Low Rates of Hepatitis B Virus Treatment Among Treatment-Eligible Patients in Safety-Net Health Systems

Gaps and disparities in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection in the USA

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection affects nearly 300 million individuals worldwide and is a leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related mortality. However, major gaps in the CHB cascade of care persist, with the majority of individuals with CHB not diagnosed and not linked to care and treatment. Even among individuals with known CHB, existing studies report on major gaps and disparities in timely linkage to care and timely access to CHB therapies. While the momentum to expand and simplify CHB treatment guidelines is promising, access to treatment still relies on individuals being effectively engaged in clinical care and liver disease monitoring. The contributing factors to the observed gaps and disparities in the CHB cascade of care are complex and multifactorial, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution than can be easily applied across all global regions. However, any serious approach towards addressing the existing gaps in the CHB cascade of care to improve patient outcomes requires a concerted investment from healthcare institutions, governments, policymakers, and industry partners to provide the necessary resources to be able to achieve this goal. Anything less than a comprehensive and collaborative approach that engages all stakeholders to invest effort and resources into tackling the global epidemic of CHB will continue to fall short in making progress towards global viral hepatitis elimination goals.

Cost-effectiveness of monitoring and liver cancer surveillance among patients with inactive chronic hepatitis B

Patients with chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) have an increased risk for death from liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the United States, only an estimated 37% of adults with chronic hepatitis B diagnosis without cirrhosis receive monitoring with at least an annual alanine transaminase (ALT) and hepatitis B deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), and an estimated 59% receive antiviral treatment when they develop active hepatitis or cirrhosis. A Markov model was used to calculate the costs, health impact and cost-effectiveness of increased monitoring of adults with HBeAg negative inactive or HBeAg positive immune tolerant CHB who have no cirrhosis or significant fibrosis and are not recommended by the current American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) clinical practice guidelines to receive antiviral treatment, and to assess whether the addition of HCC surveillance would be cost-effective. For every 100,000 adults with CHB who were initially not recommended for treatment, if the monitoring rate increased from the current 37% to 90% and treatment rate increased from 59% to 80%, 4,600 cases of cirrhosis, 2,450 cases of HCC and 4,700 HBV-related deaths would be averted with a gain of 45,000 QALYs and a savings of $180 million in lifetime health care costs. At a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, the addition of HCC surveillance with the standard recommended biannual liver ultrasound and alfa fetoprotein levels is likely cost-effective if the HCC risk ≥ 0.55%/year. Regular monitoring of persons with inactive or immune tolerant CHB who are initially not recommended to receive antiviral treatment in the United States is cost-saving. The addition of HCC surveillance with biannual US and AFP would be cost-effective for individuals with HCC incidence ≥ 0.55%/year.

Epidemiology of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Alameda County, California, 2017-2021

CONTEXT

In the United States, chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection predominantly affects ethnic minorities and vulnerable populations.

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed surveillance data to describe CHB epidemiology to guide hepatitis B virus (HBV) elimination efforts in Alameda County.

DESIGN

Persons with CHB during 2017-2021 were identified by ≥2 positive HBV tests (ie, HBsAg, HbeAg, and HBV DNA) ≥180 days apart using data from California Reportable Disease Information Exchange. Persons with CHB were stratified by age, race/ethnicity, zip code-based Healthy Places Index (HPI), and federally designated Medically Underserved Areas (MUA). Comparisons of reported CHB prevalence between groups utilized z test; comparisons between MUA regions utilized chi-square testing.

RESULTS

A total of 8122 persons with CHB were identified; reported 5-year CHB prevalence was 0.53% (95% confidence interval: 0.52%-0.54%). Reported CHB 5-year prevalence was significantly higher among persons aged 50 to 69 years old than persons aged 30 to 49 years old (0.99%, 0.78%; P < .001) and Asians, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders, African Americans compared to Whites (1.22%, 0.56%, 0.18%, 0.06%; P < .001). Reported CHB 5-year prevalence in the 2 lowest and most disadvantaged HPI quartiles was significantly higher than the 2 highest quartiles (0.55%, 0.68%, 0.37%, 0.42%; P < .001). The 1918 persons with CHB in MUA, compared to 5859 non-MUA persons, were significantly more likely to be African American (7%, 3%; P < .001) and from the lowest HPI quartile (79%, 19%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reported CHB 5-year prevalence in Alameda County was 1.5 times the national prevalence estimates, and reported prevalence was highest among Asians and persons in more disadvantaged areas. Analysis of local CHB surveillance data can guide public health efforts toward HBV elimination.

Hepatitis Delta Virus Testing and Prevalence Among Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Across Three U.S. Safety-net Health Systems

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite a high prevalence of risk factors associated with hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection among safety-net populations, data evaluating HDV testing and prevalence are limited. We aim to evaluate HDV testing practices and HDV prevalence among an ethnically diverse, multi-center cohort of safety-net patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 13,218 patients with CHB (54.2% male, 57.9% non-White minorities, 12.5% human immunodeficiency virus, and 23.0% hepatitis C virus) across 3 United States safety-net health systems from 2010 to 2022 to evaluate proportion tested for HDV and proportion positive among those tested. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression models evaluated for predictors of HDV testing and predictors of anti-HDV positive.

RESULTS

Anti-HDV testing was performed in 6.1% overall and in 4.9% that met American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria for HDV testing. Greater odds of testing were observed in men vs women (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.75), Asian individuals vs White individuals (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.74-2.72), Black/African American individuals vs White individuals (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.56), and patients with Medicare or Medicaid. Among patients with CHB tested for HDV, 15.7% were positive (22.9% among those meeting American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases HDV testing criteria). Only 2 patients (1.6%) had follow-up HDV RNA testing. Greater proportion of anti-HDV positive was observed in patients with baseline cirrhosis (47.4% vs 13.3%; P < .001), and patients with Medicare or Medicaid vs those with commercial insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Among an ethnically diverse, multi-center safety-net cohort of patients with CHB, low rates of HDV testing were observed, even among those with high-risk HDV risk factors. Among those tested, 15.7% were positive, only 2 had follow up RNA testing. This highlights the need for greater awareness, education, and advocacy to improve HDV testing rates.

Sociodemographic Disparities in Hepatitis B Treatment: A Real-World Analysis of 3 Safety-Net Health Systems in the United States

Background

Timely treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) reduces risks of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gaps in timely treatment persist, especially among underserved safety-net populations. We aim to evaluate gaps and disparities in CHB treatment in the United States.

Methods

Adults with treatment-naive CHB without human immunodeficiency virus were identified from 2010 to 2018 across 3 safety-net health systems. CHB treatment eligibility was assessed using American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria and alternative criteria, including the Simplified Approach for Hepatitis B Algorithm. Differences in CHB treatment between groups were evaluated using χ2 methods, adjusted Kaplan-Meier methods, and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Among 3749 patients with treatment-naive CHB (51.5% women, 38.7% White, 33.7% African American, 19.6% Asian, 24.6% cirrhosis), 30.0% were AASLD treatment eligible, among whom 31.0% were treated. Men were more likely than women to be treated (33.5% vs 26.6%, P < .01). On multivariable regression, there remained a trend toward greater treatment in men versus women (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .96-1.54]). Disparities by race/ethnicity and insurance status were observed. When exploring outcomes using SABA criteria, similar trends were observed. Among treatment-eligible patients, greater likelihood of treatment was observed in men versus women (aHR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.14-1.70]) and in Asians versus Whites (aHR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.16-1.94]).

Conclusions

Among an ethnically diverse multicenter safety-net cohort of CHB patients, less than one-third of treatment-eligible patients received antiviral treatment. Significant disparities in CHB treatment were observed by sociodemographic characteristics.

Characteristics and antiviral treatment eligibility of patients diagnosed with hepatitis B at a teaching hospital in Ghana: Implications for prevention and management

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection poses a considerable public health challenge in limited-resource settings especially in the sub-Saharan African region. Even though HBV infection is incurable, timely treatment is effective in preventing disease progression to liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. However, not all infected patients require treatment. The aim of the study was to determine the clinical, immunological, and virological profiles of treatment naïve patients with HBV infection, seen at the outpatient clinic of the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital. Additionally, the study sought to determine the antiviral treatment eligibility rate based on the 2015 guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) compared with the new 2024 guidelines. A hospital-based cross-sectional study involving total sampling of 220 treatment naïve HBV surface antigen positive clients was carried out. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data that were analyzed with STATA version 16. The median age at diagnosis was 34 years (IQR 26.0-41.5) with a male to female ratio of 1:1.5. A total of 138 participants (62.7%) were diagnosed with HBV infection following voluntary testing. There was a median delay of 8.5 months (IQR 3.0-22.5) between initial diagnosis and patients' presentation for medical care. In all, 24 patients (10.9%) had abnormal clinical examination findings, 172 patients (78.2%) had HBV DNA levels ≤ 2000 IU/ml whereas 8 (3.6%) were seropositive for the HBV envelope antigen. A few patients had concomitant human immunodeficiency virus (2.7%) and hepatitis C virus (1.4%) infections. Treatment eligibility rate based on the WHO 2015 guidelines was 6.4% (n = 14), however, with the updated 2024 guidelines, treatment eligibility was 42.3% (n = 93). Increasing the screening rate among the general population, early linkage to clinical care of screen positives and vaccination of screen negatives will help reduce HBV-related clinical conditions in resource-limited settings.

Association of Baseline Hepatitis B Virus DNA and On-Treatment Risk of Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Recent studies suggest an inverse relationship between baseline levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and on-treatment risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, data are limited to Asian cohorts, and it is unclear if similar associations hold true for non-Asians with CHB. We aimed to evaluate association of baseline HBV DNA with long-term risks of cirrhosis and HCC among a predominantly non-Asian cohort of CHB patients in the USA.

Methods

Using longitudinal data from the national Veterans Affairs database, we evaluated the risk of cirrhosis or HCC among adults with non-cirrhotic CHB who are on continuous antiviral therapy, stratified by moderate levels of baseline HBV DNA (4.00 - 6.99 log10 IU/mL) vs. high levels of baseline HBV DNA (7.00 log10 IU/mL or higher). Propensity score weighting was applied, and competing risks cumulative incidence functions and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized.

Results

Among 1,129 non-cirrhotic CHB patients (41% non-Hispanic White, 36% African American, mean age 57.0 years, 62.2% hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive), 585 had moderate levels of baseline HBV DNA and 544 had high HBV DNA. After propensity score weighting, no significant difference in risk of cirrhosis was observed between moderate vs. high baseline HBV DNA (4.55 vs. 5.22 per 100 person-years, hazard ratio (HR): 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69 - 1.09, P = 0.22), but risk of HCC was significantly higher in patients with moderate vs. high baseline HBV DNA (0.84 vs. 0.69 per 100 person-years, HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.09 - 1.62, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Among a national cohort of predominantly non-Asian US veterans with non-cirrhotic CHB on antiviral therapy, moderate levels of baseline HBV DNA was associated with higher risk of HCC than high HBV DNA.

Disparities in Antiviral Treatment Among Adults With Hepatitis B Cirrhosis: An Analysis of the National Veterans Affairs Cohort

Timely antiviral therapy is critical in chronic hepatitis B cirrhosis to prevent further liver complications. Among a national cohort of US Veterans with chronic hepatitis B cirrhosis, only 52% were initiated on antiviral therapy; treatment was significantly lower among patients of non-Asian ethnicity, high-risk alcohol use, and in rural settings.

Care for Vulnerable Populations with Chronic Liver Disease: A Safety-Net Perspective

Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) and facilities are the cornerstone of healthcare services for the medically underserved. The burden of chronic liver disease-including end-stage manifestations of cirrhosis and liver cancer-is high and rising among populations living in poverty who primarily seek and receive care in safety-net settings. For many reasons related to social determinants of health, these individuals often present with delayed diagnoses and disease presentations, resulting in higher liver-related mortality. With recent state-based policy changes such as Medicaid expansion that impact access to insurance and critical health services, an overview of the body of literature on SNH care for chronic liver disease is timely and informative for the liver disease community. In this narrative review, we discuss controversies in the definition of a SNH and summarize the known disparities in the cascade of the care and management of common liver-related conditions: (1) steatotic liver disease, (2) liver cancer, (3) chronic viral hepatitis, and (4) cirrhosis and liver transplantation. In addition, we review the specific impact of Medicaid expansion on safety-net systems and liver disease outcomes and highlight effective provider- and system-level interventions. Lastly, we address remaining gaps and challenges to optimizing care for vulnerable populations with chronic liver disease in safety-net settings.

On-treatment risks of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma among a large cohort of predominantly non-Asian patients with non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B

Background & Aims

The vast majority of studies evaluating differences in on-treatment risks of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have been conducted in Asia. Data on the course of CHB on antiviral therapy among predominantly non-Asian populations is less well described. We aimed to evaluate overall risks of cirrhosis and HCC and the influence of baseline factors on this risk among a predominantly non-Asian cohort of patients with CHB in the US.

Methods

Using longitudinal data from the national Veterans Affairs database, we evaluated the incidence of cirrhosis or HCC among adults with non-cirrhotic CHB on continuous antiviral therapy. Cumulative incidence functions and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models employed competing risks methods and evaluated overall risk and predictors of developing cirrhosis or HCC while on treatment.

Results

Among 2,496 patients with non-cirrhotic CHB (39.1% African American, 38.4% non-Hispanic White, 18.8% Asian, mean age 58.0 ± 13.4 years), the overall incidences of cirrhosis and HCC were 3.99 per 100 person-years (95% CI 3.66-4.35) and 0.43 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.33-0.54), respectively. The highest incidences of cirrhosis and HCC were observed in non-Hispanic White patients (5.74 and 0.52 per 100 person-years, respectively), which were significantly higher than in Asian patients (1.93 and 0.17 per 100 person-years, respectively, p <0.0001). On multivariate regression, only baseline FIB-4 score was consistently associated with long-term risk of cirrhosis or HCC.

Conclusions

Using a longitudinal cohort of predominantly non-Asian Veterans with non-cirrhotic CHB on antiviral therapy (an understudied population), we provide important epidemiological data to describe long-term risks of cirrhosis and HCC.

Impact and implications

In one of the largest studies to date of a predominantly non-Asian cohort of patients with non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B, we provide important epidemiological data describing the long-term risks of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma among patients on antiviral therapies. Among this understudied population, the overall incidence of cirrhosis was 3.99 per 100-person-years (95% CI 3.66-4.35) and of HCC was 0.43 per 100-person-years (95% CI 0.33-0.54). These data also emphasize the importance of continued monitoring and HCC surveillance among CHB patients who are maintained on antiviral therapies.

Addressing Barriers to Care in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Promoting Equity and Access

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Chronic viral hepatitis is projected to surpass the composite mortality rates of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), tuberculosis, and malaria by 2040. It can be attributed to several barriers to chronic HBV infection (CHBVI) surveillance that warrant urgent attention. Here, we report a case of a 40-year-old male with CHBVI who developed HCC and underwent partial hepatic resection. However, due to an interruption in insurance and medication regimen, the patient became the victim of healthcare disparity, which led to the progression of HCC and succumbed to widespread metastasis. This case highlights and discusses the healthcare disparity and critical value of continuity of care for patients with HBV infection to promote optimal patient outcomes.

Gaps and Disparities in Chronic Hepatitis B Monitoring and Treatment in the United States, 2016-2019

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) carries an increased risk of death from cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends patients with CHB receive monitoring of disease activity, including ALT, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg), and liver imaging for patients who experience an increased risk for HCC. HBV antiviral therapy is recommended for patients with active hepatitis and cirrhosis.

METHODS

Monitoring and treatment of adults with new CHB diagnoses were analyzed using Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Database claims data from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019.

RESULTS

Among 5978 patients with new CHB diagnosis, only 56% with cirrhosis and 50% without cirrhosis had claims for≥1 ALT and either HBV DNA or HBeAg test, and among patients recommended for HCC surveillance, 82% with cirrhosis and 57% without cirrhosis had claims for≥1 liver imaging within 12 months of diagnosis. Although antiviral treatment is recommended for patients with cirrhosis, only 29% of patients with cirrhosis had≥1 claim for HBV antiviral therapy within 12 months of CHB diagnosis. Multivariable analysis showed patients who were male, Asian, privately insured, or had cirrhosis were more likely (P<0.05) to receive ALT and either HBV DNA or HBeAg tests and HBV antiviral therapy within 12 months of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Many patients diagnosed with CHB are not receiving the clinical assessment and treatment recommended. A comprehensive initiative is needed to address the patient, provider, and system-related barriers to improve the clinical management of CHB.

Simplifying Treatment Criteria in Chronic Hepatitis B: Reducing Barriers to Elimination

BACKGROUND

Early, sustained hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA suppression reduces long-term risks of hepatocellular carcinoma. Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment criteria are complex. Simplifying criteria will improve timely linkage to therapy. We evaluated treatment eligibility patterns among US patients with CHB and propose stepwise simplification of CHB treatment criteria.

METHODS

Using 2016-2020 Quest Diagnostics data, we evaluated treatment eligibility among patients with CHB (2 positive HBV tests [HBV surface antigen, HBV e antigen, or HBV DNA] ≥6 months apart) using American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD), European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL), Asian Pacific Association for Study of the Liver (APASL), and Asian American Treatment Algorithm (AATA) criteria.

RESULTS

Among 84 916 patients with CHB, 6.7%, 6.2%, 5.8%, and 16.4% met AASLD, EASL, APASL, and AATA criteria, respectively. Among treatment-ineligible patients with CHB, proportion with significant fibrosis (aspartate aminotransferase platelet ratio index >0.5) were 10.4%, 10.4%, 10.8%, and 7.7% based on AASLD, EASL, APASL, and AATA, respectively. In the proposed treatment simplification, the proportion of patients with CHB eligible for therapy increased from 10.3% for step 1 (HBV DNA >20 000 IU/mL, elevated alanine aminotransferase [ALT] level) to 14.1% for step 2 (HBV >2000 IU/mL, elevated ALT level), 33.5% for step 3 (HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL, any ALT level), and 87.2% for step 4 (detectable HBV DNA, any ALT level).

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of patients with CHB not meeting established treatment criteria have significant fibrosis. Simplifying criteria to treat all patients with detectable HBV DNA will reduce complexity and heterogeneity in assessing treatment eligibility, improving treatment rates and progress toward HBV elimination.

Ethnic Minorities and Low Socioeconomic Status Patients With Chronic Liver Disease Are at Greatest Risk of Being Uninsured

Background

Chronic liver disease (CLD) predominantly affects ethnic minorities and socially vulnerable populations, who have high prevalence of risk factors (e.g., suboptimal insurance coverage) predisposing to healthcare disparities. We evaluate prevalence and predictors of uninsured status among CLD adults, and secondarily, how this affects documented immunity or vaccination for hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV).

Methods

Using 2011 - 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, self-reported insurance status was determined among adults with CLD. Prevalence of uninsured status was stratified by patient characteristics and evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models. Prevalence of self-reported completion of vaccination as well as laboratory value-based documented immunity to HAV and HBV was stratified by insurance status.

Results

Overall, 19.0% of adults with CLD reported having no insurance, which was highest among individuals of Hispanic ethnicity (33.5%), less than high school education (33.7%), and below poverty status (35.3%). On multivariable analyses, significantly lower odds of having any insurance coverage was observed in men, Hispanics, and individuals with lower education and lower household income. Prevalence of documented immunity or vaccination for HAV was low across all insurance categories, ranging from 46.5% to 54.0%. Prevalence of documented immunity or vaccination for HBV was similarly low across all insurance categories, ranging from 24.3% to 40.8%.

Conclusion

Prevalence of uninsured status among CLD was more than twice the US adult population, and lack of insurance particularly impacted Hispanics and individuals with low education and low household income. Low prevalence of documented immunity or vaccination for HAV and HBV across all insurance categories is concerning.