Ghrelin, appetite and critical illness

The role of hormones in sepsis: an integrated overview with a focus on mitochondrial and immune cell dysfunction

Sepsis is a dysregulated host response to infection that results in life-threatening organ dysfunction. Virtually every body system can be affected by this syndrome to greater or lesser extents. Gene transcription and downstream pathways are either up- or downregulated, albeit with considerable fluctuation over the course of the patient's illness. This multi-system complexity contributes to a pathophysiology that remains to be fully elucidated. Consequentially, little progress has been made to date in developing new outcome-improving therapeutics. Endocrine alterations are well characterised in sepsis with variations in circulating blood levels and/or receptor resistance. However, little attention has been paid to an integrated view of how these hormonal changes impact upon the development of organ dysfunction and recovery. Here, we present a narrative review describing the impact of the altered endocrine system on mitochondrial dysfunction and immune suppression, two interlinked and key aspects of sepsis pathophysiology.

Novel insights in endocrine and metabolic pathways in sepsis and gaps for future research

Sepsis is defined as any life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It remains an important cause of critical illness and has considerable short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. In the last decades, preclinical and clinical research has revealed a biphasic pattern in the (neuro-)endocrine responses to sepsis as to other forms of critical illness, contributing to development of severe metabolic alterations. Immediately after the critical illness-inducing insult, fasting- and stress-induced neuroendocrine and cellular responses evoke a catabolic state in order to provide energy substrates for vital tissues, and to concomitantly activate cellular repair pathways while energy-consuming anabolism is postponed. Large randomized controlled trials have shown that providing early full feeding in this acute phase induced harm and reversed some of the neuro-endocrine alterations, which suggested that the acute fasting- and stress-induced responses to critical illness are likely interlinked and benefical. However, it remains unclear whether, in the context of accepting virtual fasting in the acute phase of illness, metabolic alterations such as hyperglycemia are harmful or beneficial. When patients enter a prolonged phase of critical illness, a central suppression of most neuroendocrine axes follows. Prolonged fasting and central neuroendocrine suppression may no longer be beneficial. Although pilot studies have suggested benefit of fasting-mimicking diets and interventions that reactivate the central neuroendocrine suppression selectively in the prolonged phase of illness, further study is needed to investigate patient-oriented outcomes in larger randomized trials.

Oral Nutrition during and after Critical Illness: SPICES for Quality of Care!

Malnutrition is associated to poor outcomes in critically ill patients. Oral nutrition is the route of feeding in less than half of the patients during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and in the majority of ICU survivors. There are growing data indicating that insufficient and/or inadequate intakes in macronutrients and micronutrients are prevalent within these populations. The present narrative review focuses on barriers to food intakes and considers the different points that should be addressed in order to optimize oral intakes, both during and after ICU stay. They are gathered in the SPICES concept, which should help ICU teams improve the quality of nutrition care following 5 themes: swallowing disorders screening and management, patient global status overview, involvement of dieticians and nutritionists, clinical evaluation of nutritional intakes and outcomes, and finally, supplementation in macro-or micronutrients.

A Suggested Role of Human Growth Hormone in Control of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Covid19 is a worldwide pandemic challenge that started in Wuhan, China and spread to almost all countries on the planet within a few months. The causative virus was found to be highly contagious and, until now, considerably difficult to contain. A look at the epidemiological distribution of the disease over the planet has raised a number of questions whose answers could help us understand the behavior of the virus and consequently leads us to possible means of limitation of its spread or even flattening of the curve of morbidity and mortality. After the third decade of life, there is a progressive decline of growth hormone (GH) secretion by approximately 15% for every decade of adult life. The data from highly affected countries suggest a more aggressive course in the elderly, a double-time affection of males more than females, and the vulnerability of some risk groups of patients. Our observation is that GH deficiency is a common factor in all vulnerable patient groups. We think that there is a need for studying the role of growth hormone in the unique epidemiological pattern of Covid-19 so that it might help in the early detection and management of the high-risk groups as appropriate.

Anterior pituitary function in critical illness

Critical illness is hallmarked by major changes in all hypothalamic-pituitary-peripheral hormonal axes. Extensive animal and human studies have identified a biphasic pattern in circulating pituitary and peripheral hormone levels throughout critical illness by analogy with the fasting state. In the acute phase of critical illness, following a deleterious event, rapid neuroendocrine changes try to direct the human body toward a catabolic state to ensure provision of elementary energy sources, whereas costly anabolic processes are postponed. Thanks to new technologies and improvements in critical care, the majority of patients survive the acute insult and recover within a week. However, an important part of patients admitted to the ICU fail to recover sufficiently, and a prolonged phase of critical illness sets in. This prolonged phase of critical illness is characterized by a uniform suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-peripheral hormonal axes. Whereas the alterations in hormonal levels during the first hours and days after the onset of critical illness are evolutionary selected and are likely beneficial for survival, endocrine changes in prolonged critically ill patients could be harmful and may hamper recovery. Most studies investigating the substitution of peripheral hormones or strategies to overcome resistance to anabolic stimuli failed to show benefit for morbidity and mortality. Research on treatment with selected and combined hypothalamic hormones has shown promising results. Well-controlled RCTs to corroborate these findings are needed.

Adipokines in critical illness: A review of the evidence and knowledge gaps

Adipose tissue products or adipokines play a major role in chronic endocrine and metabolic disorders; however, little is known about critical conditions. In this article, the experimental and clinical evidence of alterations of adipokines, adiponectin, leptin, resistin, visfatin, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), and ghrelin in critical illness, their potential metabolic, diagnostic, and prognostic value, and the gaps in the field have been reviewed. The results showed considerable changes in the concentration of the adipokines; while the impact of adipokines on metabolic disorders such as insulin resistance and inflammation has not been well documented in critically ill patients. There is no consensus about the circulatory and functional changes of leptin and adiponectin. However, it seems that lower concentrations of adiponectin at admission with gradual consequent increase might be a useful pattern in determining better outcomes of critical illness. Some evidence has suggested the adverse effects of elevated resistin concentration, potential prognostic importance of visfatin, and therapeutic value of ghrelin. High ADMA levels and low arginine:ADMA ratio were also proposed as predictors of ICU mortality and morbidities. However, there is no consensus on these findings. Although primary data indicated the role of adipokines in critical illness, further studies are required to clarify whether the reason of these changes is pathophysiological or compensatory. The relationship of pathophysiological background, disease severity, baseline nutritional status and nutrition support during hospitalization, and variations in body fat percentage and distribution with adipokines, as well as the potential prognostic or therapeutic role of these peptides should be further investigated in critically ill patients.

Chronic Critical Illness and Persistent Inflammation: What can we Learn from the Elderly, Injured, Septic, and Malnourished?

Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who develop chronic critical illness significantly stress the clinical capacity and financial resources of healthcare systems. Although vast improvements have been made in critical care management, outcomes for this ICU subset remain poor. A hallmark for patients who progress to chronic critical illness is the development of persistent inflammation and immunosuppression. The risk factors associated with the development of chronic critical illness include increased age, medical comorbidities, severe injury, septic shock, and malnutrition. Interestingly, each of these clinical states bears strikingly similar immune defects, often resulting in the activation of a persistent inflammatory state. Strategies aimed at the prevention or early recognition of this state of immune compromise may help improve outcomes for these individuals and minimize the number who progress to chronic critical illness. This review explores the current knowledge regarding the immune defects associated with the development of persistent inflammation, the ways in which it can manifest clinically, attempted therapeutic interventions to date, and future insights into improving outcomes for this patient population.

A J-shaped relationship between caloric intake and survival in critically ill patients

Background

There is much controversy around the optimal caloric intake in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, based on the diverging results of prospective studies. Therefore, we assessed the presence of an association between caloric intake and outcome in a large cohort included in the Glucontrol study.

Methods

Patients (n = 1004) were divided into four quartiles (q1–q4) according to the daily caloric intake (n = 251/quartile). ICU, hospital and 28-day mortality and the length of stay (LOS) in ICU and in the hospital were compared between each quartile, before and after adjustment in case of differences in baseline characteristics.

Results

Caloric intake averaged 0.5 ± 0.6 (q1), 3.0 ± 0.7 (q2), 13.4 ± 5.1 (q3) and 32.4 ± 8.5 (q4) kcal/kg/day (p < 0.001 between quartiles). Comparisons among quartiles revealed that ICU, hospital and 28-day mortality were lower in q2 than in the other quartiles. ICU and hospital LOS were lower in q1 and q2. After adjustment for age, type of admission and severity scores, hospital mortality was lower in q2 than in the other quartiles, and LOS was lower in q1and q2 than in q3–q4.

Conclusions

In this large and heterogeneous cohort of ICU short stayers, a J-shaped relationship between the amount of calories provided and outcome was found. These hypothesis generating findings are consistent with the concept of improved clinical outcome by early energy restriction.

Trial registration#: ClinicalTrials.gov# NCT00107601, EUDRA-CT Number: 200400391440

Clinical application of ghrelin in the field of surgery

Ghrelin was discovered as an intrinsic ligand for the growth hormone (GH)-secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) in 1999. The endogenous production of ghrelin occurs mainly in the stomach. Ghrelin has multiple functions; it has orexigenic action, stimulates GH secretion, has anti-inflammatory activities, stimulates gastrointestinal activity, stabilizes heart function and has other metabolic roles. Moreover, ghrelin is the only gastrointestinal hormone known to stimulate appetite. In the past decade, clinical applications of ghrelin have been attempted for various pathologies, based on its anabolic function, including applications for patients with anorexia nervosa and cachexia due to chronic heart, renal or pulmonary diseases. In the field of surgery, we have conducted several clinical trials using exogenous ghrelin in patients undergoing total gastrectomy, esophagectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including cisplatin treatment, and consistently obtained unique and striking benefits in these patients. Ghrelin comprehensively improves the patients' general conditions and quality of life via its pleiotropic physiological functions. This characteristic is unique and different from the existing drugs; therefore, ghrelin may be an indispensable supplement to prevent surgical stress and postoperative sequelae. This review summarizes the recent advances toward the clinical application of ghrelin.

Preclinical gastrointestinal prokinetic efficacy and endocrine effects of the ghrelin mimetic RM-131

AIMS

The 28 amino acid hormone ghrelin, the natural ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue, or ghrelin receptor (GHR), has diverse physiological functions, including a possible role as a gastrointestinal prokinetic. The synthetic ghrelin mimetic RM-131 is in Phase II clinical trials for treatment of diabetic gastroparesis and other gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. We aimed to determine the relative potency of RM-131, when compared to other GI ghrelin mimetics, to predict efficacy and determine the role of RM-131 in models of inflammatory bowel disease.

MAIN METHODS

We evaluated and compared ghrelin, RM-131 and other synthetic ghrelin mimetics for their prokinetic potency in models of gastrointestinal disorders in the rat and we evaluated the endocrine (rats and dogs) and anti-inflammatory effects (mice) of the ghrelin mimetic RM-131.

KEY FINDINGS

The pentapeptide RM-131 increased gastric emptying in rodent models of ileus. RM-131 is about 100-fold more potent than human ghrelin and is 600 to 1800-fold more potent, when compared to several investigational ghrelin mimetics tested in clinical trials. RM-131 has anti-inflammatory effects and significantly increases survival and reduces macroscopic markers of tissue damage in a TNBS model of inflammatory bowel disease. RM-131 treatment shows a transient increase in growth hormone levels in Beagle dogs and rats, returning to baseline upon chronic treatment. Significant effects on glucose and insulin are not observed in chronic studies.

SIGNIFICANCE

RM-131's potency, efficacy and endocrine profile, are promising attributes for the treatment of diverse functional gastrointestinal disorders in humans.

Hypothalamic-pituitary hormones during critical illness: a dynamic neuroendocrine response

Independent of the underlying condition, critical illness is characterized by a uniform dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-peripheral axes. In most axes a clear biphasic pattern can be distinguished. The acute phase of critical illness is characterized by low peripheral effector hormone levels such as T3, IGF-1 and testosterone, despite an actively secreting pituitary. The adrenal axis with high cortisol levels in the presence of low ACTH levels is a noteworthy exception. In the prolonged phase of critical illness, low peripheral effector hormone levels coincide with a uniform suppression of the neuroendocrine axes, predominantly of hypothalamic origin. The severity of the alterations in the different neuroendocrine axes is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality, but it remains unknown whether the observed changes are cause or consequence of adverse outcome. Several studies have identified therapeutic potential of hypothalamic releasing factors, but clinical outcome remains to be investigated with sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials.