Crizotinib resistance overcome by ceritinib in an ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patient with brain metastases: A case report

Ceritinib-Induced Regression of an Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Driven Neuroepithelial Brain Tumor

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) pathway plays an important role in several brain tumor entities. However, the lack of inhibitors crossing the blood–brain barrier remains a significant obstacle for clinical translation. Here, we targeted the IGF pathway using ceritinib, an off-target inhibitor of the IGF1 receptor (IGF1R) and insulin receptor (INSR), in a pediatric patient with an unclassified brain tumor and a notch receptor 1 (NOTCH1) germline mutation. Pathway analysis of the tumor revealed activation of the sonic hedgehog (SHH), the wingless and integrated-1 (WNT), the IGF, and the Notch pathway. The proliferation of the patient tumor cells (225ZL) was inhibited by arsenic trioxide (ATO), which is an inhibitor of the SHH pathway, by linsitinib, which is an inhibitor of IGF1R and INSR, and by ceritinib. 225ZL expressed INSR but not IGF1R at the protein level, and ceritinib blocked the phosphorylation of INSR. Our first personalized treatment included ATO, but because of side effects, we switched to ceritinib. After 46 days, we achieved a concentration of 1.70 µM of ceritinib in the plasma, and after 58 days, MRI confirmed that there was a response to the treatment. Ceritinib accumulated in the tumor at a concentration of 2.72 µM. Our data suggest ceritinib as a promising drug for the treatment of IGF-driven brain tumors.

IGF1R Is a Potential New Therapeutic Target for HGNET-BCOR Brain Tumor Patients

(1) Background: The high-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the central nervous system with BCOR alteration (HGNET-BCOR) is a highly malignant tumor. Preclinical models and molecular targets are urgently required for this cancer. Previous data suggest a potential role of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling in HGNET-BCOR. (2) Methods: The primary HGNET-BCOR cells PhKh1 were characterized by western blot, copy number variation, and methylation analysis and by electron microscopy. The expression of IGF2 and IGF1R was assessed by qRT-PCR. The effect of chemotherapeutics and IGF1R inhibitors on PhKh1 proliferation was tested. The phosphorylation of IGF1R and downstream molecules was assessed by western blot. (3) Results: Phkh1 cells showed a DNA methylation profile compatible with the DNA methylation class "HGNET-BCOR" and morphologic features of cellular cannibalism. IGF2 and IGF1R were highly expressed by three HGNET-BCOR tumor samples and PhKh1 cells. PhKh1 cells were particularly sensitive to vincristine, vinblastine, actinomycin D (IC₅₀ < 10 nM for all drugs), and ceritinib (IC₅₀ = 310 nM). Ceritinib was able to abrogate the proliferation of PhKh1 cells and blocked the phosphorylation of IGF1R and AKT. (4) Conclusion: IGF1R is as an attractive target for the development of new therapy protocols for HGNET-BCOR patients, which may include ceritinib and vinblastine.

ASCEND-8 pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy data for ceritinib 450 mg with food in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung Cancer: A clinical perspective

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is diagnosed in up to 126,000 patients worldwide annually. Ceritinib is a next-generation ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. In December 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration-approved dose of ceritinib was changed from 750 mg/day under fasting conditions to 450 mg/day taken with food for the treatment of patients with ALK+ NSCLC. This change was implemented on the basis of data from studies designed to investigate ways to reduce the frequency of gastrointestinal adverse events noted in patients enrolled in several ASCEND clinical trials that evaluated a ceritinib 750-mg fasted dose as either first- or second/third-line treatment. This review highlights and discusses published findings from the ASCEND-8 food-effect trial and includes commentary from physicians regarding their own clinical cases of patients who were enrolled in the trial and treated with either the 750-mg fasted or 450-mg fed dose of ceritinib. The review also discusses the implications of using the recently approved ceritinib 450-mg dose in the clinical setting.

Efficacy of erlotinib and celecoxib for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib and celecoxib (EC) for treating Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ANSCLC) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type.Totally, 75 subjects with ANSCLC and EGFR wild type were included. They all underwent EC treatment. The outcome measurements consisted of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progress disease (PD), and disease control rate (DCR). Additionally, adverse events were also documented.Two-year CR, PR, SD, PD, and DCR were 4.0%, 6.7%, 42.6%, 46.7%, and 53.3% respectively. The median PFS was 3.4 months, the median OS was 10.0 months. Additionally, acceptable toxicities were recorded in this study.The results showed that EC may be efficacious for patients with ANSCLC and EGFR wild type only, and acceptable toxicity among the Chinese Han population.

Ceritinib Alone for Crizotinib-naive Versus Crizotinib-pretreated for Management of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-rearrangement Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Ceritinib shows a promising efficacy in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangement non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present systematic review determined the whole body and intracranial effectiveness and safety of ceritinib in crizotinib-naive versus crizotinib-pretreated regimens in ALK-rearrangement NSCLC. A comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and COCHRANE, was performed to identify clinical trials in English-language journals. We estimated the pooled progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) for ceritinib in whole body and intracranial responses to find differences between crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-pretreated regimens. The intracranial disease control rate in both crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-pretreated regimens was also estimated. The pooled efficacy parameters were as follows: ORR, 56.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.6%-60.1%); PFS, 8.26 months (95% CI, 6.18-11.07 months); intracranial ORR, 41.3% (95% CI, 35.3%-47.6%); and intracranial disease control rate, 79.8% (95% CI, 73.8%-84.7%). The pooled ceritinib for crizotinib-naive showed a trend toward greater ORR and longer PFS compared with ceritinib for crizotinib-pretreated (68.9% and 14.62 months vs. 48.2% and 6.32 months, respectively). The intracranial ORR for ceritinib as the initial regimen was 50.6% compared with 33.6% for crizotinib-pretreated. The discontinuation and dose reduction rates were 3.1% and 38.4%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse effects were increased alanine aminotransferase (25.5%), increased γ-glutamyltransferase (12.6%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (11.1%). Ceritinib is an effective agent for both crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Ceritinib has significant activity in crizotinib-naive patients with brain metastases.