Removal of Urea, β2-Microglobulin, and Indoxyl Sulfate Assessed by Absorbance and Fluorescence in the Spent Dialysate During Hemodialysis

Vascular calcification inhibitors in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Increased cardiovascular mortality due to multifactorial progressive arterial stiffness in chronic kidney disease is influenced by the disturbed balance between inducers and inhibitors of vascular calcification. The potential to enhance the protective effects of vascular calcification inhibitors through effective therapy could stimulate further research and collaboration. This systematic review aims to give a grounded overview of vascular calcification inhibitors and their serum levels in different stages of chronic kidney disease to demonstrate the dynamics during stages of declining kidney function and renal replacement therapy.

METHODS

The systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database on August 30th, 2023 (CRD42023459169). and conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA).

RESULTS

We screened 463 articles, of which 192 were eligible, and investigated vascular calcification inhibitors or included values of their serum levels. Serum levels of fetuin-A, vitamin D, FGF-23, Klotho, osteopontin, matrix GLA protein, osteoprotegerin, magnesium, and sclerostin are demonstrated in tables and sparingly studied substances with a perspective towards better treatment options are found in Supplementary Table.

CONCLUSION

Endogenous vascular calcification inhibitors could serve the role of valuable biomarkers to detect the process earlier and estimate the effect of treatment. The serum levels presented demonstrate the dynamics in different stages in chronic kidney disease and propose practical feedback for personalized treatment strategies. Manifold possible vascular calcification inhibitors under research set a promising starting point for more effective therapeutic interventions.

Cognitive impairment in chronic kidney disease: role of brain imaging, functional imaging, electroencephalography, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and sensors

Chronic kidney disease is associated with cognitive impairment although the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Characterization and efficient monitoring of the cognitive impact of kidney disease and ensuing therapies are critical for the accurate clinical management of patients. A vast array of imaging modalities, biomarkers, and sensors have shown relevance for the assessment of cognitive impairment. Knowing the potential and limitations of these paraclinical techniques is a necessary condition to improve the understanding of this phenomenon and to design monitoring protocols and guidelines applicable to this clinical population. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of current imaging modalities and biomarker sources available to the community, for the benefit of the research and clinical community.

Effect of Antithrombin Leakage From Hemodialysis Therapy on Antithrombin Hemodynamics

Introduction Hemodialysis (HD) therapy is a crucial treatment for patients with renal failure but can impact the hemodynamics of antithrombin (AT), a protein essential for regulating hemostasis and preventing thrombosis. Reduced AT activity can lead to thrombus formation at unusual sites and increase the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. The loss of AT during HD or hemodiafiltration (HDF) through leakage or adsorption onto dialysis membranes has not been fully investigated, and its effects on AT hemodynamics remain unclear. We aimed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying AT activity reduction due to dialysis, with the goal of developing dialysis protocols that preserve AT activity and reduce the risk of vascular access-related thrombosis. Methods AT activity and antigen levels were measured before and after dialysis therapy in 24 patients undergoing maintenance dialysis at Itaya Clinic (HD, 12; HDF, 12). AT antigen levels in dialysis effluent were also measured to analyze the effects of dialysis on AT hemodynamics. Additionally, immunofluorescence staining of dialysis membranes was used to semi-quantitatively assess the amount of AT adsorbed onto the membrane. Results AT activity and antigen levels in patients undergoing HD were significantly lower than those in healthy participants but increased following dialysis. A negative correlation was found between dialysis vintage (history of heparin use) and predialysis AT activity. AT leakage and adsorption were significantly greater with HDF than with HD. However, no correlation was observed between AT leakage and activity or antigen levels before and after dialysis. Conclusions AT activity and antigen levels were decreased in patients on HD, with long-term heparin use suggested as a contributing factor. Additionally, AT leakage was observed during HDF therapy, indicating that dialysis-related AT leakage may contribute to decreased AT activity and antigen levels. Therefore, regular measurement of AT activity is recommended for patients with HD. If AT activity decreases, treatment adjustments, such as switching to HD therapies that minimize AT leakage and adsorption, should be considered.

2-Deoxy-glucose ameliorates the peritoneal mesothelial and endothelial barrier function perturbation occurring due to Peritoneal Dialysis fluids exposure

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and prolonged exposure to PD fluids (PDF) induce peritoneal membrane (PM) fibrosis and hypervascularity, leading to functional PM degeneration. 2-deoxy-glucose (2-DG) has shown potential as PM antifibrotic by inhibiting hyper-glycolysis induced mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (MMT). We investigated whether administration of 2-DG with several PDF affects the permeability of mesothelial and endothelial barrier of the PM. The antifibrotic effect of 2-DG was confirmed by the gel contraction assay with embedded mesothelial (MeT-5A) or endothelial (EA.hy926) cells cultured in Dianeal® 2.5 % (CPDF), BicaVera® 2.3 % (BPDF), Balance® 2.3 % (LPDF) with/without 2-DG addition (0.2 mM), and qPCR for αSMA, CDH2 genes. Moreover, 2-DG effect was tested on the permeability of monolayers of mesothelial and endothelial cells by monitoring the transmembrane resistance (RTM), FITC-dextran (10, 70 kDa) diffusion and mRNA expression levels of CLDN-1 to -5, ZO1, SGLT1, and SGLT2 genes. Contractility of MeT-5A cells in CPDF/2-DG was decreased, accompanied by αSMA (0.17 ± 0.03) and CDH2 (2.92 ± 0.29) gene expression fold changes. Changes in αSMA, CDH2 were found in EA.hy926 cells, though αSMA also decreased under LPDF/2-DG incubation (0.42 ± 0.02). Overall, 2-DG mitigated the PDF-induced alterations in mesothelial and endothelial barrier function as shown by RTM, dextran transport and expression levels of the CLDN-1 to -5, ZO1, and SGLT2. Thus, supplementation of PDF with 2-DG not only reduces MMT but also improves functional permeability characteristics of the PM mesothelial and endothelial barrier.

Optical Real-Time Cardiorenal Toxin Uric Acid Measurement During Hemodialysis Using a Miniaturized Optical Sensor

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher cardiovascular risk than the general population. Cardiovascular diseases, vascular calcification among them, are the leading cause of death in these patients. Factors influencing vascular calcification are oxidative stress, inflammation, and accumulation of uremic toxins during CKD. Uric acid is a cardiorenal toxin that accumulates in the case of kidney malfunction. The primary therapy for replacing kidney function and removing toxins from end-stage renal disease patients is hemodialysis. Effective removal of toxins can be estimated by blood or dialysate lab analysis or optical monitoring. In this study, the authors tested a miniaturized optical sensor for monitoring uric acid levels and removal for the first time in a more extensive clinical study, including Hemodialysis (HD) and Post-dilutional online hemodiafiltration (HDF) procedures with different settings in Tallinn, Estonia. The results (Mean±SD, Lab vs. Sensor) of the uric acid concentration 57.20±34.05 vs. 57.22±33.09 µmol/L, reduction ratio 68.72±10.91 vs. 67.89±12.48 %, and total removed amount 7.00±2.10 vs. 7.33±2.29 mmol did not differ significantly from the values obtained from the clinical laboratory (p<0.05).Clinical Relevance-During this study, a miniaturized optical sensor was tested for the first time in the clinic in different dialysis settings. The results confirm that the sensor is reliable for regularly monitoring cardiorenal toxin uric acid removal during hemodialysis.

Treatment with Paracetamol Can Interfere with the Intradialytic Optical Estimation in Spent Dialysate of Uric Acid but Not of Indoxyl Sulfate

Optical online methods are used to monitor the haemodialysis treatment efficiency of end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of the administration of UV-absorbing drugs, such as paracetamol (Par), on the accuracy of optical monitoring the removal of uremic toxins uric acid (UA) and indoxyl sulfate (IS) during standard haemodialysis (HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. Nine patients received Par in daily dosages 1−4 g for 30 sessions. For 137 sessions, in 36 patients the total daily dosage of UV-absorbing drugs was less than 500 mg, and for 6 sessions 3 patients received additional UV-absorbing drugs. Par administration slightly affected the accuracy of optically assessed removal of UA expressed as bias between optically and laboratory-assessed reduction ratios (RR) during HD but not HDF employing UV absorbance of spent dialysate (p < 0.05) at 295 nm wavelength with the strongest correlation between the concentration of UA and absorbance. Corresponding removal of IS based on fluorescence at Ex280/Em400 nm during HD and HDF was not affected. Administration of UV-absorbing drugs may in some settings influence the accuracy of optical assessments in spent dialysate of the removal of uremic solutes during haemodialysis treatment of ESKD patients.

Toxin Removal and Inflammatory State Modulation during Online Hemodiafiltration Using Two Different Dialyzers (TRIAD2 Study)

Uremic toxins play a pathological role in atherosclerosis and represent an important risk factor in dialysis patients. Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been introduced to improve the clearance of middle- and large-molecular-weight solutes (>500 Da) and has been associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality compared to standard hemodialysis. This non-randomized, open-label observational study will explore the efficacy of two dialyzers currently used for online HDF, a polysulfone-based high-flux membrane, and a cellulose triacetate membrane, in hemodialysis patients with signs of middle-molecule intoxication or intradialytic hypotension. In particular, the two filters will be evaluated for their ability in uremic toxin removal and modulation of inflammatory status. Sixteen subjects in standard chronic bicarbonate hemodialysis requiring a switch to online HDF in view of their clinical status will be enrolled and divided into two treatment arms, according to the previous history of hypersensitivity to polysulfone/polyethersulfone dialysis filters and hypersensitivity to drugs or other allergens. Group A will consist of 16 patients without a previous history of hypersensitivity and will be treated with a polysulfone filter (Helixone FX100), and group B, also consisting of 16 patients, with a previous history of hypersensitivity and will be treated with asymmetric triacetate (ATA; SOLACEA 21-H) dialyzer. Each patient will be followed for a period of 24 months, with monthly assessments of circulating middle-weight toxins and protein-bound toxins, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, lymphocyte subsets, activated lymphocytes, and monocytes, cell apoptosis, the accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), variations in arterial stiffens measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV), and mortality rate. The in vitro effect on endothelial cells of uremic serum collected from patients treated with the two different dialyzers will also be investigated to examine the changes in angiogenesis, cell migration, differentiation, apoptosis and proliferative potential, and gene and protein expression profile. The expected results will be a better awareness of the different effects of polysulfone gold-standard membrane for online HDF and the new ATA membrane on the removal of uremic toxins removal and inflammation due to blood-membrane interaction.

Optical Method and Biochemical Source for the Assessment of the Middle-Molecule Uremic Toxin β2-Microglobulin in Spent Dialysate

Optical monitoring of spent dialysate has been used to estimate the removal of water-soluble low molecular weight as well as protein-bound uremic toxins from the blood of end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. The aim of this work was to develop an optical method to estimate the removal of β2-microglobulin (β2M), a marker of middle molecule (MM) uremic toxins, during hemodialysis (HD) treatment. Ultraviolet (UV) and fluorescence spectra of dialysate samples were recorded from 88 dialysis sessions of 22 ESKD patients, receiving four different settings of dialysis treatments. Stepwise regression was used to obtain the best model for the assessment of β2M concentration in the spent dialysate. The correlation coefficient 0.958 and an accuracy of 0.000 ± 0.304 mg/L was achieved between laboratory and optically estimated β2M concentrations in spent dialysate for the entire cohort. Optically and laboratory estimated reduction ratio (RR) and total removed solute (TRS) of β2M were not statistically different (p > 0.35). Dialytic elimination of MM uremic toxin β2M can be followed optically during dialysis treatment of ESKD patients. The main contributors to the optical signal of the MM fraction in the spent dialysate were provisionally identified as tryptophan (Trp) in small peptides and proteins, and advanced glycation end-products.

Routine online assessment of dialysis dose: Ionic dialysance or UV-absorbance monitoring?

For three-weekly hemodialysis, a single-pool Kt/V target of at least 1.4 together with a minimal dialysis dose Kt at 45 L for men and 40 L for women per each session is currently recommended. Fully automatic online calculation of Kt and Kt/V from conductivity or UV-absorbance measurements in the dialysate is standardly implemented on some hemodialysis monitors and makes it possible to estimate the dialysis dose without the need for blood or dialysate samples. Monitoring the UV-absorbance of the spent dialysate is the most direct method for estimating Kt/V as it does not require an estimate of V. Calculation of ionic dialysance from conductivity measurements is the most direct method for estimating Kt and BSA-scaled dialysis dose. Both ionic dialysance monitoring and UV-absorbance monitoring may help detect a change in urea clearance occurring during the session, but this change must be interpreted differently depending on the monitoring being considered. An abrupt decrease in urea clearance results in a decrease in ionic dialysance but, paradoxically, a sudden increase in estimated urea clearance provided by dialysate UV-absorbance monitoring. Healthcare teams who monitor both ionic dialysance and UV-absorbance in their hemodialysis units must be clearly informed of this difficulty.

A history of uraemic toxicity and of the European Uraemic Toxin Work Group (EUTox)

The uraemic syndrome is a complex clinical picture developing in the advanced stages of chronic kidney disease, resulting in a myriad of complications and a high early mortality. This picture is to a significant extent defined by retention of metabolites and peptides that with a preserved kidney function are excreted or degraded by the kidneys. In as far as those solutes have a negative biological/biochemical impact, they are called uraemic toxins. Here, we describe the historical evolution of the scientific knowledge about uraemic toxins and the role played in this process by the European Uraemic Toxin Work Group (EUTox) during the last two decades. The earliest knowledge about a uraemic toxin goes back to the early 17th century when the existence of what would later be named as urea was recognized. It took about two further centuries to better define the role of urea and its link to kidney failure, and one more century to identify the relevance of post-translational modifications caused by urea such as carbamoylation. The knowledge progressively extended, especially from 1980 on, by the identification of more and more toxins and their adverse biological/biochemical impact. Progress of knowledge was paralleled and impacted by evolution of dialysis strategies. The last two decades, when insights grew exponentially, coincide with the foundation and activity of EUTox. In the final section, we summarize the role and accomplishments of EUTox and the part it is likely to play in future action, which should be organized around focus points like biomarker and potential target identification, intestinal generation, toxicity mechanisms and their correction, kidney and extracorporeal removal, patient-oriented outcomes and toxin characteristics in acute kidney injury and transplantation.

Serum Levels and Removal by Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration of Tryptophan-Derived Uremic Toxins in ESKD Patients

Tryptophan is an essential dietary amino acid that originates uremic toxins that contribute to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient outcomes. We evaluated serum levels and removal during haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration of tryptophan and tryptophan-derived uremic toxins, indoxyl sulfate (IS) and indole acetic acid (IAA), in ESKD patients in different dialysis treatment settings. This prospective multicentre study in four European dialysis centres enrolled 78 patients with ESKD. Blood and spent dialysate samples obtained during dialysis were analysed with high-performance liquid chromatography to assess uremic solutes, their reduction ratio (RR) and total removed solute (TRS). Mean free serum tryptophan and IS concentrations increased, and concentration of IAA decreased over pre-dialysis levels (67%, 49%, −0.8%, respectively) during the first hour of dialysis. While mean serum total urea, IS and IAA concentrations decreased during dialysis (−72%, −39%, −43%, respectively), serum tryptophan levels increased, resulting in negative RR (−8%) towards the end of the dialysis session (p < 0.001), despite remarkable Trp losses in dialysate. RR and TRS values based on serum (total, free) and dialysate solute concentrations were lower for conventional low-flux dialysis (p < 0.001). High-efficiency haemodiafiltration resulted in 80% higher Trp losses than conventional low-flux dialysis, despite similar neutral Trp RR values. In conclusion, serum Trp concentrations and RR behave differently from uremic solutes IS, IAA and urea and Trp RR did not reflect dialysis Trp losses. Conventional low-flux dialysis may not adequately clear Trp-related uremic toxins while high efficiency haemodiafiltration increased Trp losses.