HJHS 2.1 and HEAD-US assessment in the hemophilic joints: How do their findings compare?

Impact of Systematic Joint Examination (Ultrasound, Functional and Physical) on Treatment Management Decisions in Patients With Haemophilia A in France: Final Data From the Prospective, Observational A-MOVE Study

BACKGROUND

Haemophilia management aims to prevent bleeding and preserve joint function. Changes in patients' joint health may influence physicians' decisions to adjust treatment. The Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) score assess joint health but are not routinely used.

AIM

To evaluate whether systematic joint examination with HJHS and/or HEAD-US had an impact on treatment management decisions in France, using final data from the A-MOVE study.

METHODS

A-MOVE (NCT04133883) was a 12-month prospective, multicentre study, which enrolled persons with haemophilia A (all severities, aged 6-40 years) treated prophylactically or on demand with standard/extended half-life FVIII replacement. At baseline, 6 and 12 months, HJHS/HEAD-US and changes in patients' management were assessed.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients from 20 sites were included in the final analysis; 68 had HJHS/HEAD-US assessments at 12 months. Over 12 months, 24.4% (n = 21/86) of patients experienced an impact on their haemophilia management due to HJHS/HEAD-US scores; these decisions were impacted by HJHS in about half of the patients (52.4%, n = 11/21) and HEAD-US in almost all patients (95.2%, n = 20/21). Both assessments contributed to a change in management decisions in about half of the patients (47.6%, n = 10/21). Twenty-nine patients (33.7%) had haemophilia management decisions impacted by factors other than HJHS/HEAD-US, including physical examination findings (n = 9) and the occurrence of bleeding episodes (n = 8).

CONCLUSIONS

Final data from the A-MOVE study show that systematic joint assessments, through functional/physical examination (HJHS) and ultrasound (HEAD-US), may impact treatment management decisions in persons with haemophilia A.

Deciphering the circulating microRNA signature of hemophilic arthropathy

BACKGROUND

Haemophilic arthropathy (HArt) is a serious complication in patients with hemophilia. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to minimise the development of HArt. The use of biomarkers may improve early diagnosis of HArt. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNAsthat regulate gene expression, and are being investigated as promising biomarkers due to their role in joint and bone metabolism.

AIMS

To investigate differential expression of miRNAs and their relationship to arthropathy in patients with hemophilia A.

METHODS

miRNA expression was examined in a pilot study followed by a validation study (100 hemophilia A patients with [n = 83] and without HArt [n = 17], 14 controls). Differential miRNA expression was investigated using real-time quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

The pilot study identified 2 miRNAs differentially expressed in patients with Hart (Pettersson score ≥ 1), after adjusting for the false discovery rate (FDR). The validation study evaluated these 2 miRNAs. The results demonstrated that two miRNAs (miR- 208a-3p and 524-3p) were significantly underexpressed in plasma of patients with HArt compared to patients without arthropathy, with FDR <0.05 (Fig. 1). In addition, 3 miRNAs (130a-3p, miR- and 506-3p) were significantly underexpressed in patients with moderate HArt (Pettersson score 4 to 7).

CONCLUSIONS

In this proof of concept study we identified a signature of 5 circulating miRNAs associated with Hart with potential as diagnosis tools for HArt. These miRNAs are potential negative regulators of gene expression, suggesting their activity in HArt by interfering with osteoblastic (miR- 208a-3p) and osteoclastic (miR-506-3p) differentiation to impair bone mineralization and remodeling processes, or regulating chondrogenesis (miR-335-5p). miRNAs associated with earlier stages of HArt will be further investigated in a sub-study of the prospective clinical trial PROVE, which will investigate the effects of long-term prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa versus emicizumab in adults with hemophilia A.

Infrared thermography: An investigative tool for detection of subclinical bleed in hemophilia on prophylaxis

Background & objectives Subclinical joint bleed is a matter of concern in individuals with hemophilia on prophylaxis. Ultrasonography (USG) is mostly used for the screening of subclinical bleeds in such individuals but it has its own limitations. Thus a more comprehensive technology is required for the detection of the same. This study undertook to evaluate the efficacy of infrared thermography (IRT) for detection of subclinical joint bleeds and its comparison with ultrasonography and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), considering MRI as the gold standard. Methods Forty eight asymptomatic individuals with hemophiliacs on prophylaxis and 15 healthy males as controls were recruited. IRT, USG and MRI were done in all participants included in the study. FLIR camera systems were used for the capture of thermograms of the joints in both the study groups. Results The mean of maximum temperature difference>0.5K (ΔT max >0.5K) as compared to a healthy joint was considered as significant. Subclinical bleeds were detected in 23.9, 7.29 and 27.08 per cent participants by IRT, USG and MRI respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of IRT and USG was detected to be 88.4 and 97.67 per cent, and 26.9 and 99 per cent, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions The findings of this study suggest that IRT is an effective tool for detection of subclinical joint bleeds in individuals with hemophilia and can be used for the monitoring of the joints in such individuals.

Assessing joint health in haemophilia patients: The combined value of physical examination and ultrasound imaging

INTRODUCTION

Early diagnosis of joint damage is pivotal in haemophilia to prevent the occurrence and progression of haemophilic arthropathy thus providing optimal personalised management. The haemophilia joint health score version 2.1 (HJHS) is based on a physical examination of the mainly affected joints. Musculoskeletal ultrasound has demonstrated the capability to detect early changes in terms of synovitis and osteochondral damage. The haemophilia early detection with ultrasound (HEAD-US) score has been proposed as a simple and reliable evaluation tool.

AIM

This study aims to investigate the correlation between the HJHS and the HEAD-US scores performed by two independent operators (physical therapist and musculoskeletal ultrasound expert) for the evaluation of the joint health status of patients with haemophilia.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients independent of the severity degree were included. Elbows, knees and ankles were evaluated by a physical therapist by HJHS and by a musculoskeletal ultrasound expert following the HEAD-US protocol.

RESULTS

We observed a good positive correlation between HJHS and HEAD-US (Spearman's rho 0.72). The main discrepancy in conceptually similar domains was found between the HJHS swelling and the HEAD-US synovitis (rho 0.17), as ultrasound was able to detect even mild synovitis when HJHS swelling was scored 0 in up to 40% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The HJHS and HEAD-US correlate well even when performed by two independent operators. Musculoskeletal ultrasound is particularly useful for the early detection of synovitis. The routine assessment of both scores helps clinicians define the stage and extension of joint involvement and set up a personalised treatment.

Force-sensing treadmill gait analysis system can detect gait abnormalities in haemophilia patients without arthropathy

BACKGROUND

Joint damage in patients with haemophilia (PwH) is commonly assessed by imaging, but few reports have described how structural changes in joints, for example, haemophilic arthropathy (HA)-affect gait ability.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated gait function among PwH with HA, PwH without HA, and people without haemophilia (non-PwH) using a Zebris FDM-T treadmill (FDM-T), an easy-to-use gait assessment instrument with a force sensor matrix.

METHODS

The following gait parameters were collected: centre of pressure trajectory intersection (COPi) anterior/posterior variability, COPi lateral variability, COPi anterior/posterior symmetry, COPi lateral symmetry, single-limb support line (SLSL) length, and SLSL variability. Participants walked at their typical gait speed. The physical function of the PwH was assessed by the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Parameters were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

Twelve PwH with HA, 28 PwH without HA, and 12 non-PwH were enrolled. Gait speed significantly differed between groups (non-PwH, 3.1 ± 0.7; PwH without HA, 2.0 ± 0.7; PwH with HA; 1.5 ± 0.4). The COPi anterior/posterior variability, COPi lateral variability, SLSL length, and SLSL variability were greater in the PwH groups than in the non-PwH group. The COPi lateral symmetry differed between PwH with HA and the other groups. The HJHS was not correlated with gait parameters among PwH with HA.

CONCLUSIONS

Gait parameters and speed were abnormal in both PwH with HA and PwH without HA. The FDM-T can be used to identify early stages of physical dysfunction that cannot be detected by conventional functional assessments such as the HJHS.

Hemophilia Joint Health Score, Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia, and Pettersson Score in Pediatric Patients With Severe Hemophilia A

Hemophilia is an X-linked recessive disorder. Children with hemophilia go through spontaneous and trauma-provoked bleeding. Recurring joint bleeds lead to ongoing incapacity. Achieving healthy joints is the primary target of hemophilia management. The current study objective was to assess hemophilic joints in individuals with hemophilic arthropathy clinically, radiographically, and functionally. This cross-sectional study included 50 children with severe hemophilia A who were selected from the pediatric hematology clinic. All children were assessed for Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Joint assessed functionally by Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH) and radiologically by plain radiograph and scored by the Pettersson scoring system. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The mean age of the studied cases of hemophilia was 8.5±3.1 years. The mean FISH score among the studied patients was 26.8±4.2, the mean HJHS was 16.8±12.8, and the Pettersson score was 4.9±2.7. The number of affected joints showed a significant negative correlation to the FISH score and a significant positive correlation to HJHS. The frequency of hemarthrosis/month showed a significant positive correlation to HJHS. The number of affected joints showed a significant negative correlation to the FISH score and a significant positive correlation to HJHS. Frequency of hemarthrosis/month showed a significant positive correlation to HJHS.

The Correlation Between the HEAD-US-C Score and HJHS in Hemophilic Arthropathy of the Knee

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to discuss the correlation between the Hemophilia Early Detection Ultrasound in China (HEAD-US-C) score and the Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 (HJHS 2.1) of the knee joint in patients with hemophilia.

METHODS

We included 70 male patients with hemophilia admitted to The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University; the patients' bilateral knee joints were evaluated using the HEAD-US-C score and HJHS. We analyzed factors influencing hemophilia arthropathy of the knee and examined the correlation between the HEAD-US-C score and HJHS.

RESULTS

The joint injury severity was positively correlated with age and the number of bleeds (P < .001). Further, the HEAD-US-C score and HJHS differed according to the severity (both P < .001), but not type (P = .163 and P = .283, respectively), of hemophilia. There was a significant correlation between the HEAD-US-C score and HJHS (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, all joint lesions observed on ultrasound corresponded to clinical joint functional abnormalities. Therefore, the HEAD-US-C is important for hemophilic arthropathy evaluation and is useful in explaining abnormal joint function.

Screening for subclinical synovial proliferation in haemophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing physical examination and ultrasound

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound is increasingly used as addition to physical examination for detection of subclinical joint changes in haemophilia. However, the added value of ultrasound to physical examination for detecting synovial proliferation is not fully established.

AIM

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of swelling at physical examination for ultrasound-detected synovial proliferation in haemophilia.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to 2 August 2022. Studies reporting original data on occurrence of swelling at physical examination and synovial proliferation on ultrasound of index joints in persons with haemophilia were included. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Diagnostic accuracy parameters of swelling at physical examination for ultrasound-detected synovial proliferation were determined. Summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies reporting on swelling at physical examination and synovial proliferation on ultrasound in 2890 joints of 627 patients were included. Prevalence of subclinical synovial proliferation ranged between 0% and 55%. Sensitivity of swelling was low [summary estimate .34; 95% confidence interval (CI) .24-.46], while specificity was high (summary estimate .97; CI .92-.99). Predictive values varied widely due to inter-study differences in prevalence of synovial proliferation.

CONCLUSION

Joint swelling has low sensitivity for presence of ultrasound-detected synovial proliferation in haemophilia, suggesting underestimation of synovial proliferation by physical examination alone. Consequently, ultrasound screening may generate important information on synovial changes which would otherwise remain undetected.

How to assess, detect, and manage joint involvement in the era of transformational therapies: Role of point-of-care ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Patients with haemophilia experience recurring hemarthroses, mainly involving knees, elbows and ankles, which lead to haemophilic arthropathy, the major chronic complication of haemophilia. With new approaches to haemophilia treatment leading to fewer joint bleeds and, in some cases, no bleeding events, assessing whether current outcome assessment tools provide adequate sensitivity and specificity for management and care of patients with haemophilia is needed.

METHODS

An overview of current imaging tools for monitoring joint health, novel osteochondral damage and synovial proliferation biomarkers, and the relationship between assessments for functionality and imaging modalities is provided. Usefulness and sensitivity of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to complement other assessments and use of ultrasound to monitor haemophilic arthropathy are also examined.

RESULTS

This review provides rationale for haemophilia teams to move beyond traditional outcomes in joint imaging, as well as guidance and evidence on assessment of joint health for potential new treatment modalities, such as gene therapy. The role of POCUS in the existing paradigm for haemophilia care and management along with the use of ultrasound as a complement to other outcome assessment tools are also discussed. Finally, the clinical effects of subclinical bleeding on joint function are described, to motivate screening for synovial proliferation.

CONCLUSION

POCUS can facilitate the early detection of joint damage and can monitor disease progression while providing insights into the efficacy of treatment regimens, and should be considered as an essential assessment tool for managing the care of patients with haemophilia.

Long-term prophylaxis: what are our options and how to define success?

Currently, we are at an enviable place in hemophilia treatment. Although full prophylaxis with standard half-life recombinant or plasma-derived factor concentrates has been definitively shown to be inadequate for full protection against bleeding and arthropathy, a number of novel therapies with improved hemostatic enhancement are clinically available or in promising clinical trials. In order to compare outcomes among a number of very efficacious therapies, it is necessary to have sensitive tools employed in long-term follow-up for several years for participants with no or minimal joint disease. The tool kit must be comprehensive, with outcomes of bleeding, factor level restoration or hemostatic capacity, joint structure, joint function, pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. This article reviews the history of prophylaxis, the promise of emerging therapies, and the sensitive tools used to assess long-term efficacy for joint structure and function.

Joint status and related risk factors in patients with severe hemophilia A: a single-center cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Hemophilic arthropathy is the most common complication of severe hemophilia A. This study aims to investigated joint status and related risk factors in patients with severe hemophilia A (PWSHA).

METHODS

This single-center study included 31 patients. Six index joints (both elbows, knees, and ankles) were evaluated using the Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with UltraSound in China (HEAD-US-C) and Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Treatment adherence was measured using the Validated Hemophilia Regimen Treatment Adherence Scale-Prophylaxis (VERITAS-Pro). We analyzed the influence of age, treatment delay (the interval between diagnosis and the initiation of treatment), prophylaxis, and treatment adherence on joint outcomes.

RESULTS

All patients were male (median age, 22 years). The median age at diagnosis was 1 year; that at initial treatment was 5 years. All patients experienced joint bleeding. HEAD-US-C and HJHS scores were positively correlated (R = 0.70, P < 0.0001). Median [range] HEAD-US-C and HJHS scores were 15 [0-36] and 32 [2-49], respectively. Age was positively correlated with both HEAD-US-C (P = 0.002) and HJHS scores (P < 0.0001). The difference of HEAD-US-C scores between groups with ≤1 year and >1 year treatment delay was close to significant (P = 0.055). HJHS scores were significantly different between these two groups (P = 0.03). Joint assessment scores were not significantly different between on-demand and low-dose prophylaxis groups. VERITAS-Pro scores were correlated with both HEAD-US-C and HJHS scores (P = 0.046 and P = 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemophilic arthropathy was pervasive in PWSHA. Age and poor adherence were significantly correlated with joint damage. Prompt treatment and adherence improvement may reduce severity.

Clinical assessment and point of care ultrasonography: How to diagnose haemophilic synovitis

BACKGROUND

The ability of clinical tools to identify early joint changes is limited. Synovitis is a fundamental finding in understanding haemophilia activity and the response to its therapies; thus, there is a need for sensitive methods to better diagnose subclinical synovitis early.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to compare the frequency with which clinical assessment and ultrasound detected synovial hypertrophy in the most frequently affected joints in patients with haemophilia (elbows, knees and ankles).

METHODS

We analysed patients with haemophilia older than 16 years who came to the haemophilia centre for routine follow-up. From the clinical assessment carried out in the consultation, the swelling, pain and history of haemarthrosis were evaluated and compared with the findings of synovial hypertrophy detected by ultrasound. This comparison was also analysed independently for elbows, knees and ankles.

RESULTS

A total of 203 joints of 66 patients with haemophilia (mean age 34 years), most of them on secondary, tertiary prophylaxis or on demand treatment, were included. In joints with swelling, pain and history of haemarthrosis, 78% of the joints showed synovial hypertrophy on ultrasound. However, in joints with no swelling, no pain and no history of haemarthrosis, 40% presented subclinical synovial hypertrophy on ultrasound. This percentage was higher in elbows than in knees and ankles.

CONCLUSION

In adults with haemophilia, physical examination and point-of-care ultrasound study provide complementary data on their joint disease. However, without ultrasound, the ability to detect subclinical synovitis is considerably reduced, especially in the elbows.

Quantitative measurements of haemophilic joint tissues by point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound: Associations with clinical and functional joint outcome parameters

Background

Painful arthropathy is a long‐term complication in patients with hemophilia (PWH), affecting mobility and quality of life. A major barrier for the appraisal of joint health is the absence of point‐of‐care (POC) imaging modalities to promptly identify and manage arthropathic changes. Accordingly, we developed the Joint tissue Activity and Damage Exam (JADE) POC musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) protocol. JADE is validated for haemophilic joint tissue recognition with high intra/inter‐rater and inter‐operator reliability.

Aims

Evaluate associations of JADE with clinical (Hemophilia Joint Health Score, [HJHS]) and functional (total arc [combined flexion and extension range of motion [ROM]]) parameters.

Methodology

In this multi‐centre prospective study, we recruited PWH A or B with at least one arthropathic joint. We evaluated joint health (both elbows, knees, and ankles) by comparing JADE measurements (soft tissue and cartilage thickness, and osteochondral alterations) with HJHS and total arc.

Results

Of 44 PWH, most had hemophilia A (35/44), were severe (36/44) and had a median age of 36 years. Increasing HJHSs and declining total arc, indicating worsening arthropathy, were associated with JADE measurements in the expected direction, including (1) increasing length of osteochondral alterations, (2) diminished cartilage thickness, and (3) greater soft tissue expansion. The ankles had the highest proportion of joints without measurable (missing) cartilage. In multivariable models MSKUS measurements explained 68% and 71% of the variation in HJHS and total arc respectively for the elbow, 55% and 29% respectively for the knee, and 50% and 73% for the ankle.

Conclusions

This study highlights the associations of direct intra‐articular ultrasonography measurements using the JADE protocol with clinical and functional parameters. Our findings underscore the clinical value of POC MSKUS using the JADE protocol as a complementary instrument for the diagnosis and management of haemophilic arthropathy.

Correlation between Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) score and Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) in patients with hemophilic arthropathy

BACKGROUND

Hemophilic arthropathy, a condition manifested as joint destruction due to spontaneous joint bleeding, is one complication of hemophiliac patients. Early detection and intervention may improve the outcome, in which ultrasonography can be an ideal modality with the introduction of HEAD-US (Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound) protocol. Studies have shown US benefit in hemophiliac patients, including its potential as an alternative for the Hemophiliac Joint Health Score (HJHS) system. However, many of the studies were conducted in countries with better management of hemophilia using prophylaxis treatment. It is unclear whether HEAD-US has a correlation with HJHS in countries using episodic treatment only, like in Indonesia.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the correlation between HEAD-US and HJHS in hemophiliac patients with joint problems in Indonesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional correlation study between HEAD-US and HJHS was performed with primary data collected from 120 hemophilic patients. US examination was performed on elbow, knee and ankle joints using the HEAD-US scoring method by a musculoskeletal radiologist. HJHS examination was conducted by a trained physiotherapist and a medical rehabilitation specialist. All examiner is member of multidisciplinary Hemophiliac Management Team in Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participant was 9.3 (5-14) years old. The median score of HEAD-US was 8 (1-28) with most of the joint abnormalities found on the ankles. The median score of HJHS was 3 (0-35), with most joint abnormalities found on the knees. There was a moderate correlation between HEAD-US and HJHS score (p < 0.05, r = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

HEAD-US shows a moderate correlation to HJHS in hemophiliac patients who received episodic treatment. HEAD-US can provide additional value in the anatomical evaluation of the joint and could be complementary to HJHS in assessing the joint status in hemophilic patient.

Ultrasound evaluation of joint damage and disease activity in adult patients with severe haemophilia A using the HEAD-US system

INTRODUCTION

The Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) system and scoring scale has proven to be an accurate and time-efficient imaging method for identifying joint damage in patients with haemophilia.

AIM

Observational, multicentre, cross-sectional study conducted in 8 centres in Spain that assessed the joint status of adult patients with severe haemophilia A (SHA) using HEAD-US.

METHODS

Joint status of the elbow, knee and ankle was evaluated in adults with SHA receiving on-demand (OD) treatment, or primary (PP), secondary (SP), tertiary (TP) or intermittent (IP) prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Of the 95 patients enrolled, 87 received prophylaxis (6.3% PP, 38.9% SP, 43.2% TP and 3.2% IP). Mean age was 35.2 years, and 59% of patients had not undergone image testing in the last year. The HEAD-US score was 0 in all joints in 6.3% of patients. The ankle was the most affected joint, regardless of treatment regimen. Patients receiving OD treatment, TP or IP had the overall worst scores, mainly in the ankles and elbows; a similar but milder profile was observed in patients on SP; and patients on PP had the best score in all joints.

CONCLUSION

Joint function may be effectively preserved in patients with SHA on PP, but OD treatment or later initiation of prophylaxis does not seem to prevent progression of arthropathy. Disease worsening was observed in patients OD, TP or IP, most often affecting ankles and elbows. Closer ultrasound imaging monitoring may improve management of these patients.

Haemophilia early arthropathy detection with ultrasound and haemophilia joint health score in the moderate haemophilia (MoHem) study

INTRODUCTION

Detection of early arthropathy is crucial for the management of haemophilia, but data on moderate haemophilia are limited. Therefore, we evaluated joint health and treatment modalities in Nordic patients with moderate haemophilia A (MHA) and B (MHB).

AIM

To explore and compare the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) and Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) to detect early arthropathy in moderate haemophilia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, multicentre study covering Nordic patients with MHA and MHB. Arthropathy was evaluated by HEAD-US and HJHS 2.1.

RESULTS

We assessed 693 joints in 118 patients. HEAD-US scores (medians [interquartile ranges]) were as follows: elbows 0 points (0-0), knees 0 (0-0) and ankles 0 (0-1). Respectively, by HJHS: elbows 0 (0-1), knees 0 (0-1) and ankles 0 (0-1). Cartilage (14%) and bone (13%) were most commonly affected by HEAD-US. Frequent HJHS findings were crepitus on motion in knees (39%), and loss of flexion (23%) and extension (13%) in ankles. HEAD-US correlated strongly with HJHS (elbows r = .70, knees r = .60 and ankles r = .65), but 24% had discordant scores. Joints with HJHS zero points, 5% captured HEAD-US ≥1 point. Moreover, 26% had HJHS findings without HEAD-US pathology. Notably, 31% of knees had crepitus on motion and normal HEAD-US.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the joints attained low scores implying good joint health. HEAD-US correlated strongly with HJHS. In 5%, HEAD-US detected subclinical pathology. Crepitus on motion was frequently reported despite normal HEAD-US, thus not necessarily reflecting arthropathy. HEAD-US therefore improves the joint assessment in moderate haemophilia.