Physiological and Psychological Stress in Patients Living With a Left Ventricular Assist Device

Measuring salivary cortisol in biobehavioral research: A systematic review and methodological considerations

The assessment of salivary cortisol in community settings has gained popularity in biobehavioral research due to its noninvasive sampling, ease of handling and storage, and suitability for repeated sampling in short intervals. Ensuring consistent methodological practices for salivary cortisol is essential. This systematic review critically examines salivary cortisol collection procedures, data cleaning, and analysis to better understand its role in biobehavioral research within community populations. Fifty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Results indicated significant variability in study designs and cortisol measurement procedures, particularly regarding the biobehavioral role of cortisol, sampling periods, covariate considerations, cortisol analysis parameters, and data analysis plans. The review highlights commonly used and promising study designs while identifying methodological issues in cortisol measurement and analysis that should be addressed to improve comparability in future research.

Comparing mental health and substance use disorders in patients receiving durable VADs versus transplants: A TriNetX database analysis

Ventricular assist device (VAD) and cardiac transplant patients experience significant strain on their physical and mental wellbeing postoperatively. Mental health and substance use disorders (MHDs and SUDs) have substantial effects on the quality of life and compliance of transplant and VAD patients. In this study, we compare and characterize MHDs and SUDs between VAD and cardiac allograft patients and transplant list patients with and without VADs. This study compares the incidence of MHDs and SUDs between VAD and cardiac transplant patients. Cohorts were defined using ICD-10 codes in TriNetX, a large public database. Patient characteristics were matched by using propensity score matching. Incidence was analyzed using the log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Survival analysis showed a statistically significant impact of adjustment disorder, nicotine dependence, and mood disorder in VAD patients as compared to cardiac allograft recipients. Depression and opioid use disorder had a significantly higher incidence in post-transplant patients compared to their VAD counterparts. Survival analysis showed that PTSD and mood disorder had a statistically significant effect on the patients waiting on transplant wait list without VADs as compared to those with VADs. MHDs and SUDs have profound implications on quality of life, survival, and medication compliance. The incidence of MHDs and SUDs differed between VAD versus cardiac transplant patients as well as the patients on the transplant waitlist with and without VADs. Mental health resources should be tailored to address risk factors that may be unique to each group of patients.

Recognition of psychological comorbidity and psychotherapeutic treatment status of ventricular assist device patients

BACKGROUND

Due to its high impact on quality of life and mental health, close monitoring and often psychotherapy is recommended for patients with a ventricular assist device (VAD). This study investigates the psychological comorbidity and the corresponding psychotherapeutic treatment situation of VAD patients. Special attention is also given to the professional perspective VAD team (assistant and senior cardiologists and specialized nurses).

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional observational study. Data from 50 VAD patients (mean age = 53.52, standard deviation = 13.82 years, 84.0% male) and their VAD team were analyzed. The presence of a psychological disorder was evaluated by structured clinical interviews for DSM-IV (SCID-I-Interviews). Patients answered a questionnaire regarding their current psychotherapeutic treatment status and their attitude towards psychotherapy. The VAD team answered a questionnaire about the patients' needs for psychotherapy and indicated whether they addressed this topic with the patient. Data were analyzed descriptively, by analysis of variance and t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 58% of VAD patients suffered from at least one significant psychological disorder, 79.3% of those were not in psychotherapy. The VAD team could not identify the patients who suffered from a psychological disorder (F = 1.90; p = 0.18). They perceived more need for psychotherapy than they addressed with their patients (T = 3.39; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While there is a high psychological morbidity among VAD patients, only few receive psychotherapy. Psychological comorbidity is not easily detected by the VAD team. Standardized psychosocial care could be implemented by regular psychological assessments and further information of patients and their VAD teams.

Unveiling stress markers: A systematic review investigating psychological stress biomarkers

Psychological stress is a ubiquitous facet of modern life, impacting individuals across diverse contexts and demographics. Understanding its physiological manifestations through biomarkers has gained substantial attention within the scientific community. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases for peer-reviewed articles published within the past decade. Preliminary findings reveal many biomarkers associated with psychological stress across different biological systems, including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, immune system, cardiovascular system, and central nervous system. This systematic review explores psychological, physiological, and biochemical biomarkers associated with stress. Analyzing recent literature, it synthesizes findings across these three categories, elucidating their respective roles in stress response mechanisms. Psychological markers involve subjective assessments like self-reported stress levels, perceived stress scales, or psychometric evaluations measuring anxiety, depression, or coping mechanisms. Physiological markers include heart rate variability, blood pressure, and immune system responses such as cytokine levels or inflammatory markers. Biochemical markers involve hormones or chemicals linked to stress. It includes cortisol, catecholamines, copeptin, salivary amylase, IL-6, and C-reactive protein.

Inpatient Specialist Palliative Care in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD): A Retrospective Case Series

Background

Repeat hospitalizations, complications, and psychosocial burdens are common in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Specialist palliative care (sPC) involvement supports patients during decision-making until end-of-life. In the United States, guidelines recommend early specialist palliative care (esPC) involvement prior to implantation. Yet, data about sPC and esPC involvement in Europe are scarce.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective descriptive study of deceased LVAD patients who had received sPC during their LVAD-related admissions to two university hospitals in Duesseldorf, Germany and Basel, Switzerland from 2010 to 2021. The main objectives were to assess: To which extent have LVAD patients received sPC, how early is sPC involved? What are the characteristics of those, how did sPC take place and what are key challenges in end-of-life care?

Results

In total, 288 patients were implanted with a LVAD, including 31 who received sPC (11%). Twenty-two deceased LVAD patients (19 male) with sPC were included. Mean patient age at the time of implantation was 67 (range 49–79) years. Thirteen patients (59%) received LVAD as destination therapy, eight patients (36%) were implanted as bridge to transplantation (BTT), and one as an emergency LVAD after cardiogenic shock (5%). None of the eight BTT patients received a heart transplantation before dying. Most (n = 13) patients lived with their family and mean Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was three. Mean time between LVAD implantation and first sPC contact was 1.71 years, with a range of first sPC contact from 49 days prior to implantation to more than 6 years after. Two patients received esPC before implantation. In Duesseldorf, mean time between first sPC contact and in-hospital death was 10.2 (1–42) days. In Basel, patients died 16 (0.7–44) months after first sPC contact, only one died on the external sPC unit. Based on thorough examination of two case reports, we describe key challenges of sPC in LVAD patients including the necessity for sPC expertise, ethical and communicative issues as well as the available resources in this setting.

Conclusion

Despite unequivocal recommendations for sPC in LVAD patients, the integration of sPC for these patients is yet not well established.

Sleeping prone with a left ventricular assist device: Dream or reality?

BACKGROUND

Among many other factors, restrictions on sleeping positions decrease quality of life after durable left ventricular assist device implantation. Specifically, device manufacturers and clinicians typically advise against sleeping in the prone position owing to concerns for driveline disruption, exit site infection, and hemodynamic compromise. Yet, no data exist to inform these recommendations and to the best of our knowledge no studies have examined sleep position in people with left ventricular assist devices. We report the first case of a person with a left ventricular assist device who slept prone, every night, for over one year.

CASE

This is a 38-year-old man with a HeartWare™ left ventricular assist device who had previously not disclosed that he was sleeping in the prone position for the 16 months following device implantation. The patient did not suffer any episodes of device-related malfunction, infection, neurologic insult, or hemodynamic compromise. We performed a non-invasive assessment in both supine and prone positions to better understand the hemodynamic effects of the prone position.

CONCLUSION

In select recipients of left ventricular assist devices, sleeping in the prone position may be safely tolerated.

Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life 2 Years After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Insights From INTERMACS

Background

Factors related to health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) 2 years after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation are unknown. We sought to determine whether preimplant intended goal of LVAD therapy (heart transplant candidate [short‐term group], uncertain heart transplant candidate [uncertain group], and heart transplant ineligible [long‐term group]) and other variables were related to HRQOL 2 years after LVAD implantation.

Methods and Results

Our LVAD sample (n=1620) was from INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). Using the EuroQol‐5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ‐5D‐3L), a generic HRQOL measure, and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ‐12), a heart failure–specific HRQOL measure, multivariable linear regression modeling was conducted with the EQ‐5D‐3L Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and KCCQ‐12 overall summary score (OSS) as separate dependent variables. Two years after LVAD implant, the short‐term group had a significantly higher mean VAS score versus the uncertain and long‐term groups (short‐term: 75.18 [SD, 20.62]; uncertain: 72.27 [SD, 20.33]; long‐term: 70.87 [SD, 22.09], P=0.01); differences were not clinically meaningful. Two‐year mean scores did not differ by group for the KCCQ‐12 OSS (short‐term, 67.85 [SD, 20.61]; uncertain, 67.79 [SD, 19.31]; long‐term, 67.08 [SD, 21.49], P=0.80). Factors associated with a worse VAS score 2 years postoperatively (n=1205) included not working; not having a short‐term LVAD; and postoperative neurological dysfunction, greater health‐related stress, coping poorly, less VAD self‐care confidence, and less satisfaction with VAD surgery, explaining 28% of variance (P<0.001). Factors associated with a worse KCCQ‐12 OSS 2 years postoperatively (n=1250) included not working; history of high body mass index and diabetes mellitus; and postoperative renal dysfunction, greater health‐related stress, coping poorly, less VAD self‐care confidence, less satisfaction with VAD surgery, and regret regarding VAD implantation, accounting for 36% of variance (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Factors related to HRQOL 2 years after LVAD implantation include demographic, clinical, and psychological variables.

[Palliative care in patients with left ventricular assist devices: systematic review]

Hintergrund

Bei terminal herzinsuffizienten Patienten gewinnt die Implantation von Linksherzunterstützungssystemen (LVAD) als Therapieoption zunehmend an Bedeutung. Diese Systeme werden als Überbrückung bis zu einer Herztransplantation (BTT) oder als definitive Therapie (DT) eingesetzt. Sie können die Lebensqualität verbessern und die Lebenszeit verlängern. Trotzdem bleibt die Prognose besonders bei DT oder bei Wechsel von BTT zu DT mit Blick auf die Lebenszeit und auftretende Komplikationen ungünstig. Bisher ist ungeklärt, ob eine LVAD-Implantation eine Indikation für eine frühzeitige Integration von Palliativmedizin darstellt.

Ziel der Arbeit

Erfassung der aktuellen Studienlage über den Einfluss einer palliativmedizinischen Behandlung bei LVAD-Patienten.

Material und Methoden

Im Mai 2020 wurde eine systematische Literaturrecherche in 6 verschiedenen Datenbanken durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Von den 491 Treffern der Literaturrecherche wurden 21 Arbeiten in diese Übersichtsarbeit eingeschlossen. Durch die frühzeitige Integration der Palliativmedizin vor LVAD-Implantation erhöhte sich die Anzahl der Patienten mit vorausschauender Versorgungsplanung und Vorsorgeinstrumenten. Außerdem zeigte sich ein positiver Einfluss auf das familiäre Umfeld, das Symptommanagement und die Umstände des Versterbens. Es gibt verschiedene Formate für die Integration palliativmedizinischer Konzepte in die LVAD-Therapie.

Diskussion

Die frühzeitige und kontinuierliche Einbindung der Palliativmedizin im Verlauf einer LVAD-Therapie kann die Behandlungsqualität verbessern. Die Ausarbeitung von spezifischen Handlungsempfehlungen ist in Abhängigkeit vom Therapieziel (BTT oder DT) sinnvoll. Empfohlen werden Schulungen für Palliativmediziner und LVAD-Spezialisten.

Psychological Spectrum Experienced by Heart Failure Patients After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Depression and anxiety disorders are prevalent in patients with heart failure. They are associated with adverse effects such as rapid disease progression, poor medication compliance, low quality of life and increased mortality rate. The current literature review aims to provide an overview of the overall rate of depression in patients who receive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and identify the psychological phases that these individuals experienced peri- and post-LVAD implantation. A PubMed search using regular and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords identified 239 articles. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, removal of duplicate studies, and careful review of articles, 40 studies provided relevant information on our primary end-point. These 40 studies selected include 13 paid articles with abstracts and 27 free full-text articles comprising eight prospective cohort studies, five retrospective cohort studies, six cross-sectional studies, one qualitative study, one randomized clinical trial, one systematic review, four literature reviews, and one practice guide. Our review shows that patients experienced different psychological phases after LVAD implantation. However, as the time from implantation progressed, these patients showed a significant improvement in depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life.

Perceived Stress and Depressive Symptoms as Predictors of Decisional Conflict in Dyads Considering a Left Ventricular Assist Device

BACKGROUND

The decision to pursue a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) commits loved ones to major caregiving responsibilities and, often, medical decision-making. How emotional domains overlap within patients and their caregivers and contribute to conflict around the decision to pursue LVAD remains largely unexplored.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The associations within and between individuals in patient-caregiver dyads considering LVAD were estimated in a specific type of structural equation model known as the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. This model tested whether each person's depression and stress predicted their own decisional conflict (actor effects), as well as their partner's decisional conflict (partner effects). At the time of study enrollment when a formal LVAD evaluation was initiated, 162 patient-caregiver dyads completed assessments of decisional conflict using the Decisional Conflict Scale, depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2, and stress using the Perceived Stress Scale. Across both models, decisional conflict was significantly correlated within patient-caregiver dyads (β=0.47 and 0.44, for depression and perceived stress models, respectively, P<0.001). Greater perceived stress in both the patient (β=0.18; P<0.05) and caregiver (β=0.28; P<0.001) was significantly related to greater decisional conflict (both actor effects). Greater patient depressive symptoms were related to greater patient decisional conflict (β=0.16; P<0.05), whereas caregiver depression symptoms was not related to their own decisional conflict (β=0.07; P=0.37). There were no partner effects identified between decisional conflict and perceived stress or depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and caregiver conflict over the decision to pursue an LVAD was highly correlated in this sample, with greater perceived stress significantly predicting greater decisional conflict in both patients and caregivers. Depressive symptoms in patients also predicted greater patient decisional conflict. No partner effects were identified in predicting decisional conflict. These results contribute to a larger body of work acknowledging the importance of patient-caregiver well-being in serious illness. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02344576.