Early nutritional therapy: the role of enteral and parenteral routes

Nutrition during extracorporeal life support: A review of pathophysiological bases and application of guidelines

BACKGROUND

Patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS), either for respiratory or cardiac support, are at high risk of malnutrition; guidelines on nutrition in critical care have not incorporated solid evidence regarding these settings. The aim of this narrative review is to gather the available evidence in the existing literature and transpose general principles to the ECLS population.

METHODS

A literature review of observational and interventional studies on nutrition during ECLS, and evaluation of nutrition guidelines in this perspective.

RESULTS

Nutrition is paramount for improving outcomes in ECLS, as well as in critically ill patients. The caloric needs during ECLS can vary according to the severity of the clinical state, sedation, paralysis, and temperature stability. Precise evaluation of energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry is difficult because ECLS is a system dedicated to removing carbon dioxide; however, modified equations composed of carbon dioxide values taken from the membrane lung are available. Guidelines suggest starting early enteral nutrition (EN) with a hypocaloric (70%-80% of the needs) strategy, also in acute states such as septic or cardiogenic shock. Moreover, EN, despite previous concerns, is feasible in prone position, an increasingly adopted strategy during mechanical ventilation. The catabolic state is maximal in these patients, causing a protein and muscular reduction. Therefore, adequate protein delivery should be guaranteed by administering a high protein intake of up to 2 g/kg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on nutrition tailored to ECLS patients are warranted. Early hypocaloric EN with high protein intake, tailored on indirect calorimetry, may be the most appropriate option.

Nutritional status of trauma patients hospitalized at surgical intensive care unit

Malnutrition results from a decrease or increase or imbalance of energy, protein and other nutrients, leading to measurable negative effects on body tissue, body shape, organ function and clinical status. Research shows that nutritional support is one of the necessary processes for survival of traumatic patient hospitalized at surgical intensive care unit. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nutritional status of trauma patients hospitalized at surgical intensive care unit of Kowsar Hospital in Semnan, Iran. This cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on patients older than 18 years with head, neck and femur injuries. Initial data were collected using a checklist containing demographic information questions, designed from the Ministry of Health and Medical Education's Nutrition Screening Form, which was available in the Nutrition Assessment Forms and Guidelines for Hospitalized Patients Approved in 2013. The data were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, paired t-test and Pearson coefficient. The confidence level was 95% and significance level was less than 0.05 in all tests. The amount of energy determined by the intensive care unit for the patients, with a significantly lower relationship than the amount of energy required by the patients for 24 hours, based on the Harris Benedict formula was (918.20±474.80 calories vs. 1535.76±243.73 calories, respectively and P-value˂0.001). The amount of protein determined by the intensive care unit for the patients for 24 hours, with a significantly relationship lower than the protein required for the patients for 24 hours, was (51.68±34.39 vs. 106.57±13.67, respectively, and P-value˂ 0.001). There was a statistically significant relationship between the age of the patients and energy (P˂0.001) and protein (P˂0.001) determined by the intensive care unit for the patients for 24 hours and energy (P˂0.001) and protein (P˂0.001) required for the patients for 24 hours. The results of this study showed that both the amount of energy and the amount of protein determined by the intensive care unit for trauma patients for less than 24 hours were lower than the required level; therefore, dietary modification for these patients is recommended.

Nutritional status of trauma patients hospitalized at surgical intensive care unit

Malnutrition results from a decrease or increase or imbalance of energy, protein and other nutrients, leading to measurable negative effects on body tissue, body shape, organ function and clinical status. Research shows that nutritional support is one of the necessary processes for survival of traumatic patient hospitalized at surgical intensive care unit. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nutritional status of trauma patients hospitalized at surgical intensive care unit of Kowsar Hospital in Semnan, Iran. This cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on patients older than 18 years with head, neck and femur injuries. Initial data were collected using a checklist containing demographic information questions, designed from the Ministry of Health and Medical Education's Nutrition Screening Form, which was available in the Nutrition Assessment Forms and Guidelines for Hospitalized Patients Approved in 2013. The data were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, paired t-test and Pearson coefficient. The confidence level was 95% and significance level was less than 0.05 in all tests. The amount of energy determined by the intensive care unit for the patients, with a significantly lower relationship than the amount of energy required by the patients for 24 hours, based on the Harris Benedict formula was (918.20±474.80 calories vs. 1535.76±243.73 calories, respectively and P-value˂0.001). The amount of protein determined by the intensive care unit for the patients for 24 hours, with a significantly relationship lower than the protein required for the patients for 24 hours, was (51.68±34.39 vs. 106.57±13.67, respectively, and P-value˂ 0.001). There was a statistically significant relationship between the age of the patients and energy (P˂0.001) and protein (P˂0.001) determined by the intensive care unit for the patients for 24 hours and energy (P˂0.001) and protein (P˂0.001) required for the patients for 24 hours. The results of this study showed that both the amount of energy and the amount of protein determined by the intensive care unit for trauma patients for less than 24 hours were lower than the required level; therefore, dietary modification for these patients is recommended.

Early Achievement of Enteral Nutrition Protein Goals by Intensive Care Unit Day 4 is Associated With Fewer Complications in Critically Injured Adults

: Objective: We hypothesized that failure to achieve protein goals early in the critical care course via enteral nutrition is associated with increased complications.

BACKGROUND

Although robust randomized controlled trials are lacking, present data suggest that early, adequate nutrition is associated with improved outcomes in critically ill patients. Injured patients are at risk of accumulating significant protein debt due to interrupted feedings and intolerance.

METHODS

Critically injured adults who were unable to be volitionally fed were included in this retrospective review. Data collected included demographics, injury characteristics, number and types of operations, total prescribed and delivered protein and calories during the first 7 days of critical care admission, complications, and outcomes. Group-based trajectory modeling was applied to identify subgroups with similar feeding trajectories in the cohort.

RESULTS

There were 274 patients included (71.2% male). Mean age was 50.56  ± 19.76 years. Group-based trajectory modeling revealed 5 Groups with varying trajectories of protein goal achievement. Group 5 fails to achieve protein goals, includes more patients with digestive tract injuries (33%, P = 0.0002), and the highest mean number of complications (1.52, P = 0.0086). Group 2, who achieves protein goals within 4 days, has the lowest mean number of complications (0.62, P = 0.0086) and operations (0.74, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is heterogeneity in the trajectory of protein goal achievement among various injury pattern Groups. There is a sharp decline in complication rates when protein goals are reached within 4 days of critical care admission, calling into question the application of current guidelines to healthy trauma patients to tolerate up to 7 days of nil per os status and further reinforcing recommendations for early enteral nutrition when feasible.

Early nutritional therapy in trauma: after A, B, C, D, E, the importance of the F (FEED)

A significant number of deaths in trauma occurs days to weeks after the initial injury, being caused by infection and organ failure related to hypercatabolism and consequent acute protein malnutrition. Nutritional therapy should be planned and included with other routines of resuscitation for patients with multiple trauma and severe burns. The rapid acquisition of a route for nutritional support is important to start early nutritional therapy within 48 hours of care. The enteral route is the preferred option in traumatized postoperative patients but the parenteral route should be prescribed when enteral feeding is contraindicated or inadequate. After the initial measures dictated by ATLS, synthesized in the A (airway), B (breathing), C (circulation), D (disability) and E (exposure), we include the letter F (feed) to emphasize the importance of early nutritional care in trauma.

Optimal timing for the initiation of enteral and parenteral nutrition in critical medical and surgical conditions

The early provision of nutrients as part of specialized therapy for critically ill patients admitted for critical medical and surgical conditions is recommended by various international guidelines. Enteral nutrition is the first option and should be initiated 24-48 h after admission to an intensive care unit. Even after gastrointestinal anastomosis, early oral or enteral feeding is not only safe but also associated with enhanced recovery and fewer complications. Recent studies showed that the use of an enteral diet or parenteral nutrition that contains immune nutrients enhances the recovery of critically ill patients. Although the precise caloric target remains controversial, the general consensus advocates the avoidance of prolonged hypocaloric or hypercaloric feeding. However, there is still debate about the timing of the initiation of parenteral nutrition when enteral nutrition either is impossible or does not meet the nutritional goals. Although controversy remains, two recent studies showed that when enteral feeding is not feasible the early initiation of parenteral nutrition was not associated with palpable benefit.

[Usage profile of different parenteral support options in acute and chronic care facilities]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of parenteral, enteral, and mixed nutrition in one acute and one chronic hospital.

DESIGN

Retrospective, non-randomised, observational study. STUDY SITES: South Seville Health Area: Acute Hospital (H1) and Chronic Hospital (H2) with 447 and 84 beds, respectively. We analysed all episodes of artificial nutrition administered in a 6-month period. Exclusion criteria included: age <18 years, oral supplements, and peripheral nutrition.

RESULTS

Artificial nutrition was used in a total of 568 episodes: 406 were enteral nutrition, 162 were parenteral nutrition, constituting 4.95%, 3.54% and 1,41% of all hospitalisations, respectively. Enteral nutrition was more common at H2 hospital (n=219, 15.5/100 hospitalisations) and parenteral nutrition was more commonly used at H1 (n=155, 6.96/100 hospitalisations), with the ICU providing the majority of treatments (43.8%). Mixed nutritional support was used in 68 patients (0.59% of all cases), and was most commonly used in the surgery department (n=32, P<.001). The most commonly used enteral formula was the special diabetes diet; 41.2% at H1 and 46.6% at H2. Patient mortality with enteral nutrition was 37% at H1, 63% at H2, and was correlated with age (OR=1.025, 95% CI: 1.006-1.046, P<.05), male sex (OR=1.612, 95% CI: 1.023-2.540, P<.05), and time in ICU (OR=49.379, 95% CI: 11.971-203.675, P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Enteral nutrition was more frequently used in both the acute and chronic hospitals. Parenteral nutrition and mixed nutritional support were used almost exclusively at the acute hospital.

Early enteral nutrition and clinical outcomes of severe traumatic brain injury patients in acute stage: a multi-center cohort study

Guidelines for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) published in 2007 recommend providing early nutrition after trauma. Early enteral nutrition (EN) started within 48 h post-injury reduces clinical malnutrition, prevents bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract, and improves outcome in sTBI patients sustaining hypermetabolism and hypercatabolism. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of early EN support on survival rate, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and clinical outcome of sTBI patients. Medical records of sTBI patients with GCS scores 4-8 were recruited from 18 hospitals in Taiwan, excluding patients with GCS scores ≤3. During 2002-2010, data from 145 EN patients receiving appropriate calories and nutrients within 48 h post-trauma were collected and compared with 152 non-EN controls matched for gender, age, body weight, initial GCS score, and operative status. The EN patients had a greater survival rate and GCS score on the 7th day in the intensive care unit (ICU), and a better outcome at 1 month post-injury. After adjusting for age, gender, initial GCS score, and recruitment period, the non-EN patients had a hazard ratio of 14.63 (95% CI 8.58-24.91) compared with EN patients. The GCS score during the first 7 ICU days was significantly improved among EN patients with GCS scores of 6-8 compared with EN patients with GCS scores of 4-5 and non-EN patients with GCS scores of 6-8. This finding demonstrates that EN within 48 h post-injury is associated with better survival, GCS recovery, and outcome among sTBI patients, particularly in those with a GCS score of 6-8.

A retrospective study about the influence of early nutritional support on mortality and nosocomial infection in the critical care setting

BACKGROUND & AIMS

To determine whether early nutritional support reduces mortality and the incidence of nosocomial infection, in critically ill patients in the current practice.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted in all critically ill patients who had been prescribed nutritional support, throughout one year, in an Intensive Care Unit. The time to start and the route of delivery of nutritional support were determined by the attending clinician's assessment of gastrointestinal function and hemodynamic stability. Age, gender, severity of illness, start time and route of nutritional support, prescribed and delivered daily caloric intake for the first 7 days, whether they were a medical or surgical patient, length of stay in ICU, incidence rate of nosocomial infections and ICU mortality were recorded. Patients were classified according to whether or not they received nutritional support within 48 h of their admission to ICU and Binary Logistic Regression was performed to assess the effect of early nutritional support on ICU mortality and ICU nosocomial infections after controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

Ninety-two consecutive patients were included in the study. Start time of nutritional support showed a mean of 3.1 ± 1.9 days. Patients in the early nutritional support group had a lower ICU mortality in an unadjusted analysis (20% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.033). Early nutritional support was found to be an independent predictor of mortality in the regression analysis model (OR 0,28; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0,84; p = 0.023). Our study did not demonstrate any association between early nutritional support and the incidence of nosocomial infection (OR 0.77; 95%. confidence interval, 0.26 to 2,24; p = 0.63), which was related to the route of nutritional support and the caloric intake. The delayed nutritional support group showed a longer length of stay and nosocomial infections than the early group, although these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that early nutrition support reduces ICU mortality in critically ill patients, although it does not demonstrate any influence over nosocomial infection in the current practice in intensive care.

Economics and outcome in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Medical care costs represent a large proportion of the gross domestic product in developed countries, and intensive care units (ICUs) consume a significant amount of those resources. The aim of this review is to analyze how the healthcare cost problem is studied in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Permanent staffing and other overhead costs have the greatest impact on ICU costs. A growing number of studies from around the world are quantifying the costs of ICU care. Mechanical ventilation, particularly in severely ill patients, and sepsis management are responsible for much of the economic burden in the ICU. New expensive therapies and life support systems make formal economic analyses necessary.

SUMMARY

Although economic justification should not be the only issue to influence treatments offered in the ICU, increasing use of tools such as cost-benefit analyses is needed to help with medical decisions on the critically ill patient.

Abordagem multimodal em cirurgia colorretal sem preparo mecânico de cólon

OBJETIVO: Avaliar os resultados pós-operatórios de um protocolo multimodal de cuidados peri-operatórios sem preparo mecânico de cólon (protocolo ACERTO) em pacientes submetidos a operações colorretais. METODOS: Foram avaliados prospectivamente 53 pacientes (37M e 16F; 57 [18-82] anos) submetidos à diversas operações colorretais com pelo menos uma anastomose divididos em dois grupos. O primeiro grupo (n=25) foi operado entre Janeiro de 2004 e Julho de 2005 com protocolo convencional incluindo preparo mecânico de cólon. O segundo grupo (n=28) foi operado entre agosto de 2005 e junho de 2008, após a implantação do protocolo ACERTO e sem preparo de cólon. Comparou-se estatisticamente a incidência de complicações, a duração da hospitalização e a mortalidade em ambos os grupos. RESULTADOS: Dois (3,8%) pacientes faleceram no pós-operatório, um em cada grupo. Pacientes do grupo ACERTO tiveram jejum pré-operatório abreviado, receberam menos fluido intravenoso e re-alimentaram mais cedo que o grupo convencional (p<0.05). Não houve diferença na morbidade pós-operatória (36% vs. 28,6%; p=0,56) com incidência de fístula anastomótica semelhante (12 vs. 10,7%; p=1,00). O número de complicações por paciente foi menor no grupo ACERTO (p=0.01). O tempo de internação do grupo ACERTO, operado sem preparo de cólon foi abreviado em 4,5 dias (12 [4-43] dias vs 7,5 [3-47] dias, p = 0,04). CONCLUSÃO: As rotinas do protocolo ACERTO são seguras e melhoram resultados em cirurgia colorretal por diminuir gravidade de complicações e o tempo de internação.

Bench-to-bedside review: metabolism and nutrition

Acute kidney injury (AKI) develops mostly in the context of critical illness and multiple organ failure, characterized by alterations in substrate use, insulin resistance, and hypercatabolism. Optimal nutritional support of intensive care unit patients remains a matter of debate, mainly because of a lack of adequately designed clinical trials. Most guidelines are based on expert opinion rather than on solid evidence and are not fundamentally different for critically ill patients with or without AKI. In patients with a functional gastrointestinal tract, enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutrition. The optimal timing of parenteral nutrition in those patients who cannot be fed enterally remains controversial. All nutritional regimens should include tight glycemic control. The recommended energy intake is 20 to 30 kcal/kg per day with a protein intake of 1.2 to 1.5 g/kg per day. Higher protein intakes have been suggested in patients with AKI on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, the inadequate design of the trials does not allow firm conclusions. Nutritional support during CRRT should take into account the extracorporeal losses of glucose, amino acids, and micronutrients. Immunonutrients are the subject of intensive investigation but have not been evaluated specifically in patients with AKI. We suggest a protocolized nutritional strategy delivering enteral nutrition whenever possible and providing at least the daily requirements of trace elements and vitamins.