Predictive Value of Transimpedance Matrix Measurements to Detect Electrode Tip Foldover

Evaluation of Transimpedance Matrix Measurement (TIM) heatmap for the assessment of cochlear implant electrode placement in patients with Inner Ear Malformations

<b>Introduction:</b> It is estimated that 20% of pediatric patients eligible for implantation have various forms of Inner Ear Malformations (IEM). Transimpedance Matrix Measurement (TIM) is a relatively novel electrophysiological measurement protocol of the impedance patterns of electrode contacts within the cochlea. <br><br><b>Aim:</b> Presentation of TIM measurements, in the form of a heatmap, in patients with IEM. <br><br><b>Materials and methods:</b> Among 112 implantations performed between 2018 and 2024 in the pediatric group, 23 patients were diagnosed with IEM (20.5%). TIM and Stenver's plain X-ray were performed for all patients. <br><br><b>Results:</b> In 19 patients, standard approach with mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy was performed, in 2 cases retrofacial approach, in 2 petrosectomy with blind sac procedure, and in 2 "banana technique". In most patients, electrode Contour Advance (CA) was used. One case of tip fold-over showed a characteristic cross pattern. For all other IEM there were normal diagonals but voltage distribution showed abnormal distribution within the cochlea. <br><br><b>Discussion:</b> Most patients received a CA electrode because of its greater rigidity and the possibility of inhibiting CSF leakage by applying a piece of connective tissue for sealing to the electrode. Heatmaps for different IEM types differ from each other, but it is still possible to recognize TFO. The voltage spread in the cochlea in IEM shows different patterns for particular types of anomalies. <br><br><b>Conclusions:</b> TIM measurement as a heatmap seems to be a quick and reliable method for detecting electrode array tip fold-over intraoperatively for patients with inner ear malformations. Our study complements the knowledge about the use of research based on TIM heatmap.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Intraoperative TransImpedance Matrix Recordings Compared With X-ray Imaging in Detecting Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Tip Foldovers: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

Characterize the sensitivity and specificity of TransImpedance Matrix (TIM) recordings compared with x-rays in detecting cochlear implant tip foldovers.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Multi-institutional, academic and private surgery centers.

PATIENTS

Patients 6 months and older undergoing cochlear implantation.

INTERVENTIONS

After cochlear implant array insertion, intraoperative TIM recordings and x-rays were conducted to confirm appropriate placement. If a foldover was identified, repeat insertion, followed by TIM and x-ray, was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Presence of tip foldovers as determined by TIM recordings and x-rays.

RESULTS

There were 13 tip foldovers out of 484 insertions, yielding a 2.7% tip foldover rate. Using x-rays as the "gold standard," TIM recordings showed 100% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 84.6% positive predictive value (PPV), and 100% negative predicative value in detecting tip foldovers. The x-ray images for two TIM-identified tip foldovers were interpreted as normal intraoperatively (apparent false positives), but then were interpreted as foldovers when presented to the operating surgeon postoperatively in a blinded fashion. If these false positives had been reclassified as true positives, TIM specificity and PPV would both improve to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide further support regarding the utility of TIM recordings to evaluate appropriate cochlear implant electrode array position. Despite the low tip foldover rate reported across the literature and within this study, this multicenter patient group provided a large sample size to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of TIM recordings in identifying tip foldovers. Compared with the reference-standard, x-ray imaging, TIM recordings show equivalent, and in some cases superior, performance in identification of tip foldovers. Thus, use of TIM can potentially preclude the need for routine intraoperative x-rays without compromising patient care.

Development and Evaluation of a Reusable, Force Measuring Tool for the Robot-Assisted Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

Limitations in human kinematics during cochlear implantation induce pressure transients and increased forces on intracochlear structures. Herein, we present a novel head-mounted surgical tool designed for the motorized insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays. The tool integrates a force measurement feature to overcome the lack of haptic feedback in current robotic solutions.

METHODS

Utilizing a prototype device, we compare force measurements with those exerted on intracochlear structures in a realistic temporal bone model. Furthermore, we test the tool on six temporal bone specimens in a surgical setting to assess its performance in various anatomies.

RESULTS

Force measurements exhibit good agreement with intracochlear forces, offering significantly improved resolution over manual, tactile sensing. Successful electrode array insertions in six cadaver specimens affirmed the feasibility of tool setup, motorized insertion and tool removal in different anatomies.

CONCLUSION

The tool allows the robot-assisted insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays and offers valuable insights during the surgical procedure, demonstrating promise for application in clinical contexts.

SIGNIFICANCE

This instrument has the potential to aid surgeons in achieving atraumatic placement of electrodes, consequently contributing to the improvement of hearing outcomes in cochlear implantation.

Sensitivity and Costs of Intraoperative Trans-Impedance Matrix Recordings, Spread of Excitation Functions, and X-ray Imaging in Detecting Cochlear Implant Tip Foldovers

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the sensitivity and financial costs of Trans-Impedance Matrix recordings, Spread of Excitation functions, and x-rays in detecting cochlear implant tip foldovers.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

113 ears of 108 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Following cochlear implantation and before concluding surgery, intraoperative Trans-Impedance Matrix recordings, Spread of Excitation functions, and x-rays were conducted to evaluate presence of tip foldover.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Presence of tip foldover; recording time necessary for and costs of Trans-Impedance Matrix, spread of excitation, and x-rays.

RESULTS

There were six tip foldovers. Trans-Impedance Matrix showed 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predicative value in detecting tip foldovers. Spread of excitation showed 29% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 67% positive predictive value, and 95% negative predicative value. Trans-Impedance Matrix recordings were completed significantly faster than spread of excitation and x-rays. Elimination of x-rays from our intraoperative workflow results in a twofold cost reduction.

CONCLUSION

Trans-Impedance Matrix recordings have potential great clinical utility in evaluating proper CI placement intraoperatively and reducing costs of surgery while not compromising patient care. Given the low tip foldover rate, a multicenter study is in progress to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predicative value of Trans-Impedance Matrix in a larger dataset. This can provide better guidance to cochlear implant clinics interested in evaluating the impact of using Trans-Impedance Matrix on patient care as well as the economics of reducing use of intraoperative imaging.

International Consensus Statements on Intraoperative Testing for Cochlear Implantation Surgery

OBJECTIVES

A wide variety of intraoperative tests are available in cochlear implantation. However, no consensus exists on which tests constitute the minimum necessary battery. We assembled an international panel of clinical experts to develop, refine, and vote upon a set of core consensus statements.

DESIGN

A literature review was used to identify intraoperative tests currently used in the field and draft a set of provisional statements. For statement evaluation and refinement, we used a modified Delphi consensus panel structure. Multiple interactive rounds of voting, evaluation, and feedback were conducted to achieve convergence.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine provisional statements were included in the original draft. In the first voting round, consensus was reached on 15 statements. Of the 14 statements that did not reach consensus, 12 were revised based on feedback provided by the expert practitioners, and 2 were eliminated. In the second voting round, 10 of the 12 revised statements reached a consensus. The two statements which did not achieve consensus were further revised and subjected to a third voting round. However, both statements failed to achieve consensus in the third round. In addition, during the final revision, one more statement was decided to be deleted due to overlap with another modified statement.

CONCLUSIONS

A final core set of 24 consensus statements was generated, covering wide areas of intraoperative testing during CI surgery. These statements may provide utility as evidence-based guidelines to improve quality and achieve uniformity of surgical practice.

A Case Series Suggests Peaking Transimpedance as a Possible Marker for Scalar Dislocations in Cochlear Implantation

INTRODUCTION

During postoperative implant control, we observed extraordinary peaks in transimpedance measurements. While searching for a possible reason, it appeared that they might correlate with scalar dislocations.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, six adult CI patients who underwent transimpedance measurements and postoperative imaging were analyzed. Intra- and postoperative transimpedance measurements were visual inspected. The intracochlear position of electrodes was radiologically identified.

RESULTS

From 6 patients with transimpedance matrices showing an extraordinary peak in the off-diagonal area, five electrode arrays showed no correct scalar localization in the scala tympani, and one had a correct scalar localization in the scala tympani.

CONCLUSIONS

A peaking transimpedance might be a marker for scalar dislocation in CIs.

Characterizing Cochlear Implant Trans-Impedance Matrix Heatmaps in Patients With Abnormal Anatomy

OBJECTIVE

To characterize transimpedance matrix (TIM) heatmap patterns in patients at risk of labyrinthine abnormality to better understand accuracy and possible TIM limitations.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of TIM patterns, preoperative, and postoperative imaging.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing cochlear implantation with risk of labyrinthine abnormality.

INTERVENTION

None.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were evaluated. Twenty-five percent (n = 19) of patients had a TIM pattern variant identified. These variants were separated into 10 novel categories. Overall, 9% (n = 6) of electrodes were malpositioned on intraoperative x-ray, of which 50% (n = 3) were underinserted, 17% (n = 1) were overinserted, 17% (n = 1) had a tip foldover, and 17% (n = 1) had a coiled electrode. The number of patients with a variant TIM pattern and normal x-ray was 18% (n = 14), and the number of patients with normal TIM pattern and malposition noted on x-ray was 3% (n = 2; both were electrode underinsertions that were recognized due to open circuits and surgical visualization).A newly defined skip heat pattern was identified in patients with IP2/Mondini malformation and interscalar septum width <0.5 mm at the cochlear pars ascendens of the basal turn.

CONCLUSIONS

This study defines novel patterns for TIM heatmap characterization to facilitate collaborative and comparative research moving forward. In doing so, it highlights a new pattern termed skip heat, which corresponds with a deficient interscalar septum of the cochlea pars ascendens of the basal turn in patients with IP2 malformation. Overall, the data assist the surgeon in better understanding the implications and limitations of TIM patterns within groups of patients with risk of labyrinthine abnormalities.

Worldwide differences in surgeon intraoperative practices for cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE

To characterize practice patterns of intraoperative imaging and/or functional confirmation of cochlear implant electrode location worldwide.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of otolaryngologists performing cochlear implantation was conducted between March 1 and May 6, 2023. Participants were recruited worldwide using an international otologic society membership email list and at professional meetings. Ninety-seven of the 125 invited participants (78%) completed the survey. Participants were categorized by continent.

RESULTS

North American surgeons use intraoperative X-rays more frequently than surgeons in Europe and Asia (p < 0.001). Otolaryngologists in Europe and Asia more frequently use no intraoperative imaging (p = 0.02). There is no regional difference between the intraoperative use of electrophysiologic instruments. European and Asian surgeons implant MED-EL devices (p = 0.012) more frequently than North American surgeons, who more frequently use Cochlear Corporation devices (p = 0.003). MED-EL use is related to less frequent intraoperative X-ray use (p = 0.02). Advanced Bionics use is related to more frequent intraoperative CT use (p = 0.03). No significant association existed between years of practice, number of cochlear implantation surgeries performed yearly, volume of pediatric CI practice, and use of intraoperative tools.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative practice for radiologic and functional verification of cochlear implant electrode positioning varies worldwide. Practice guidelines may help establish a standard of care for cochlear implantation.

Identifying Slim Modiolar Electrode Tip Fold-Over With Intracochlear Electrocochleography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictive value of intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) for identifying tip fold-over during cochlear implantation (CI) using the slim modiolar electrode (SME) array.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

METHODS

From July 2022 to June 2023, 142 patients, including adults and children, underwent intracochlear ECochG monitoring during and after SME placement. Tone-bursts were presented from 250 Hz to 2 kHz at 108 to 114 dB HL. A fast Fourier transform (FFT) allowed for frequency-specific evaluation of ECochG response. ECochG patterns during insertion and postinsertion were evaluated using sensitivity and specificity analysis to predict tip fold-over. Intraoperative plain radiographs served as a reference standard.

RESULTS

Fifteen tip fold-over cases occurred (10.6%) with significant ECochG response (>2 µV). Sixty-one cases without tip fold-over occurred (43.0%) with significant ECochG response. All tip fold-overs had both a nontonotopic postinsertion sweep and nonrobust active insertion pattern. No patients with robust insertion or tonotopic sweep patterns had tip fold-over. Sensitivity of detecting tip fold-over when having both nonrobust insertion and nontonotopic sweep patterns was 100% (95% confidence inteval [CI] 78.2%-100%), specificity was 68.9% (95% CI 55.7%-80.1%), and the overall accuracy was 72.0% (95% CI 60.5%-81.7%).

CONCLUSION

Intracochlear ECochG monitoring during cochlear implantation with the SME can be a valuable tool for identifying properly positioned electrode arrays. In cases where ECochG patterns are nonrobust on insertion and nontonotopic for electrode sweeps, there may be a concern for tip fold-over, and intraoperative imaging is necessary to confirm proper insertion.

A scoping review on the clinical effectiveness of Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements in detecting extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs in Cochlear Ltd devices

BACKGROUND

Extrusion of electrodes outside the cochlea and tip fold overs may lead to suboptimal outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Intraoperative measures such as Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements may enable clinicians to identify electrode malposition and direct surgeons to correctly place the electrode array during surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the current literature on the effectiveness of TIM measurements in identifying extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs.

METHODS

A scoping review of studies on TIM-based measurements were carried out using the Databases-Medline/PubMed, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library following PRISMA guidelines. Eleven full texts articles met the inclusion criteria. Only human studies pertaining to TIM as a tool used in CI were included in the review. Further, patient characteristics, electrode design, and TIM measurement outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

TIM measurements were available for 550 implanted ears with the subjects age ranged between 9 months to 89 years. Abnormal TIM measurements were reported for 6.55% (36). Tip fold over was detected in 3.64% (20) of the cases, extracochlear electrodes in 1.45% (8), and 1.45% (8) were reported as buckling. Slim-modiolar electrode array designs were more common (54.71%) than pre-curved (23.34%) or lateral wall (21.95%) electrode array. Abnormal cochlear anatomy was reported for five ears (0.89%), with normal cochlear anatomy for all other patients.

CONCLUSION

TIM measurement is a promising tool for the intraoperative detection of electrode malposition. TIM measurement has a potential to replace intraoperative imaging in future. Though, TIM measurement is in its early stages of clinical utility, intuitive normative data sets coupled with standardised criteria for detection of abnormal electrode positioning would enhance its sensitivity.

Changes in Revision Cochlear Implantation and Device Failure Profiles

OBJECTIVES

As cochlear implantation (CI) experiences rapid innovations and its indications expand, the characteristics of revision CI (RCI) are evolving. This study investigated changes in the RCI profile and explored their clinical implications.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all CIs performed at a tertiary medical institution between October 2001 and January 2023. The rates of and reasons for RCI were evaluated in relation to the manufacturer and device model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to examine cumulative and device survival curves. Cumulative and device survival rates were additionally analyzed based on age group, period of primary CI, and manufacturer. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate the association between RCI and the device manufacturer.

RESULTS

Among 1,430 CIs, 73 (5.1%) required RCI. The predominant reason for RCI was device failure (40 of 73 RCIs [54.8%]), with an overall device failure rate of 2.8%. This was followed by flap-associated problems and migration (nine of 73 RCIs each [12.3%]). Flap retention issues emerged as a new cause in three cases (two involving the CI 632 and one involving the SYNCHRONY 2 implant), and six instances of electrode tip fold-over arose (four for the CI 600 series and two for the CI 500 series). The overall 10-year cumulative and device survival rates were 93.4% and 95.8%, respectively. After excluding models with recall issues, significant differences in cumulative (P =0.010) and device (P =0.001) survival rates were observed across manufacturers.

CONCLUSION

While the overall CI survival rate is stable, device failure persists as the predominant reason for RCI. Moreover, the types of complications leading to revision (including issues with flap retention and electrode tip fold-over) have shifted, particularly for newer implant models. Given the clinical importance of device failure and subsequent reoperation, clinicians should remain informed about and responsive to these trends.