Gender Differences in Mortality After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant: A Causal Mediation Analysis Approach

Left Ventricular Dimensions and Clinical Outcomes With a Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device

BACKGROUND

Prior analyses have suggested that a smaller left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) is associated with reduced survival following HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device implantation.

OBJECTIVES

In this trial-based comprehensive analysis, the authors sought to examine clinical characteristics and association with the outcome of this specific relationship.

METHODS

The authors analyzed the presence of LVEDD <55 mm among 1,921 analyzable HeartMate 3 patients within the MOMENTUM 3 (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3) trial portfolio, on endpoints of overall survival and adverse events at 2 years. Adverse events included hemocompatibility-related (stroke, bleeding, and pump thrombosis) and non-hemocompatibility-related (right heart failure, infection) outcomes.

RESULTS

Those with a smaller LVEDD (<55 mm) (n = 108) were older (age 63 ± 11 years vs 60 ± 12 years; P = 0.005), were more often female (31% vs 20%; P = 0.096), and had more ischemic cardiomyopathy (60.2% vs 42.6%; P = 0.0004) compared with the LVEDD ≥55 mm group (n = 1,813). Death during implant hospitalization was higher (14.8 vs 5.7%; P = 0.0007) and survival at 2 years was lower (63.3% vs 81.8%; HR: 1.97 [95% CI: 1.39-2.79]; P = 0.0002) in the LVEDD <55 mm group. The LVEDD <55 mm group experienced more deaths due to hemocompatibility-related adverse events (2.8% vs 0.6%; HR: 4.61 [95% CI: 1.29-16.45]; P = 0.018) and right heart failure, both early (0-30 days; 7.4% vs 2.0%; HR: 3.70 [95% CI: 1.73-7.91]; P = 0.001) and late (>30 days; 12.0 vs 4.8%; HR: 2.58 [95% CI: 1.37-4.84]; P = 0.003). Low-flow alarms rehospitalizations were higher in the LVEDD <55 mm cohort (17.4 vs 8.3%; HR: 2.39 [95% CI: 1.59-3.59]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although infrequent in occurrence, smaller LVEDD (<55 mm) is associated with increased risk for early and late mortality, a consequence of hemocompatibility-related and right heart failure-related deaths. Rehospitalizations due to low-flow alarms are also more frequent. (MOMENTUM 3 IDE Clinical Study Protocol [HM3™]; NCT02224755; MOMENTUM 3 Continued Access Protocol [MOMENTUM 3 CAP]; NCT02892955).

Sex differences in long-term heart failure prognosis: a comprehensive meta-analysis

AIMS

Sex differences in the long-term prognosis of heart failure (HF) remain controversial, and there is a lack of comprehensive pooling of the sex differences in outcomes of HF. This study aims to characterize the sex differences in the long-term prognosis of HF and explore whether these differences vary by age, HF course, left ventricular ejection fraction, region, period of study, study design, and follow-up duration.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review was conducted using Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, from 1 January 1990 to 31 March 2024. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM), and the secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality (CVM), hospitalization for HF (HHF), all-cause hospitalization, a composite of ACM and HHF, and a composite of CVM and HHF. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Ninety-four studies (comprising 96 cohorts) were included in the meta-analysis, representing 706,247 participants (56.5% were men; the mean age was 71.0 years). Female HF patients had a lower risk of ACM (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.80, 0.85; I2 = 84.9%), CVM (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.79, 0.89; I2 = 70.7%), HHF (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89, 0.98; I2 = 84.0%), and composite endpoints (ACM + HHF: HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83, 0.95; I2 = 80.0%; CVM + HHF: HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.77, 0.93; I2 = 87.9%) compared with males. Subgroup analysis revealed that the lower risk of mortality observed in women was more pronounced among individuals with long-course HF (i.e. chronic HF, follow-up duration > 2 years) or recruited in the randomized controlled trials (P for interaction < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Female HF patients had a better prognosis compared with males, with lower risks of ACM, CVM, HHF, and composite endpoints. Despite the underrepresentation of female populations in HF clinical trials, their mortality benefits tended to be lower than in real-world settings.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42024526100.

Influence of implant strategy on the transition from temporary left ventricular assist device to durable mechanical circulatory support

OBJECTIVES

Bridging from a temporary microaxial left ventricular assist device (tLVAD) to a durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) is playing an increasing role in the treatment of terminally ill patients with heart failure. Scant data exist about the best implant strategy. The goal of this study was to analyse differences in the dLVAD implant technique and effects on patient outcomes.

METHODS

Data from 341 patients (19 European centres) who underwent a bridge-to-bridge implant from tLVAD to dLVAD between January 2017 and October 2022 were retrospectively analysed. The outcomes of the different implant techniques with the patient on cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorporeal life support or tLVAD were compared.

RESULTS

A durable LVAD implant was performed employing cardiopulmonary bypass in 70% of cases (n = 238, group 1), extracorporeal life support in 11% (n = 38, group 2) and tLVAD in 19% (n = 65, group 3). Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences in age (P = 0.140), body mass index (P = 0.388), creatinine level (P = 0.659), the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (P = 0.190) and rate of dialysis (P = 0.110). Group 3 had significantly fewer patients with preoperatively invasive ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation before the tLVAD was implanted (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001 respectively). Concomitant procedures were performed more often in groups 1 and 2 compared to group 3 (24%, 37% and 5%, respectively, P < 0.001). The 30-day mortality data showed significantly better survival after an inverse probability of treatment weighting in group 3, but the 1-year mortality showed no significant differences among the groups (P = 0.012 and 0.581, respectively). Postoperative complications like the rate of right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implants or re-thoracotomy due to bleeding, postoperative respiratory failure and renal replacement therapy showed no significant differences among the groups. Freedom from the first adverse event like stroke, driveline infection or pump thrombosis during follow-up was not significantly different among the groups. Postoperative blood transfusions within 24 h were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 compared to surgery on tLVAD support (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis, the transition from tLVAD to dLVAD without further circulatory support did not show a difference in postoperative long-term survival, but a better 30-day survival was reported. The implant using only tLVAD showed a reduction in postoperative transfusion rates, without increasing the risk of postoperative stroke or pump thrombosis. In this small cohort study, our data support the hypothesis that a dLVAD implant on a tLVAD is a safe and feasible technique in selected patients.

Sex-Based Differences in Patients With Left Ventricular-Assisted Devices and Strokes

Background

Sex-based differences in clinical outcomes among patients with stroke related to left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are not well described.

Objectives

In this study, the authors examined differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in men and women who had a stroke during LVAD hospitalization.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample from 2010 and 2019 was used to identify patients with stroke during LVAD hospitalization. Outcomes of interest include inpatient mortality and clinical complications among men vs women. Weighted logistic regression was used to determine the association of sex and outcomes. Adjustments were made for age and the Elixhauser comorbidity index.

Results

In total, 35,820 patients underwent LVAD implantation (77% men), and 6.12% (n = 2,192) of patients experienced stroke. Women who had stroke were younger than men who had stroke (mean age in women was 51 years vs men 59 years, P < 0.001). Men with strokes had a higher burden of comorbidities than women. While there were no differences in the odds of ischemic stroke, women had higher odds of hemorrhagic stroke compared to men (OR: 1.49 [95% CI: 1.02-2.18]). Mortality in patients with LVAD who had stroke was significantly higher than in those without stroke. Between 2010 and 2019, stroke rates significantly increased among men, while the trend remained variable among women.

Conclusions

In this national cohort, men had a higher comorbidity burden and had worsening stroke trends over the last decade compared to women. Women had fewer LVAD implants and a higher incidence of hemorrhagic stroke. Understanding the factors that contribute to sex-related outcome disparities among LVAD stroke patients is crucial in addressing these diverging trends.

Clinical Outcomes With a Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device Among Women and Men

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are underused among women with advanced heart failure, but reasons remain unclear. Outcomes in women compared with men with contemporary fully magnetically levitated LVADs remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The authors examined differences in characteristics, 2-year outcomes, and risk for key adverse events among women and men.

METHODS

In 2,200 HeartMate3 (HM3) (Abbott Cardiovascular) LVAD recipients in the MOMENTUM 3 study (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3), survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning pump at 2 years was analyzed between women and men. Other outcomes included overall 2-year survival, adverse events, and functional measures.

RESULTS

Women comprised 20.4% (n = 448 of 2,200) of the study population and were younger, with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and more often were Black persons compared with men. The primary endpoint (women 79.4% vs men 75.5% (adjusted [a]HR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.75-1.24]; P = 0.66) or survival at 2 years (women 82.4% vs men 80.2%; aHR: 1.06 [95% CI: 0.81-1.40]; P = 0.66) was no different. Women had an increased rate of stroke (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]: 1.52 [95% CI: 1.09-2.11]; P = 0.012), major bleeding (aIRR: 1.28 [95% CI: 1.15-1.42]; P < 0.0001) and infection (aIRR 1.14 [95% CI: 1.03-1.55]; P = 0.01), but these differences were not seen among older (>65 years) patients. Both groups had similar gains in 6-minute walk distance and quality-of-life measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in the primary composite endpoint or overall survival in women compared with men at 2 years of support. Reasons underlying increase in hemocompatibility-related events and infection-related morbidity in younger women deserves further study. (MOMENTUM 3 IDE [HM3], NCT02224755; MOMENTUM 3 Continued Access Protocol [MOMENTUM 3 CAP], NCT02892955).

Sex disparities in left ventricular assist device implantation outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 50 000 patients

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) represent an important therapeutic option for patients progressing to end-stage heart failure. Women have been historically underrepresented in LVAD studies, and have been reported to have worse outcomes despite technological optimisation. We aimed to systematically explore the evidence on sex disparities in the use and outcomes of LVAD implantation.

METHODS

A systematic database search with meta-analysis was conducted of comparative original articles of men versus women undergoing LVAD implantation, in EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane database and Google Scholar, from inception to July 2022. Primary outcomes were stroke (haemorrhagic and ischaemic) and early/overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were LVAD thrombosis, right VAD implantation, major bleeding, kidney dysfunction, and device/driveline infection.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 137 relevant studies, including 22 meeting the inclusion criteria with a total of 53 227 patients (24.2% women). Overall mortality was higher in women (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.62, p = 0.02), as was overall stroke (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.06-1.66, p = 0.01), including ischemic (OR 1.80, 95%CI 1.22-2.64, p = 0.003) and haemorrhagic (OR 1.72, 95%CI 1.09-2.70, p = 0.02). Women had more frequent right VAD implantation (OR 2.11, 95%CI 1.24-3.57, p = 0.006) and major bleeding (OR 1.40, 95%CI 1.06-1.85, p = 0.02). Kidney dysfunction, LVAD thrombosis, and device/driveline infections were comparable between sexes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that women face a greater risk of adverse events and mortality post-LVAD implantation. Although the mechanisms remain unclear, the difference in outcomes is thought to be multifactorial. Further research, that includes comprehensive pre-operative characteristics and post-operative outcomes, is encouraged.

Sex differences in patients undergoing heart transplantation and LVAD therapy

INTRODUCTION

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplantation (HT) are the two life-sustaining therapies that have revolutionized the management of end-stage heart failure (HF). Yet, significant sex differences exist with respect to their use and effects.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes sex differences in the utilization, outcomes, and complications of LVAD and HT. Particular emphasis is placed on leading clinical trials in the field, historical and recent large registries-based analyses, as well as contemporary technological and policy changes affecting these differences.

EXPERT OPINION

Women with advanced HF remain under-treated with guideline-directed medical therapy and are less likely to be referred for consideration for LVAD and HT. This remains true despite newer LVAD technology and the new heart transplant allocation system. Community outreach, education, as well as increased representation of women in clinical research may reduce inequities.

Sex-based considerations for implementation of ventricular assist device therapy

Women with advanced heart failure receive advanced surgical therapies such as durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or heart transplantation at a rate much lower compared to males. Reasons for this discrepancy remain largely unknown. Much of what is understood reflects outcomes of those patients who ultimately receive device implant or heart transplantation. Females have been shown to have a higher mortality following LVAD implantation and experience higher rates of bleeding and clotting phenomena and right ventricular failure. Beyond outcomes, the literature is limited in the identification of pre-operative factors that drive lower than expected LVAD implant rates in this population. More focused research is needed to define the disparities in advance heart failure therapy delivery in women and other underserved populations.

Racial and Sex Inequities in the Use of and Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Importance

While left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) increase survival for patients with advanced heart failure (HF), racial and sex access and outcome inequities remain and are poorly understood.

Objectives

To assess risk-adjusted inequities in access and outcomes for both Black and female patients and to examine heterogeneity in treatment decisions among patients for whom clinician discretion has a more prominent role.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study of 12 310 Medicare beneficiaries used 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service administrative claims. Included patients had been admitted for heart failure from 2008 to 2014. Data were collected from July 2007 to December 2015 and analyzed from August 23, 2020, to May 15, 2022.

Exposures

Beneficiary race and sex.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The propensity for LVAD implantation was based on clinical risk factors from the 6 months preceding HF admission using XGBoost and the synthetic minority oversampling technique. Beneficiaries with a 5% or greater probability of receiving an LVAD were included. Logistic regression models were estimated to measure associations of race and sex with LVAD receipt adjusting for clinical characteristics and social determinants of health (eg, distance from LVAD center, Medicare low-income subsidy, neighborhood deprivation). Next, 1-year mortality after LVAD was examined.

Results

The analytic sample included 12 310 beneficiaries, of whom 22.9% (n = 2819) were Black and 23.7% (n = 2920) were women. In multivariable models, Black beneficiaries were 3.0% (0.2% to 5.8%) less likely to receive LVAD than White beneficiaries, and women were 7.9% (5.6% to 10.2%) less likely to receive LVAD than men. Individual poverty and worse neighborhood deprivation were associated with reduced use, 2.9% (0.4% to 5.3%) and 6.7% (2.9% to 10.5%), respectively, but these measures did little to explain observed disparities. The racial disparity was concentrated among patients with a low propensity score (propensity score <0.52). One-year survival by race and sex were similar on average, but Black patients with a low propensity score experienced improved survival (7.2% [95% CI, 0.9% to 13.5%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HF, disparities in LVAD use by race and sex existed and were not explained by clinical characteristics or social determinants of health. The treatment and post-LVAD survival by race were equivalent among the most obvious LVAD candidates. However, there was differential use and outcomes among less clear-cut LVAD candidates, with lower use but improved survival among Black patients. Inequity in LVAD access may have resulted from differences in clinician decision-making because of systemic racism and discrimination, implicit bias, or patient preference.

Outcomes in Smaller Body Size Adults after HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

Outcomes in patients with smaller body size following HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device (HM3) implantation are not well characterized. We sought to evaluate outcomes in smaller vs. larger BSA patients in the MOMENTUM 3 pivotal trial and its Continued Access Protocol cohort.

METHODS

The analysis cohort included 1015 HM3 patients divided into 2 groups: BSA≤1.70 m² (small patients, n=82) and BSA>1.70 m² (large patients, n=933). The composite primary endpoint was survival at 2-years free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. Adverse events were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Smaller patients were more frequently women (56.1% vs. 17.7%, P<.001), had lower prevalence of diabetes (28.1% vs. 43.9%, P=.005) and hypertension (51.2% vs. 71.9%, P<.001), larger median indexed LVEDD (normalized by BSA, 40 vs. 33 mm/m², P<.001), and lower median serum creatinine (1.1 vs. 1.3 mg/dl, P<.001). The proportion of patients achieving the composite endpoint at 2-years was 77% in both groups (adjusted HR = 1.14 [95% confidence interval: 0.68-1.91], P=.62). Two-year adverse event rates were also similar between groups except for sepsis (6.1% vs. 14.9%, P=.029) and cardiac arrhythmias (24.4% vs. 35.3%, P=.005), which were higher in the larger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes following HM3 implantation were comparable between small and large patients. Smaller body size should not be used to deny HM3 implantation in patients who are otherwise suitable durable MCS candidates.

Sex Differences in Recovery and Device Replacement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy

Background The relevance of sex and preimplant factors for clinical outcomes among patients with left ventricular assist devices intended for destination therapy is unclear. Methods and Results INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) data (2006-2017) from 6771 men and 1690 women with left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy were analyzed to evaluate the contribution of preimplant clinical, demographic, and clinically judged psychosocial characteristics to time until death, heart transplant, device explant due to recovery, or complication-related device replacement. Associations of sex with time until each competing outcome were evaluated using cumulative incidence functions and event-specific Cox proportional hazards models. Women were younger, more likely to have nonischemic diagnoses, and reported less substance abuse but were more likely to be unmarried, not working for an income, overweight, and depressed than men. After 2 years, women had higher probabilities for recovery (3.7% versus 1.6%, P<0.001) and device replacement (12.1% versus 10%, P=0.019) than men but not for death and transplant (P>0.12). The sex differences remained after controlling for covariates (adjusted hazard ratio [HR_adj] recovery, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.30-2.70; P<0.001; HR_adj device replacement, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.33; P=0.015). Female-specific diagnoses (eg, postpartum heart failure) contributed to women's enhanced rate of recovery. Demographic and psychosocial factors were unrelated to women's increased event rates. Conclusions In destination therapy, women have higher rates of device replacement and recovery than men. The latter was partly explained by female-specific diagnoses. Standardized assessments of psychosocial characteristics are needed to elucidate their association with sex differences in outcomes.

Heart Failure Subtypes and Cardiomyopathies in Women

Heart failure affects over 2.6 million women and 3.4 million men in the United States with known sex differences in epidemiology, management, response to treatment, and outcomes across a wide spectrum of cardiomyopathies that include peripartum cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, stress cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and sarcoidosis. Some of these sex-specific considerations are driven by the cellular effects of sex hormones on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, endothelial response to injury, vascular aging, and left ventricular remodeling. Other sex differences are perpetuated by implicit bias leading to undertreatment and underrepresentation in clinical trials. The goal of this narrative review is to comprehensively examine the existing literature over the last decade regarding sex differences in various heart failure syndromes from pathophysiological insights to clinical practice.

Does Size Matter for Female Continuous-flow LVAD Recipients? A Translational Approach to a Decade Long Question

Females have increased risk of right-ventricular failure (RVF) and 3 month mortality after left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. In this translational study, we tested the hypothesis that sex differences in outcomes are driven by pump-induced LV size-volume mismatch, due to a negative impact on interventricular septal (IVS) interdependence. Adult continuous-flow LVAD recipients from the International Society For Heart And Lung Transplantation Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support registry (n = 15,498) were studied to determine association of female sex with outcomes of 3 month mortality and RVF. Female sex was associated with smaller preimplant left-ventricular end-diastolic diameter (6.5 vs. 6.9 cm, p < 0.001), increased 3 month mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.42, p < 0.001) and RVF (OR: 1.18, p = 0.005). Smaller left-ventricular end-diastolic diameter was associated with worse outcomes after LVAD implantation (OR for mortality: 1.20, p < 0.001; RVF: 1.09, p < 0.001), and attenuated the association of female sex with these outcomes. In test bench heart phantoms (n = 4), the IVSs of smaller hearts demonstrated abnormal leftward shift earlier than larger hearts (volume change at IVS shift: 40 [95% confidence interval: 30-52] vs. 50 [95% confidence interval: 48-69] ml). Smaller LV size partially mediates worse post-LVAD outcomes for female patients, due to lower volume thresholds for adverse IVS shifting.

Sex Differences in Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) continues to be a major contributor of morbidity and mortality for men and women alike, yet how the predisposition for, course and management of HF differ between men and women remains underexplored. Sex differences in traditional risk factors as well as sex-specific risk factors influence the prevalence and manifestation of HF in unique ways. The pathophysiology of HF differs between men and women and may explain sex-specific differences in clinical presentation and diagnosis. This in turn contributes to variation in response to both pharmacologic and device/surgical therapy. This review examines sex-specific differences in HF spanning prevalence, risk factors, pathophysiology, presentation, and therapies with a specific focus on highlighting gaps in knowledge with calls to action for future research efforts.

Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex-Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients

Background

Prior studies have shown that women have worse 3‐month survival after receiving a left ventricular assist device compared with men. Currently used prognostic scores, including the Heartmate II Risk Score, do not account for the increased residual risk in women. We used the IMACS (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) registry to create and validate a sex‐specific risk score for early mortality in left ventricular assist device recipients.

Methods and Results

Adult patients with a continuous‐flow LVAD from the IMACS registry were randomly divided into a derivation cohort (DC; n=9113; 21% female) and a validation cohort (VC; n=6074; 21% female). The IMACS Risk Score was developed in the DC to predict 3‐month mortality, from preoperative candidate predictors selected using the Akaike information criterion, or significant sex × variable interaction. In the DC, age, cardiogenic shock at implantation, body mass index, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin, hemoglobin, albumin, platelet count, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter, tricuspid regurgitation, dialysis, and major infection before implantation were retained as significant predictors of 3‐month mortality. There was significant ischemic heart failure × sex and platelet count × sex interaction. For each quartile increase in IMACS risk score, men (odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.74–2.00; P<0.0001), and women (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.47–2.59; P<0.0001) had higher odds of 3‐month mortality. The IMACS risk score represented a significant improvement over Heartmate II Risk Score (IMACS risk score area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: men: DC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69–0.73; VC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.66–0.72; women: DC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.77; VC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66–0.76; P<0.01 for improvement in receiver operating characteristic) and provided excellent risk calibration in both sexes. Removal of sex‐specific interaction terms resulted in significant loss of model fit.

Conclusions

A sex‐specific risk score provides excellent risk prediction in LVAD recipients.