Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review

Comparing prolonged infusion to intermittent infusion strategies for beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with gram-negative bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Our objective is to determine whether prolonged infusion (PI) of beta-lactam antibiotics yields superior outcomes compared to intermittent infusion (II) in patients with Gram-Negative Bacterial (GNB) infections.

METHODS

We systematically searched papers from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov, targeting mortality as the primary outcome and looking at the clinical cure rate, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay lengths, antibiotic treatment duration, and mechanical ventilation (MV) duration as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis of 18 studies, including 5 randomized control trials and 13 observational studies, with a total of 3,035 patients-1,510 in the PI group and 1,525 in the II group, revealed significant findings. PI was associated with reduced mortality (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81; p = 0.001; I2 = 4.52%) and a shorter MV duration (SMD, -0.76; 95% CI, -1.37 to -0.16; p = 0.01; I2 = 87.81%) compared to II. However, no differences were found in clinical cure rates, antibiotic treatment duration, length of hospital stay, or length of ICU stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The PI approach for administering beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with suspected or confirmed GNB infections may be advantageous in reducing mortality rates and the duration of MV when compared to the II strategy.

Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam infusion in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The two latest studies on prolonged versus intermittent use of β-lactam antibiotics in patients with sepsis did not reach consistent conclusions, further contributing to the controversy surrounding the effectiveness of the prolonged β-lactam antibiotics infusion strategy. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prolonged and intermittent β-lactam infusion in adult patients with sepsis.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for original randomized controlled trials comparing prolonged and intermittent β-lactam infusion in sepsis patients. A random-effects model was used to evaluate mortality, clinical success, microbiological success, and adverse events. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the impact of various factors on the mortality rates. Relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the overall effect sizes for dichotomous outcomes. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023463905).

RESULTS

We assessed 15 studies involving 2130 patients. In our comprehensive assessment, we found a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR, 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02) and a notable improvement in clinical success (RR, 1.16; 95% CI 1.03-1.31; P = 0.02) in the prolonged infusion group compared to the intermittent infusion group, whereas microbiological success did not yield statistically significant results (RR, 1.10; 95% CI 0.98-1.23; P = 0.11). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the two groups (RR, 0.91; 95% CI 0.64-1.29; P = 0.60). Additionally, remarkable conclusions were drawn from subgroup analyses including studies with sample sizes exceeding 20 individuals per group (RR, 0.84; 95%CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.03), research conducted post-2010 (RR, 0.84; 95%CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.03), cases involving infections predominantly caused by Gram-negative bacteria (RR, 0.81; 95%CI 0.68-0.96; P = 0.02), as well as the administration of a loading dose (RR, 0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02) and the use of penicillin (RR, 0.61; 95% CI 0.38-0.98; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to intermittent infusion, prolonged infusion of β-lactam antibiotics significantly decreases all-cause mortality among patients with sepsis and enhances clinical success without increasing adverse events.

Continuous Versus Intermittent Linezolid Infusion for Critically Ill Patients with Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Efficacy and Safety Challenges

High variability of linezolid blood concentrations with partial subtherapeutic levels was observed in critically ill patients who received a standard intravenous dose of linezolid, contributing to drug resistance and toxicity. Continuous infusions of linezolid have been suggested as an alternative and provide good serum and alveolar levels without fluctuations in trough concentration. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of continuous linezolid infusion versus the standard regimen in critically ill patients. A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 179 patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Patients were randomized into two groups. The first group received IV linezolid 600 mg twice daily, while the second group received 600 mg IV as a loading dose, followed by a continuous infusion of 1200 mg/day (50 mg/h) for at least 8−10 days. The continuous infusion group showed a higher clinical cure rate than the intermittent infusion group (p = 0.046). Furthermore, efficacy was proven by greater improvement of P/F ratio (p = 0.030) on day 7 of treatment, a lower incidence of developing sepsis after beginning treatment (p = 0.009), and a shorter time to reach clinical cure (p < 0.001). Hematological parameters were also assessed during the treatment to evaluate the safety between the two groups. The incidence of thrombocytopenia was significantly lower in the continuous infusion group than in the intermittent infusion group. In addition, a stepwise logistic regression model revealed that the intermittent infusion of linezolid was significantly associated with thrombocytopenia (OR =4.128; 95% CI = 1.681−10.139; p =0.001). The current study is the first to assess the clinical aspects of continuous infusion of linezolid beyond pharmacokinetic studies. Continuous infusion of linezolid outperforms intermittent delivery in safety and improves clinical effectiveness in critically ill patients with Gram-positive nosocomial pneumonia.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients: Current Practice and Future Perspectives With a Focus on Clinical Outcome

PURPOSE

Early initiation of antibiotics is essential for ameliorating infections in critically ill patients. The correct dosage of antibiotics is imperative to ensure their adequate exposure. Critically ill patients have altered pharmacokinetic parameters and are often infected by less susceptible microorganisms. Differences in drug disposition are not considered with standard doses of antibiotics. This can lead to suboptimal antibiotic exposure in critically ill patients. To overcome this problem of suboptimal dosing, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a strategy commonly used to support individualized dosing of antibiotics. It is routinely used for vancomycin and aminoglycosides in clinical practice. In recent years, it has become apparent that TDM may also be used in other antibiotics.

METHODS

This review summarizes the evidence for TDM of antibiotics in critically ill patients, focuses on clinical outcomes, and summarizes possibilities for optimized TDM in the future.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

After reviewing the literature, we can conclude that general TDM implementation is advised for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides, as evidence of the relationship between TDM and clinical outcome is present. For antibiotics, such as beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and linezolid, it seems rational to perform TDM in specific patient cases. TDM involving other antibiotics is supported by individual cases, specifically to decrease toxicity. When focusing on future possibilities to improve TDM of antibiotics in critically ill patients, implementation of model-informed precision dosing should be investigated because it can potentially streamline the TDM process. The logistics of TDM, such as turnaround time and available equipment, are challenging but may be overcome by rapid bioanalytical techniques or real-time monitoring of drug concentrations through biosensors in the future. Education, clinical information on targets, and clinical outcome studies are other important factors that facilitate TDM implementation.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies

Patients with infection can develop sepsis, and their mortality can be high. An important aspect in the treatment of sepsis is adequate management of the infection.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of doripenem for Japanese patients in intensive care unit

We aimed to construct a novel population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model of doripenem (DRPM) for Japanese patients in intensive care unit, incorporating the clearance of DRPM by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Twenty-one patients treated with DRPM (0.25 or 0.5 g) by intravenous infusion over 1 h were included in the study. Nine of the 21 patients were receiving CRRT. Plasma samples were obtained before and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after the first DRPM administration. PPK analysis was conducted by nonlinear mixed effects modeling using a two-compartment model. Total clearance (CLtotal) in the model was divided into CRRT clearance (CLCRRT) and body clearance (CLbody). The final model was: CLtotal (L h-1) = CLbody(non-CRRT) = 3.65 × (Ccr/62.25)0.64 in the absence of CRRT, or = CLbody(CRRT) + CLCRRT = 2.49 × (Ccr/52.75)0.42 + CLCRRT in the presence of CRRT; CLCRRT = QE × 0.919 (0.919 represents non-protein binding rate of DRPM); V1 (L) = 10.04; V2 (L) = 8.13; and Q (L h-1) = 3.53. Using this model, CLtotal was lower and the distribution volumes (V1 and V2) tended to be higher compared to previous reports. Also, Ccr was selected as a significant covariate for CLbody. Furthermore, the contribution rate of CLCRRT to CLtotal was 30-40%, suggesting the importance of drug removal by CRRT. The population analysis model used in this study is a useful tool for planning DRPM regimen and administration. Our novel model may contribute greatly to proper use of DRPM in patients requiring intensive care.

Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam antibiotics intravenous infusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized trials

Background

The prolonged β-lactam infusion strategy has emerged as the standard treatment for sepsis or septic shock despite its unknown efficacy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam antibiotics infusion on outcomes in sepsis or septic shock patients by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A thorough search was conducted on MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mortality between prolonged and intermittent infusion in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were the attainment of the target plasma concentration, clinical cure, adverse events, and occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. We performed a subgroup analysis stratified according to the year of publication before or after 2015 and a trial sequential analysis (TSA). The Der Simonian–Laird random-effects models were subsequently used to report the pooled risk ratios (RR) with confidence intervals (CI).

Results

We identified 2869 studies from the 3 databases, and 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Hospital mortality did not decrease (RR 0.69 [95%CI 0.47–1.02]) in the prolonged infusion group. The attainment of the target plasma concentration and clinical cure significantly improved (RR 0.40 [95%CI 0.21–0.75] and RR 0.84 [95%CI 0.73–0.97], respectively) in the prolonged infusion group. There were, however, no significant differences in the adverse events and the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria between the groups (RR 1.01 (95%CI 0.95–1.06) and RR 0.53 [95%CI 0.10–2.83], respectively). For the subgroup analysis, a significant improvement in hospital mortality or clinical cure was reported in studies published in or after 2015 (RR 0.66 [95%CI 0.44–0.98] and RR 0.67 [95%CI 0.50–0.90], respectively). The results of the TSA indicated an insufficient number of studies for a definitive analysis.

Conclusions

The prolonged infusion of β-lactam antibiotics significantly improved upon attaining the target plasma concentration and clinical cure without increasing the adverse event or the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Prolonged infusion could not improve hospital mortality although an improvement was shown for studies published in or after 2015. Further studies are warranted as suggested by our TSA results.

Optimizing Antibiotic Treatment Strategies for Neonates and Children: Does Implementing Extended or Prolonged Infusion Provide any Advantage?

Optimizing the use of antibiotics has become mandatory, particularly for the pediatric population where limited options are currently available. Selecting the dosing strategy may improve overall outcomes and limit the further development of antimicrobial resistance. Time-dependent antibiotics optimize their free concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) when administered by continuous infusion, however evidences from literature are still insufficient to recommend its widespread adoption. The aim of this review is to assess the state-of-the-art of intermittent versus prolonged intravenous administration of antibiotics in children and neonates with bacterial infections. We identified and reviewed relevant literature by searching PubMed, from 1 January 1 2000 to 15 April 2020. We included studies comparing intermittent versus prolonged/continuous antibiotic infusion, among the pediatric population. Nine relevant articles were selected, including RCTs, prospective and retrospective studies focusing on different infusion strategies of vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime and meropenem in the pediatric population. Prolonged and continuous infusions of antibiotics showed a greater probability of target attainment as compared to intermittent infusion regimens, with generally good clinical outcomes and safety profiles, however its impact in terms on efficacy, feasibility and toxicity is still open, with few studies led on children and adult data not being fully extendable.

Serum ammonia levels on admission for predicting sepsis patient mortality at D28 in the emergency department: A 2-center retrospective study

We assessed the predictive value of serum ammonia level on admission for the 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis.We retrospectively included septic patients admitted to the emergency department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University and The Fourth People's Hospital of Zigong city from June 2017 to May 2018. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to 28-day survival. Comparisons of serum ammonia level and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score were made between 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to determine independent risk factors affecting 28-day mortality rate, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also used to evaluate the efficacy of risk factors.Total of 316 patients were included into the study, 221 survived to 28 days and 95 were died before 28 days. The 28-day mortality rate was 30.06%. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the ammonia level, C reactive protein, SOFA score, and the leukocyte were independent risk factors for the 28-day mortality rate. In predicting the 28-day mortality rate, the SOFA score presented an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.815, and the ammonia levels presented the AUC of 0.813.The ammonia level, C reactive protein, SOFA score, and the leukocyte are independent risk factors for 28-day mortality rate in septic patients. Moreover, the serum ammonia and SOFA score have similar predictive values. The serum ammonia level is also a suitable early indicator for prognostic evaluation of patients with sepsis as well.