Preventing Facial Nerve Stimulation by Triphasic Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users: Intraoperative Recordings

[Fitting of cochlear implant systems]

The technical fitting of cochlear implant (CI) systems is a central component of the CI care process. On the one hand, this consists of a standardized procedure, while on the other, the individual needs of the patient are taken into account. It starts with the "initial fitting" during basic therapy, where the initial focus is on achieving a satisfactory impression of sound and loudness. In the follow-up therapy, fine adjustment is carried out to achieve the best possible speech perception in quiet and in noise. The aim is to individually adjust the CI processor to audiological targets. The fitting is carried out by a specially qualified professional in accordance with the German CI fitting guidelines and takes into account anatomical conditions, electrophysiological measurements, and audiological evaluation data. The CI fitting should maintain hearing and speech perception throughout life, thus ensuring a significant improvement in quality of life. In children, achieving the best possible CI fitting is fundamental to facilitating normal speech development.

Asymmetric pulses delivered by a cochlear implant allow a reduction in evoked firing rate and in spatial activation in the guinea pig auditory cortex

Despite that fact that the cochlear implant (CI) is one of the most successful neuro-prosthetic devices which allows hearing restoration, several aspects still need to be improved. Interactions between stimulating electrodes through current spread occurring within the cochlea drastically limit the number of discriminable frequency channels and thus can ultimately result in poor speech perception. One potential solution relies on the use of new pulse shapes, such as asymmetric pulses, which can potentially reduce the current spread within the cochlea. The present study characterized the impact of changing electrical pulse shapes from the standard biphasic symmetric to the asymmetrical shape by quantifying the evoked firing rate and the spatial activation in the guinea pig primary auditory cortex (A1). At a fixed charge, the firing rate and the spatial activation in A1 decreased by 15 to 25 % when asymmetric pulses were used to activate the auditory nerve fibers, suggesting a potential reduction of the spread of excitation inside the cochlea. A strong "polarity-order" effect was found as the reduction was more pronounced when the first phase of the pulse was cathodic with high amplitude. These results suggest that the use of asymmetrical pulse shapes in clinical settings can potentially reduce the channel interactions in CI users.

Cochlear implant electrode design for safe and effective treatment

The optimal placement of a cochlear implant (CI) electrode inside the scala tympani compartment to create an effective electrode-neural interface is the base for a successful CI treatment. The characteristics of an effective electrode design include (a) electrode matching every possible variation in the inner ear size, shape, and anatomy, (b) electrically covering most of the neuronal elements, and (c) preserving intra-cochlear structures, even in non-hearing preservation surgeries. Flexible electrode arrays of various lengths are required to reach an angular insertion depth of 680° to which neuronal cell bodies are angularly distributed and to minimize the rate of electrode scalar deviation. At the time of writing this article, the current scientific evidence indicates that straight lateral wall electrode outperforms perimodiolar electrode by preventing electrode tip fold-over and scalar deviation. Most of the available literature on electrode insertion depth and hearing outcomes supports the practice of physically placing an electrode to cover both the basal and middle turns of the cochlea. This is only achievable with longer straight lateral wall electrodes as single-sized and pre-shaped perimodiolar electrodes have limitations in reaching beyond the basal turn of the cochlea and in offering consistent modiolar hugging placement in every cochlea. For malformed inner ear anatomies that lack a central modiolar trunk, the perimodiolar electrode is not an effective electrode choice. Most of the literature has failed to demonstrate superiority in hearing outcomes when comparing perimodiolar electrodes with straight lateral wall electrodes from single CI manufacturers. In summary, flexible and straight lateral wall electrode type is reported to be gentle to intra-cochlear structures and has the potential to electrically stimulate most of the neuronal elements, which are necessary in bringing full benefit of the CI device to recipients.

Hearing Performance in Cochlear Implant Users Who Have Facial Nerve Stimulation

Introduction  Facial nerve stimulation (FNS) is a complication in cochlear implant (CI) when the electrical current escapes from the cochlea to the nearby facial nerve. Different management to reduce its effects are available, although changes might result in a less-than-ideal fitting for the CI user, eventually reducing speech perception. Objective  To verify the etiologies that cause FNS, to identify strategies in managing FNS, and to evaluate speech recognition in patients who present FNS. Methods  Retrospective study approved by the Ethical Board of the Institution. From the files of a CI group, patients who were identified with FNS either during surgery or at any time postoperatively were selected. Data collection included: CI manufacturer, electrode array type, age at implantation, etiology of hearing loss, FNS identification date, number of electrodes that generated FNS, FNS management actions, and speech recognition in quiet and in noise. Results  Data were collected from 7 children and 25 adults. Etiologies that cause FNS were cochlear malformation, head trauma, meningitis, and otosclerosis; the main actions included decrease in the stimulation levels followed by the deactivation of electrodes. Average speech recognition in quiet before FNS was 86% and 80% after in patients who were able to accomplish the test. However, there was great variability, ranging from 0% in quiet to 90% of speech recognition in noise. Conclusion  Etiologies that cause FNS are related to cochlear morphology alterations. Facial nerve stimulation can be solved using speech processor programming parameters; however, it is not possible to predict outcomes, since results depend on other variables.

Cochlear-facial dehiscence - the most common cause of facial nerve stimulation from a cochlear implant? A case-control study

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of cochlear-facial dehiscence (CFD) and other radiographical pathologies in ears with facial nerve stimulation (FNS) from a cochlear implant (CI). Methods: Retrospective case-control study of 27 patients with CI and FNS on either ear (study group) and 27 patients without FNS, matched for age, sex and type of electrode array (control group). Preoperative CT scans of all 108 ears were re-evaluated. Subanalyses included comparisons between the study and control groups and associations between FNS and radiographic pathologies. Results: CFDs were detected in 20 of 54 ears (37%) in the study group and in 3 of 54 ears (6%) in the control group (P < 0.001). The corresponding numbers of otosclerosis were 10 (18%) and 0 (P = 0.011) and of developmental anomalies 16 (30%) and 8 (15%) (not significant). FNS was present in 33 ears in the study group, of which 14 (42%) had a CFD. FNS was absent in six ears with CFD and CI, four of which contralateral to an ear with FNS. Eight of 14 ears with FNS and CFD had a lateral electrode array and six had a perimodiolar electrode array. We found no association between the presence of CFD and stimulation thresholds for FNS. The adjusted odds ratio for developing FNS in the presence of a CFD was 9.9 (95% CI 2.7-36.0). Conclusions: CFD was the most common radiographic pathology in ears with FNS, with a 10-fold increased risk of FNS. To avoid CI-related FNS, preoperative CT scan and awareness of typical dehiscence symptoms are strongly recommended.

Risk factors and management strategies of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation in cochlear implant recipients: A systematic review

Objectives

To systematically review the prevalence and risk factors of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation (FNS) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. And to report the different management strategies used for reducing and resolving FNS.

Data Source

Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) of the World Health Organization (WHO).

Review Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) on studies that reported FNS as a complication after CI. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was used to identify the relevant articles. We extracted the data on the prevalence of FNS after CI activation, the reported grades, and the management strategies. The number of associated electrodes; cause of deafness; co-anomalies; and duration of hearing loss and their relationships with FNS were also studied.

Results

Twenty-one relevant articles were included in this review. The prevalence of FNS among the CI populations was 5.29% (175/3306 patients). Among those whose ages were reported, 58.3% (95/163) were adults, and 41.7% (68/163) were pediatrics. Modifying the different fitting parameters was the most used strategy, as it successfully resolved FNS in 85.5% of the patients (142/166). The second commonly used management strategy was surgical intervention (reimplantation or explantation), which was reported in seven studies for 23 patients.

Conclusion

FNS after CI activation could be controlled and resolved with many advances that range from readjusting the fitting parameters to surgical intervention. However, further studies are required to validate the efficacy of each management strategy and its impact on patients' performance. Our findings demonstrate that CI recipients with FNS could still benefit from the CI devices and their FNS could be controlled.

Intra-cochlear differences in the spread of excitation between biphasic and triphasic pulse stimulation in cochlear implants: A modeling and experimental study

Triphasic pulse stimulation can prevent unpleasant facial nerve stimulation in cochlear implant users. Using electromyographic measurements on facial nerve effector muscles, previous studies have shown that biphasic and triphasic pulse stimulations produce different input-output functions. However, little is known about the intracochlear effects of triphasic stimulation and how these may contribute to the amelioration of facial nerve stimulation. The present study used a computational model of implanted human cochleae to investigate the effect of pulse shape on the intracochlear spread of excitation. Biphasic and triphasic pulse stimulations were simulated from three different cochlear implant electrode contact positions. To validate the model results, experimental spread of excitation measurements were conducted with biphasic and triphasic pulse stimulation from three different electrode contact positions in 13 cochlear implant users. The model results depict differences between biphasic and triphasic pulse stimulations depending on the position of the stimulating electrode contact. While biphasic and triphasic pulse stimulations from a medial or basal electrode contact caused similar extents of neural excitation, differences between the pulse shapes were observed when the stimulating contact was located in the cochlear apex. In contrast, the experimental results showed no difference between the biphasic and triphasic initiated spread of excitation for any of the tested contact positions. The model was also used to study responses of neurons without peripheral processes to mimic the effect of neural degeneration. For all three contact positions, simulated degeneration shifted the neural responses towards the apex. Biphasic pulse stimulation showed a stronger response with neural degeneration compared to without degeneration, while triphasic pulse stimulation showed no difference. As previous measurements have demonstrated an ameliorative effect of triphasic pulse stimulation on facial nerve stimulation from medial electrode contact positions, the results imply that a complementary effect located at the facial nerve level must be responsible for reducing facial nerve stimulation.

Facial nerve stimulation in adult cochlear implant recipients with far advanced otosclerosis

Objectives

The objective of this study was to predict occurrence of facial nerve stimulation (FNS) in cochlear implanted patients for far-advanced otosclerosis (FAO) by correlating preoperative computed tomography (CT)-scan data to FNS and to evaluate FNS impact on hearing outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective analysis on 91 ears (76 patients) implanted for FAO. Electrodes were straight (50%) or perimodiolar (50%). Demographic data, extension of otosclerosis on preoperative CT scan, occurrence of FNS, and speech performance were analyzed.

Results

Prevalence of FNS was 21% (19 ears). FNS appeared during the first month (21%), 1-6 months (26%), 6-12 months (21%), and over 1 year (32%) postimplantation. Cumulative incidence of FNS at 15 years was 33% (95% CI = [14-47%]). Extension of otosclerotic lesions on preimplantation CT-scan was more severe in FNS ears compared to No-FNS (p < .05): for Stage III, 13/19 (68%) and 18/72 (25%) ears for FNS and No-FNS groups, respectively (p < .05). Location of otosclerotic lesions relative to the facial nerve canal was similar whatever the presence or not of FNS. Electrode array had no impact on FNS occurrence. At 1 year post-implantation, duration of profound hearing loss (≥5 years) and previous stapedotomy were negatively associated with speech performance. FNS did not impact hearing outcomes, despite a lower percentage of activated electrodes (p < .01) in the FNS group. Nevertheless, FNS were associated with a decrease of speech performance both in quiet (p < .001) and in noise (p < .05).

Conclusion

Cochlear implanted patients for FAO are at greater risk of developing FNS affecting speech performance over time, probably due to a higher percentage of deactivated electrodes. High resolution CT-scan is an essential tool allowing FNS prediction but not time of onset.

Level of evidence

2b, Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, 2022.

Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation

One severe side effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) is coincidental facial nerve stimulation (FNS). Clinical methods to alleviate FNS range from the reprogramming of processor settings to revision surgery. We systematically assessed different changes in CI stimulation modes that have been discussed in the literature as "rescue factors" from FNS: electrode configuration (broad to focused), pulse shape (symmetric biphasic to pseudo-monophasic), and pulse polarity (cathodic to anodic). An FNS was assessed, based on electrophysiological thresholds, in 204 electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) input/output functions recorded from 33 ears of 26 guinea pigs. The stimulation level difference between auditory nerve eCAP threshold and FNS threshold was expressed as the eCAP-to-FNS offset. Coincidental FNS occurred in all animals and in 45% of all recordings. A change from monopolar to focused (bipolar, tripolar) configurations minimized FNS. The Euclidean distance between the CI contacts and the facial nerve explained no more than 33% of the variance in FNS thresholds. For both the FNS threshold and the eCAP-to-FNS offset, the change from cathodic to anodic pulse polarity significantly reduced FNS and permitted a gain of 14-71% of the dynamic range of the eCAP response. This "anodic rescue effect" was stronger for pseudo-monophasic pulses as compared to the symmetric biphasic pulse shape. These results provide possible mechanisms underlying recent clinical interventions to alleviate FNS. The "anodic-rescue effect" may offer a non-invasive therapeutic option for FNS in human CI users that should be tested clinically, preferably in combination with current-focusing methods.

The Effects of Multi-Mode Monophasic Stimulation with Capacitive Discharge on the Facial Nerve Stimulation Reduction in Young Children with Cochlear Implants: Intraoperative Recordings

Facial nerve stimulation (FNS) is a potential complication which may affect the auditory performance of children with cochlear implants (CIs). We carried out an exploratory prospective observational study to investigate the effects of the electrical stimulation pattern on FNS reduction in young children with CI. Ten ears of seven prelingually deafened children with ages up to 6 years old who undergone a unilateral or bilateral CI surgery were included in this study. Electromyographic (EMG) action potentials from orbicularis oculi muscle were recorded using monopolar biphasic stimulation (ST1) and multi-mode monophasic stimulation with capacitive discharge (ST2). Presence of EMG responses, facial nerve stimulation thresholds (T-FNS) and EMG amplitudes were compared between ST1 and ST2. Intra-cochlear electrodes placement, cochlear-nerve and electrode-nerve distances were also estimated to investigate their effects on EMG responses. The use of ST2 significantly reduced the presence of intraoperative EMG responses compared to ST1. Higher stimulation levels were required to elicit FNS with ST2, with smaller amplitudes, compared to ST1. No and weak correlation was observed between cochlea-nerve and electrode-nerve distances and EMG responses, respectively. ST2 may reduce FNS in young children with CI. Differently from the electrical stimulation pattern, the cochlea-nerve and electrode-nerve distances seem to have limited effects on FNS in this population.

The Effect of Pulse Shape and Interphase Gaps on Speech Perception and Perceived Sound Quality in Electrical Hearing

BACKGROUND

Stimulation with triphasic pulses has been shown to reduce the occurrence of unwanted facial nerve stimulation (FNS) with cochlear implants (CIs). However, there is little data available on how different pulse shapes affect the hearing outcome with electrical hearing in general. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of different stimulation pulse shapes on speech perception in noise, as well as loudness perception and subjective sound quality.

METHODS

Twenty experienced cochlear-implant users not suffering from FNS participated in a prospective single-visit study. Based on the subjects' current clinical fitting, six fitting maps with different pulse shapes (biphasic and triphasic) and different interphase gap (IPG) durations (2.1 µs, 10 µs, and 20 µs) were created. First, the loudness was balanced for each configuration by adjusting the stimulation charge amount. Then, speech perception in noise was measured with a German matrix sentence test (Oldenburg Sentence test). The perception of particular sound attributes of speech and music, as well as overall preference, was evaluated with visual analog scales.

RESULTS

Similar levels of speech perception were obtained with triphasic stimulation ( P = 0.891) and longer IPGs ( P = 0.361) compared to the subjects' clinical map settings. The stimulation amplitudes for equal loudness were significantly higher with triphasic stimulation compared to biphasic stimulation when keeping the IPG constant. Increasing the IPG had a significantly larger effect on perceived loudness ( P < 0.0001) and charge reduction for equal loudness with triphasic pulses compared to biphasic pulses. Triphasic configuration showed lower overall subjective sound quality ratings than biphasic for speech intelligibility, clarity, naturalness, and overall preference, as well as for music naturalness, and overall preference in the acute setting without adaptation time. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons against the clinical map revealed significantly lower speech naturalness ratings for triphasic with 2.1 µs IPG and for triphasic with 20 µs IPG only.

CONCLUSION

Although some sound quality attributes were rated lower compared to the clinical map in the acute test setting, stimulation with triphasic pulses does not affect speech perception in noise and can be considered as a valuable option in CI fitting.

Cochlear re-implantation with the use of multi-mode grounding associated with anodic monophasic pulses to manage abnormal facial nerve stimulation

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cochlear re-implantation using multi-mode grounding stimulation associated with anodic monophasic pulses to manage abnormal facial nerve stimulation (AFNS) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Methods: Retrospective case report. An adult CI recipient with severe AFNS and decrease in auditory performance was re-implanted with a new CI device to change the pulse shape and stimulation mode. Patient's speech perception scores and AFNS were compared before and after cochlear re-implantation, using monopolar stimulation associated with cathodic biphasic pulses and multi-mode stimulation mode associated to anodic monophasic pulses, respectively. The insertion depth angle and the electrode-nerve distances were also investigated, before and after cochlear re-implantation. Results: AFNS was resolved, and the speech recognition scores rapidly increased in the first year after cochlear re-implantation while remaining stable. After cochlear re-implantation, the e15 and e20 electrodes showed shorter electrode-nerve distances compared to their correspondent e4 and e7 electrodes, which induced AFNS in the first implantation. Conclusions: Cochlear re-implantation with multi-mode grounding stimulation associated with anodic monophasic pulses was an effective strategy for managing AFNS. The patient's speech perception scores rapidly improved and AFNS was not detected four years after cochlear re-implantation.

Application of intentional facial nerve stimulation during cochlear implantation as an electrophysiological tool to estimate the intracochlear electrode position

This proof of concept describes the use of evoked electromyographic (EMG) activation of the facial nerve for intraoperative monitoring of the electrode insertion during cochlear implantation (CI). Intraoperative EMG measurements from the facial nerve were conducted in nine patients undergoing CI implantation. Electric current pulses were emitted from contacts on the CI array during and immediately after electrode insertion. For control, the results of EMG measurements were compared to postoperative flat panel volume computed tomography scans with secondary reconstruction (fpVCT_SECO). During insertion, the EMG response evoked by the electrical stimulation from the CI was growing with the stimulating contact approaching the facial nerve and declined with increasing distance. After full insertion, contacts on the apical half of the CI array stimulated higher EMG responses compared with those on the basal half. Comparison with postoperative imaging demonstrated that electrode contacts stimulating high EMG responses had the shortest distances to the facial nerve. It could be demonstrated that electrically evoked EMG activation of the facial nerve can be used to monitor the progress during CI electrode insertion and to control the intracochlear electrode position after full insertion.

In vivo closed-loop control of a locust's leg using nerve stimulation

Activity of an innervated tissue can be modulated based on an acquired biomarker through feedback loops. How to convert this biomarker into a meaningful stimulation pattern is still a topic of intensive research. In this article, we present a simple closed-loop mechanism to control the mean angle of a locust’s leg in real time by modulating the frequency of the stimulation on its extensor motor nerve. The nerve is interfaced with a custom-designed cuff electrode and the feedback loop is implemented online with a proportional control algorithm, which runs solely on a microcontroller without the need of an external computer. The results show that the system can be controlled with a single-input, single-output feedback loop. The model described in this article can serve as a primer for young researchers to learn about neural control in biological systems before applying these concepts in advanced systems. We expect that the approach can be advanced to achieve control over more complex movements by increasing the number of recorded biomarkers and selective stimulation units.

Management of Severe Facial Nerve Cross Stimulation by Cochlear Implant Replacement to Change Pulse Shape and Grounding Configuration: A Case-series

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the combined effect of changing pulse shape and grounding configuration to manage facial nerve stimulation (FNS) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients.

PATIENTS

Three adult CI recipients with severe FNS were offered a replacement implant when standard stimulation strategies and programming adjustments did not resolve symptoms. Our hypothesis was that the facial nerve was less likely to be activated when using anodic pulses with "mixed-mode" intra-cochlear and extra-cochlear current return.

INTERVENTION

All patients were reimplanted with an implant that uses a pseudo-monophasic anodic pulse shape, with mixed-mode grounding (stimulus mixed-mode anodic)-the Neuro Zti CI (Oticon Medical). This device also allows measurements of neural function and loudness with monopolar, symmetric biphasic pulses (stimulus MB), the clinical standard used by most CIs as a comparison.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The combined effect of pulse shape and grounding configuration on FNS was monitored during surgery. Following CI activation, FNS symptoms and performance with the Neuro Zti implant were compared with outcomes before reimplantation.

RESULTS

FNS could only be recorded using stimulus MB for all patients. In clinical use, all patients reported reduced FNS and showed an improvement in Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences recognition compared with immediately before reimplantation. Bamford-Kowal-Bench scores with a male speaker were lower compared with measurements taken before the onset of severe FNS for patients 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients where CI auditory performance was severely limited by FNS, charge-balanced pseudo-monophasic stimulation mode with a mixed-mode grounding configuration limited FNS and improved loudness percept compared with standard biphasic stimulation with monopolar grounding.

Polarity Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers Based on Pulse Shape, Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategy and Array

Neural health is of great interest to determine individual degeneration patterns for improving speech perception in cochlear implant (CI) users. Therefore, in recent years, several studies tried to identify and quantify neural survival in CI users. Among all proposed techniques, polarity sensitivity is a promising way to evaluate the neural status of auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) in CI users. Nevertheless, investigating neural health based on polarity sensitivity is a challenging and complicated task that involves various parameters, and the outcomes of many studies show contradictory results of polarity sensitivity behavior. Our computational study benefits from an accurate three-dimensional finite element model of a human cochlea with realistic human ANFs and determined ANF degeneration pattern of peripheral part with a diminishing of axon diameter and myelination thickness based on degeneration levels. In order to see how different parameters may impact the polarity sensitivity behavior of ANFs, we investigated polarity behavior under the application of symmetric and asymmetric pulse shapes, monopolar and multipolar CI stimulation strategies, and a perimodiolar and lateral CI array system. Our main findings are as follows: (1) action potential (AP) initiation sites occurred mainly in the peripheral site in the lateral system regardless of stimulation strategies, pulse polarities, pulse shapes, cochlear turns, and ANF degeneration levels. However, in the perimodiolar system, AP initiation sites varied between peripheral and central processes, depending on stimulation strategies, pulse shapes, and pulse polarities. (2) In perimodiolar array, clusters formed in threshold values based on cochlear turns and degeneration levels for multipolar strategies only when asymmetric pulses were applied. (3) In the perimodiolar array, a declining trend in polarity (anodic threshold/cathodic threshold) with multipolar strategies was observed between intact or slight degenerated cases and more severe degenerated cases, whereas in the lateral array, cathodic sensitivity was noticed for intact and less degenerated cases and anodic sensitivity for cases with high degrees of degeneration. Our results suggest that a combination of asymmetric pulse shapes, focusing more on multipolar stimulation strategies, as well as considering the distances to the modiolus wall, allows us to distinguish the degeneration patterns of ANFs across the cochlea.

Apical Reference Stimulation: A Possible Solution to Facial Nerve Stimulation

OBJECTIVES

Postimplantation facial nerve stimulation is a common side-effect of intracochlear electrical stimulation. Facial nerve stimulation occurs when electric current intended to stimulate the auditory nerve, spread beyond the cochlea to excite the nearby facial nerve, causing involuntarily facial muscle contractions. Facial nerve stimulation can often be resolved through adjustments in speech processor fitting but, in some instances, these measures exhibit limited benefit or may have a detrimental effect on speech perception. In this study, apical reference stimulation mode was investigated as a potential intervention to facial nerve stimulation. Apical reference stimulation is a bipolar stimulation strategy in which the most apical electrode is used as the reference electrode for stimulation on all the other intracochlear electrodes.

DESIGN

A person-specific model of the human cochlea, facial nerve and electrode array, coupled with a neural model, was used to predict excitation of auditory and facial nerve fibers. These predictions were used to evaluate the effectiveness in reducing facial nerve stimulation using apical reference stimulation. Predictions were confirmed in psychoacoustic tests by determining auditory comfort and threshold levels for the apical reference stimulation mode while capturing electromyography data in two participants.

RESULTS

Models predicted a favorable outcome for apical reference stimulation, as facial nerve fiber thresholds were higher and auditory thresholds were lower, in direct comparison to conventional monopolar stimulation. Psychophysical tests also illustrated decreased auditory thresholds and increased dynamic range during apical reference stimulation. Furthermore, apical reference stimulation resulted in lower electromyography energy levels, compared to conventional monopolar stimulation, which suggests a reduction in facial nerve stimulation. Subjective feedback corroborated that apical reference stimulation alleviated facial nerve stimulation.

CONCLUSION

Apical reference stimulation may be a viable strategy to alleviate facial nerve stimulation considering the improvements in dynamic range and auditory thresholds, complemented with a reduction in facial nerve stimulation symptoms.

Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update

Cochlear implants (CIs) are the world's most successful sensory prosthesis and have been the subject of intense research and development in recent decades. We critically review the progress in CI research, and its success in improving patient outcomes, from the turn of the century to the present day. The review focuses on the processing, stimulation, and audiological methods that have been used to try to improve speech perception by human CI listeners, and on fundamental new insights in the response of the auditory system to electrical stimulation. The introduction of directional microphones and of new noise reduction and pre-processing algorithms has produced robust and sometimes substantial improvements. Novel speech-processing algorithms, the use of current-focusing methods, and individualised (patient-by-patient) deactivation of subsets of electrodes have produced more modest improvements. We argue that incremental advances have and will continue to be made, that collectively these may substantially improve patient outcomes, but that the modest size of each individual advance will require greater attention to experimental design and power. We also briefly discuss the potential and limitations of promising technologies that are currently being developed in animal models, and suggest strategies for researchers to collectively maximise the potential of CIs to improve hearing in a wide range of listening situations.

Effect of the Relative Timing between Same-Polarity Pulses on Thresholds and Loudness in Cochlear Implant Users

The effect of the relative timing between pairs of same-polarity monophasic pulses has been studied extensively in single-neuron animal studies and has revealed fundamental properties of the neurons. For human cochlear implant listeners, the requirement to use charge-balanced stimulation and the typical use of symmetric, biphasic pulses limits such measures, because currents of opposite polarities interact at the level of the neural membrane. Here, we propose a paradigm to study same-polarity summation of currents while keeping the stimulation charge-balanced within a short time window. We used pairs of mirrored pseudo-monophasic pulses (a long-low phase followed by a short-high phase for the first pulse and a short-high phase followed by a long-low phase for the second pulse). We assumed that most of the excitation would stem from the two adjacent short-high phases, which had the same polarity. The inter-pulse interval between the short-high phases was varied from 0 to 345 μs. The inter-pulse interval had a significant effect on the perceived loudness, and this effect was consistent with both passive (membrane-related) and active (ion-channel-related) neuronal mechanisms contributing to facilitation. Furthermore, the effect of interval interacted with the polarity of the pulse pairs. At threshold, there was an effect of polarity, but, surprisingly, no effect of interval nor an interaction between the two factors. We discuss possible peripheral origins of these results.

Evaluation of computed tomography parameters in patients with facial nerve stimulation post-cochlear implantation

PURPOSE

To compare the preoperative computed tomography (CT) parameters, including the thickness and density of the bone separating the upper basal turn of the cochlea (UBTC) and the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve (LSFN), in patients with and without facial nerve stimulation (FNS) in post-cochlear implants (CI).

METHODS

A retrospective case review of 1700 CI recipients in a tertiary referral center between January 2010 and January 2020 was performed; out of the 35 recipients who were found to have FNS, 29 were included in the study. The control group comprised the same number of randomly selected patients. CT parameters of the patients were measured independently by three fellowship-trained neuro-otologists blinded to the postoperative status of the patients. Thickness in axial and coronal views and density of the bone separating the UBTC and the LSFN were measured.

RESULT

There was satisfactory agreement between the readings of the three reviewers. The distances (in mm) between the UBTC and LSFN obtained from the coronal (0.43 ± 0.24 vs. 0.63 ± 0.2) and axial (0.42 ± 0.25 vs. 0.6 ± 0.18) views were statistically lower in the FNS group (p = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively). The density (in HU) of the bony partition was also statistically lower in the FNS group (1038 ± 821 vs. 1409 ± 519; p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Patients who experienced FNS postoperatively had significantly lower distance and bone density between the UBTC and the LSFN. This finding can help surgeons in preoperative planning in an attempt to decrease the occurrence of FNS.

Performance of cochlear implant recipients fitted with triphasic pulse patterns

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of triphasic pulse pattern stimulation strategy on the audiological performance of cochlear implant recipients with unintended facial nerve stimulation (FNS), and to compare the audiological and speech outcomes before and after switching to triphasic stimulation.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who have changed their fitting maps from biphasic to triphasic pulse pattern stimulation because of FNS after cochlear implantation (CI). All identified patients with FNS after CI from 2017 to 2019 were included in this study. The medical records of 11 patients (16 ears) were queried for demographic and radiological data, pure tone audiometry, speech reception thresholds, speech discrimination score at 65 dB, maximum comfortable levels, thresholds, and dynamic range. Then, these parameters were compared in the two conditions, biphasic and triphasic.

RESULTS

Using triphasic pulse stimulation only or combined with switch-off of few channels, complete resolution of FNS was achieved. Triphasic pulse pattern stimulation was associated with better speech discrimination scores (75.25 ± 26.13%) compared to the biphasic pulse (58.25 ± 26.13%). This triphasic strategy also showed higher maximum comfortable levels (36.62 ± 1.63 qu) than biphasic strategy (31.58 ± 2.5 qu). Moreover, the dynamic range was wider using triphasic pulse strategy. In general, the triphasic pulse pattern resulted in successful suppression of facial nerve stimulation with suitable maximum comfortable levels and better speech discrimination.

CONCLUSION

Triphasic pulse pattern stimulation is an appropriate tool in controlling FNS following cochlear implantation with wider dynamic range. We recommend that all patients with facial nerve stimulation after CI surgery be switched to a triphasic pulse program prior to considering further surgery.

Device profile of the MED-EL cochlear implant system for hearing loss: overview of its safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Patients suffering from severe to profound hearing loss or even deafness can achieve a hearing improvement with a cochlear implant (CI) treatment that is significantly higher than the results achieved with conventional hearing aids. The CI system consists of an implantable stimulator, which is inserted retro-auricularly into the mastoid, and an externally worn processor unit, which provides the pickup of sound and processing of acoustic information as well as the power supply for the stimulator and internal current sources. The stimulator has an electrode array that is inserted into the cochlea.

AREAS COVERED

This is a descriptive overview of MED-EL's multichannel CI system (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), which was introduced to the European market in 1994. The continuing development of the implant as well as the external components is outlined and various other aspects (stimulation strategy, adaptation, results, reliability) are discussed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The strength of the company is the continuous pursuit of innovative ideas. This is evidenced by numerous innovations. The reliability of the implants has been continuously improved. The current SYNCHRONY models of the manufacturer show no indication of technically caused failures over an observation period of 5 years.

Investigating Facial Nerve Stimulation After Cochlear Implantation in Adult and Pediatric Recipients

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Facial nerve stimulation (FNS) can occur after cochlear implantation for a small number of recipients. This study aimed to investigate if a correlation exists between the variables involved in FNS.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort review.

METHODS

There were 32 out of 1,100 cochlear implant recipients who experienced FNS in our clinic between 2010 and 2019. The following variables were recorded from a retrospective chart review: grade of FNS, onset of FNS, the number of channels stimulating FNS, and radiological findings of abnormalities in the inner ear. Statistical analyses were performed to identify a correlation between any of the variables involved. The techniques used to reduce FNS were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eleven adult ears had progressive hearing loss, three had idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and one congenital SNHL. All pediatric ears were diagnosed with congenital SNHL, except for one ear with idiopathic sudden SNHL. The grade of FNS ranged from mild stimulation or slight motion in the eye, mouth, nasolabial, or forehead regions (n = 8) to total severe stimulation of the facial musculature and/or severe pain (n = 3). The onset of FNS occurred immediately after activation for nine ears, and up to 16 months later for the other subjects. A significant correlation was observed between the number of channels stimulating FNS, the grade of FNS, and the radiological findings of the inner ear. FNS was completely resolved for 30 ears and partially resolved for two ears.

CONCLUSIONS

FNS can occur any time after cochlear implantation and can affect both adult and pediatric. However, it can be effectively resolved using specific fitting techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c Laryngoscope, 131:374-379, 2021.

Effects of the relative timing of opposite-polarity pulses on loudness for cochlear implant listeners

The symmetric biphasic pulses used in contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) consist of both cathodic and anodic currents, which may stimulate different sites on spiral ganglion neurons and, potentially, interact with each other. The effect on the order of anodic and cathodic stimulation on loudness at short inter-pulse intervals (IPIs; 0-800 μs) is investigated. Pairs of opposite-polarity pseudomonophasic (PS) pulses were used and the amplitude of each pulse was manipulated independently. In experiment 1 the two PS pulses differed in their current level in order to elicit the same loudness when presented separately. Six users of the Advanced Bionics CI (Valencia, CA) loudness-ranked trains of the pulse pairs using a midpoint-comparison procedure. Stimuli with anodic-leading polarity were louder than those with cathodic-leading polarity for IPIs shorter than 400 μs. This effect was small-about 0.3 dB-but consistent across listeners. When the same procedure was repeated with both PS pulses having the same current level (experiment 2), anodic-leading stimuli were still louder than cathodic-leading stimuli at very short intervals. However, when using symmetric biphasic pulses (experiment 3) the effect disappeared at short intervals and reversed at long intervals. Possible peripheral sources of such polarity interactions are discussed.