Risk factors for thrombosis in Serbian children

Thromboembolism in Children

OBJECTIVE

To study pediatric patients who were diagnosed with thrombosis between January 2009 and March 2020.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated with respect to thrombophilic risk factors, localization of the thrombus, response to treatment, and recurrence rates during the last 11 y.

RESULTS

Among 84 patients, 59 (70%) had venous thrombosis and 20 (24%) had arterial thrombosis. The number of documented thrombosis amongst hospitalized children in authors' hospital has increased over the years. It has been observed that the annual incidence of thromboembolism has increased after 2014. Thirteen patients were recorded between 2009 and 2014 and 71 patients between 2015 and 2020 (until March 2020). Exact thrombosis localization could not be detected in 5 patients. The median age of patients was 8 ± 5.95 (range 0-18). Fourteen children (16.9%) had a history of familial thrombosis. Genetic and/or acquired risk factors were detected in 81 (96.4%) of the patients. Overall, 64 patients (76.1%) had acquired risk factors such as infection (20.2%), catheterization (13.1%), liver disease (11.9%), mastoiditis (8.3%), liver transplantation (6%), hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (4.8%), dehydration (3.6%), trauma (3.6%) and cancer (2.4%). As genetic risk factors, the most common genetic mutations were PAI-1 4G>5G, MTHFR C677T, and MTHFR A1298C mutations. Twenty-eight (41.2%) patients had at least one genetic thrombophilic mutation. At least one homozygous mutation in 37 patients (44%) and at least one heterozygous mutation in 55 patients (65.4%) were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The annual incidence of thrombosis has increased over the years. Genetic predisposition and acquired risk factors play an important role in etiology, treatment, and follow-up in children with thromboembolism. Especially, genetic predisposition is common. Thrombophilic risk factors should be investigated and optimal therapeutic and prophylactic measures should be promptly taken in children with thrombosis.

Thrombotic events in acute promyelocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Thrombotic events (TE) appear to be more common in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) than in other acute leukemias, with reported prevalence ranging from 2 to 10-15%.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data on TE appearance in 63 APL patients.

RESULTS

TE occured in 13 (20.6%) cases, four arterial (6.3%) and nine venous (14.3%). TE were more frequently diagnosed after initiation of weekly D-dimer monitoring (7 TE during 20 months vs 6 during 76 months, P=0.032). Patients with and without venous thrombosis were significantly different regarding female/male ratio (P=0.046), PT (P=0.022), aPTT (P=0.044), ISTH DIC score (P=0.001), bcr3 (P=0.02) and FLT3-ITD (P=0.028) mutation. The most significant risk factor for venous TE occurrence in multivariate analysis was FLT3-ITD mutation (P=0.034). PAI-1 4G/4G polymorphism was five times more frequent in patients with venous TE than without it (P=0.05). Regarding risk factors for arterial TE we failed to identify any.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that APL-related TE rate is higher than previously reported and that weekly D-dimer monitoring might help to identify patients with silent thrombosis. Moreover, our study suggests a possible relationship between venous TE occurrence and several laboratory findings (PT, aPTT, ISTH DIC score, bcr3 isoform, FLT3-ITD mutation and PAI 4G/4G). Prophylactic use of heparin might be considered in patients with ISTH DIC score<5, bcr3 isoform, FLT3-ITD mutation and PAI 4G/4G.