1
|
Kelly R, Tinnemore AR, Nguyen N, Goupell MJ. On the Difficulty of Defining Duration of Deafness for Adults With Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear 2025:00003446-990000000-00424. [PMID: 40254735 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2025]
Abstract
The amount of time that a person with a cochlear implant experiences severe-to-profound hearing loss before implantation is thought to impact the underlying neural survival, health, and function of the auditory system, thus likely being closely related to post-implantation performance in auditory tasks. The reporting of this number in the research literature is ubiquitous. Although it is most commonly called "duration of deafness," our point of view is that the term is imprecise and the calculation of this number can be nontrivial, particularly for cases of adult onset of hearing loss. We provide suggestions on changing the terminology to "duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss." We also propose a method of determining this number through a series of questions that leads a participant/patient through their progression of hearing loss. We encourage research methodology that requires researchers to explicitly report the process used to determine the duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss with the overall goals of (1) improving rigor and reproducibility in cochlear-implant research and (2) improving the translation between research findings and clinical recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Kelly
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Anna R Tinnemore
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
- Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicole Nguyen
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew J Goupell
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
- Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhan KY, Dizdar K, Kallogjeri D, Bao J, Dang S, Varghese J, Lee D, Walia A, Durakovic N, Wick CC, Buchman CA, Herzog JA, Shew MA. Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Older Adults, Ages 80-90. Otol Neurotol 2025; 46:381-387. [PMID: 40077838 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether postoperative speech recognition after cochlear implantation (CI) differ between age groups of 80 to 89 and 90+. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS Older adult (80+ years old) bilateral sensorineural hearing loss patients undergoing CI. INTERVENTIONS Therapeutic, CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Speech testing battery at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Self-reported balance and vertigo symptoms were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 221 patients were included in this study, with 171 cases ages 80 to 89 and 50 cases ≥90 years old. A total of 60.3% had an abnormal preoperative cognitive screen based on either Montreal Cognitive Assessment or Mini Mental State Examination. No major demographic or clinical variables were noted across age groups. Mean 1 year postoperative speech scores were as follows for ages 80 to 89 versus 90+, respectively: CNC 50% (±21%) versus 47% (±18%), AzBio Quiet 54% (±26%) versus 50% (±25%), and AzBio +10SNR 28% (±21%) versus 21% (±17%). Age, abnormal cognitive screen, duration of hearing loss, and comorbidity measures such as BMI, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27, and American Society of Anesthesiology physical status class were not correlated with any speech measure. Overall rates of persistent self-reported balance symptoms at activation were 22.7%, decreasing to 7.5% at 1 year. Datalogging was >11 hours use on average for both age groups. CONCLUSIONS CI speech recognition in the 80 to 89 and 90+ age range significantly improved from preoperative scores. No major speech recognition differences were identified between age groups. Age at implantation, abnormal cognitive screening, and comorbidity status did not influence speech perception, which suggests that candidacy in older adult CI patients should not be withheld strictly due to these parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karmela Dizdar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dorina Kallogjeri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - James Bao
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sabina Dang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jordan Varghese
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - David Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Amit Walia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Nedim Durakovic
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Cameron C Wick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Craig A Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jacques A Herzog
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew A Shew
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Otology & Neurotology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berg KA, Noble JH, Dawant BM, Sunderhaus LW, DeFreese AJ, Labadie RF, Gifford RH. Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement and Music Perception. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2025; 151:220-227. [PMID: 39786766 PMCID: PMC11907309 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 11/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
Importance Cochlear implants enable improvements in speech perception, but music perception outcomes remain variable. Image-guided cochlear implant programming has emerged as a potential programming strategy for increasing the quality of spectral information delivered through the cochlear implant to improve outcomes. Objectives To perform 2 experiments, the first of which modeled the variance in music perception scores as a function of electrode positioning factors, and the second of which evaluated image-guided cochlear implant programming as a strategy to improve music perception with a cochlear implant. Design, Setting, and Participants This single-center, prospective study recruited 50 adult patients with at least 6 months of cochlear implant listening experience and normal cochlear anatomy to participate in experiment 1 from 2013 to 2023. Data analysis was conducted from January to February 2024. Thirty-four of the 50 patients from experiment 1 also completed experiment 2. Interventions Cochlear implant programming using a computed tomography-guided electrode selection strategy. Main Outcomes and Measures University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music score, including subtests of pitch discrimination thresholds, isochronous familiar melody recognition, and timbre recognition. Results Of 50 participants, 20 (40%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 57.7 (16.4) years. Experiment 1 suggested that better music perception abilities in the 50 participants were associated with patients who were younger and had a postlingual onset of deafness, as well as electrode arrays with a full scala tympani insertion, higher modiolar distance, and shallower insertion depth. Experiment 2 suggested improvements in melody recognition in the 34 participants using the image-guided cochlear implant programming strategy. Patients with apical electrodes that were deactivated were more likely to demonstrate an improvement in their pitch perception thresholds with the image-guided strategy, likely due to the low-frequency stimuli used in the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music. Conclusions and Relevance This study identified patient and device factors that were associated with music perception outcomes with a cochlear implant. These findings suggest that a personalized, image-guided approach to programming may improve music perception abilities for patients with cochlear implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn A. Berg
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jack H. Noble
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Benoit M. Dawant
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Linsey W. Sunderhaus
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Andrea J. DeFreese
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Robert F. Labadie
- Department of Otolaryngology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - René H. Gifford
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paul BT, Trinh V, Chen J, Le T, Lin V, Dimitrijevic A. Speech outcomes in cochlear implant users depend on visual cross-modal cortical activity measured before or after implantation. Brain Commun 2025; 7:fcaf071. [PMID: 40008325 PMCID: PMC11851104 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 11/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants can partially restore hearing function in deaf individuals, but long-term speech listening outcomes vary widely across cochlear implant users. Visual cross-modal plasticity, where auditory cortical neurons upregulate visual inputs to assist visual processing, is one factor proposed to worsen cochlear implant users' speech outcomes because it may limit auditory processing capability. However, evidence for this view is conflicting, and the relationship of cross-modal activity to speech perception may depend on other variables such as the type of visual activity and when it is assessed. To clarify, we measured visual cross-modal activity during a silent lip reading task using EEG in a cross-sectional, observational study. The study tested visual brain activation in 14 individuals prior to receiving a cochlear implant, 15 individuals tested at least 1 year after receiving and using a cochlear implant and 13 typical hearing controls who did not use a cochlear implant or hearing aid. Cross-modal responses to the onset of a visual event were positively correlated to speech outcomes in cochlear implant users tested after surgery but were negatively correlated in those tested prior to cochlear implant surgery. In addition, cross-modal increases in neural oscillatory power in the alpha band (8-12 Hz) arising in the lip reading task were associated with worse speech outcomes in both cochlear implant user groups. Taken together, results redress claims that cross-modal plasticity is maladaptive for speech outcomes and instead suggest that this relationship depends on the time point of testing, stage of sensory processing and likely the relevance of the stimulus for speech. In addition, findings form the basis for new neural markers that are predictive of cochlear implant users' long-term speech ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon T Paul
- Department of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - Vincent Trinh
- Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Joseph Chen
- Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Trung Le
- Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Vincent Lin
- Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Andrew Dimitrijevic
- Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
- Evaluative Clinical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tawakkul Q, Almuhawas F, Alarifi S, Fatani N, Hagr A. Bilateral Simultaneous Cochlear Implants: How Early Activation Influences Wearing Hours. J Clin Med 2025; 14:961. [PMID: 39941630 PMCID: PMC11818215 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2025] [Revised: 01/22/2025] [Accepted: 01/24/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cochlear implantation (CI) is a transformative intervention for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, providing auditory and speech perception improvements. Traditional CI activation occurs 4-6 weeks post-surgery; however, recent advancements allow for early activation within 1-2 days. The integration of data logging in modern CI systems offers objective insights into processor usage and auditory exposure, which are crucial for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 63 patients with bilateral simultaneous CIs using MED-EL SONNET2/RONDO3 devices. Patients were classified into early activation (n = 30, activation within 1-2 days) and classical activation groups (n = 33, activation after day 2). Data logging metrics, patient demographics, and implant details were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Poisson regression. Results: Daily processor usage did not significantly differ between groups (9.5 ± 3.0 h/day for classical vs. 9.4 ± 3.7 h/day for early activation, p = 0.927). Subgroup analysis showed a significant 18% increase in processor usage with each additional year of patient age (IRR = 1.18, p < 0.001) and a 15% decrease in usage with each year delay in implantation age (IRR = 0.85, p < 0.001) among early activation users. Switch-on frequencies were comparable between groups, with no significant differences observed (p = 1.0). Conclusions: Early activation is feasible and associated with consistent CI usage, providing potential benefits in auditory rehabilitation. Future research should explore its impact on long-term speech and language outcomes to inform evidence-based practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qusai Tawakkul
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12211, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fida Almuhawas
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12211, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sarah Alarifi
- Research Department, MED-EL Gmbh, Riyadh 11563, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Nawaf Fatani
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12211, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12211, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
DeFreese A, Berg K, Noble J, Dawant B, Holder J, Amberg S, Brown C, Burg E, Dwyer N, Sisler-Dinwiddie A, Sparrow T, Sunderhaus L, Yaras S, Bennett M, Jan T, Moberly A, O’Malley M, Patro A, Perkins E, Tawfik K, Haynes D, Gifford R. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch and Cochlear Implant Outcomes by Electrode Type. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2025; 151:135-142. [PMID: 39666319 PMCID: PMC11826361 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024]
Abstract
Importance Speech recognition outcomes with a cochlear implant (CI) are highly variable. One factor suggested to correlate with CI-aided speech recognition is frequency-to-place mismatch, or the discrepancy between the natural tonotopic organization of the cochlea and the electric frequency allocation of the CI electrodes within the patient's cochlea. Objective To evaluate the association between frequency-to-place mismatch and speech recognition outcomes in a large cohort of postlingually deafened adult CI users, while controlling for various clinical factors known to be associated with those outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from a CI program at a tertiary medical center and included CIs from postlingually deafened adult CI users. After excluding patients whose data were not logged, patients with implantations occurring between 2016 and 2023 were included in the analysis. The data were extracted in November 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Results of the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) monosyllabic word recognition test measured in the CI-aided alone condition 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after activation served as the main outcome. The independent variables included frequency-to-place mismatch, electrode array type, mean modiolar distance, electrode position, age at implantation, biological sex, contralateral hearing abilities, time since CI activation (test interval), and daily device use. Results In 498 CIs from 447 postlingually deafened adults (mean [SD] age, 63.1 [17.1] years; 271 [54.4%] CIs with male users), frequency-to-place mismatch was negatively correlated with CI-aided speech recognition outcomes, but the association was only significant for precurved electrode arrays and not straight electrode arrays. In the linear mixed effects model for straight electrode arrays, only test interval (β = 1.14 [95% CI, 0.90-1.38]) and daily device use (β = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.42-1.38]) were correlated with the improvement of word recognition over the first year of device use. In the model for precurved electrode arrays, mismatch at 1500 Hz (β = -0.011 [95% CI, -0.011 to -0.006]), scalar location (β = 16.37 [95% CI, 9.01 to 23.74]), test interval (β = 1.18 [95% CI, 1.18-1.41]) and daily device use (β = 1.65 [95% CI, 1.15-2.14]) all were significantly associated with the improvement of word recognition over the first year of device use. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of postlingually deafened adult CI users, including both straight and precurved electrode arrays, daily device use and time since CI activation were found to be significantly associated with improved CI-aided speech recognition outcomes. Frequency-to-place mismatch at 1500 Hz and scalar location were associated with word recognition only for precurved arrays. These findings suggest that, for patients with straight arrays, any interference produced by frequency-to-place mismatch may be overcome by adaptation, which could be supported by daily device use. However, for patients with precurved arrays, daily device use may not be sufficient to completely overcome electrode placement factors, including scalar location and mismatch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea DeFreese
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Katelyn Berg
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jack Noble
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Benoit Dawant
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jourdan Holder
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Susan Amberg
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Christine Brown
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Emily Burg
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Nichole Dwyer
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Allyson Sisler-Dinwiddie
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Tayler Sparrow
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Linsey Sunderhaus
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Stephanie Yaras
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Marc Bennett
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Taha Jan
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Aaron Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Matthew O’Malley
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ankita Patro
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Elizabeth Perkins
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kareem Tawfik
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David Haynes
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - René Gifford
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bogdanov C, Goulios H, Mulders WHAM, Tavora-Vieira D. Investigating the effect of cochlear implant usage metrics on cortical auditory-evoked potential responses in adult recipients post-implantation. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1453274. [PMID: 39640296 PMCID: PMC11619141 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1453274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study examines the effect of cochlear implant (CI) device usage metrics on post-operative outcomes in unilateral CI recipients. The primary objective is to investigate the relationship between CI usage frequency (average daily CI use) and duration (total years of CI use) on electrically evoked cortical auditory-evoked potential (eCAEP) response peak latency (ms) and amplitude (μV). Methods Adult CI users (n = 41) who previously exhibited absent acoustically evoked CAEP responses participated in the study. The peak latency and amplitude of eCAEP P1-N1-P2 responses were recorded, when present for the apical, medial, and basal test electrode contacts. CI duration was defined as the number of years between the date of CI activation and date that eCAEP testing was performed. CI usage frequency was defined as the average number of hours per day of audio processor use, which was recorded using the CI programming software. Results Overall, 27 participants (65.85%) exhibited detectable eCAEP responses across one or more electrode contacts. Among these, 18 participants (43.9%) elicited eCAEP responses at all three electrode contacts, while 7 (17.07%) showed responses at two contacts, and 2 (4.88%) at one contact. For the remaining 14 participants (34.15%), eCAEP responses were either absent or undetectable. CI usage frequency (average daily CI use [hours/day]) was captured for 32 (78%) of the participants (median 10.35 h/day, range 0.2-16 h/day). Participants with present eCAEP responses for the basal electrode (n = 14) showed significantly higher CI usage frequency (11.8 h/day, p = 0.026) compared to those with non-detectable responses (6.25 h/day). An association was found between higher CI usage frequency and reduced N1 (p = 0.002), P2 (p = 0.0037) and P1-N1 inter-peak (p = 0.015) response latency (ms). While CI duration (total CI use [years]) did not differ significantly between groups based on the presence of eCAEP responses, an association was found between greater CI duration and increased eCAEP response amplitude (μV) for the P2 (p = 0.008) and N1-P2 peak-peak (p = 0.009) response components. Discussion Additionally, most (65.85%) participants who previously exhibited absent acoustic CAEP responses developed eCAEP responses after consistent CI use and increased CI experience. These findings may suggest a potential for cortical plasticity and adaptation with consistent CI use over time. Recognizing the impact of device usage metrics on neural responses post-implantation enhances our understanding of the importance of consistent daily CI use. Overall, these findings contribute to addressing the variability among CI users, improving post-operative outcomes and advancing the standard of personalized care in auditory rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caris Bogdanov
- School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Helen Goulios
- School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Dayse Tavora-Vieira
- Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, WA, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patro A, Lawrence PJ, Tamati TN, Ning X, Moberly AC. Using Machine Learning and Multifaceted Preoperative Measures to Predict Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Prospective Pilot Study. Ear Hear 2024; 46:00003446-990000000-00338. [PMID: 39238093 PMCID: PMC11825478 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To use machine learning and a battery of measures for preoperative prediction of speech recognition and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. DESIGN Demographic, audiologic, cognitive-linguistic, and QOL predictors were collected from 30 postlingually deaf adults before CI surgery. K-means clustering separated patients into groups. Reliable change index scores were computed for speech recognition and QOL from pre-CI to 6 months post-CI, and group differences were determined. RESULTS Clustering yielded three groups with differences in reliable change index for sentence recognition. One group demonstrated low baseline sentence recognition and only small improvements post-CI, suggesting a group "at risk" for limited benefits. This group showed lower pre-CI scores on verbal learning and memory and lack of musical training. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative assessments can prognosticate CI recipients' postoperative performance and identify individuals at risk for experiencing poor sentence recognition outcomes, which may help guide counseling and rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Patro
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- These authors are co-first authors of this work
| | - Patrick J. Lawrence
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- These authors are co-first authors of this work
| | - Terrin N. Tamati
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Xia Ning
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Translational Data Analytics Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Aaron C. Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ezenwa AC, Goupell MJ, Gordon-Salant S. Cochlear-implant listeners benefit from training with time-compressed speech, even at advanced ages. JASA EXPRESS LETTERS 2024; 4:054402. [PMID: 38717468 PMCID: PMC11075136 DOI: 10.1121/10.0025431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
This study evaluated whether adaptive training with time-compressed speech produces an age-dependent improvement in speech recognition in 14 adult cochlear-implant users. The protocol consisted of a pretest, 5 h of training, and a posttest using time-compressed speech and an adaptive procedure. There were significant improvements in time-compressed speech recognition at the posttest session following training (>5% in the average time-compressed speech recognition threshold) but no effects of age. These results are promising for the use of adaptive training in aural rehabilitation strategies for cochlear-implant users across the adult lifespan and possibly using speech signals, such as time-compressed speech, to train temporal processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amara C Ezenwa
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, , ,
| | - Matthew J Goupell
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, , ,
| | - Sandra Gordon-Salant
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, , ,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patro A, Lindquist NR, Holder JT, Freeman MH, Gifford RH, Tawfik KO, O’Malley MR, Bennett ML, Haynes DS, Perkins EL. Improved Postoperative Speech Recognition and Processor Use With Early Cochlear Implant Activation. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:386-391. [PMID: 38437818 PMCID: PMC10939836 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report speech recognition outcomes and processor use based on timing of cochlear implant (CI) activation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS A total of 604 adult CI recipients from October 2011 to March 2022, stratified by timing of CI activation (group 1: ≤10 d, n = 47; group 2: >10 d, n = 557). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Average daily processor use; Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) and Arizona Biomedical (AzBio) in quiet at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits; time to peak performance. RESULTS The groups did not differ in sex ( p = 0.887), age at CI ( p = 0.109), preoperative CNC ( p = 0.070), or preoperative AzBio in quiet ( p = 0.113). Group 1 had higher median daily processor use than group 2 at the 1-month visit (12.3 versus 10.7 h/d, p = 0.017), with no significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months. The early activation group had superior median CNC performance at 3 months (56% versus 46%, p = 0.007) and 12 months (60% versus 52%, p = 0.044). Similarly, the early activation group had superior median AzBio in quiet performance at 3 months (72% versus 59%, p = 0.008) and 12 months (75% versus 68%, p = 0.049). Both groups were equivalent in time to peak performance for CNC and AzBio. Earlier CI activation was significantly correlated with higher average daily processor use at all follow-up intervals. CONCLUSION CI activation within 10 days of surgery is associated with increased early device usage and superior speech recognition at both early and late follow-up visits. Timing of activation and device usage are modifiable factors that can help optimize postoperative outcomes in the CI population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Patro
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Nathan R. Lindquist
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jourdan T. Holder
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Michael H. Freeman
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - René H. Gifford
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kareem O. Tawfik
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Matthew R. O’Malley
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Marc L. Bennett
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David S. Haynes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Elizabeth L. Perkins
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kasdan AV, Butera IM, DeFreese AJ, Rowland J, Hilbun AL, Gordon RL, Wallace MT, Gifford RH. Cochlear implant users experience the sound-to-music effect. AUDITORY PERCEPTION & COGNITION 2024; 7:179-202. [PMID: 39391629 PMCID: PMC11463729 DOI: 10.1080/25742442.2024.2313430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024]
Abstract
Introduction The speech-to-song illusion is a robust effect where repeated speech induces the perception of singing; this effect has been extended to repeated excerpts of environmental sounds (sound-to-music effect). Here we asked whether repetition could elicit musical percepts in cochlear implant (CI) users, who experience challenges with perceiving music due to both physiological and device limitations. Methods Thirty adult CI users and thirty age-matched controls with normal hearing (NH) completed two repetition experiments for speech and nonspeech sounds (water droplets). We hypothesized that CI users would experience the sound-to-music effect from temporal/rhythmic cues alone, but to a lesser magnitude compared to NH controls, given the limited access to spectral information CI users receive from their implants. Results We found that CI users did experience the sound-to-music effect but to a lesser degree compared to NH participants. Musicality ratings were not associated with musical training or frequency resolution, and among CI users, clinical variables like duration of hearing loss also did not influence ratings. Discussion Cochlear implants provide a strong clinical model for disentangling the effects of spectral and temporal information in an acoustic signal; our results suggest that temporal cues are sufficient to perceive the sound-to-music effect when spectral resolution is limited. Additionally, incorporating short repetitions into music specially designed for CI users may provide a promising way for them to experience music.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna V. Kasdan
- Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Curb Center for Art, Enterprise, and Public Policy, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Iliza M. Butera
- Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Andrea J. DeFreese
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jess Rowland
- Lewis Center for the Arts, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Reyna L. Gordon
- Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Curb Center for Art, Enterprise, and Public Policy, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mark T. Wallace
- Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - René H. Gifford
- Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|