Long-term hearing preservation after microsurgical excision of vestibular schwannoma

Hypofractionated Versus Single-Session Radiosurgery to Preserve Hearing in Patients Affected by Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: The ACOUNEU Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

During the last decades, in addition to tumor control, hearing preservation has become an important priority in the treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS). Given that the potential advantages of hypofractionated radiosurgery (hRS) over single-session radiosurgery (RS) in terms of improved hearing outcomes remain unclear, this randomized trial aims to provide a robust answer to this question.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The present is a double-arm randomized clinical trial. The study started in 2011 and the last patient was enrolled in 2020. The minimum follow-up was 36 months. The trial involved patients with a diagnosis of sporadic VS with preserved hearing. One hundred and eight patients were enrolled. Participants were randomized to receive either hRS (18 Gy/3 consecutive fractions) or RS (most commonly 12 Gy/1 fraction). At each follow-up, clinical assessment, volumetric magnetic resonance imaging, and audiometry were evaluated. The primary endpoint was hearing sparing 36 months after RS or hRS. The maintenance of a serviceable hearing was defined according to the American Academy of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery classification.

RESULTS

Of the 108 randomized patients, 100 (47 RS and 53 hRS) were included in the analysis (mean age, 55 years; 56% female). No significant differences between hRS and RS were found in terms of hearing preservation (hazard ratio, 1.083; [95% CI, 0.603-1.946], and P = .789), with pretreatment hearing status, age, and dose to cochlea being the only significant predictors. No other parameters, including tumor volume, were associated with hearing preservation. At a median follow-up of 62 months, local control was 92% (95% CI, 84.8%-96.5%). Treatment-related toxicity was mild or moderate, in general not exceeding National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 2.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first randomized clinical trial comparing 2 different radiosurgical regimens while focusing on hearing preservation. The study failed to demonstrate the potential advantages of hRS over RS with respect to hearing preservation. The volumetric analysis confirmed an excellent postradiosurgery tumor control rate for both RS and hRS groups. These results may guide the clinicians in the treatment schedule choice to preserve hearing in patients with VS.

Hearing Preservation Outcomes in 230 Consecutive Patients with Small Vestibular Schwannomas Treated with Microsurgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) outcomes for patients with small sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) who elect to undergo microsurgical resection.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary single-academic institution.

PATIENTS

Individuals 18 years or older with small sporadic VS (≤15 mm) who underwent microsurgical resection from 2018 to 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

Microsurgical resection via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) or retrosigmoid (RS) approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative HP (word recognition score ≥ 50%) and facial nerve function.

RESULTS

Of the 230 consecutive patients with small sporadic VS who elected to undergo microsurgical resection, hearing was preserved in 61% of patients. When stratified by tumor size, patients with tumors ≤10 mm had a 72% hearing preservation rate. On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for hearing preservation were the presence of preoperative vertigo (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.52) and tumor size. Patients with tumors between 0 to 5 mm and 5.1 to 10 mm had 3.62 higher odds (95% CI, 1.39-9.4) and 2.52 higher odds (95% CI, 1.30-4.9) of hearing preservation, respectively, when compared to patients with tumors that were larger than 10 mm. At the time of last follow-up, a House-Brackmann (HB) 1 or 2 was maintained in 95% (n = 218) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical resection for patients with small VS is associated with good hearing preservation and excellent facial nerve outcomes. Because larger tumor size portends poorer hearing outcomes, for patients who elect to undergo microsurgical resection for hearing preservation, proactive surgical intervention when tumors are ≤10 mm should be considered to increase the likelihood of hearing preservation.

Physical Inactivity and Sedentariness in Older Hearing Loss patients: Restoration With Hearing Aids

OBJECTIVES

Hearing loss causes numerous functional deficits. However, few studies have been conducted to assess the association between hearing loss and physical inactivity. This study aimed to evaluate the physical activity and sedentary behavior of hearing loss patients and their relation with the use of hearing aids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We extracted participants over 60 years of age with information on hearing status and physical activities from the eighth Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey conducted from 2019 to 2020. We classified them into four groups: a normal hearing group (≤25 dB), a mild hearing loss group (>25 dB and ≤40 dB), a moderate hearing loss group (>40 dB and ≤50 dB), and a non-serviceable hearing group (>50 dB). Additionally, we extracted hearing aid users with hearing levels exceeding 50 dB.

RESULTS

After adjusting other factors, the non-serviceable hearing group walked less frequently than the moderate (p = 0.004) and mild hearing loss group (p < 0.001) and walked less and sat more than the normal hearing group (walking frequency: p < 0.001; walking time: p = 0.020; and sitting time: p = 0.034). Also, the hearing aid users walked more frequently (p = 0.003) and for longer (p = 0.045) than the non-serviceable hearing group.

CONCLUSION

Hearing loss is associated with reduced walking and a sedentary lifestyle. The use of hearing aids is associated with improved physical activity. Appropriate interventions, including hearing aids, should be provided to hearing loss patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 (individual cross-sectional study) Laryngoscope, 134:5109-5115, 2024.

Long-Term Hearing Outcome For Vestibular Schwannomas After Microsurgery And Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Hearing loss is a common symptom associated with vestibular schwannoma (VS), either because of the tumor's effects on the cochlear nerve or due to active treatments such as surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Treatment decisions for VS are based on factors including tumor size, hearing status, patient symptoms, and institutional preference. The study aimed to investigate long-term auditory outcomes in VS patients undergoing active treatments with a hearing preservation intent.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, searching Scopus, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases from inception to January 2024.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies meeting inclusion criteria, including a minimum 5-year follow-up and assessment of pre- and posttreatment hearing outcomes, were included. Pooled prevalence estimates for serviceable hearing after SRS and microsurgery were calculated using MetaXL software. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, with 356 patients included for analysis. The pooled prevalence of maintaining serviceable hearing after SRS at 10 years was 18.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7%-43.3%), with wide prediction intervals indicating variability in outcomes. Microsurgery demonstrated a higher prevalence of maintaining long-term serviceable hearing, with a pooled estimate of 74.5% (95% CI: 63.5%-84.1%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review underscores the importance of long-term follow-up in evaluating auditory outcomes in VS treatment. Despite the biases inherent to pretreatment patients selection, hearing preservation microsurgery for sporadic VS removal demonstrated favorable and stable long-term serviceable hearing.

Quality of Life for Patients with Sporadic Small Vestibular Schwannomas Following Middle Fossa Craniotomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate quality-of-life outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) undergoing a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study from 2018 to 2023.

SETTING

Tertiary academic institution.

PATIENTS

Adults with sporadic VS.

INTERVENTIONS

MCF.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the change in preoperative and 1-year postoperative Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-life (PANQOL) scores. Secondary outcome measures included hearing preservation and facial nerve function.

RESULTS

Of the 164 patients who underwent MCF for sporadic VS, 78 patients elected to voluntarily complete preoperative PANQOL assessments prior to surgery. Seventy-one (91%) of those 78 patients completed postoperative PANQOL surveys. Fifty (70%) of the respondents were female and the median age was 48 years (range, 27-71 years). Overall, at 1-year postsurgery, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was obtained in the hearing (mean difference, 10.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-16.7) and anxiety (mean difference, 18.8; 95% CI, 11.7-25.9) domains. For patients with hearing preservation (n = 48, 68%), MCIDs were reached in the hearing (mean difference, 13.4; 95% CI, 6.3-20.6), anxiety (mean difference, 20.8; 95% CI, 11.8-29.9), energy (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8), pain (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8) domains, and overall PANQOL scores (mean difference, 12.7; 95% CI, 7.1-18.3). Postoperatively, 64 (90%) patients maintained a House-Brackmann I.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest study examining disease-specific QOL for VS patients undergoing MCF. Based on our institution's experience, MCF approach for small VS is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in QOL, hearing preservation, and excellent facial nerve outcomes.

Temporal lobe injury with middle fossa approach to intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review

There are several surgical approaches for vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection. However, management has gradually shifted from microsurgical resection, toward surveillance and radiosurgery. One of the arguments against microsurgery via the middle fossa approach (MFA) is the risk of temporal lobe retraction injury or sequelae. Here, we sought to evaluate the incidence of temporal lobe retraction injury or sequela from a MFA via a systematic review of the existing literature. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies reporting temporal lobe injury or sequela during MFA for VS were identified. Data was aggregated and subsequently analyzed to evaluate the incidence of temporal lobe injury. 22 studies were included for statistical analysis, encompassing 1522 patients that underwent VS resection via MFA. The overall rate of temporal lobe sequelae from this approach was 0.7%. The rate of CSF leak was 5.9%. The rate of wound infection was 0.6%. Meningitis occurred in 1.6% of patients. With the MFA, 92% of patients had good facial outcomes, and 54.9% had hearing preservation. Our series and literature review support that temporal lobe retraction injury or sequelae is an infrequent complication from an MFA for intracanalicular VS resection.

Hearing Aid in Vestibular-Schwannoma-Related Hearing Loss: A Review

(1) Background: Several types of hearing aids are available for the rehabilitation of vestibular-schwannoma (VS)-related hearing loss. There is a lack of recently published papers regarding this theme. The aim of the present work is to organize current knowledge. (2) Methods: A review of the literature regarding the topics "vestibular schwannoma", "hearing loss", and "hearing aid" was performed. Nineteen studies were thus considered. (3) Results: Conventional hearing aids, contralateral routing of signal (CROS) aids, bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA), and others are available options for hearing rehabilitation in VS patients. The speech discrimination score (SDS) is considered the best measure to assess candidacy for rehabilitation with hearing aids. The best hearing rehabilitative conditions in VS patients when using conventional hearing aid devices are a mild-moderate hearing loss degree with good word recognition (more than 50% SDS). CROS-Aid and BAHA are reported to be beneficial. CROS-Aid expands on the area of receiving hearing. BAHA aids use direct bone-conduction stimulation. Unfortunately, there are no available studies focused specifically on VS patients that compare CROS and BAHA technologies. (4) Conclusions: Hearing aids, CROS, and BAHA are viable options for rehabilitating hearing impairment in VS, but require an accurate case-by-case audiological evaluation for rehabilitating hearing impairment in VS. Further studies are needed to prove if what is currently known about similar hearing illnesses can be confirmed, particularly in the case of VS.

Using a Facial Nerve Stimulator to Record the Auditory Nerve Compound Action Potential to Locate the Auditory Nerve During Vestibular Schwannoma Resection

BACKGROUND

Improved technology in vestibular neuroma resection and facial nerve protection has become more sophisticated, and the protection of hearing during vestibular schwannoma resection is crucial. Currently, brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP), cochlear electrography, and cochlear nerve compound action potential (CNAP) are frequently used. The CNAP waveform is stable; however, the recording electrode can easily affect the procedure and cannot map the auditory nerve. The purpose of the study was to explore a simple method to record the CNAP and map the auditory nerve.

METHODS

In this study, CNAP was recorded using a facial nerve bipolar stimulator to localize and protect the auditory nerve. The BAEP click stimulation mode was used. A bipolar stimulator was used as the recording electrode to record CNAP and locate anatomical displacement of the auditory nerve. The CNAP of 40 patients was monitored. Pure tone audiometry, speech discrimination score, and auditory evoked potential (BAEP) evaluations were performed on all patients before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 40 patients, 30 patients obtained CNAP during surgery, and the rate of CNAP obtained was significantly higher than that of BAEP. The sensitivity and specificity of decrease in CNAP in predicting significant hearing loss were 88.9% and 66.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the disappearance of CNAP in predicting significant hearing loss were 52.9% and 92.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The bipolar facial nerve stimulator can locate and protect the auditory nerve by recording a stable potential. The CNAP obtained rate was significantly higher than that of BAEP. The disappearance of BAEP during acoustic neuroma monitoring can be used as a standard alert for the surgeon, and decrease in CNAP is an alert for the operator.

Evaluation of the hearing preservation and tissue response of dexamethasone and hyaluronic acid delivery during cochlear implantation on cats in a three-month period study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of DX and HA on hearing preservation and tissue response with cochlear implantation in a cat mode.

METHODS

11 cats were bilaterally implanted with Nurotron electrode. According to the different treatment, 22 ears were subdivided into four following groups: Electrode (E) only, Electrode +HA (E+H), Electrode + DX (E+DX), and Electrode +HA +DX (E+H+DX). Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) thresholds were recorded before and 3 months after surgery. After 3 months of cochlear implantation histopathological assessment of all cochleae were performed .

RESULTS

At low frequencies, the mean ABR thresholds shift in animals treated with E+H+DX demonstrated a statistically significant difference. The proportion of cochleae showing fibrous tissue and new bone formation was 50% in E+H+DX group, 66.7% in E+DX group, 83.3% in E+H group and 100% in E group.

CONCLUSION

United HA and DX local delivery could provide better protection against hearing loss at low-frequency threshold and could more effectively reduce the trauma related to electrode insertion and the fibrous tissue formation around the electrode.

Middle Cranial Fossa Approach for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma

The middle fossa approach is an excellent technique for removing appropriate vestibular schwannomas in patients with serviceable hearing. Knowledge of the intricate middle fossa anatomy is essential for optimal outcomes. Gross total removal can be achieved with preservation of hearing and facial nerve function, both in the immediate and long-term periods. This article provides an overview of the background and indications for the procedure, a description of the operative protocol, and a summary of the literature on postoperative hearing outcomes.

Management of Vestibular Schwannoma with Normal Hearing

INTRODUCTION

This work aimed to study the management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients with normal hearing (NH).

METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken in a Quaternary referral center for skull base pathologies. Among 4,000 VS patients 162 met our strict audiological criteria for NH. These patients were divided into 2 management groups, wait and scan (W&S) (45/162, 25%) and operated patients (123/162, 75%), and 6 patients were included in both groups.

RESULTS

Our management strategy achieved the goals for treatment of VS. First goal, all tumors were completely removed except for 2 intentional residuals. Second goal, facial nerve (FN) function preservation (House Brackmann I, II, and III) was 95.9%. Third goal, possible hearing preservation (HP) attempts occurred in (50/122) (40.9%) with an HP rate in 44% of the patients. Additionally, there were only 2 cases of postoperative complications with no CSF leakage. The prospect of HP in NH patients did not differ with respect to tumor size. However, patients with normal preoperative ABR seemed to have better chances of HP and good FN function and vice versa. HP rate was superior for the MCFA as opposed to the RS + RLA. W&S group demonstrated hearing stability in 88.9% of the patients and FN function stability of HB I in 100% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection is a reasonable and definitive management option for VS with NH. Nevertheless, choosing to manage cases with observation remains an appropriate management option for NH patients. ABR might be considered as an adjuvant tool indicating better prognosis for HP.

Auditory Brain Stem Response Predictors of Hearing Outcomes after Middle Fossa Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas

Objectives To analyze the relationship between preoperative and intraoperative auditory brain stem response (ABR) characteristics and hearing outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) undergoing hearing preservation (HP) surgery via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach.

Design Prospective study.

Setting Academic tertiary skull base referral center.

Methods Pre- and postoperative pure-tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS) were examined. Intraoperative ABR wave III latency, wave V latency, and amplitude were recorded. HP was defined as postoperative WRS ≥50%.

Participants Adult patients with VS and WRS ≥50% who underwent MCF tumor resection between November 2017 and September 2019.

Main Outcome Measures Postoperative hearing outcomes.

Results Sixty patients were included. Mean tumor size was 9.2 mm (range, 3–17). HP rates were 56.7% for the cohort and 69.7% for tumors <10 mm. A complete loss of wave V was associated with an 82.9% increase in postoperative PTA (p < 0.001) and 97.2% decrease in WRS (p < 0.001), whereas a diminished wave V was correlated with 62.7% increase in PTA (p < 0.001) and 55.7% decrease in WRS (p = 0.006). A diminished or absent wave V, but not increased wave III/V latency or decreased wave V amplitude, was correlated with a decline in postoperative hearing class (r = 0.735, p < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that a stable wave V has the highest accuracy in predicting HP (sensitivity of 82.6%, specificity of 84.8%).

Conclusion Of the examined preoperative and intraoperative ABR characteristics, a stable wave V intraoperatively was the strongest predictor of HP after MCF resection of VS.

Level of Evidence Level III.

Hearing Preservation After Intervention in Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the durability of audiological outcomes after radiation and surgery in the management of vestibular schwannoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS

Adults with sporadic vestibular schwannoma and serviceable hearing at the time of intervention.

INTERVENTIONS

Gamma Knife, middle cranial fossa, or retrosigmoid approaches.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pure-tone audiometry and speech discrimination scores.

RESULTS

Postintervention serviceable hearing (class A/B) was preserved in 70.4% (n = 130; mean follow-up, 3.31 yr; range, 0-15.25 yr). Of the 49 patients treated with radiation, 19 (39.6%) had serviceable hearing at last follow-up, compared with 38 (46.9% of 81) who underwent retrosigmoid (n = 36 [44.4%]) and middle cranial fossa (n = 45 [55.6%]) approaches (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-2.82; p = 0.47). A matched analysis by age, tumor volume, and preintervention hearing (n = 38) also found no difference in hearing preservation (HP) likelihood between surgery and radiation (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.24-35.91; p = 0.59). After initial HP, 4 (9.5%) surgical versus 10 (37.0%) radiated patients subsequently lost residual serviceable (A/B) hearing (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69; p = 0.01) at a mean 3.74 ± 3.58 and 4.73 ± 3.83 years after surgery and radiation, respectively. Overall, 5- and 10-year HP rates (A/B) after initially successful HP surgery were 84.4 and 63.0%, respectively. However, survival estimates declined to 48.9% at 5 years and 32.7% at 10 years when patients with immediate postoperative serviceable hearing loss were also included, which were comparable to radiation-HP rates at 5 and 10 years of 28.0 and 14.2%, respectively ( p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

After vestibular schwannoma intervention, overall HP was similar between radiated and surgical cohorts. However, when successful, surgical approaches offered more durable hearing outcomes at long-term follow-up.

Early Translabyrinthine Surgery for Small- and Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannomas: Consecutive Cohort Analysis of Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Reappraisal of the role of translabyrinthine (TLAB) surgery in small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 330 consecutive patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2019 with small- and medium-sized VS up to 20 mm in the extrameatal portion submitted to surgical treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

VS removal through microscopic TLAB approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Facial nerve function according to the House-Brackmann scale at 12-month follow-up, postoperative complications and entity of tumor resection assessed with postoperative MRI. A comparative analysis of outcomes between two groups of patients was further conducted, according to tumor size: Group A, small-sized (intrameatal or ≤10 mm extrameatal tumors) and Group B, medium-sized VSs (extrameatal between 11 and 20 mm).

RESULTS

Complete tumor removal was achieved in all cases. The overall complication rate was 5.5%, being cerebrospinal fluid leak the most frequent. Patients with small-sized VS (n = 121) presented a significantly better facial nerve function than patients with medium-sized tumors (n = 209), showing House-Brackmann Grades I to II in 92.6% versus 73.6% of cases, respectively ( p < 0.001). A nearly 4.5-fold higher risk of poor facial nerve function at 12 months affects patients with medium-sized tumors (odds ratio, 4.473; 95% confidence interval, 2.122-9.430; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the current scenario of multioptional VS management, when hearing preservation is not feasible, early TLAB approach as first-line treatment for small-sized VSs showed favorable results. Factors supporting such proactive surgical treatment include long-term definitive cure, no major complications, good facial nerve outcomes, and the possibility of simultaneous hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant.

Analysis of Hearing Preservation in Middle Cranial Fossa Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

Describe the effect of preoperative hearing on the likelihood of hearing preservation after middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach for resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS) and the effect of hearing preservation on disease-specific quality of life (QOL).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care skull base surgery program.

PATIENTS

Sixty three adult patients with preoperative word recognition score (WRS) ≥50% who underwent MCF resection of VS between 2017 and 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent MCF VS resection with attempted hearing preservation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hearing preservation (postoperative WRS ≥50%), hearing-related Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) score.

RESULTS

Sixty three patients with mean age 47.4 (±9.6) years and tumor size 11.5 (±0.5) mm were analyzed. Hearing was preserved (+HP) and lost (-HP) in 37 (58.7%) and 26 (41.3%) patients, respectively. Preoperatively, pure tone average audiometry was significantly lower among the +HP group (20.0 dB) versus -HP (31.0 dB, p < 0.003). WRS was higher among +HP versus -HP (94% vs. 84%, respectively; p < 0.002). Linear regression showed that intra- versus extra-canalicular tumor location, sudden hearing loss history, fundal fluid cap thickness, and tumor size had no relationship to hearing preservation outcomes. When evaluating postoperative QOL data (n = 37) hearing-related PANQOL score differed between +HP and -HP (t35 = 2.458, p = 0.0191) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients undergoing MCF resection of VS, rates of HP were higher for patients with excellent preoperative hearing. Postoperatively, +HP patients reported improved hearing-related PANQOL scores compared to -HP patients.

Primary treatment of small-to-medium (<3cm) sporadic vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis on hearing preservation and tumor control rates for microsurgery versus radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

A meta-analysis of sporadic VS patients primarily treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or microsurgery (MS) was performed, and hearing preservation outcome (HPO), tumor control (TC), and facial nerve dysfunction (FND) were analyzed.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted (Medline and Scopus database) for the period, January 2010 to June 2020 with appropriate MeSH. English language articles for small-to-medium sporadic VS (<3cm) utilizing SRS or MS as primary treatment modality, with minimum follow-up of 3 years, were included. Studies had to report an acceptable standardized hearing metric.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria: 10 (microsurgery); 23 (radiosurgery); (one comparative study included in both). HPO, at ∼65 months follow-up, were comparable between MS group (10 studies; 809 patients) and SRS group (23 studies; 1234 patients) (56% versus 59%, p=0.1527). TC, at ∼70 months follow-up, was significantly better in MS group (9 studies; 1635 patients) versus SRS group (19 studies; 2260 patients) (98% versus 92%, p < 0.0001). FND, at ∼ 12 months follow-up, was significantly higher in MS group (8 studies; 1101 patients) versus SRS group (17 studies; 2285 patients) (10% versus 2%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

MS and SRS are comparable primary treatments for small (<3cm) sporadic VS with respect to HPO at 5-year follow-up in patients with serviceable hearing at presentation; ∼50% patients for both modalities will likely lose serviceable hearing by that time-point. High TC rates (>90%) were seen with both modalities; MS (98%) versus SRS (92%). The post-treatment FND was significantly less with SRS group (2%) versus MS group (10%).

Cochlear T2 Signal May Predict Hearing Outcomes After Resection of Acoustic Neuroma

OBJECTIVE

Examine the impact of preoperative cochlear Fast Imaging Employing Steady-state Acquisition (FIESTA) and Constructive Interference in Steady State (CISS) signal intensity on hearing outcomes after middle cranial fossa (MCF) resection of acoustic neuroma (AN).

METHODS

Adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent MCF AN resection for hearing preservation (HP) between November 2017 and September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had preoperative word recognition score (WRS) ≥50%. HP was defined as postoperative WRS ≥50%. A neuroradiologist blinded to patients' clinical and audiometric outcomes reviewed patients' preoperative magnetic resonance images. Ipsilateral-to-contralateral cochlear FIESTA/CISS signal intensity ratios were determined using hand-drawn regions of interest focused on the cochlear fluid. Preoperative and postoperative pure tone average (PTA) and WRS were reviewed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were reviewed (60.8% female). Mean age was 47 years and mean tumor size 9.2 mm (±3.8). Hearing was preserved in 56.9% (n = 29). FIESTA/CISS signal ratios did not significantly differ between patients with and without HP. Lower FIESTA/CISS signal ratios correlated with greater declines in hearing (r = 0.322, p = 0.011 for PTA; and r = 0.384, p = 0.004 for WRS). On multivariate analysis accounting for tumor size and preoperative PTA/WRS, decreases in FIESTA/CISS signal ratios independently predicted greater declines in hearing by PTA (b = -100.9, p = 0.012) and WRS (b = 76.208), although the latter result was not statistically significant (p = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear FIESTA/CISS signal intensity may be a predictor of postoperative hearing loss after MCF AN resection. In this cohort, degraded preoperative cochlear FIESTA/CISS signal strongly predicted postoperative hearing loss.Level of Evidence: IV.

Hearing Outcomes with Percutaneous and Transcutaneous BAHA® Technology in Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate outcomes of BAHA Connect® and BAHA Attract® implantations, and to examine the prognostic utility of a preimplantation Softband®-attached processor trial.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent Connect® (19 ears) and Attract® (25 ears) implantation between 2007 and 2017.

INTERVENTION

BAHA® implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Unaided air conduction (AC), bone conduction (BC), and speech reception thresholds (SRTs), as well as free field (FF) aided with Softband®-attached processor and with implant-attached processor thresholds.

RESULTS

Serviceable implant-attached processor PTA0.5,1,2 kHz (≤35 dB HL) was achieved in 89 and 88% of the Connect® and the Attract® ears, respectively, while at 4 kHz this was achieved in 68 and 32% of the Connect® and the Attract® ears, respectively (p  =  0.032). Significantly more Connect® ears showed alignment between FF aided with implant-attached processors thresholds and BC thresholds. The alignment between the Softband®-attached processors thresholds and implant-attached processors thresholds was similar in the two groups. Both groups exhibited similar positive improvement in the quality of life questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

Accessibility to sound with the implant-attached processor is well predicted by the pre-implantation Softband® trial, both in the BAHA Connect® and in the BAHA Attract® ears. Hearing rehabilitation targets at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz are met by most Connect® and Attract® ears, while at 4 kHz the outcome with Attract® is poorer. This information should be presented to the patient during consultation prior to a decision as to the type of BAHA® device to be implanted.

Preoperative Sudden Hearing Loss May Predict Hearing Preservation After Retrosigmoid Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVES

Describe the effect of preoperative sudden hearing loss (SHL) on likelihood of hearing preservation (HP) after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent retrosigmoid VS resection for HP between February 2008 and December 2018 were reviewed. All patients had preoperative word recognition score (WRS) of at least 50%. Similarly, HP was defined as postoperative WRS of more than or equal to 50%. Regression analysis was used to describe the effect of SHL on HP, accounting for tumor size, and preoperative hearing quality.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent retrosigmoid VS resection for HP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

WRS of at least 50%.

RESULTS

Of 160 patients who underwent retrosigmoid VS resection during the study period, 153 met inclusion criteria. Mean tumor size was 14.0 (±6) mm. Hearing was preserved in 41.8% (n = 64). Forty patients (26.1%) had a history of preoperative SHL. Among 138 patients (90.2%) in whom the cochlear nerve was anatomically preserved during surgery, HP was achieved in 61.8% of those with SHL (21 of 34) and 41.3% of those without SHL (43 of 104) (p = 0.0480). On univariate and multivariate analysis (accounting for tumor size and preoperative hearing quality), SHL was a significant positive predictor of HP (odds ratio 2.292, p = 0.0407 and odds ratio 2.778, p = 0.0032, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In patients with VS and retained serviceable hearing, SHL is an independent predictor of HP after retrosigmoid microsurgical resection when the cochlear nerve is preserved.

The Effect of Tumor Size on Likelihood of Hearing Preservation After Retrosigmoid Vestibular Schwannoma Resection

OBJECTIVES

1) Describe the effect of tumor size on the likelihood of hearing preservation after retrosigmoid approach for resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS).2) Describe the effect of preoperative hearing status on the likelihood of hearing preservation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adult (18 years or older) patients underwent retrosigmoid VS resection and postoperative audiometry between 2008 and 2018 and had a preoperative word recognition score (WRS) of at least 50%. Patients with a history of neurofibromatosis 2, radiation, or previous resection were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent retrosigmoid VS resection with attempted hearing preservation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

WRS of at least 50%.

RESULTS

Data from 153 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 50.8 (±11.3) years and mean tumor size 14 (±6) mm. Hearing was preserved and lost in 64 (41.8%) and 89 (58.2%) patients, respectively. Hearing preservation rates were higher for intrameatal tumors than for tumors with extrameatal extension (57.6% versus 29.4%, p = 0.0005). On univariate and multivariate regression analysis, tumor size (per mm increase) was a negative predictor of hearing preservation (odds ratio [OR] 0.893, p = 0.0002 and 0.841, p = 0.0005, respectively). Preoperative American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Hearing Class was also predictive of hearing preservation (p = 0.0044). Class A hearing (compared with class B hearing) was the strongest positive risk factor for hearing preservation (OR 3.149, p = 0.0048 and 1.236, p = 0.0005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Small tumor size and preoperative class A hearing are positive predictors of hearing preservation in patients undergoing the retrosigmoid approach for VS resection.

Time-based Assessment of Hearing Preservation Rates After Microsurgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To determine short- and intermediate-term hearing preservation rates after microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS).

DATA SOURCES

Systematic review of the Ovid, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases.

STUDY SELECTION

This study was restricted to full-text English-language articles detailing VS resection via the middle cranial fossa or retrosigmoid approaches. Documentation of pre- and posttreatment hearing outcomes with American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gardner-Robertson, or word recognition score scales, as well as time to follow-up were required. Duplicate data sets, studies with >10% of patients with neurofibromatosis two, previous or nonsurgical VS treatment, case reports with <five patients, or studies detailing decompressive surgery were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently performed full-text reviews to determine study eligibility. Discrepancies were settled by consensus. "Class A/B, I/II" hearing was defined as AAO-HNS Class A or B, Gardner-Robertson Class 1 or 2, or PTA ≤ 50 dB with word recognition score ≥ 50% on audiogram.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pooled estimates of preserved Class A/B, I/II hearing at last postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Of 1323 reports, 14 were utilized in analyses yielding data from 2,977 patients. Mean follow-up was 52.5 months (SD = 19.9). Class A/B, 1/2 hearing was preserved at last follow-up in 57% of patients. Meta-regression revealed that resection through the middle cranial fossa was associated with preservation of serviceable hearing. Moreover, when preserved in the immediate postoperative period, it seems to be stable over time.

Postoperative headache after surgical treatment of cerebellopontine angle tumors: a systematic review

Purpose

Postoperative headache (POH) is a complication that occurs after surgical resection of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. The two most common surgical approaches are the translabyrinthine (TL), and retrosigmoid (RS) approach. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate whether POH occurs more frequently after RS compared to TL approaches.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, Pubmed and Embase. Studies were included if POH after CPA tumor removal was reported and both surgical approaches were compared. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.

Results

In total, 3,942 unique articles were screened by title and abstract. After the initial screening process 63 articles were screened for relevance to the inquiry, of which seven studies were included. Three studies found no significant difference between both surgical approaches (p = 0.871, p = 0.120, p = 0.592). Three other studies found a lower rate of POH in the TL group compared to the RS group (p = 0.019, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Another study showed a significantly lower POH rate in the TL group after one and six months (p = 0.006), but not after 1 year (p = 0.6).

Conclusion

The results of this systematic review show some evidence of a lower rate of POH in favor of the TL approach versus the RS approach for CPA tumor resection. Prospective research studies are needed to further investigate this finding.

Treatment Outcome of Hydrocephalus Associated with Vestibular Schwannoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Managing hydrocephalus in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) is controversial. We evaluated the clinical factors associated with hydrocephalus.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2019, 562 patients with VS were treated at our institute. We applied endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), external ventricular drainage (EVD), and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts to patients with hydrocephalus. The relationships of patient, tumor, and surgical variables with the hydrocephalus outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

Preoperative hydrocephalus (Evans ratio ≥0.3) was present in 128 patients. Six patients who received a preresectional VP shunt were excluded after analyzing the hydrocephalus outcome. Seven of the remaining 122 patients had severe hydrocephalus (Evans ratio ≥0.4). Primary tumor resection, VP shunting, ETV, and EVD were performed in 60, 6, 57, and 5 patients, respectively. The hydrocephalus treatment failure rate was highest in the EVD group. Persistent hydrocephalus was present in five (8%) and seven (12%) patients in the primary resection and ETV groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that severe hydrocephalus, the cystic tumor, and the extent of resection (subtotal resection or partial resection) were associated with hydrocephalus treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger ventricles and a higher cystic portion are predictive of persistent hydrocephalus. We recommend attempting near-total tumor resection in patients with VS.

Preoperative Radiographic Predictors of Hearing Preservation After Retrosigmoid Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

To identify preoperative radiographic predictors of hearing preservation (HP) after retrosigmoid resection of vestibular schwannomas (VSs).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series with chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary skull base referral center.

METHODS

Adult patients with VSs <3 cm and word recognition scores (WRSs) ≥50% who underwent retrosigmoid resection and attempted HP between February 2008 and December 2018 were identified. Pure tone average (PTA), WRS, and magnetic resonance imaging radiographic data, including tumor diameter and dimensional extension relative to the internal auditory canal (IAC), were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were included. The average tumor size was 13.8 mm (range, 3-28). Hearing was preserved in 41.7% (n = 63). HP rates were higher for intracanalicular tumors than tumors with cerebellopontine angle (CPA) components (57.6% vs 29.4%, P = .03). On multivariate analysis, maximal tumor diameter (odds ratio [OR], 0.892; P < .001) and preoperative PTA (OR, 0.974; P = .026) predicted HP, while mediolateral tumor diameter predicted postoperative PTA (OR, 1.21; P = .005) and WRS (OR, -1.89; P < .001). For tumors extending into the CPA, younger age (OR, 0.913; P = .012), better preoperative PTA (OR, 0.935; P = .049), smaller posterior tumor extension (OR, 0.862; P = .001), and smaller caudal extension relative to the IAC (OR, 0.844; P = .001) all predicted HP.

CONCLUSION

Rates of HP are highest in patients with small intracanalicular VSs and good preoperative hearing. For tumors extending into the CPA, greater posterior and caudal tumor extension relative to the IAC may portend worse hearing outcomes.

Long-term prognosis of preserved useful hearing after surgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma: a study of 91 cases

BACKGROUND

In patients with a vestibular schwannoma, some studies have reported that useful hearing preserved initially after surgery deteriorates gradually in the long term. Studies with more patients are needed to clarify the maintenance rate of postoperative hearing function and to identify prognostic of hearing function.

METHOD

Ninety-one patients (mean age, 39.5 years; mean tumor size, 18.9 mm) with preserved useful hearing immediately after surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The useful hearing was defined as the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) classes A and B. Hearing tests, including auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), were evaluated preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at outpatient follow-up.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up (mean, 63.0 months), the useful hearing was maintained in 79 patients (87%), and the hearing class remained unchanged during the follow-up period in 40 patients (44%). Significant predictors of useful hearing maintenance were AAO-HNS class A immediately after surgery, improvement of ABR, and the absence of postoperative DPOAE deterioration. Postoperative DPOAE deterioration correlated with hearing class deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite hearing being preserved in vestibular schwannoma patients immediately after surgery, Thirteen percent lost their useful hearing during the long follow-up period, and hearing class worsened in 55% of the patients. This study, which analyzed one of the largest series of vestibular schwannoma patients, demonstrated that retrocochlear condition is a key factor for useful hearing maintenance. In patients with vestibular schwannoma who have preserved hearing function, regular postoperative monitoring of hearing function is as important as regular MRI.

Relationship of a "Fundal Fluid Cap" and Vestibular Schwannoma Volume: Analysis of Preoperative Radiographic Findings and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between radiographic fundal fluid cap in the lateral internal auditory canal, preoperative clinical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannoma who underwent microsurgical excision.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six consecutive patients (mean age 49.4 yr [range 29-74]) who underwent microsurgical vestibular schwannoma excision.

INTERVENTIONS

Microsurgical excision.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Linear fundal fluid size and tumor size calculated using volumetric analysis were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and correlated to hearing status and postoperative facial nerve function.

RESULTS

Mean fundal fluid size was 2.18 mm (range 0-7.32). Mean tumor volume was 5.58 cm (range, 0.210-40.3 cm). Short- and long-term postoperative House-Brackmann scores were 2.4 and 1.4, respectively. Fundal fluid size was associated with tumor volume (rs = 0.488, p = 0.003) but not preoperative hearing status (p = 0.333). The presence of fundal fluid and larger tumor volumes were statistically associated with poorer short-term and long-term postoperative facial nerve function (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic fundal fluid size is correlated to tumor volume.

Systematic Review of Hearing Preservation After Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term hearing preservation rate for spontaneous vestibular schwannoma treated by primary radiotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, and EMBASE databases were searched using a comprehensive Boolean keyword search developed in conjunction with a scientific librarian. English language papers published from 2000 to 2016 were evaluated.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria: full articles, pretreatment and posttreatment audiograms or audiogram based scoring system, vestibular schwannoma only tumor type, reported time to follow-up, published after 1999, use of either Gamma Knife or linear accelerator radiotherapy.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

case report or series with fewer than five cases, inadequate audiometric data, inadequate time to follow-up, neurofibromatosis type 2 exceeding 10% of study population, previous treatment exceeding 10% of study population, repeat datasets, use of proton beam therapy, and non-English language.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently analyzed papers for inclusion. Class A/B, 1/2 hearing was defined as either pure tone average less than or equal to 50 db with speech discrimination score more than or equal to 50%, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Hearing Class A or B, or Gardner-Robertson Grade I or II. Aggregate data were used when individual data were not specified.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Means were compared with student t test.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty seven articles containing a total of 2,195 patients with preserved Class A/B, 1/2 hearing were identified for analysis. The aggregate crude hearing preservation rate was 58% at an average reporting time of 46.6 months after radiotherapy treatment. Analysis of time-based reporting shows a clear trend of decreased hearing preservation extending to 10-year follow-up. This data encourages a future long-term controlled trial.

Ultra Long-Term Audiometric Outcomes in the Treatment of Vestibular Schwannoma With the Middle Cranial Fossa Approach

OBJECTIVE

Define the long-term audiometric outcomes of vestibular schwannomas treated using the middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective records review.

SETTING

University-based tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing treatment of small vestibular schwannomas using the MCF approach.

INTERVENTION(S)

MCF exposure and treatment of small vestibular schwannomas.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Demographic and audiometric variables were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirteen subjects demonstrated audiometric data for review. The average time between surgery and the most recent audiometric testing was 14 years (range 10-18 yr). The mean baseline pure-tone average (PTA) was 36 dB HL and the most recent PTA was 59 dB HL in the operated ear. The mean baseline PTA was 16 dB HL and the most recent PTA was 37 dB HL in the nonoperated ear. The mean change from baseline to most recent follow-up was a threshold elevation of 22 and 19 dB HL in the operated and nonoperated ears, respectively. The mean baseline speech discrimination score (SDS) was 83% and the most recent SDS was 73% in the operated ear. The mean baseline SDS was 98% and the most recent SDS was 94% in the nonoperated ear. The mean changes from baseline to most recent follow-up were 10 and 0% SDS depression in the operated and nonoperated ears, respectively. The rates of changes in PTA and SDS were not statistically different between the operated and nonoperated ears.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgically preserved hearing is maintained in the majority of patients more than 10 years following surgery. PTA and SDS changes were similar between the ipsilateral and contralateral ears.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on Hearing Preservation Outcomes in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas

Question 1

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 2

Among patients with AAO-HNS (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery hearing classification) class A or GR (Gardner-Robertson hearing classification) grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery, utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 3

What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery using ≤13 Gy to the tumor margin?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size, marginal tumor dose ≤12 Gy, and cochlear dose ≤4 Gy. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome.

Question 4

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 5

Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 6

What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size commonly less than 1 cm, and presence of a distal internal auditory canal cerebrospinal fluid fundal cap. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome.

Question 7

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation of vestibular schwannomas at 2, 5, and 10 yr following diagnosis?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 8

Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation at 2 and 5 yr following diagnosis?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, and moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr. Insufficient data were available to determine the probability of hearing preservation at 10 yr for this population subset.

Question 9

What patient and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing during conservative observation?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled regarding probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, as well as nongrowth of the tumor. Tumor size at the time of diagnosis, age, and sex do not predict future development of nonserviceable hearing during observation.  The full guideline can be found at: https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-manage-ment-patients-vestibular-schwannoma/chapter_3.

Surgical Outcomes in Idiopathic Recurrent Facial Nerve Paralysis: A Rare Clinical Entity

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the postoperative facial nerve dysfunction, audiometric outcomes, and long-term quality-of-life outcomes of patients with idiopathic recurrent facial nerve paralysis (RFP) after middle cranial fossa (MCF) microsurgical decompression.

METHODS

Retrospective chart analysis of 11 (mean age 37.0 years, range 5 to 67) patients at an academic tertiary referral center who underwent MCF facial nerve decompression. Data analysis included evaluation of pre- and postoperative House-Brackmann (HB) score, pre- and postoperative pure-tone average (PTA), pre-and postoperative word recognition scores (WRS), and postoperative Facial Clinimetric Evaluation survey.

RESULTS

Mean number of preoperative facial paralysis episodes was 3.5 (range 2 to 6), and preoperative HB score was 4.5 (range 1 to 6). Postoperatively, 0 patients had further episodes of facial nerve paralysis at an average of 6.5 years (range 0.1 to 17.6) (P = 0.005), and the average postoperative HB score was 2.1 (range 1 to 3) (P = 0.011). Postoperative audiometry was stably maintained as assessed with PTA and WRS scores.

CONCLUSION

Microsurgical facial nerve decompression for idiopathic RFP may be a reliable therapeutic modality to prophylactically decrease the number of facial nerve paralysis episodes and may also help to improve facial nerve functional status.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:200-205, 2020.

Quality of life related to symptomatic outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannomas: A Canadian Centre perspective

Patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) typically present with hearing loss and tinnitus as well as variable cranial nerve dysfunctions. Surgical resection, stereotactic radiotherapy and/or conservative management employing serial magnetic resonance or computed tomography imaging serve as the main treatment options. Quality of life (QoL) may be impacted by the extent of tumour burden and exacerbated or relieved by treatment. Subjective assessment and quality of life inventories provide valuable information in client centered approaches with important implications for treatment. The intention of QoL measurements affecting VS patients within a clinical setting is to facilitate discussions regarding treatment options and objectively evaluate patient- centered clinical outcomes in a naturalistic setting.

Hearing Preservation in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

Modern imaging techniques allow early detection of small vestibular schwannomas (VSs) with minimal or no hearing impairment. While controversy surrounds the management of these tumors, given their benign nature and unpredictable natural history, microsurgical excision is the only modality that offers the opportunity to cure the tumor and preserve hearing. Hearing preservation in VS surgery may be accomplished via the middle fossa or retrosigmoid approaches. Appropriate patient selection and surgical approach is critical in achieving the best hearing outcomes. This article highlights the preoperative assessment, patient selection and prognostic factors, intraoperative monitoring of hearing, and surgical approaches to optimize hearing preservation during VS removal.

Hearing Outcomes Reporting in Lateral Skull Base Surgery

Hearing outcomes reporting has evolved significantly and new standards for reporting now enable a more precise and comprehensive representation of hearing outcomes. Hearing is one of the critical sensory domains contained within the lateral skull base and temporal bone. For those patients with serviceable hearing, hearing preservation is a key treatment goal. Pre- and postoperative hearing assessment is fundamental to the diagnostic evaluation of patients preparing to undergo lateral skull base surgery. Standardization in reporting these hearing outcomes is critical to compare the efficacy of different treatment options for lateral skull base lesions. Over the time, reporting of hearing outcomes has evolved from broadly categorizing patients into large groups to comparing individual patients which requires more specific datasets to compare pre- and posttreatment hearing outcomes. Future research in lateral skull base surgery will benefit from precise, accurate, and easily understood reporting outcomes, all of which will allow for more efficient comparability between studies and pooling of data for meta-analysis.

Surgical outcome in smaller symptomatic vestibular schwannomas. Is there a role for surgery?

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no consensus in the initial management of small vestibular schwannomas (VSs). They are routinely watched and/or referred for radiosurgical treatment, although surgical removal is also an option. We hereby evaluate clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone surgical removal of smaller symptomatic VSs.

METHODS

Patients with vestibular schwannomas (grade T1-T3b according to Hannover classification) were reviewed. Patients with symptomatic tumors who underwent surgery were evaluated. Their preoperative hearing status was based on the guideline of the committee on hearing and equilibrium of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) foundation. Their postoperative facial nerve function, hearing status, vestibular symptoms, and degree of tumor resection were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were selected for surgery via a retrosigmoid approach based on their age, symptoms, and their own decision-making after discussion of management options. Most patients presented with hearing loss. Seventeen patients had useful hearing preoperatively. Among them, 10 patients (59%) preserved useful hearing (class A or B) postoperatively. MRI at 1-year follow-up confirmed complete resection in 26/29 patients. Also, 29 patients (97%) had HB grade I-II, and 1 patient had HB III at 1-year follow-up. Except for 1 patient with CSF leak, 1 patient with delayed facial nerve palsy, and 2 patients with asymptomatic sigmoid sinus occlusion, there were no other new morbidities.

CONCLUSION

Although both observation and radiosurgery are valid options in the management of smaller size vestibular schwannomas, surgical treatment seems to offer a high rate of facial nerve preservation, a reasonable rate of hearing sparing, and a high total resection rate. Clinicians should consider surgical treatment as a valid option in the initial management of symptomatic small vestibular schwannomas in younger patients.

Middle Fossa Approach for Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Decade of Experience

BACKGROUND

The middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach is a challenging surgical technique for the resection of small and intermediate sized, primarily intracanalicular, vestibular schwannomas (VS), with the goal of hearing preservation (HP).

OBJECTIVE

To describe a decade-long, single institutional experience with the MCF approach for resection of VS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 63 patients who underwent the MCF approach for resection of VS from 2006 to 2016. Audiometric data included pure-tone average (PTA), low-tone pure-tone average (LtPTA), word recognition score, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) hearing classification at presentation and follow-up. Patients with postoperative serviceable (AAO-HNS class A-B) and/or useful (AAO-HNS class A-C) hearing were compared to those without HP. Facial nerve function was assessed using the House–Brackmann scale.

RESULTS

The mean age and duration of follow-up were 50 ± 13 yr and 21 ± 21 mo, respectively. The mean tumor size was 10 ± 4 mm. The serviceable and usable HP rates were 54% and 50%, respectively. Some residual hearing was preserved in 71% of patients. Large tumor size (P = .05), volume (P = .03), and extrameatal tumor extension (P = .03) were associated with poor audiometric outcomes. The presence of a fundal fluid cap (P = .01) was a favorable finding. At definitive testing, LtPTA was significantly better preserved than traditional PTA (P = .01). Facial nerve outcomes, tumor control rates, and durability of audiometric outcomes were excellent. 47% of patients pursued aural rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

In our series, the MCF approach for VS provided excellent rates of tumor and facial nerve function, with durable serviceable HP.

Long-term Hearing Preservation After Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the long-term results of hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma resection.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid/Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library from January 1980 to January 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, minimum 10 patients in the treatment group, hearing preserving microsurgery, no previous radiation treatment, serviceable hearing at immediate postop follow-up, hearing outcomes reported using Gardner Robinson or the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgeons hearing grading scales, and average follow-up of 5 years. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and last follow-up audiograms were required. Exclusion criteria included neurofibromatosis type 2 patients and surgery for salvage therapy or decompression.

DATA EXTRACTION

Quality evaluated using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Meta-analysis was performed using R v3.2.2, Metafor package v 1.9-7. Cohen's D was used to determine effect size. Ten reports had at least 5-year follow-up and used standardized hearing grading scales. The systematic review found that if hearing was preserved at Class A or B at early postop visit, the chance of preserving hearing at 5 years was excellent. Those who maintained speech discrimination score ≥ 89% at the early postoperative follow-up had better long-term hearing preservation. The meta-analysis reveals that only preoperative and postoperative pure-tone average was associated with long-term hearing preservation.

CONCLUSION

Long-term (>5 yr) hearing durability rates are generally very good. Most studies do not report patient and tumor characteristics, therefore precluding combining studies for meta-analysis. Only preoperative and postoperative postoperative pure-tone average was associated with long-term hearing durability.

3D-constructive interference into steady state (3D-CISS) labyrinth signal alteration in patients with vestibular schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate signal intensity of the inner ear using 3D-CISS imaging and correlated signal characteristics in patients with vestibular schwannoma to neuro-otological symptoms.

METHODS

Sixty patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had had initial and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Individual treatment strategies consisted of "wait-and-watch", surgical tumour resection, stereotactic radiosurgery or both surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery. For all patients a complete baseline and treatment course neuro-otological examination was re-studied.

RESULTS

On initial MRI, 3D-CISS sequence signal loss of the membranous labyrinth was present in 20 patients (33.3%); signal loss of cochlea in 20 (33.3%) and coincident signal loss of sacculus/utriculus in 17 (85%) of them. Sequential analysis of follow-up MRI series demonstrated slightly increased labyrinthine signal degradation, independently of the chosen therapy. Correlation of initial MRI results with initial neuro-otological symptoms showed significance only for cochlear obstruction versus vertigo (p=0.0397) and sacculus/utriculus obstruction versus vertigo (p=0.0336). No other statistically significant relationships were noted.

CONCLUSION

3D-constructive interference into steady state (3D-CISS) is appropriate for observing inner ear signal loss in patients with vestibular schwannoma. However, except for vertigo, no significant correlation was noted between initial neuro-otological symptomatology and signal loss of the inner ear.

Cochlear Nerve Action Potential Monitoring for Preserving Function of an Unseen Cochlear Nerve in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) has been used in patients with small vestibular schwannoma (<15 mm) to preserve cochlear nerve function. We performed surgery for a larger vestibular schwannoma under CNAP monitoring with the aim of preserving cochlear nerve function, and compared the data with findings from 10 patients with hemifacial spasm who underwent microvascular decompression surgery.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report the case of a patient with a 26-mm vestibular schwannoma and normal hearing function who underwent neurosurgery under electrophysiological monitoring of the facial and cochlear nerves. Amplitudes of evoked facial muscle responses were maintained at approximately 70% during the operation. The latency of wave V on brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) increased by 0.5 ms, and amplitude was maintained at approximately 70% of the value at the beginning of the operation. Latencies of P1, N1, and P2 on CNAP did not change intraoperatively. These latencies were comparable to those of 10 normal patients with hemifacial spasm. CNAP monitoring proved very useful in confirming the location of the cochlear nerve in the operative field and preserving cochlear nerve function. Both facial nerve function and hearing acuity were completely preserved after tumor removal, and wave V latency on BAEP returned to normal and was maintained in the normal range for at least 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CNAP monitoring is extremely useful for preserving the function of the unseen cochlear nerve during vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Summary and consensus in 7th International Conference on acoustic neuroma: An update for the management of sporadic acoustic neuromas

Sporadic vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma) is a benign tumor arising from cochleovestibular nerve. Nowadays, various specialties and medical centers are treating this disease, and the multidisciplinary collaboration is the trend. In an effort to promote a uniform standard for reporting clinical results, even for treatment indications, the mainly controversies were posed and discussed during the 7th International Conference on acoustic neuroma, and the agreement was summarized by the Committee of this conference. The main symptoms grading and tumor stage should note its name of classification for making them comparable. The goal of the modern managements for vestibular schwannoma is to improve the quality of life with lower mortality, lower morbidity and better neurological function preservation. The experience of surgical team and their preference might be a major factor for the outcome. Because of lacking of long-term follow-up large data after radiotherapy, and with the development of microsurgery, radiotherapy is now less recommended except for recurrent cases or elderly patients.