Intratemporal Intraneural Perineurioma of the Facial Nerve

Clinical Features, Natural History, and Outcomes of Intraneural Perineuriomas: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Intraneural perineurioma is a rare peripheral nerve sheath tumor characterized by localized proliferation of perineurial cells. The literature consists predominantly of case reports and institutional series, with inconsistent and confusing nomenclature. We present a pooled analysis of all reported cases of intraneural perineurioma in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed according to PRISMA guidelines to identify all reported cases of intraneural perineurioma in the literature. Individual cases were pooled and analyzed for demographics, clinical features, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 172 cases were identified across 72 studies, of which 149 were found in major peripheral nerves and their branches. Median age of patients at diagnosis and onset of symptoms was 18 years (interquartile range [IQR], 12-34 years) years and 13.5 years (IQR, 8-26 years), respectively, with 54.4% (81/149) being female. The most common sites were the sciatic nerve or its branches (41.9%), median nerve (13.5%), radial nerve (12.2%), and brachial plexus (12.2%). Most patients were managed conservatively (52.9%; 72/136). Among those managed conservatively with available follow-up (n = 31), median follow-up was 11 months, and most (67.7%, n = 21) reported no change in neurologic status, although worsening was noted in 29.0% (9/31). Among surgically managed cases (n = 64), the most common intervention was resection with or without repair (62.5%; 40/64), neurolysis (25%; 16/64), or tendon transfers without resection (12.5%; 8/64). No lesion recurred after surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraneural perineurioma represents a benign focal lesion presenting with weakness and atrophy affecting adolescents and young adults. Most cases are managed nonoperatively and surgical treatment strategies are varied.

The natural history of vestibular schwannoma growth-prospective 40-year data from an unselected national cohort

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated and thus international consensus has not been achieved. Treatment options are observation, radiotherapy, and surgery. Knowledge on the natural history of tumor growth is essential for choice of treatment modality. The aim is to present intra-/extrameatal tumor growth and management data from a prospective, unselected national cohort of patients diagnosed with VS during the period 1976-2015.

METHODS

Since 1976, all data from patients diagnosed with sporadic VS in Denmark have been referred to our national treatment center, where they have been entered prospectively into the national database. Data on tumor localization, growth, and treatment were retrieved. Growth definition: >2 mm by linear measurement, in accordance with the Tokyo 2001 consensus-meeting recommendations.

RESULTS

3637 cases of VS were diagnosed, in which 1304 patients had surgery and 21 received radiotherapy post diagnosis. 2312 patients were observed with mean follow-up of 7.33 years. Of these, 434(19%; 102 intra-and 332 extrameatal tumors) changed to active treatment during the observation period due to tumor growth. 5 years after diagnosis, 21% of the intrameatal tumors exhibited growth during observation, whereas 37% of extrameatal tumors had grown, increasing to 25% intrameatal and 42% extrameatal after 10 years. Following growth, the intrameatal tumors were mostly observed further and the extrameatal mostly underwent surgery. Tumor growth occurred mainly within the first 5 years post diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

This natural history study documents the growth occurrence of both intra-and extrameatal VS during the first 12 years after diagnosis and should be used in patient counseling, management, and treatment decision making.

Tracking Spontaneous Vestibular Schwannoma Regression with Volumetric Measurements

OBJECTIVE

To characterize a series of patients with MRI evidence of spontaneous vestibular schwannoma (VS) regression.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Retrospective review between 2012 and 2020 from a single, tertiary-care center of all patients with an untreated, sporadic VS and spontaneous regression in volumetric tumor size over the course of observation. The main outcome measures included VS size and location, presenting symptoms, medication use, changes in pure-tone averages and word recognition scores.

RESULTS

The 13 treatment-naïve patients (62% female, mean age 67.1 years) with spontaneous VS regression represented 3.9% of all patients undergoing observation with serial imaging during the study period. Median tumor size from initial MRI was 529.0 mm³ (range: 108 mm³ -13,180 mm³ ). The mean interval between MRI measurements was 5.5 years (SD 4.4 years). The average percent decrease in tumor size was 36.1% (SD 21.9%) and the average rate of volume decrease was 15.8 mm³ /yr (SD 25.4 mm³ /yr). Five patients were classified as having major regression, defined by a relative decrease in volume of >40%, while eight patients had minor regression (<40% relative volume reduction). No significant differences in initial tumor size, rate of regression, or audiometric changes were observed between the major and minor regression cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with evidence of a spontaneously shrinking VS have a heterogeneous presentation. Due to the scarcity of this phenomenon, predicting which tumors will eventually undergo regression remains unclear. Employing volumetric measurements to compare serial MRI scans may improve the accuracy of detecting shrinking tumors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1647-E1652, 2021.

Can Intraneural Perineuriomas Occur Intradurally? An Anatomic Perspective

BACKGROUND: Intraneural perineuriomas are rare, benign lesions produced by the neoplastic proliferation of perineurial cells. They typically present in adolescents and affect nerves of the limbs. In our experience, we have not encountered a single case of classic intraneural perineurioma at an intradural location.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intraneural perineuriomas could occur intradurally, given the prevalence of intradural nerve sheath tumors, and explain our findings with an anatomic perspective.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the high-resolution magnetic resonance images of 56 patients from an institutional registry of patients with intraneural perineurioma. All cases were analyzed for signs of proximal extension toward spinal nerves, roots, and spinal cord. A literature review was performed. The clinical, radiological, and histopathological features of potential intradural lesions were critically appraised against strict criteria for a diagnosis of classic intraneural perineurioma.

RESULTS: Fifteen of 56 (27%) patients with intraneural perineurioma had a proximal localization in the lumbosacral or brachial plexus. Not a single case occurred proximal to the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). One case of trigeminal intraneural perineurioma occurred distal to the gasserian ganglion. A literature review did not reveal any convincing cases of classic intraneural perineuriomas occurring in an intraspinal intradural location and revealed only 1 possible case in an intracranial intradural location.

CONCLUSION: Based on our study, the occurrence of classic intraneural perineuriomas intradurally is exceedingly rare, if at all present. This may be related to the paucity of perineurial cells at the nerve root level and reciprocal interactions between neuroglial cells at the central-to-peripheral transition zones.