Measurement and Mitigation of Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion

Scala Tympani Volume Influences Initial 6-Month Hearing Preservation With Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of scala tympani (ST) volume, cochlear duct length (CDL), and angular insertion depth (AID) on low-frequency hearing preservation for cochlear implant (CI) recipients of lateral wall electrode arrays.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 45 adult CI recipients of 24-, 28-, or 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode arrays with preoperative unaided hearing thresholds ≤45 decibel hearing level (dB HL) at 250 Hz. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate cochlear morphology and electrode array position. A linear mixed effects model evaluated effects of ST volume, CDL, AID, preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA; 125, 250, and 500 Hz), age at surgery, and biological sex on the postoperative change in LFPTA at activation and 6 months post-activation.

RESULTS

There were significant main effects of ST volume (p = 0.044), age (p = 0.028), and biological sex (p = 0.003), indicating better low-frequency hearing preservation for CI recipients with larger ST volumes, younger age at surgery, and female biological sex. Although CDL positively correlated with ST volume (r = 0.74, p < 0.001), there was no significant main effect of CDL (p = 0.367). A broad range in AID of the most apical electrode contact was observed (301.4°-681.8°); however, there was no significant main effect of AID on low-frequency hearing preservation (p = 0.700).

CONCLUSIONS

During the initial 6 months following implantation, intrinsic factors such as cochlear morphology may have a greater impact on low-frequency hearing preservation than apical positioning of a flexible lateral wall electrode array when using soft surgical techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 135:1781-1787, 2025.

Characterization of Tip Fold-Over Using Fluoroscopy and Intracochlear Pressure in Cadaver Specimens

OBJECTIVES

Cochlear implant array malpositioning is associated with impaired speech perception, vertigo, and facial nerve stimulation. Tip fold-over is a subset of malpositioning that occurs more often with perimodiolar electrodes, but historically it has not been characterized due to lack of knowledge regarding electrode movements of the electrode within the cochlea. The aim of this study was to characterize the mechanics of tip fold-over events and their associated insertion pressure profiles.

METHODS

Cadaveric human heads were surgically prepared with a mastoidectomy and facial recess. Fiberoptic pressure sensors were inserted into the scala vestibuli and tympani to measure intracochlear pressures. Perimodiolar CI electrodes (Cochlear Slim-Modiolar, CI532) were inserted via round window under fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

Three types of tip fold-over events were observed: anterior-posterior C-shaped, medial-lateral C-shaped, and S-shaped roll-overs. The largest transient pressures occurred with anterior-posterior and S-type roll-over, and were associated with rotation or twisting inside the cochlea.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate at least three subtypes of tip fold-overs. Elevated pressure transients were noted before and during the tip fold-over event related to electrode twisting. The characterization of tip fold-over into subtypes is novel and may aid identification of tip fold-over events intraoperatively in the future. It remains important to identify tip fold-over events, and they should be recognized early using a multimodal verification system. Further investigation is still required to determine the significance of these changes and other possible patterns of intracochlear electrode movement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA: Cadaver study Laryngoscope, 135:1795-1802, 2025.

Quantitative in-vitro assessment of a novel robot-assisted system for cochlear implant electrode insertion

PURPOSE

As an increasing number of cochlear implant candidates exhibit residual inner ear function, hearing preservation strategies during implant insertion are gaining importance. Manual implantation is known to induce traumatic force and pressure peaks. In this study, we use a validated in-vitro model to comprehensively evaluate a novel surgical tool that addresses these challenges through motorized movement of a forceps.

METHODS

Using lateral wall electrodes, we examined two subgroups of insertions: 30 insertions were performed manually by experienced surgeons, and another 30 insertions were conducted with a robot-assisted system under the same surgeons' supervision. We utilized a realistic, validated model of the temporal bone. This model accurately reproduces intracochlear frictional conditions and allows for the synchronous recording of forces on intracochlear structures, intracochlear pressure, and the position and deformation of the electrode array within the scala tympani.

RESULTS

We identified a significant reduction in force variation during robot-assisted insertions compared to the conventional procedure, with average values of 12 mN/s and 32 mN/s, respectively. Robotic assistance was also associated with a significant reduction of strong pressure peaks and a 17 dB reduction in intracochlear pressure levels. Furthermore, our study highlights that the release of the insertion tool represents a critical phase requiring surgical training.

CONCLUSION

Robotic assistance demonstrated more consistent insertion speeds compared to manual techniques. Its use can significantly reduce factors associated with intracochlear trauma, highlighting its potential for improved hearing preservation. Finally, the system does not mitigate the impact of subsequent surgical steps like electrode cable routing and cochlear access sealing, pointing to areas in need of further research.

Hearing preservation in pediatric cochlear implantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pediatric cochlear implantation has evolved considerably over the past three decades to include more patients at earlier ages with greater degrees of residual hearing. As an extension, a significant focus of research over the past decade has surrounded preservation of existing acoustic hearing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple studies published within the last 5 years demonstrate aidable acoustic hearing preservation in 60-90% of pediatric patients, with 40-60% experiencing complete hearing preservation following cochlear implantation. Durability of preserved hearing varies among patients, with some patients losing residual hearing within 1 year of surgery whereas others maintain acoustic hearing through at least 5 years of follow-up. Speech outcomes appear superior among patients with preserved acoustic hearing, particularly in the presence of background noise. Several recent studies suggest a music appreciation advantage in children with preserved acoustic hearing following cochlear implantation.

SUMMARY

Hearing preservation rates during cochlear implantation in children matches, if not often exceeds, hearing preservation rates observed among adults. Preservation of acoustic hearing during cochlear implantation confers multiple advantages for the pediatric population. Beyond improved speech understanding and music appreciation, minimizing intracochlear trauma and resultant scarring facilitates potential future regenerative treatments or revision surgery.

The role of pressure and friction forces in automated insertion of cochlear implants

Objectives

Despite the success of cochlear implant (CI) surgery for hearing restoration, reducing CI electrode insertion forces is an ongoing challenge with the goal to further reduce post-implantation hearing loss. While research in this field shows that both friction and quasistatic pressure forces occur during CI insertion, there is a lack of studies distinguishing between these origins. The present study was conducted to analyze the contribution of both force phenomena during automated CI insertion.

Methods

Five MED-EL FLEX28 CI electrode arrays were inserted into both a regular and uncoiled version of the same average scala tympani (ST). Both ST models had a pressure release hole at the apical end, which was kept open or closed to quantify pressure forces. ST models were filled with different sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lubricants (1, 5, and 10% SDS, water). The viscosity of lubricants was determined using a rheometer. Insertions were conducted with velocities ranging from v= 0.125 mm/s to 2.0 mm/s.

Results

Viscosity of SDS lubricants at 20°C was 1.28, 1.96, and 2.51 mPas for 1, 5, and 10% SDS, respectively, which lies within the values reported for human perilymph. In the uncoiled ST model, forces remained within the noise floor (maximum: 0.049 × 10-3 N ± 1.5 × 10-3 N), indicating minimal contribution from quasistatic pressure. Conversely, forces using the regular, coiled ST model were at least an order of magnitude larger (minimum: Fmax = 28.95 × 10-3 N, v = 1 mm/s, 10% SDS), confirming that friction forces are the main contributor to total insertion forces. An N-way ANOVA revealed that both lubricant viscosity and insertion speed significantly reduce insertion forces (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

For the first time, this study demonstrates that at realistic perilymph viscosities, quasistatic pressure forces minimally affect the total insertion force profile during insertion. Mixed friction is the main determinant, and significantly decreases with increaseing insertion speeds. This suggests that in clinical settings with similar ST geometries and surgical preparation, quasistatic pressure plays a subordinate role. Moreover, the findings indicate that managing the hydrodynamics of the cochlear environment, possibly through pre-surgical preparation or the use of specific lubricants, could effectively reduce insertion forces.

Vestibular function and hearing preservation in children following a minimally invasive cochlear implantation

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effect of minimally invasive cochlear implantation (CI) on the vestibular function (VF) and residual hearing (RH) as well as their relationship in pediatric recipients before and after surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-four pediatric patients with preoperative low frequency residual hearing (LFRH) (250 or 500 Hz ≤ 80 dB HL) who underwent minimally invasive CI were enrolled. Pure-tone thresholds, the cervical/ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP/oVEMP), and video head impulse test (vHIT) were all evaluated in the 24 pediatric patients with preoperative normal VF before and at 1 and 12 months after surgery. The relationship between changes in hearing and VF was analyzed preoperatively and at 1 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences on VF preservation and hearing preservation (HP) at both 1 and 12 months post-CI (p > 0.05). At 1 month post-CI, the correlations of the variations in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains of horizontal semicircular canal (HSC) and posterior semicircular canal (PSC) and the shift in 250 Hz threshold were negatively correlated (r = - 0.41, p = 0.04 and r = - 0.43, p = 0.04, respectively). At 12 months post-CI, the shift in 250 Hz threshold negatively correlated to the variations in VOR gain of superior semicircular canal (SSC) (r = - 0.43, p = 0.04); the HP positively correlated to the variation in oVEMP-amplitude ratio (AR) (r = 0.41, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that there were partial correlations between VF preservation and HP both in the short- and long-terms after atraumatic CI surgery, especially with the 250 Hz threshold. Regarding the variation of PSC function, the correlation with hearing status was variable with time after atraumatic CI surgery. Minimally invasive techniques for HP are successful and effective for the preservation of VF in pediatric patients both in the short- and long-terms.

Impact of Insertion Speed, Depth, and Robotic Assistance on Cochlear Implant Insertion Forces and Intracochlear Pressure: A Scoping Review

Cochlear implants are crucial for addressing severe-to-profound hearing loss, with the success of the procedure requiring careful electrode placement. This scoping review synthesizes the findings from 125 studies examining the factors influencing insertion forces (IFs) and intracochlear pressure (IP), which are crucial for optimizing implantation techniques and enhancing patient outcomes. The review highlights the impact of variables, including insertion depth, speed, and the use of robotic assistance on IFs and IP. Results indicate that higher insertion speeds generally increase IFs and IP in artificial models, a pattern not consistently observed in cadaveric studies due to variations in methodology and sample size. The study also explores the observed minimal impact of robotic assistance on reducing IFs compared to manual methods. Importantly, this review underscores the need for a standardized approach in cochlear implant research to address inconsistencies and improve clinical practices aimed at preserving hearing during implantation.

Robotic assistance during cochlear implantation: the rationale for consistent, controlled speed of electrode array insertion

Cochlear implants (CI) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with severe to profound sensory hearing loss by providing a method of bypassing normal hearing to directly stimulate the auditory nerve. A further advance in the field has been the introduction of "hearing preservation" surgery, whereby the CI electrode array (EA) is carefully inserted to spare damage to the delicate anatomy and function of the cochlea. Preserving residual function of the inner ear allows patients to receive maximal benefit from the CI and to combine CI electric stimulation with acoustic hearing, offering improved postoperative speech, hearing, and quality of life outcomes. However, under the current paradigm of implant surgery, where EAs are inserted by hand, the cochlea cannot be reliably spared from damage. Robotics-assisted EA insertion is an emerging technology that may overcome fundamental human kinetic limitations that prevent consistency in achieving steady and slow EA insertion. This review begins by describing the relationship between EA insertion speed and generation of intracochlear forces and pressures. The various mechanisms by which these intracochlear forces can damage the cochlea and lead to worsened postoperative outcomes are discussed. The constraints of manual insertion technique are compared to robotics-assisted methods, followed by an overview of the current and future state of robotics-assisted EA insertion.