.5%. The sensitivity and accuracy in patients with abnormal MLNs were 81.1% and 84.4%, respectively. In those with para-mediastinal masses, sensitivity and accuracy were 96.4% and 96.8%. The accuracy for both masses and lymph nodes was 100%, and in the LAG (left adrenal gland), it was 66.6%. Conclusions: Our results show that, in patients with suspected mediastinal masses, EUS-FNA is an accurate technique to evaluate all reachable mediastinal nodal stations, including station 5.

Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration With a 19-Gauge Needle vs 21- and 22-Gauge Needles for Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is commonly used to evaluate mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Studies focusing on malignant lymphadenopathy have compared 21- and 22-gauge (21G and 22G, respectively) needles and have not identified an advantage of one needle size over the other in terms of diagnostic yield.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the 19-gauge (19G) EBUS needle offer greater diagnostic yield and sensitivity vs the 21G and 22G EBUS needles for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study retrospectively examined records of 730 patients from the Stather Canadian Outcomes Registry for Chest Procedures (SCOPE) database who underwent EBUS-TBNA for a diagnosis of suspected sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed. A propensity score analysis of two groups was performed. One group comprised patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA with a 19G needle, the other with a 21G or 22G needle. Cases for analysis were selected with a 1:2 ratio of 19G vs 21/22G using logistic regression and random matching with all eligible 19G cases included.

RESULTS

There were 137 patients (312 targets) in the 19G group and 274 patients (631 targets) in the 21/22G group in the propensity score analysis. The diagnostic yield was 107 of 137 (78.1%) in the 19G group vs 194 of 274 (70.8%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 7.3%; 95% CI, -1.9 to 15.6; P = .116). The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for sarcoidosis was 80 of 84 (95.2%) in the 19G group vs 150 of 156 (96.2%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 1.0%; 95% CI, -4.2 to 8.2; P = .71). In patients with a final diagnosis of lymphoma, EBUS was diagnostic in 10 of 13 (76.9%) in the 19G group vs 12 of 12 (100%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 23.1%; 95% CI, -5.4 to 50.3; P = .08).

INTERPRETATION

The study did not identify an advantage of the 19G EBUS needle over the 21/22G EBUS needles for diagnostic yield nor sensitivity for sarcoidosis or lymphoma.

Mediastinal tumours and pseudo-tumours: a comprehensive review with emphasis on multidisciplinary approach

The diagnosis of a mediastinal mass may be challenging for clinicians, since lesions arising within the mediastinum include a variety of disease entities, frequently requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Age and sex represent important information, which need to be integrated with imaging and laboratory findings. In addition, the location of the mediastinal lesion is fundamental; indeed, we propose to illustrate mediastinal diseases based on the compartment of origin. We consider that this structured approach may serve as hint to the diagnostic modalities and management of mediastinal diseases. In this review, we present primary mediastinal tumours in the evolving context of new diagnostic and therapeutic tools, with recently described entities, based on our own experience with >900 cases encountered in the past 10 years.

Given the mediastinal anatomical heterogeneity, the correct positioning of mediastinal lesions becomes primal, in order to first establish a clinical suspicion and then to assist in planning biopsy and surgical procedurehttps://bit.ly/3p0gsk3

Mediastinal Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma Achieved by Endoscopic Transesophageal Cryobiopsy

Guidelines have recommended endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy as initial sampling approaches of mediastinal lymph nodes for lung cancer staging. However, the small sample volume might restrict the diagnostic utility of needle aspiration in certain mediastinal diseases. We have recently shown that transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy, which is capable of providing larger amounts of intact tissue, improves diagnostic yield in rare tumors and benign diseases compared to EBUS-TBNA. Here, we present a case of mediastinal nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma successfully diagnosed by endoscopic transesophageal cryobiopsy.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and classification of lymphomas

BACKGROUND

endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a safe and effective technique in the diagnosis of mediastinal and abdominal masses. However, the usefulness of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis and classification of lymphomas is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the yield of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis and classification of lymphomas.

METHODS

a retrospective case series was performed in a tertiary referral center. All consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNA with a suspected diagnosis of lymphoma from March 2013 to June 2019 were included.

RESULTS

thirty-five patients (54.3 % women, median age 72 years) were included. The most frequent location of the node was the abdomen (67.9 %). Nodes were punctured using a 22-gauge (85.7 %) and 19-gauge needle (14.3 %) with a slow-pull technique. The number of passes performed were three or more in 82.9 % of patients. The samples were processed by the cellblock method. Adequate samples for immunohistochemical and molecular biological study were obtained in 33 (94.3 %) patients. EUS-FNA correctly diagnosed lymphoma in 30 out of 35 patients (85.7 %), and subclassification was determined in 23 patients (65.7 %). The most frequent diagnosis was non-Hodgkin lymphoma (85.7 %). There was one moderate adverse event (bleeding), which was resolved during the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA may be a valuable technique in the evaluation of suspected lymphomas with an adequate diagnostic yield and a very low rate of adverse events.

Endosonography-Guided Biopsy as a First Test in the Diagnosis of Lymphoma

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis of lymphoma. A retrospective analysis of patients with suspected mediastinal lymphoproliferative disorders who underwent EBUS-TBNA, EUS-FNA or combined procedures from 2009 to 2019 was conducted using a prospectively maintained interventional thoracic endoscopy database. Demographic data, imaging, needle size, surgical biopsy, complications rate and pathology reports were reviewed. Over a 10-year period, a total of 444 patients were investigated with endosonography as the first diagnostic procedure for mediastinal adenopathy suspicious for lymphoma. Lymphoma was diagnosed in 77 patients (17.3%). In total, 68 patients (88.3%) were diagnosed using endosonographic mediastinal tissue sampling. Four patients had both lymphoproliferative disorders and lung cancer. Nine patients (11.7%) required a surgical biopsy to confirm the lymphoma diagnosis (6 non-diagnostic; 3 inadequate samples from endosonographic biopsies). In patients with adequate biopsies via endosonography, the sensitivity for the diagnosis of lymphoma, was 91.9% (n = 68/74). The histopathologic subtype of lymphoma was determined by endosonographic biopsies in 61 patients (89.7%) with an increased sensitivity (92.6%) for low grade Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). No acute complication related to endosonography was observed. Endosonographic biopsy (EBUS and/or EUS) of mediastinal adenopathy in patients with suspected lymphoma is a highly sensitive and safe diagnostic test. Endosonography should be the first test in the diagnosis of suspicious mediastinal lymphoma and should be followed by surgical biopsy in cases of insufficient sampling or indefinite diagnosis.

Respiratory cytology in malignant lung disease - The thoracic oncologist's perspective

Respiratory cytology continues to play a central role in the diagnosis and staging of thoracic malignancy, although over time indications have changed. Historically, sputum cytology and endobronchial brushings and washings figured prominently, but with the advent of endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound much greater emphasis is placed on fine needle aspirates from lymph nodes. The advent of targeted sequencing panels for genomic profiling to identify driver mutations and PD-L1 directed immunotherapy means that there is a need to extract increasing amounts of diagnostic and predictive information from ever smaller amounts of diagnostic material. Recent work has demonstrated that cytology samples are well suited to delivering the information required, but in order to understand the limitations of clinical and laboratory techniques, a close working relationship between pathologist and thoracic oncologist is needed to optimise sample procurement and utilisation.

Mediastinal lymphadenopathy: a practical approach

Introduction: Mediastinal lymphadenopathy is secondary to various benign and malignant etiologies. There is a variation in the underlying cause in different demographic settings. The initial clue to the presence of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes is through thoracic imaging modalities. Malignancy (Lung cancer, lymphoma, and extrathoracic cancer) and granulomatous conditions (sarcoidosis and tuberculosis) are the most common causes. For a confident diagnosis, the clinician must choose from several available options and integrate the clinical, radiological, and pathology findings. An accurate diagnosis is necessary for optimal management.Areas covered: We performed a search of the PUBMED database to identify relevant articles on the causes, imaging modalities, and interventional modalities to diagnose these conditions. We discuss a practical approach toward the evaluation of a patient with mediastinal lymphadenopathy.Expert opinion: Mediastinal lymphadenopathy is a commonly encountered clinical problem. Treating physicians need to be aware of the clinico-radiological manifestations of the common diagnostic entities. Selecting an appropriate tissue diagnosis modality is crucial, with an intent to use the least invasive technique with good diagnostic yield. Endosonographic modalities (EBUS-TBNA, EUS-FNA, and EUS-B-FNA) have emerged as the cornerstone to most patients' diagnosis. An accurate diagnosis translates into favorable treatment outcomes.

Image-guided lymph node fine-needle aspiration: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience

INTRODUCTION

Although the diagnostic utility of lymph node fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is well established in the evaluation of metastatic malignancy, its value in the diagnosis of lymphoma is more controversial; yet, there is a growing trend among practitioners towards less-invasive procedures such as FNA and core needle biopsy (CNB). The guidelines recently published by the American Society for Clinical Pathology/College of American Pathology (CAP) regarding the workup of lymphoma include recommendations on the value and limitations of FNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 1237 image-guided lymph node aspirates from 695 procedures (410 nodes from 360 ultrasound [US]-guided cases, 799 from 309 endobronchial ultrasound [EBUS], 25 from 23 endoscopic ultrasound [EUS], and 3 from 3 computed tomography [CT]).

RESULTS

The majority (40 of 46, 87%) of lymph nodes suspected of lymphomatous involvement were aspirated under ultrasound. Core needle biopsy [CNB] was obtained for 41 (89%) lymph nodes, including all 40 US specimens. Flow cytometry (FC) was performed on 37 (80%) aspirates; aspirates without FC were from patients who had a history of Hodgkin lymphoma, or showed granulomata or non-hematologic malignancy onsite. Thirty-one (67%) lymph nodes were sent for review by hematopathology. Forty-two (91%) lymph node FNA/CNB yielded actionable diagnoses. Seventeen of 241(7%) cases aspirated for other indications (14 US, 3 EBUS) were involved by a lymphoproliferative process. All were reviewed by hematopathology. All 14 US cases had FC and CNB.

CONCLUSION

Our institutional approach towards lymph node cytopathology for lymphoma workup appears to be in accordance with the new CAP guidelines, and demonstrates a potential triage and workflow model for lymph node FNA specimens that allows for accurate diagnosis in cases where lymphoma is a consideration.

High Sensitivity of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB in Lymphadenopathy Caused by Metastatic Disease: A Prospective Comparative Study

Background/Aims

The diagnostic work-up of lymphadenopathy is challenging but important to determine the correct therapy. Nevertheless, few studies have addressed the topic of endosonography (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition in lymphadenopathy. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNB) in intrathoracic and intraabdominal lymphadenopathy.

Methods

In a tertiary care center, patients with lymphadenopathy referred for EUS-guided sampling were included prospectively from 2014 to 2019 (NCT02360839). In all cases, EUS-FNB (22 gauge) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) (25 gauge) were performed. The patients were randomized to the first needle pass with FNB or FNA. Study outcomes were the diagnostic accuracy and adverse event rate.

Results

Forty-eight patients were included (median age: 69 years [interquartile range, 59–76]; 24/48 females [50%]). The final diagnoses were metastasis (n=17), lymphoma (n=11), sarcoidosis (n=6), and inflammatory disease (n=14). The diagnostic performance of the two modalities was comparable, including a high sensitivity for metastatic nodes (EUS-FNB: 87% vs. EUS-FNA: 100%, p=0.5). The sensitivity for lymphoma was borderline superior in favor of EUS-FNB (EUS-FNB: 55% vs. EUS-FNA: 9%, p=0.06). No adverse events were recorded.

Conclusions

In lymphadenopathy, both EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA are safe and highly sensitive for metastatic lymph node detection. Lymphoma diagnosis is challenging regardless of the needle used.

Thoracic endosonography (EBUS/EUS-b) in the diagnosis of different intrathoracic diseases: A 4-year experience at a single-centre in Greece

BACKGROUND

In the last decade, the advent of thoracic endosonography has revolutionised the field of diagnostic bronchoscopy.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre prospective study in "Sotiria" Chest diseases hospital between January 2016 and December 2019. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and diagnostic value of combined EBUS/EUS-b in comparison with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-b FNA in different intrathoracic diseases.

RESULTS

A total of 266 patients were enrolled (70.7% males, 85.7% smokers, mean age ± SD: 62.8 ± 11.8). Diagnosis and staging of suspected lung cancer (LC) were the main indications for EBUS/EUS-b in 56.7% of patients, followed by lymphadenopathy of unknown origin in 27%, lymphadenopathy in previous malignancy in 10.9%, and staging of proven LC in 5.3%. EUS-b FNA alone or combined with EBUS-TBNA was performed in 14.7% of patients. A total of 512 lymph nodes was sampled (481 through EBUS-TBNA and 31 through EUS-b FNA). EBUS/EUS-b led to a definitive diagnosis in 68.4% of the patients. Most cases (50.4%) were malignancies, while 18% represented benign diseases (83.3% sarcoidosis). Sensitivity of combined EBUS/EUS-b was higher in comparison with sensitivity of both procedures alone (100% vs 89.4% vs 88.9%). Accordingly, the overall sensitivity of EBUS/EUS-b for the detection of malignancy and sarcoidosis was 93% and 95.2%, respectively. No severe complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Thoracic endosonography is an efficient, safe, minimally invasive tool yielding high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected malignancy and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Experienced pulmonologists in EBUS-TBNA should more routinely perform EUS-b FNA to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions.

Diagnostic yield and safety of the ProCore versus the standard EBUS-TBNA needle in subjects with suspected sarcoidosis

Background: No randomized trial has compared the yield of the ProCore needle, a novel needle for endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), with standard needles.Research design and methods: Consecutive subjects with intrathoracic lymphadenopathy due to suspected sarcoidosis were randomized 1:1 to undergo EBUS-TBNA with either the 22-gauge ProCore (EchoTip-ProCore, Cook-Medical) or the 22-gauge standard (Vizishot, Olympus) needle. The primary outcome was the diagnostic sensitivity; the secondary outcomes included the number of adequate aspirates obtained and procedure-related complications.Results: We randomized 100 (mean age, 43.4 years; 53% women) subjects. Of the 84 subjects finally diagnosed with sarcoidosis, the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA was higher with the ProCore (36/42, 85.7%) versus the standard needle (31/42, 73.8%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.18). We obtained adequate aspirates in 95.2% and 90.5% subjects in the ProCore and the standard needle groups, respectively (p = 0.68). One complication (transient hypoxemia) occurred in each group. There were two incidences of the ProCore needle getting bent during the procedure.Conclusions: We found no difference in the sensitivity, specimen adequacy, or safety of EBUS-TBNA when performed with the ProCore or the Olympus needle in subjects with sarcoidosis. Larger studies are required to confirm our findings.[clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03656003].

Application of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis and treatment of mediastinal lymph node tuberculous abscess: a case report and literature review

Background

This study aimed to report the experience of diagnosis and treatment of one rare case of mediastinal lymph node tuberculous abscess (MLNTA) using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA).

Case presentation

An 18-year-old female patient was hospitalized in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University in November 2017, due to intermittent left chest pain. She was suspected of infecting tuberculosis (TB) and thus received anti-TB treatment. Since April 1, 2018, she began to exhibit symptoms of chest distress. The patient was then admitted to Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital and continued receiving systemic anti-TB treatment during the whole course. On April 11, 2018, she received EBUS-TBNA to puncture pus and inject isoniazid. Simultaneously, the pus was sent for cytopathological and bacteriological examination, both supporting the diagnosis of TB in the patient. On April 24 and May 10, she received two times of EBUS-TBNA treatment. The symptoms of chest distress were relieved, but granulomatous neoplasm occurred at the EBUS-TBNA site on the trachea wall. The patient then received local clamp removal and cryotherapy on May 29 and Jul 19, respectively. Chest computed tomography (CT) reexamination on September 28 revealed that the MLNTA lesion had been completely absorbed, and electronic bronchoscopic reexamination on September 30 demonstrated that the granulomatous neoplasm on the trachea wall was entirely invisible.

Conclusions

Using EBUS-TBNA to puncture and aspirate pus and inject drugs can be effectively used to diagnose and treat MLNTA, which provides a new, less invasive, safe and reliable method for diagnosis and treatment of MLNTA.

Diagnostic efficacy of EBUS-TBNA in benign diseases in a population with a high prevalence of tuberculosis

SETTING

Although endobronchial ultrasonography-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has a well-known place in the staging and diagnosis of lung cancer, the place of EBUS is not clear in the diagnosis of benign diseases, especially in countries with a high prevalence of tuberculosis.

AIM

The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of EBUS-TBNA in benign diseases in a population with a high prevalence of tuberculosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between October 2011 and March 2018, 1077 EBUS-TBNA was applied.

RESULTS

The diagnosis was reached with mediastinoscopy or video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in 41 (74.5%) and with the second EBUS-TBNA performed in 14 (25.5%) of 55 EBUS practices in 41 patients with malignancy diagnosis. The final diagnosis was achieved with clinical/radiological features in 7 (77.7%) cases of sarcoidosis, with VATS/mediastinoscopy in 2 (22.2%) cases, with EBUS-TBNA performed for the second time in 6 (54.5%) tuberculosis cases and with acid-resistance bacilli reproduction in Lowenstein-Jensen culture in 5 (45.4%) cases. Two hundred and ninety-five (79.7%) patients were accepted as "benign disease" due to the absence of radiological and clinical progression of lesions in the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA is high in benign diseases such as sarcoidosis and tuberculosis.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in sarcoidosis: Beyond the diagnostic yield

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is the commonly used technique for pathological confirmation of clinically suspected sarcoidosis, mostly owing to its consistently high success rate in the detection of granulomas. However, other possible advantages, which are less appreciated and often poorly studied, may also contribute to the wider use of EBUS-TBNA in the future. These advantages include refinement of differential diagnoses through the study of lymph node characteristics during B-mode examination; reduction of complications associated with bronchoscopy, as well as improved triage of the specimen for ancillary studies with the use of rapid on-site evaluation; optimization of the quality of the sample through the selection of a target area for biopsy with minimal vascularity and absence of calcifications by using the colour Doppler and the B-mode; and prediction of the presence of extensive lymph node fibrosis by using the strain elastography module. Yet, limitations and possible clinical drawbacks should also be acknowledged. Indeed, due to the lack of specificity of the pathology findings in EBUS-derived samples, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is one of the exclusion and should remain essentially clinical. The external validity of EBUS-TBNA results in sarcoidosis is questionable, as they mainly derive from studies in populations with a high disease prevalence. Finally, the risk exists that the low morbidity and high diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA may lead to its overuse in patients with clinical/radiological findings specific enough to secure a clinical diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: Techniques and Challenges

Intrathoracic lymphadenopathy is a common problem encountered in clinical practice and is caused by a wide variety of diseases. Traditionally, the mediastinal lymph nodes were sampled using conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), or surgical methods such as mediastinoscopy, and thoracotomy (open or video-assisted thoracoscopy). However, surgical modalities including mediastinoscopy are invasive, expensive, and not universally available. Moreover, they are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Conventional TBNA although minimally invasive has a low diagnostic yield. In the last decade, endobronchial ultrasound-guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as the diagnostic procedure of choice in evaluating undiagnosed intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. EBUS-TBNA is also currently the preferred modality in the mediastinal staging of lung cancer. The procedure is minimally invasive, safe, and can be performed as a day-care procedure. In the era of personalized medicine in lung cancer, optimizing the procedure, sample collection, and processing are crucial, as more tissue is required for performing a wide array of molecular tests. Despite its widespread use and acceptance, the diagnostic sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA is still low. To maximize the yield, cytologists and physicians should be aware of the technical details of the procedure. Herein, we discuss the technique of performing EBUS-TBNA, its indications, contraindications, and the processing of the samples at our bronchoscopy suite. We also highlight the challenges faced by the cytologists and clinicians while processing EBUS aspirates.