A bispecific antibody demonstrates limited measurability in routine coagulation assays

In vitro effects of combining Mim8 with factor VIII, FVIIa, and activated prothrombin complex concentrates in thrombin generation assays

BACKGROUND

Mim8 is a novel antifactor IXa/antifactor X bispecific antibody in clinical development for prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A with and without inhibitors. Patients treated with Mim8 may need supplementary bleed treatment under certain conditions such as surgery or major trauma.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to better understand the response of Mim8 in thrombin generation assays (TGAs) alone or in combination with other hemostatic proteins.

METHODS

We used TGAs with different activators (tissue factor (TF) and activated factor XI) to better understand the similarities and differences between the mode of action of Mim8 and factor VIII (FVIII). Following this, we investigated the effects of mixing Mim8 with the main bleed treatment options for persons with hemophilia A with or without inhibitors: FVIII, activated factor VII (FVIIa), and activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC).

RESULTS

The results indicated that for patients without inhibitors, Mim8 does not interfere with FVIII's mode of action. For patients with inhibitors, Mim8 mixed with aPCC results in a strong synergistic effect causing thrombin generation far exceeding the normal levels. Contrary to this, mixing Mim8 with FVIIa results in a more controlled additive effect, visible only when using TF as a trigger, which does not exceed the normal level of thrombin generation.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the use of approved clinical doses of FVIIa for bleed treatment of patients with FVIII inhibitors treated with Mim8. Additionally, the findings suggest that concomitant use of FVIII and Mim8 is safe for managing breakthrough bleeds.

In vitro validation of chromogenic substrate assay for evaluation of surrogate FVIII-activity of emicizumab

[Introduction] Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking activated factor VIII (FVIII), is increasingly used in prophylaxis against bleeding in hemophilia A. Human factor-based chromogenic substrate assay (hCSA) shows concentration-dependency between emicizumab and reported FVIII activity. However, the assay measurement settings have not been optimized for emicizumab, and the reported FVIII activity cannot be directly referred as surrogate FVIII activity. [Materials and Methods] For in vitro validation of hCSA-reported surrogate FVIII activity, we compared the equation curves for emicizumab concentration with surrogate FVIII activity using spiked plasma in the thrombin generation assay (TGA), hCSA, and clot waveform analysis (CWA). Then, we generated conversion equations for hCSA-reported surrogate FVIII value to that of TGA. We also assessed the additive effect of rFVIII onto 340 nM (i.e., 50 μg/mL) emicizumab using the same assays. [Results] With 1:20 diluted plasma, halving hCSA-reported surrogate FVIII activity can be approximated to that in TGA triggered by the extrinsic pathway reagent (27.3 IU/dL vs. 13.9 IU/dL) under therapeutic emicizumab concentration. Both in TGA and hCSA, the additive effect of added FVIII on therapeutic emicizumab concentration (340 nM) was maintained at low levels of FVIII but gradually decreased at higher levels. [Conclusions] Surrogate FVIII activity can be estimated simply by halving hCSA-reported FVIII value, and the additive effect of FVIII on emicizumab diminishes at high concentrations. Based on our in vitro study, a clinical study is currently being conducted to compare individual variation of surrogate FVIII activity in hCSA and TGA.

Microsimulation to compare activity-related bleed risks between pharmacokinetic-guided rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis and emicizumab

BACKGROUND

Owing to a lack of clinical study data, computational modeling was used to estimate activity-related bleed risk during prophylaxis with either rurioctocog alfa pegol or emicizumab.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A pharmacokinetic (PK)-based computational model was used to estimate factor VIII (FVIII) levels for individual patients in the PROPEL study who were treated with PK-guided rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis targeting FVIII trough levels of 1-3% or 8-12%. Emicizumab was assumed to have 20% FVIII equivalency. Six hypothetical patient activity profiles were created using the National Hemophilia Foundation's physical activity risk ratings scale. For each profile and treatment regimen combination, the total bleed risk over a 2-week period was estimated relative to a patient who was participating in a low-risk activity with 0% FVIII, and the overall relative bleed risks were compared.

RESULTS

For all evaluated activity profiles, rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis targeting either 1-3% or 8-12% FVIII trough levels was associated with a lower estimated bleed risk compared with emicizumab prophylaxis with assumed 20% FVIII equivalency (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although this model does not reflect actual patient outcomes, it suggests that PK-guided rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis may reduce the bleed risk during physical activities.

Thrombin generation for monitoring hemostatic therapy in hemophilia A: A narrative review

Patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) have an increased risk of spontaneous and trauma-related bleeding because of a congenital absence of factor VIII (FVIII). Most severe HA patients use prophylactic FVIII concentrate, the effect of which can be monitored with FVIII activity level measurement. However, FVIII activity level is less valuable in predicting the potential clinical bleeding risk. Some patients still experience breakthrough bleeds despite adequate FVIII trough levels, whereas others do not bleed with trough levels below threshold. This difference may be caused by inter-individual differences in pro- and anticoagulant factors, the so-called hemostatic balance. Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) measure the hemostatic balance as a whole. Thereby, the TGAs may be a better tool in the guidance and monitoring of treatment in HA patients. In addition, TGAs offer the opportunity to determine the response to bypassing agents and treatment with non-factor replacement therapy, in which FVIII activity assays are not suitable for monitoring. This review summarizes the current knowledge about monitoring different HA treatment modalities by TGA, as a single treatment option and when used in a concomitant fashion.