Incidence for Tip Foldover During Cochlear Implantation

The Role of Routine Plain Film Imaging Post Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of routine post-op X-ray in cochlear implantation patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review study.

SETTING

Primary or revision cochlear implant patients who had routine postoperative X-ray (XR) or had planned postoperative computed tomography (CT) due to clinical concerns for array malposition.

METHODS

All images were reviewed, and those were considered abnormal if there was a bent tip, kinking, incomplete insertion, or if the electrode array didn't follow the expected cochlear curvature. Postoperative CT scans were performed in patients with abnormal postoperation X-ray, or if there were abnormal surgical findings encountered during insertion which raised the suspicion for suboptimal placement.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients with a mean age of 64.8 ± 18.9 years were included. XRs were performed in 188 patients and others had CT scan from the beginning. Only 2 out of 188 patients had abnormal findings on XR, which showed malposition of the electrode in one patient and a tip fold over and incomplete insertion in the other one. Both patients with abnormal findings had labyrinthitis ossificans. The patient with tip fold over ultimately underwent re-implantation. Another patient with incomplete insertion had required extended basal turn drilling during implantation, and no additional measures were taken.

CONCLUSION

Routine XR findings did not provide the reason for additional intervention, and its benefit for patients without demonstrable cochlear abnormalities was minimal. Post-op XR can be informative in selected high risk patients, but CT imaging is a reasonable alternative to better define anatomic array location in patients particularly at risk.

[Fitting of cochlear implant systems]

The technical fitting of cochlear implant (CI) systems is a central component of the CI care process. On the one hand, this consists of a standardized procedure, while on the other, the individual needs of the patient are taken into account. It starts with the "initial fitting" during basic therapy, where the initial focus is on achieving a satisfactory impression of sound and loudness. In the follow-up therapy, fine adjustment is carried out to achieve the best possible speech perception in quiet and in noise. The aim is to individually adjust the CI processor to audiological targets. The fitting is carried out by a specially qualified professional in accordance with the German CI fitting guidelines and takes into account anatomical conditions, electrophysiological measurements, and audiological evaluation data. The CI fitting should maintain hearing and speech perception throughout life, thus ensuring a significant improvement in quality of life. In children, achieving the best possible CI fitting is fundamental to facilitating normal speech development.

Characterization of Tip Fold-Over Using Fluoroscopy and Intracochlear Pressure in Cadaver Specimens

OBJECTIVES

Cochlear implant array malpositioning is associated with impaired speech perception, vertigo, and facial nerve stimulation. Tip fold-over is a subset of malpositioning that occurs more often with perimodiolar electrodes, but historically it has not been characterized due to lack of knowledge regarding electrode movements of the electrode within the cochlea. The aim of this study was to characterize the mechanics of tip fold-over events and their associated insertion pressure profiles.

METHODS

Cadaveric human heads were surgically prepared with a mastoidectomy and facial recess. Fiberoptic pressure sensors were inserted into the scala vestibuli and tympani to measure intracochlear pressures. Perimodiolar CI electrodes (Cochlear Slim-Modiolar, CI532) were inserted via round window under fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

Three types of tip fold-over events were observed: anterior-posterior C-shaped, medial-lateral C-shaped, and S-shaped roll-overs. The largest transient pressures occurred with anterior-posterior and S-type roll-over, and were associated with rotation or twisting inside the cochlea.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate at least three subtypes of tip fold-overs. Elevated pressure transients were noted before and during the tip fold-over event related to electrode twisting. The characterization of tip fold-over into subtypes is novel and may aid identification of tip fold-over events intraoperatively in the future. It remains important to identify tip fold-over events, and they should be recognized early using a multimodal verification system. Further investigation is still required to determine the significance of these changes and other possible patterns of intracochlear electrode movement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA: Cadaver study Laryngoscope, 135:1795-1802, 2025.

Cochlear implantation with Slim Modiolar Electrode carriers enables hearing preservation

PURPOSE

To investigate hearing preservation in patients who received a cochlear implant with a preformed electrode carrier, namely the Slim Modiolar (SM).

METHODS

A monocentric, retrospective study was conducted. A total of 51 adult patients (24 females, 27 males), representing 60 ears, were included in the final evaluation. The mean age was 60.9 ± 15.2 years (range 17.5-89.7 years). All patients had some degree of residual hearing. Frequency-specific pure-tone audiometry was performed at three time points: preoperatively (T0), within 30 days postoperatively (T1), and at a later time point during follow-up (T2; 20.7 ± 17.6 months). Low frequency pure tone average and the HEARRING group formula were used to facilitate comparison of hearing preservation rates with other results published so far.

RESULTS

In the first month after surgery, no significant deterioration was observed for the low frequencies, but a significant deterioration was observed at follow-up. Using the HEARRING classification system, the average short-term (T0-T1) hearing preservation score was 70%, which corresponds to partial hearing preservation. During follow-up (T0-T2), the score decreased to 61% in the study group, still representing partial hearing preservation. Complete hearing loss occurred in 20% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Especially in the low frequency range, the utilisation of SM electrode carriers during cochlear implantation facilitates preservation of residual hearing.

Influence of surgeon experience on the incidence of tip fold-over with slim preformed cochlear implant electrodes

PURPOSE

To assess whether increasing experience with implantation of a thin preformed electrode array for perimodiolar insertion reduces the incidence of tip fold-over (TFO).

METHODS

The retrospective study included 100 patients who received a cochlear implant (CI) with the Slim Modiolar (SM) electrode array (Cochlear, Sydney, Australia) at a university CI centre between November 2015 and December 2022. Postoperative radiological imaging was performed to verify electrode position. Surgical reports and radiological images were reviewed and the incidence of TFO was analyzed for three experienced CI surgeons. In addition, the incidence of intraoperative measurements showing evidence of electrode malposition and the mean duration of surgery over time were documented.

RESULTS

129 SM implantations in 100 patients were included. In seven cases (5.4%) TFO was radiologically detected and successfully revised. In eight cases (6.2%), electrophysiological measurements indicated misplacement and the position was corrected during the same surgery. For one surgeon, five out of 67 implantations (7.5%) were affected by TFO, with the frequency of this complication decreasing over time. The average surgery time for all surgeons was 122.2 (± 44.2) minutes, with two surgeons showing a decrease over time.

CONCLUSION

The results show a tendency that the SM electrodes can be implanted with a lower complication rate and faster over time. Therefore, it can be assumed that the implantation of the SM electrode requires a certain amount of practice, even for experienced surgeons. As intraoperative electrophysiological measurements detected 71.4% of all radiologically confirmed TFOs, their use is highly recommended.

Transimpedance Matrix Measurement (TIM) Parameters Evaluation for the Assessment of Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement and Modiolar Proximity in Children

Introduction: Transimpedance matrix measurement (TIM) is an electrophysiological measurement protocol of the impedance patterns of electrode contacts within the cochlea. Several studies have reported that TIM is an effective tool for the identification of abnormal electrode array placement. However, the normative values for properly inserted electrodes, as well as correlation of the TIM patterns with the electrode position, are not completely determined. Objectives: The first aim of this study is to establish normative values of TIM measurements obtained in children with proper electrode array insertion and tip fold-over, with proper inner ear anatomy and in congenital anomalies. The second aim of this study is to compare TIM measurements in Slim Modiolar (SM) and in Contour Advance (CA) electrodes, as their position is different according to the modiolus proximity. Methods: A total of 55 pediatric patients were included in the study and underwent cochlear implantation. 62 intraoperative measurements were conducted in this group-50 in children with normal inner ear anatomy and 12 in children with inner ear malformations. After each implantation, a plain x-ray was obtained. Results: There were clear statistically significant differences in TIM patterns in patients where electrode fold-over was confirmed and between SM and CA electrodes. Conclusions: TIM is a promising technique for intraoperative analysis of electrode placement. TIM patterns differ and correlate consistently with the different models of array implanted. This study is the first to report TIM patterns observed in children with normal inner ear anatomy and in inner ear malformations.

Transimpedance Matrix Can Be Used to Estimate Electrode Positions Intraoperatively and to Monitor Their Positional Changes Postoperatively in Cochlear Implant Patients

OBJECTIVE

Accurate positioning of the electrode array during cochlear implant (CI) surgery is crucial for achieving optimal hearing outcomes. Traditionally, postoperative radiological imaging has been used to assess electrode position. Transimpedance matrix (TIM) measurements have also emerged as a promising method for assessing electrode position. This involves utilizing electric field imaging to create an electric distance matrix by analyzing voltage variations among adjacent electrodes. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using intraoperative TIM measurements to estimate electrode position and monitor postoperative changes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University Medical center, tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing CI (CI622) surgery between January 2019 and June 2022.

INTERVENTION

CI electrode positions and maximal angular insertion depths (maxAID) were determined using X-ray imaging according to Stenvers' projection. The mean gradient phase (MGP) was extracted from the TIM, and a correlation between the MGP and maxAID was examined. A model was then built to estimate the maxAID using the MGP, and changes in electrode location over time were assessed using this model.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Twenty-four patients were included in this study. A positive correlation between the maxAID and the MGP ( R = 0.7, p = 0.0001) was found. The established model was able to predict the maxAID with an accuracy of 27.7 ± 4.4°. Comparing intraoperative and postoperative TIM measurements, a decrease of 24.1° ± 10.7° in maxAID over time was observed.

CONCLUSION

TIM measurements are useful for estimating the insertion depth of the electrode and monitoring changes in the electrode's position over time.

Changes in Revision Cochlear Implantation and Device Failure Profiles

OBJECTIVES

As cochlear implantation (CI) experiences rapid innovations and its indications expand, the characteristics of revision CI (RCI) are evolving. This study investigated changes in the RCI profile and explored their clinical implications.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all CIs performed at a tertiary medical institution between October 2001 and January 2023. The rates of and reasons for RCI were evaluated in relation to the manufacturer and device model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to examine cumulative and device survival curves. Cumulative and device survival rates were additionally analyzed based on age group, period of primary CI, and manufacturer. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate the association between RCI and the device manufacturer.

RESULTS

Among 1,430 CIs, 73 (5.1%) required RCI. The predominant reason for RCI was device failure (40 of 73 RCIs [54.8%]), with an overall device failure rate of 2.8%. This was followed by flap-associated problems and migration (nine of 73 RCIs each [12.3%]). Flap retention issues emerged as a new cause in three cases (two involving the CI 632 and one involving the SYNCHRONY 2 implant), and six instances of electrode tip fold-over arose (four for the CI 600 series and two for the CI 500 series). The overall 10-year cumulative and device survival rates were 93.4% and 95.8%, respectively. After excluding models with recall issues, significant differences in cumulative (P =0.010) and device (P =0.001) survival rates were observed across manufacturers.

CONCLUSION

While the overall CI survival rate is stable, device failure persists as the predominant reason for RCI. Moreover, the types of complications leading to revision (including issues with flap retention and electrode tip fold-over) have shifted, particularly for newer implant models. Given the clinical importance of device failure and subsequent reoperation, clinicians should remain informed about and responsive to these trends.

Utility of Intraoperative Radiographs in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of intraoperative radiographs to confirm electrode position following pediatric cochlear implantation (CI).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Single tertiary care pediatric center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted, including all pediatric patients undergoing CI at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh over a 13-year period.

RESULTS

We identified 326 patients undergoing 492 procedures. Across the cohort, there were 7 cases that required intraoperative electrode reinsertion due to malposition or presumed malposition. For 6 of the 7 cases, intraoperative X-ray identified electrode malposition. Neural response telemetry (NRT) testing was also abnormal for 4 of these cases prior to reinsertion. Implantation of Cochlear's Slim Modiolar electrode was associated with an abnormal perioperative X-ray (odds ratio [OR]: 9.2, p = 0.03) and increased change in management (OR: 9.2, p = 0.03) compared to Cochlear's Contour Advance (CA). Incidence of abnormal X-rays was 1.24% overall, 4% in the Slim Modiolar group, and 0.3% in the CA group. The Slim Modiolar electrode accounted for 4 of 7 cases requiring reinsertion, and in all 4 of these cases, electrode fold-over was identified on the X-ray. NRT was normal in 1 of these 4 cases.

CONCLUSION

The use of Cochlear's Slim Modiolar electrode was associated with a significantly increased risk of abnormal intraoperative X-ray compared to the CA electrode. Given the risk of fold-over with routine insertion and normal electrical testing using the Slim Modiolar electrode, we recommend routine use of intraoperative skull X-ray to confirm electrode position.

Cochlear Implant Fold Detection in Intra-operative CT Using Weakly Supervised Multi-task Deep Learning

In cochlear implant (CI) procedures, an electrode array is surgically inserted into the cochlea. The electrodes are used to stimulate the auditory nerve and restore hearing sensation for the recipient. If the array folds inside the cochlea during the insertion procedure, it can lead to trauma, damage to the residual hearing, and poor hearing restoration. Intraoperative detection of such a case can allow a surgeon to perform reimplantation. However, this intraoperative detection requires experience and electrophysiological tests sometimes fail to detect an array folding. Due to the low incidence of array folding, we generated a dataset of CT images with folded synthetic electrode arrays with realistic metal artifact. The dataset was used to train a multitask custom 3D-UNet model for array fold detection. We tested the trained model on real post-operative CTs (7 with folded arrays and 200 without). Our model could correctly classify all the fold-over cases while misclassifying only 3 non fold-over cases. Therefore, the model is a promising option for array fold detection.

Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function

The cochlear implant (CI) is widely considered to be one of the most innovative and successful neuroprosthetic treatments developed to date. Although outcomes vary, CIs are able to effectively improve hearing in nearly all recipients and can substantially improve speech understanding and quality of life for patients with significant hearing loss. A wealth of research has focused on underlying factors that contribute to success with a CI, and recent evidence suggests that the overall health of the cochlea could potentially play a larger role than previously recognized. This article defines and reviews attributes of cochlear health and describes procedures to evaluate cochlear health in humans and animal models in order to examine the effects of cochlear health on performance with a CI. Lastly, we describe how future biologic approaches can be used to preserve and/or enhance cochlear health in order to maximize performance for individual CI recipients.

Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer

OBJECTIVE

Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays have demonstrated superior audiometric outcomes compared with straight electrodes in a handful of studies. However, previous comparisons have often failed to account for preoperative hearing and age. This study compares hearing outcomes for precurved and straight electrodes by a single manufacturer while controlling for these and other factors in a large cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Two hundred thirty-one adult CI recipients between 2015 and 2021 with cochlear (Sydney, Australia) 522/622 (straight) or 532/632 (precurved) electrode arrays.

INTERVENTIONS

Postactivation speech recognition and audiometric testing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech recognition testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant word [CNCw] and AzBio) was collected at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Hearing preservation was characterized by a low-frequency pure-tone average shift, or the change between preoperative and postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-one patients (253 ears) with 6-month and/or 12-month CNCw or AzBio testing were included. One hundred forty-nine (59%) and 104 (41%) ears were implanted with straight and precurved electrode arrays, respectively. Average age at implantation was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-77 y). There was no significant difference in mean age between groups. CNCw scores were significantly different ( p = 0.001) between straight (51%; IQR, 36-67%) and precurved arrays (64%; IQR, 48-72%). AzBio scores were not significantly different ( p = 0.081) between straight (72%; IQR, 51-87%) and precurved arrays (81%; IQR, 57-90%). Controlling for age, race, sex, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time, precurved electrode arrays performed significantly better on CNCw (b = 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-16.0; p < 0.001) and AzBio (b = 8.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-16.0;, p = 0.014) testing. Hearing preservation was not different between electrodes on adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

During the study period, patients undergoing placement of precurved electrode arrays had significantly higher CNC and AzBio scores than patients receiving straight electrodes, even after controlling for age, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time.

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED

Understanding the difference in audiometric outcomes between precurved and straight electrode arrays will help to guide electrode selection.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

To understand differences in speech recognition scores postoperatively by electrode array type (precurved versus straight).

DESIRED RESULT

To demonstrate a difference in hearing performance postoperatively by electrode type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

INDICATE IRB OR IACUC

Approved by the Institutional IRB (090155).

Misplaced Cochlear Implant Electrodes Outside the Cochlea: A Literature Review and Presentation of Radiological and Electrophysiological Findings

HYPOTHESIS

It is possible to detect when misplacement and malposition of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array has occurred intraoperatively through different investigations. We aim to explore the literature surrounding cochlear implant misplacements and share our personal experience with such cases to formulate a quick-reference guide that may be able to help cochlear implant teams detect misplacements early.

BACKGROUND

Misplacement and malposition of a cochlear implant array can lead to poor hearing outcomes. Where misplacements go undetected during the primary surgery, patients may undergo further surgery to replace the implant array into the correct intracochlear position.

METHODS

Systematic literature review on cochlear implant misplacements and malpositions and a retrospective review of our program's cases in over 6,000 CI procedures.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cases of CI misplacements are reported in the English literature. Sixteen cases of cochlear implant misplacements are reported from our institution with a rate of 0.28%. A further 12 cases of intracochlear malpositions are presented. The electrophysiological (CI electrically evoked auditory brainstem response, transimpedance matrix) and radiological (X-ray and computed tomography scan) findings from our experience are displayed in a tabulated quick-reference guide to show the possible characteristics of misplaced and malpositioned cochlear implant electrode arrays.

CONCLUSION

Both intraoperative electrophysiological and radiological tests can show when the array has been misplaced or if there is an intracochlear malposition, to prompt timely intra-operative reinsertion to yield better outcomes for patients.

Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events

Background and Objective

The cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion process is a key step in CI surgery. One of the aims of advances in robotic-assisted CI surgery (RACIS) is to realize better cochlear structure preservation and to precisely control insertion. The aim of this literature review is to gain insight into electrode selection for RACIS by acquiring a thorough knowledge of electrode insertion and related complications from classic CI surgery involving a manual electrode insertion process.

Methods

A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to find relevant literature on electrode tip fold over (ETFO), electrode scalar deviation (ESD), and electrode migration (EM) from both pre-shaped and straight electrode types.

Results

A total of 82 studies that include 8,603 ears implanted with a CI, i.e., pre-shaped (4,869) and straight electrodes (3,734), were evaluated. The rate of ETFO (25 studies, 2,335 ears), ESD (39 studies, 3,073 ears), and EM (18 studies, 3,195 ears) was determined. An incidence rate (±95% CI) of 5.38% (4.4-6.6%) of ETFO, 28.6% (26.6-30.6%) of ESD, and 0.53% (0.2-1.1%) of EM is associated with pre-shaped electrodes, whereas with straight electrodes it was 0.51% (0.1-1.3%), 11% (9.2-13.0%), and 3.2% (2.5-3.95%), respectively. The differences between the pre-shaped and straight electrode types are highly significant (p < 0.001). Laboratory experiments show evidence that robotic insertions of electrodes are less traumatic than manual insertions. The influence of round window (RW) vs. cochleostomy (Coch) was not assessed.

Conclusion

Considering the current electrode designs available and the reported incidence of insertion complications, the use of straight electrodes in RACIS and conventional CI surgery (and manual insertion) appears to be less traumatic to intracochlear structures compared with pre-shaped electrodes. However, EM of straight electrodes should be anticipated. RACIS has the potential to reduce these complications.

Variations in microanatomy of the human modiolus require individualized cochlear implantation

Cochlear variability is of key importance for the clinical use of cochlear implants, the most successful neuroprosthetic device that is surgically placed into the cochlear scala tympani. Despite extensive literature on human cochlear variability, few information is available on the variability of the modiolar wall. In the present study, we analyzed 108 corrosion casts, 95 clinical cone beam computer tomographies (CTs) and 15 µCTs of human cochleae and observed modiolar variability of similar and larger extent than the lateral wall variability. Lateral wall measures correlated with modiolar wall measures significantly. ~ 49% of the variability had a common cause. Based on these data we developed a model of the modiolar wall variations and related the model to the design of cochlear implants aimed for perimodiolar locations. The data demonstrate that both the insertion limits relevant for lateral wall damage (approximate range of 4–9 mm) as well as the dimensions required for optimal perimodiolar placement of the electrode (the point of release from the straightener; approximate range of 2–5mm) are highly interindividually variable. The data demonstrate that tip fold-overs of preformed implants likely result from the morphology of the modiolus (with radius changing from base to apex), and that optimal cochlear implantation of perimodiolar arrays cannot be guaranteed without an individualized surgical technique.

Evaluation of a Transimpedance Matrix Algorithm to Detect Anomalous Cochlear Implant Electrode Position

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Transimpedance measurements from cochlear implant electrodes have the potential to identify anomalous electrode array placement, such as tip fold-over (TFO) or fold-back, basal electrode kinking, or buckling. Analysing transimpedance may thus replace intraoperative or post-operative radiological imaging to detect any potential misplacements. A transimpedance algorithm was previously developed to detect deviations from a normal electrode position with the aim of intraoperatively detecting TFO. The algorithm had been calibrated on 35 forced, tip folded electrode arrays in six temporal bones to determine the threshold criterion required to achieve a sensitivity of 100%. Our primary objective here was to estimate the specificity of this TFO algorithm in patients, in a prospective study, for a series of electrode arrays shown to be normally inserted by post-operative imaging. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Intracochlear voltages were intraoperatively recorded for 157 ears, using Cochlear’s Custom Sound™ EP 5 electrophysiological software (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia), for both Nucleus® CI512 and CI532 electrode arrays. The algorithm analysed the recorded 22 × 22 transimpedance matrix (TIM) and results were displayed as a heatmap intraoperatively, only visible to the technician in the operating theatre. After all clinical data were collected, the algorithm was evaluated on the bench. The algorithm measures the transimpedance gradients and corresponding phase angles (θ) throughout the TIM and calculates the gradient phase range. If this was greater than the predetermined threshold, the algorithm classified the electrode array insertion as having a TFO. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Five ears had no intraoperative TIM and four anomalous matrices were identified from heatmaps and removed from the specificity analysis. Using the 148 remaining data sets (<i>n</i> = 103 CI532 and <i>n</i> = 45 CI512), the algorithm had an average specificity of 98.6% (95.80%–99.75%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The algorithm was found to be an effective screening tool for the identification of TFOs. Its specificity was within acceptable levels and resulted in a positive predictive value of 76%, with an estimated incidence of fold-over of 4% in perimodiolar arrays. This would mean 3 out of 4 cases flagged as a fold-over would be correctly identified by the algorithm, with the other being a false positive. The measurements were applied easily in theatre allowing it to be used as a routine clinical tool for confirming correct electrode placement.

Cochlear Implant Electrode Tip Fold-Over: Our Experience With Long and Flexible Electrode

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate if there is any incidence of electrode tip fold-over with 31.5 mm long and flexible lateral wall electrodes implanted in two high-volume Cochlear Implant (CI) centers in Germany. In addition, a detailed literature review was performed to capture all the peer-reviewed publications reporting on tip fold-over with CI electrodes from different CI brands for comparison.

METHODS

Post-operative X-ray images of FLEX SOFT electrode from MED-EL in Stenver's view were retrospectively investigated for the presence of electrode tip fold-over from 378 consecutive cases in two high-volume CI centers in Germany. All patients were implanted between 2010 and 2018 by three individual experienced CI surgeons using round window and extended round window approach for CI electrode insertion. A literature review was performed following a thorough PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) search using the keywords "cochlear implant electrode tip fold-over" or "cochlear implant electrode tip roll-over" to capture articles that were published until December 2020 in English language only. Articles selection was based on electrode-related issues investigated only in-patient cases applying imaging modality. Those studies investigated tip fold-over in cadaveric temporal bones and cases with inner-ear malformation excluded.

RESULTS

No single case of tip fold-over was clinically detected from the retrospective investigation of post-operative X-ray images from 378 consecutive cases. The electrode angular insertion depth as measured applying the cochlear coordinate system, varied from a minimum of 560° to a maximum of 720°. The literature review on the tip fold-over issue resulted in 24 peer-reviewed published articles in total. Tip fold-over with pre-curved modiolar-hugging electrodes was reported in 85 cases out of 1,606 implantations making an incidence rate of 5.3%. With the straight lateral wall electrodes, the tip fold-over was reported in four cases out of 398 implantations making an incidence rate of 1%, not including the number of implantations reported in the current study. Otherwise it would be 0.5%.

CONCLUSION

Electrode tip fold-over with 31.5 mm long flexible lateral wall electrodes is highly exceptional and this can be generalized to any of the straight lateral wall electrodes from any CI brand. The literature review on tip fold-over revealed an incidence rate of 5.3% with pre-curved or modiolar-hugging electrodes and 1% with straight lateral wall electrodes from CI brands. Including this series of 0% tip fold-over, the incidence rate of electrode tip fold-over with LW electrode type would be 0.5%.

Comparison Between Transimpedance Matrix (TIM) Measurement and X-ray Fluoroscopy for Intraoperative Electrode Array Tip Fold-Over Detection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare Transimpedance Matrix (TIM-) measurement and X-ray fluoroscopy for the intraoperative detection of electrode array tip fold-over in cochlear implant recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective agreement study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty-two patients (47 ears) consecutively implanted with the Slim Modiolar Electrode.

INTERVENTIONS

Five raters, with different levels of clinical experience, individually retrospectively evaluated the TIM-heatmaps and X-ray fluoroscopy images of all patients included in this study for electrode array tip fold-over.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Agreement between raters' individual evaluation and the diagnosis given during clinical intraoperative evaluation for both modalities, as well as the inter-method agreement between TIM-measurement and fluoroscopy, and the inter-rater agreement for both modalities.

RESULTS

A tip fold-over was found in three of the forty-seven implantations (6.4%) included in this study. The average agreement between raters' evaluation and the intraoperative evaluation was 88% (Cohens κ = 0.378) for fluoroscopy and 99% (Cohens κ = 0.915) for TIM-measurement. Two raters misdiagnosed at least one tip fold-over as being correctly positioned when evaluating the fluoroscopy images (1/3 and 3/3, respectively). Each of the raters correctly detected all three tip fold-overs using the TIM-heatmaps. The inter-rater agreement for fluoroscopy was classified as "fair" (Fleiss' κ = 0.286), while the inter-rater agreement for TIM-measurement was classified as "near-perfect" (Fleiss' κ = 0.850).

CONCLUSIONS

TIM-measurement has a high potential to replace X-ray fluoroscopy for intraoperatively detecting electrode array tip fold-over in cochlear implantation, especially in patients implanted with flexible, precurved arrays.

Electrocochleography Observations in a Series of Cochlear Implant Electrode Tip Fold-Overs

OBJECTIVE

Tip fold-over is a rare but serious complication of cochlear implant (CI) surgery. The purpose of this study was to present intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG) observations in a series of CI electrode tip fold-overs.

PATIENTS

Five pediatric subjects undergoing CI surgery through a round window (RW) approach with a perimodiolar electrode array, who were diagnosed with either auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder or enlarged vestibular aqueduct.

INTERVENTIONS

Intraoperative RW ECochG during CI surgery: tone burst stimuli were presented from 95 to 110 dB SPL.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Magnitude and phase characteristics of ECochG responses obtained intraoperatively before and immediately after electrode insertion were examined for patients with and without tip fold-over.

RESULTS

Three subjects presented with tip fold-over and two formed the control group. Among fold-over cases, one participant exhibited an inversion in the starting phase of the cochlear microphonic response and a decrease in spectral magnitude from pre- to postinsertion. Both subjects who did not exhibit a change in phase had an increase in the ECochG-total response (ECochG-TR) magnitude. No case in the control group exhibited a change in starting phase. In regard to the ECochG-TR, all controls showed a decrease in the magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the small number of patients, heterogeneous ECochG response patterns were observed within the fold-over group. Though these results are not conclusive, they can serve as a framework to begin to understand ECochG's utility in detecting intraoperative tip fold-over.

Transimpedance Matrix (TIM) Measurement for the Detection of Intraoperative Electrode Tip Foldover Using the Slim Modiolar Electrode: A Proof of Concept Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to report on our preliminary experience with Transimpedance Matrix (TIM)-measurement for the detection of cochlear implant electrode tip foldovers compared with intraoperative imaging in patients implanted with the slim modiolar electrode (SME).

STUDY DESIGN

Proof of concept study.

SETTING

Tertiary university referral center.

PATIENTS

Twenty five ears (in 22 patients) implanted consecutively with the SME.

INTERVENTIONS

Following cochlear implantation, intraoperative TIM-measurement and fluoroscopy were performed. One week postoperatively, the electrode position was evaluated using Computed Tomography (CT)-imaging.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Electrode array tip foldover.

RESULTS

Electrode array tip foldover occurred in three of the 25 cochlear implantations performed (12%). In each case, the foldover was detected by both TIM and fluoroscopy, leading to reposition and correct intracochlear placement of the array.

CONCLUSIONS

TIM-measurement is a promising method for the intraoperative detection of an electrode array tip foldover. The TIM-tool with intuitive heatmap display is easy to use, fast, and readily available to clinics using TIM-software in the operating theatre.

Cochlear electrode array tip fold-over in incomplete partition-I - A case report

Electrode tip fold-over is a rare complication of cochlear implantation (CI), especially in lateral wall (LW) electrodes. We describe a case of LW electrode tip fold-over in a patient with incomplete partition type-1 (IP-I). Preoperative measurement of cochlear length is important for optimal CI electrode selection. In cochlear malformation, Stenvers x-ray is superior to spread of excitation in detecting tip fold-over. Despite tip fold-over, hearing threshold, speech reception threshold, and word recognition score were almost symmetrical bilaterally. Therefore, revision surgery should be reserved for patients with persistent symptoms or markedly affected speech performance, in whom deactivation did not suffice.

Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis

Objectives/Hypothesis

Two types of electrode arrays for cochlear implants (CIs) are distinguished: lateral wall and perimodiolar. Scalar translocation of the array can lead to intracochlear trauma by penetrating from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli or scala media, potentially negatively affecting hearing performance of CI users. This systematic review compares the lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays with respect to scalar translocation.

Study Design

Systematic review.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for studies published within the last 11 years. No other limitations were set. All studies with original data that evaluated the occurrence of scalar translocation or tip fold‐over (TF) with postoperative computed tomography (CT) following primary cochlear implantation in bilateral sensorineuronal hearing loss patients were considered to be eligible. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers.

Results

We included 33 studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta‐analysis of five cohort studies comparing scalar translocation between lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays showed that lateral wall arrays have significantly lower translocation rates (7% vs. 43%; pooled odds ratio = 0.12). Translocation was negatively associated with speech perception scores (weighted mean 41% vs. 55%). Tip fold‐over of the array was more frequent with perimodiolar arrays (X² = 6.8, P < .01).

Conclusions

Scalar translocation and tip fold‐overs occurred more frequently with perimodiolar arrays than with lateral wall arrays. In addition, translocation of the array negatively affects hearing with the cochlear implant. Therefore, if one aims to minimize clinically relevant intracochlear trauma, lateral wall arrays would be the preferred option for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 131:1358–1368, 2021

Intraoperatives Tip-Foldover-Screening mittels Spread of Excitation Messungen

BACKGROUND

In rare cases, a cochlear implantation can lead to a so-called tip fold-over during insertion of the electrode array. In order to detect or exclude such a misalignment a radiological check of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array is carried out intra- or often post-operatively (gold standard), thereby exposing the patient to additional radiation. Alternatively, successful electrode insertion can be verified by measuring the spread of excitation (SOE). However, interpretation of the test results requires considerable expertise, and standardized measurement protocols and reference values are also essential. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate an automated screening procedure in order to obtain a reliable statement about the normal tonotopic position of the implanted CI electrode array intraoperatively and with as little effort as possible.

METHODS

For CI surgery with Cochlear™ Nucleus® implants, an intraoperative tip-fold-over (TFO) screening was performed in a bi-centric study in over 100 adult patients: Firstly, threshold measurements for electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) using AutoNRT™ were recorded. Subsequently, SOE measurements were carried out on electrodes 13 and 22. The automated evaluation of the SOE data sets then made it possible to make a dichotomous decision about a normal or abnormal test result. The position of the electrode array was checked intra- or post-operatively using conventional transorbital X-ray (reference method).

RESULTS

The intraoperative TFO screening procedure is applicable in around 80% of cases. The accuracy of the screening for measurements via the active stimulation electrodes 13 / 22 is 63.9% / 95.4%. The classification error is 36.1% / 4.6% and the phi coefficient is 0.27 / 0.69. All radiologically proven tip-fold-overs were reliably identified with the intraoperative screening (sensitivity = 100%). A higher specificity (>95%) can be achieved only with measurements via electrode 22.

CONCLUSIONS

The TFO Screening via measurement at electrode 22 can successfully distinguish between a correct and incorrect position of the electrode array due to a tip-fold-over, and the remaining cases would require further imaging.

Pre- and post-operative imaging of cochlear implants: a pictorial review

Cochlear implants are increasingly used to treat sensorineural hearing disorders in both children and adults. Pre-operative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging play a pivotal role in patient selection, to rule out findings that preclude surgery or identify conditions which may have an impact on the surgical procedure. The post-operative position of the electrode array within the cochlea can be reliably identified using cone-beam computed tomography. Recognition of scalar dislocation, cochlear dislocation, electrode fold, and malposition of the electrode array may have important consequences for the patient such as revision surgery or adapted fitting.

Device profile of the MED-EL cochlear implant system for hearing loss: overview of its safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Patients suffering from severe to profound hearing loss or even deafness can achieve a hearing improvement with a cochlear implant (CI) treatment that is significantly higher than the results achieved with conventional hearing aids. The CI system consists of an implantable stimulator, which is inserted retro-auricularly into the mastoid, and an externally worn processor unit, which provides the pickup of sound and processing of acoustic information as well as the power supply for the stimulator and internal current sources. The stimulator has an electrode array that is inserted into the cochlea.

AREAS COVERED

This is a descriptive overview of MED-EL's multichannel CI system (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), which was introduced to the European market in 1994. The continuing development of the implant as well as the external components is outlined and various other aspects (stimulation strategy, adaptation, results, reliability) are discussed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The strength of the company is the continuous pursuit of innovative ideas. This is evidenced by numerous innovations. The reliability of the implants has been continuously improved. The current SYNCHRONY models of the manufacturer show no indication of technically caused failures over an observation period of 5 years.

Immediate and 1-Year Outcomes with a Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array

OBJECTIVE

To explore the immediate and 1-year outcomes of patients who underwent implantation with the slim modiolar electrode (SME).

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive case series with chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral academic center.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

Between May 2016 and August 2018, a total of 326 cochlear implantations (CIs) were performed. Intraoperative x-rays were performed in all cases to identify tip rollovers. Scalar location was identified for 76 CIs that had postoperative computed tomography reconstructions. Speech outcomes were measured at 3, 6, and 12 months with consonant-nucleus-consonant word and AzBio sentences in quiet and noise (+10-dB signal-to-noise ratio). Preservation of hearing was defined as maintaining a low-frequency pure tone average ≤80 dB at 250 and 500 Hz.

RESULTS

Among 326 CIs, 23 (7%) had tip rollovers. Postoperative reconstructions revealed 5 of 76 (6.6%) scalar translocations. A subset of 177 cases met criteria for evaluation of speech perception scores. The marginal mean differences between presurgery and 12 months for speech tests were as follows: consonant-nucleus-consonant, 43.7 (95% CI, 39.8-47.6); AzBio in quiet, 49.7 (95% CI, 44.9-54.4); and AzBio in noise, 29.9 (95% CI, 25.2-34.7). Sixty-one patients were identified with preservable hearing (low-frequency pure tone average ≤80 dB), and 12 of 61 (20%) preserved hearing at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

CI with SME provides reliable scala tympani insertion in a consistent perimodiolar position. An initially increased tip rollover rate improved with case volume and sheath design improvement. For long-term outcomes, speech performance was comparable to that of other cochlear implants. While hearing preservation for the SME may be better than prior perimodiolar electrodes, consistent outcomes are unlikely.

Electrophysiological detection of electrode fold-over in perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays: a multi-center study case series

PURPOSE

It is important for the surgeon to determine the position of the CI electrode array during and after its placement within the cochlea. Most preferably, this should be within the scala tympani to obtain the best audiological outcome. Thus, misplacement into the scala vestibuli or tip fold-over should be prevented. Since there are different ways to ensure proper positioning of the electrode array within the scala tympani (e.g., intraoperative radiography, electrophysiological recordings), our study was aimed at detecting intraoperative electrophysiologic characteristics to better understand the mechanisms of those electrode tip fold-overs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a multi-centric, retrospective case-control series, patients with a postoperatively by radiography detected tip fold-over in perimodiolar electrodes were included. The point of fold-over (i.e., the electrode position) was determined and the intraoperative Auto-NRT recordings were analysed and evaluated.

RESULTS

Four patients were found to have an electrode tip fold-over (out of 85 implantees). Significant changes of the Auto-NRT recordings were not detected. All tip fold-overs occurred in the most apical part of the electrodes.

DISCUSSION

Cochlear implantation for hearing impaired patients plays a decisive role in modern auditory rehabilitation. Perimodiolar electrode arrays may fold over during the insertion and, hence, could have a negative impact on audiological outcome. Characteristic electrophysiologic changes to possibly predict this were not found in our series.

Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation

Objective

Determine the occurrence rate of cochlear implant (CI) electrode tip fold-over and electrode scalar deviation as reported in patient cases with different commercial electrode types.

Data-sources

PubMed search for identifying peer-reviewed articles published till 2018 on CI electrode tip fold-over and scalar deviation. Key-words for searching were “Cochlear electrode tip fold-over”, “Cochlear electrode scalar position” and “Cochlear electrode scalar location”.

Articles-selection

Only if electrode related issues were investigated in patient cases. 38 articles met the inclusion-criteria.

Results

13 articles on electrode tip fold-over issue covering 3177 implanted ears, out of which 50 ears were identified with electrode tip fold-over with an occurrence rate of 1.57%. Out of 50 ears, 43 were implanted with pre-curved electrodes and the remaining 7 with lateral-wall electrodes. One article reported on both tip fold-over and scalar deviation. 26 articles reported on the electrode scalar deviation covering an overall number of 2046 ears out of which, 458 were identified with electrode scalar deviation at a rate of 22.38%. After removing the studies that did not report on the number of electrodes per electrode type, it was 1324 ears implanted with pre-curved electrode and 507 ears with lateral-wall electrode. Out of 1324 pre-curved electrode implanted ears, 424 were reported with scalar deviation making an occurrence rate of 32%. Out of 507 lateral-wall electrode implanted ears, 43 were associated with scalar deviation at an occurrence rate of 6.7%.

Conclusion

This literature review revealing the fact of higher rate of electrode insertion trauma associated with pre-curved electrode type irrespective of CI brand is one step closer to obsolete it from the clinical practice in the interest of patient's cochlear health.

Why Pre-Curved Modiolar Hugging Electrodes Only Cover The Basal Turn of The Cochlea and Not Beyond that?

The question of why pre-curved modiolar hugging (MH) electrodes only cover the basal turn of the cochlea and not beyond that is unanswered yet in the CI field. Therefore the aim of this article is to show what the practical limitations are with the pre-curved MH electrode design in not being able to fabricate beyond one full turn. Every CI electrode design needs a metal mold with grooves for placing the platinum wires and for injecting with the silicone elastomer. Limitations in making a mold with groove that goes beyond one full turn of curvature along with the mechanical deformation of the curved silicone elastomer, prevents making a pre-curved MH electrode beyond one full turn. Electrode tip fold-over, electrode scalar deviation and the inconsistent electrode to modiolus wall proximity are the reported issues with this electrode type which does not help by any means to the operating surgeon and the pediatric candidates especially. If intra-operative imaging is recommended to confirm the proper placement of the electrode for one particular electrode design, then how many clinics in the world may have this facility and is it ethical to put the patient under more radiation risk are the natural questions that needs to be answered in the interest of the patient. Every CI brand should come out of their marketing philosophy and innovate what is essential in bringing the full benefit of the device to the patients.

Considerations and Rationale for Cochlear Implant Electrode Design - Past, Present and Future

The electrode array of a cochlear implant forms a permanent, often lifelong interface between the implanted electronics and neural structures of the cochlea. A cochlear implant is primarily prescribed to restore hearing via electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. As with any neural stimulator intended to either deliver electrical stimulus or record a neural response, the aim is to place the electrodes in close proximity to the target neural structures. The broadening of indications and the concept of preservation of low-frequency residual hearing over the last two decades has resulted in an increased understanding of the mechanisms and implications of intracochlear trauma for both the hearing preservation surgery and electrical stimulation outcomes with cochlear implantation, as well as the influence of many biographic and audiological patient factors correlated with achieving better hearing outcomes. These two goals, the proximity to the cochlear nerve for electrical stimulation and the preservation of cochlear structures, have typically been viewed as mutually exclusive, with perimodiolar electrode arrays being preferred for the former, and lateral wall electrode arrays for the latter. The design evolution of both the lateral wall and perimodiolar electrodes is presented, considering the cochlea anatomy and continued understanding of the mechanics and dynamics of electrode insertion, along with the influence of the ongoing changes to the intracochlear environment to provide a rationale for the electrode design with the intent to provide the greatest patient benefit over their implanted lifetime.