Normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global Scores for Experienced Cochlear Implant Users from a Multi-Institutional Study

Factors Associated with Preoperative Patient Expectations in the Cochlear Implant Evaluation Process

OBJECTIVE

To determine what factors are associated with patients' preoperative expectations of their postimplantation experience with their cochlear implant devices.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of data from a prospectively maintained cochlear implant database was conducted.

SETTING

Tertiary, academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Adult patients who underwent a cochlear implant candidacy evaluation and completed the CIQOL-Expectations validated instrument were included.

RESULTS

Age was found to have a weak association with increased expectations in some domains of the CIQOL-Expectations. There were some very weak associations identified between a patient's baseline functional ability and their expectations in the corresponding domain. However, no modifiable variable included in the current analysis was found to have an association with patient expectations.

CONCLUSION

Understanding patient expectations is a critical part of the success of medical interventions such as cochlear implantation. However, they are complex and likely multifactorial, and future studies are needed to look at other potential variables that may contribute to their formation.

Does cochlear implant electrode array design affect audiologic outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting literature regarding whether cochlear implants (CI) electrode array (EA) selection impacts audiologic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes for the two EA designs, precurved and straight.

METHODS

A systematic search of CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and SCOPUS was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported word recognition scores, sentence recognition scores in quiet or noise, or hearing preservation (HP) rates for patients with post-lingual hearing loss who underwent CI with either EA type. Primary outcome measures included mean difference (baseline vs. post-surgery) and proportions (%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Of 4134 unique abstracts screened, 92 studies (N = 5365 patients, 5658 ears) were included. Mean improvement of overall word recognition scores for patients with precurved EAs (46.5%, 95% CI: 43.13-49.88%) was significantly (p = 0.0009) superior to that of patients with straight EAs (36.33%; 95% CI, 31.4-41.27%). There was no significant difference between mean improvement of Azbio Quiet scores, mean improvement of overall sentences in noise scores, or HP or pure-tone averages between patients with precurved EAs and those with straight EAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Precurved EAs were superior in mean word recognition score improvement, but there was no superior EA design regarding sentence recognition or hearing preservation.

Bilateral cochlear fibrosis complicating chronic myeloid leukemia: A CARE case report

PURPOSE

We report the second case of bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss with intracochlear fibrosis due to chronic myeloid leukemia.

CASE REPORT

A 44-year-old man presented to the emergency department with rapidly progressive bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus and vertigo, associated with dyspnea. Chronic myeloid leukemia complicated by pulmonary and cochleovestibular leukostasis was diagnosed, and cytoreductive treatment was started. Despite this treatment, bilateral total hearing loss and complete vestibular deficit persisted. MRI showed bilateral labyrinthitis, and emergency cochlear implantation was indicated. During surgery, inflammatory intracochlear tissue made electrode array insertion possible only against resistance. One year after implantation, there was significant improvement in speech recognition and communication scores.

CONCLUSION

In case of sudden sensorineural hearing loss induced by chronic myeloid leukemia, treatment should be as fast as possible, with prompt cochlear implantation in case of definitive profound hearing loss, because of the risk of cochlear fibrosis and ossification.

Changes in Outcomes Expectations During the Cochlear Implant Evaluation Process

OBJECTIVES

Patient expectations are a critical factor in determining cochlear implant (CI) candidacy. However, minimal data are available on how potential CI recipients develop their expectations and if expectations can be modified by providers. In addition, there is little insight into the resources patients use to inform their decision to undergo implantation. This project aims to assess (1) the role of the CI evaluation (CIE) process on patients' expectations, (2) the extent to which patients' pre-CI outcome expectations can be modified, (3) the information patients use to inform their expectations, and patients' preferences for the discussion/display of potential CI outcomes.

DESIGN

Prospective mixed methods study of 32 adult CI patients undergoing CIEs. Outcome measures included: pre-CI Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 Profile scores (CIQOL-35 Profile); pre-CIE/post-CIE/day of surgery CIQOL-Expectations scores; post-CIE/day of surgery Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) scores; and pre-CI aided CNC-word and AzBio sentence scores. Thematic analyses of key informant interviews with 19 potential CI recipients were also performed.

RESULTS

In aim 1, CI CIQOL-Expectation domain scores remained essentially unchanged following the CIE when averaged across all participants ( d = 0.01 to 0.17). However, changes in expectations were observed for many participants at the individual level. Regarding the second aim, participants with higher pre-CIE expectations showed a decrease in expectations following the CIE for all CIQOL domains except emotional and social ( d = -0.27 to -0.77). In contrast, the only significant change in participants with lower expectations was an increase in expectations in the environment score from pre-CIE to the day of surgery ( d = 0.76). Expectations remained essentially unchanged or continued to change in the same direction between the post-CIE and the day of surgery, narrowing the gap between participants with higher and lower expectations. Overall, participants demonstrated low overall conflict related to their decision to proceed with cochlear implantation (mean DCS of 11.4 post-CIE and 14.2 at time of surgery out of 100) but DCS scores were higher for participants with lower pre-CIE expectations ( d = 0.71). In aim 3, key informant interviews demonstrated no differences between the low- and high expectation cohorts regarding resources used to develop their perception of CI outcomes. Potential CI recipients placed high value in talking with patients who had previously received a CI, and preferred discussing CI functional abilities via clinical vignettes described in the CIQOL Functional Staging System rather than by discussing speech recognition or CIQOL-35 Profile scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that, although overall expectations averaged across the cohort remained essentially unchanged, individual participants' pre-CI expectations can be modified and there is value in measuring these expectations using the CIQOL-Expectations tool to determine if they are realistic. This information can then be utilized during personalized counseling to present a more accurate representation of likely CI outcomes for each patient. Discussions between potential CI recipients and current CI users may also provide valuable information to inform their expectations. In addition, communicating potential CI benefits using CIQOL functional stages and associated clinical vignettes may result in more realistic patient expectations and support shared decision-making related to CI surgery.

Differences in music appreciation between bilateral and single-sided cochlear implant recipients

OBJECTIVE

To compare changes in music appreciation after cochlear implant (CI) surgery for patients with bilateral and single-sided deafness (SSD).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on all adult CI unilateral or bilateral recipients from November 2019 to March 2023. Musical questionnaire subset data from the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) - 35 Profile Instrument Score (maximum raw score of 15) was collected. Functional CI assessment was measured with CI-alone speech-in-quiet (SIQ) scores (AzBio and CNC).

RESULTS

22 adults underwent CI surgery for SSD and 21 adults for bilateral deafness (8 sequentially implanted). Every patient group had clinically significant improvements (p < 0.001) in mean SIQ scores in the most recently implanted ear (Azbio (% correct) SSD: 14.23 to 68.48, bilateral: 24.54 to 82.23, sequential: 6.25 to 82.57). SSD adults on average had higher music QOL scores at baseline (SSD: 11.05; bilateral: 7.86, p < 0.001). No group had significant increases in raw score at the first post-operative visit (SSD: 11.45, p = 0.86; bilateral: 8.15, p = 0.15). By the most recent post-implantation evaluation (median 12.8 months for SSD, 12.3 months for bilateral), SSD adults had a significant increase in raw score from baseline (11.05 to 12.45, p = 0.03), whereas bilaterally deafened (7.86 to 9.38, p = 0.12) adults had nonsignificant increases.

CONCLUSIONS

SSD patients demonstrate higher baseline music appreciation than bilaterally deafened individuals regardless of unilateral or bilateral implantation and are more likely to demonstrate continued improvement in subjective music appreciation at last follow-up even when speech perception outcomes are similar.

Quality of Life With Cochlear Implantation Using the CIQOL-35 at a Tertiary Urban Medical Center: Our Experience

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 questionnaire (CIQOL-35).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Single-institution tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Patients 18 years and older who have undergone CI and CIQOL-35 survey.

INTERVENTIONS

Implementing CIQOL-35 from 2019 to 2022 to measure change in QOL after CI. Statistical analysis included nonparametric, univariate, and multivariate analyses. Significance was set at 0.05.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in QOL among CI patients in each of the CIQOL-35 domains.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (40 female, 53 male) aged 20 to 93 years (median 70 years) turned in 164 QOL surveys (68 preactivation, 96 postactivation). Postactivation median QOL was 5 to 15 points higher across all domains ( p < 0.001). QOL score distributions among unilateral CI only, bilateral CI, and unilateral CI with contralateral hearing aid users were not statistically different ( p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified that male sex ( β = -2.0; 95% confidence interval, -3.9 to -0.1) was a negative predictor for environment scores and not being married ( β = 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 4.0) was a positive predictor for entertainment scores. Median follow-up time was 13 months post-CI (interquartile range [IQR], 7.1-21.5 months).

CONCLUSIONS

CI patients experienced improved QOL postactivation among all QOL domains, whereas specific CI use pattern in regard to unilateral, bilateral, or bimodal did not affect QOL. Multivariate analysis identified marital status and sex as possible QOL predictors.

Bilateral Cochlear Implants and Bimodal Hearing: A Comparison of Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

 Despite significant advances in the field of cochlear implants (CIs), there is no widely accepted criterion for when to counsel on bilateral CIs in adults. This is partly due to conflicting findings on the advantages of bilateral CIs versus bimodal hearing (i.e., CI with a contralateral hearing aid). Because of this, clinicians rely on a poorly defined combination of clinical measures and patient discussion to evaluate a patient's listening needs and preferences. Patients' needs and preferences are often used to guide recommendations on whether bilateral CIs or bimodal hearing is best for that individual, suggesting that an in-depth comparison of each group's self-reported outcomes is warranted.

PURPOSE

 Given the limited number of studies directly comparing quality of life (QoL) in bimodal and bilateral patients, the current study conducted a preliminary comparison of self-reported outcomes to better understand patient-reported benefits of each listening configuration.

RESEARCH DESIGN

 This was a between-subjects comparison.

STUDY SAMPLE

 Fifteen bimodal and nine bilateral adult CI users made the study sample.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

 Participants completed the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Profile 35. For group comparison purposes, monosyllabic word recognition and nonverbal intelligence were measured. Independent samples t-tests with Holm-Bonferroni corrections were used to compare bimodal and bilateral patients across domains of the CIQOL.

RESULTS

 Bilateral CI users self-reported better environmental, emotional, social, and global QoL when compared to bimodal users. The groups did not differ on age, nonverbal intelligence, speech recognition abilities, and duration of hearing loss; however, bimodal users had less experience listening with their CI than the bilateral CI users.

CONCLUSION

 Bilateral CI users showed widespread advantages in QoL when compared to bimodal users. Bilateral CI users self-reported significantly better environmental QoL which conflicts with previous in-lab and self-report results suggesting a bimodal advantage. Additionally, due to a lack of current literature, it is unclear why a bilateral advantage is observed for emotional and social QoL. Results of the current study not only provide additional support on the benefits of bilateral implantation but also stress the need to further explore the self-reported benefits of each listening configuration.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Real-world Functioning in Adult Cochlear-implant Users

Hypothesis

As a result of COVID-19 lockdowns and the associated effects on the auditory-social environments of cochlear-implant (CI) users, we expected that adult CI users would report a decrease in real-world communication abilities, a decrease in social isolation, and a decrease in quality of life (QOL) from pre- to post-pandemic.

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic brought many changes to the environments in which adults with CIs interact and communicate. However, the impact of these changes on CI users' real-world functioning is not well understood. This study investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on real-world communication abilities, social isolation, and CI-related QOL in adult CI users.

Methods

Fourteen adult CI users completed self-report questionnaires assessing communication abilities, social isolation, and CI-related QOL at time points before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses at the 2 time points were compared to evaluate changes in CI users' real-world functioning.

Results

Adult CI users showed a significant decrease in self-reported communication ability and a nonsignificant decline in CI-related QOL from before to during COVID-19. However, a nonsignificant trend of a decline in social isolation was also observed in adult CI users.

Conclusion

Findings showed a decrease in self-reported communication abilities and, to a lesser extent, CI-related QOL, suggesting that changes to the auditory-social environment brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic may have negatively impacted communication abilities in real-world, challenging environments. Yet, the potential decrease in social isolation suggests that these changes may have had an overall positive effect on social interaction, potentially with close family and friends in well-controlled environments. Assessing changes in real-world functioning in the same CI users from both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique glimpse into how changes in the auditory-social environment may impact outcomes in adult CI users.

Correlation Between Quality of Life and Speech Recognition Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To study the relationship between Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 Global (CIQOL-10) scores and speech recognition scores 6 and 12 months after cochlear implantation (CI) and to compare CIQOL-10 scores for patients who met the benchmark speech recognition scores with those who did not.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

One hundred twenty-four adults who underwent CI between 2018 and 2021 and completed a CIQOL-10 questionnaire at their 6- and/or 12-month postoperative visit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CIQOL-10, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word, and AzBio in quiet and noise scores.

RESULTS

At 6 months, weak positive correlations were found between CIQOL-10 and CNC (n = 78, r = 0.234, p = 0.039) and AzBio in quiet (n = 73, r = 0.293, p = 0.012) scores but not AzBio in noise scores (n = 39, r = 0.207, p = 0.206). At 12 months, weak positive correlations were found between CIQOL-10 and CNC (n = 98, r = 0.315, p = 0.002), AzBio in quiet (n = 88, r = 0.271, p = 0.011), and AzBio in noise (n = 48, r = 0.291, p = 0.045) scores. Patients who met the benchmark CNC scores had notably higher CIQOL-10 scores than those who did not at 6 months (52.0 vs 45.5, p = 0.008) and 12 months (52.0 vs 45.5, p = 0.003). A similar relationship was found for those who met the benchmark AzBio in quiet scores at both 6 months (52.0 vs 44.0, p = 0.006) and 12 months (52.0 vs 46.5, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

CIQOL-10 scores have weak positive correlations with postoperative speech recognition outcomes at 6 and 12 months. This highlights the need for the continued use of quality-of-life measures, such as the CIQOL-10, in assessing CI outcomes to gain a more comprehensive understanding of patients' experiences.

Determinants of Cochlear Implant Satisfaction and Decisional Regret in Adult Cochlear Implant Users

OBJECTIVE

Determine associations expected and actual cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, decisional regret, and satisfaction in experienced adult CI users.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-nine adult CI users meeting traditional bilateral hearing loss indications with ≥12 months CI experience.

INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients completed the validated Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living and Decisional Regret instruments. Pre- and post-CI outcomes (CI Quality of Life [CIQOL]-Expectations; CIQOL-35 Profile; CNC words, AzBio Sentences) were obtained from a prospectively maintained clinical database.

RESULTS

Using established cutoff scores, 29% of patients reported a substantial degree of post-CI decisional regret. For each CIQOL domain, patients without decisional regret obtained post-CI outcome scores closer to pre-CI expectations compared with patients with decisional regret ( d = 0.34 to 0.91); similar results were observed with higher CI user satisfaction ( d = 0.17-0.83). Notably, the degree of pre- to post-CI improvement in CNC or AzBio scores did not differ between patients with and without decisional regret or with lower and higher satisfaction. Finally, greater pre-/postimprovement in CIQOL-35 Profile domain scores demonstrated far stronger associations with lower decisional regret and higher satisfaction than changes in speech recognition scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with better alignment of their pre-CI expectations and post-CI outcomes and greater pre-/post-CIQOL improvement had lower decisional regret and higher satisfaction. This emphasizes the importance of evidence-based pre-CI counseling regarding real-world CI benefits and caution against assuming that improvements in speech recognition are related to patient satisfaction.

Cochlear Implants for Single-Sided Deafness: Quality of Life, Daily Usage, and Duration of Deafness

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience for adults undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for single-sided deafness (SSD).

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series for adults with SSD who underwent CI between January 2013 and May 2021 at our institution. CNC and AzBio speech recognition scores, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12), datalogging, and the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-10 Global measure were utilized.

RESULTS

Sixty-six adults underwent CI for SSD (median 51.3 years, range 20.0-74.3 years), and 57 (86.4%) remained device users at last follow-up. Compared to pre-operative performance, device users demonstrated significant improvement in speech recognition scores and achieved peak performance at six months post-activation for CNC (8.0% increased to 45.6%, p < 0.0001) and AzBio in quiet (12.2% increased to 59.5%, p < 0.0001). THI was decreased at 6 months post-implantation (58.1-14.6, p < 0.0001), with 77% of patients reporting improved or resolved tinnitus. Patients demonstrated improved SSQ12 scores as well as the disease-specific CIQOL-10 Global questionnaire. Duration of deafness was not associated with significant differences in speech recognition performance. Average daily wear time was positively associated with CNC and AzBio scores as well as post-operative CIQOL-10 scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein we present the largest cohort of adult CI recipients with SSD with data on speech recognition scores, tinnitus measures, and SSQ12. Novel insights regarding the correlation of datalogging, duration of deafness, and CI-specific quality of life (CIQOL-10) metrics are discussed. Data continue to support CI as an efficacious treatment option for SSD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:2362-2370, 2023.

Conditional Minimal Detectable Change for the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 Profile Associated With Improved Functional Abilities 12 Months After Cochlear Implantation

Importance

It is essential to measure an individual patient's baseline and follow-up abilities to demonstrate changes in clinical outcomes over time. Inherent in this strategy is interpreting whether the measured change is clinically significant and beyond measurement error. Conditional minimal detectable change (cMDC) values are widely used in many disciplines but have rarely been established for outcome measures in otolaryngology or hearing research, and never in cochlear implantation.

Objective

To determine cMDC values for the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 (CIQOL-35) Profile instrument to enhance our understanding of the initial and ongoing changes in functional abilities from cochlear implants (CIs).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Item response theory analyses of responses from a multi-institutional cohort of 705 CI users at a tertiary CI center were used to derive standard error (SE) values for each possible CIQOL-35 domain score. Using an iterative approach, these SE values were used to calculate cMDC values for every possible pre-CI and post-CI domain score combination. We then compared pre-CI to 12-month post-CI CIQOL-35 domains scores in an independent cohort of 65 adult CI users to determine whether the measured change exceeded error to be clinically significant. The analysis took place on December 14, 2022.

Interventions

The CIQOL-35 Profile instrument and cochlear implantation.

Results

The cMDC values were smaller for the communication domain, and global measure and cMDC values for all domains were larger at the extremes of the measurement scale. Overall, 60 CI users (92.3%) demonstrated improvement beyond cMDC at 12 months post-CI for at least 1 CIQOL-35 domain, and no patients' scores declined beyond cMDC for any domain. The percentage of CI users demonstrating improvement beyond cMDC varied by domain, with communication (53 [81.5%]) showing the largest number of CI users improving, followed by global (42 [64.6%]) and entertainment (40 [60.9%]). In general, CI users who demonstrated improvement in CIQOL-35 domains had greater improvement in speech recognition scores than patients who did not, but the strength and significance of these associations greatly varied by domain and speech material.

Conclusions and Relevance

This multistep cohort study found that cMDC values for the CIQOL-35 Profile provided personalized thresholds for detecting real changes in patient self-reported functional abilities over time across multiple domains, which may inform clinical decision-making. Moreover, these longitudinal results reveal the domains with more or less improvement, which may aid in patient counseling.

Understanding Patient Expectations Before Implantation Using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations Instrument

Importance

Previous research suggests that clinicians view realistic patient expectations as the most important nonaudiological factor in the decision to proceed with a cochlear implant (CI). However, clinicians have few data to determine whether patients' outcome expectations are realistic.

Objective

To address this unmet clinical need through the development and psychometric analysis of a new patient-reported outcome measure, the CI Quality of Life (CIQOL) Expectations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary CI center from February 26, 2020, to August 31, 2021. First, a team comprising 2 CI audiologists, a CI surgeon, a hearing scientist, and 2 psychometricians with experience in instrument development converted all items from the CIQOL-35 Profile instrument into statements reflecting expected outcomes. Then, cognitive interviews with 20 potential CI users assessed the clarity and comprehensiveness of the new instrument. Next, responses to the CIQOL-Expectations instrument for 131 potential adult CI candidates were psychometrically analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Finally, degree to which patient expectations changed from before to after and their CI evaluation appointments was measured.

Intervention

The CIQOL-Expectations instrument.

Results

Of 178 participants, 85 (47.8%) were female, and there was 1 (0.6%) Asian, 26 (14.6%) Black or African American, 1 (0.6%) Latinx, and 150 (84.3%) White individuals. No major content or grammar changes were identified during the cognitive interviews. Overall, all CIQOL domains demonstrated adequate to strong psychometric properties. Several domains did not meet all a priori established indicators of model fit or ability to separate CI users based on response patterns, but all met most indicators. Potential CI users demonstrated the highest mean (SD) expectation scores for the environment (70.2 [20.8]) and social (68.4 [18.0]) domains. In addition, the entertainment (20 [15.3%]) and environment (31 [24.4%]) domains had the highest percentage of patients with expectation scores of 100. Yet, normative CIQOL-35 Profile data from experienced CI users suggested few patients obtain this high degree of functional benefit after implant.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that the CIQOL-Expectations instrument may provide an opportunity to assess potential CI users' expected outcomes using modification of an established CIQOL instrument and a patient-centered framework. The included items and domains reflect real-world functional abilities valued by CI users and may provide opportunities for an evidence-based shared decision-making approach to the CI evaluation process. With this instrument, clinicians can compare individual patients' pre-CI outcome expectations with established normative data and provide appropriate counseling.