1
|
Chan KS, Oo AM. Establishing the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic and Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2946-2982. [PMID: 37658172 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05812-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive distal gastrectomy (MIDG) is non-inferior compared with open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. However, MIDG bears a learning curve (LC). This study aims to evaluate the number of cases required to surmount the LC (i.e. NLC) in MIDG. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to August 2022 for studies which reported NLC in MIDG. NLC on reduced-port/single-port MIDG only were separately analysed. Poisson mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) was used to determine NLC. Negative binomial regression was used to compare NLC between laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG). RESULTS A total of 45 articles with 71 data sets (LDG n=47, RDG n=24) were analysed. There were 7776 patients in total (LDG n=5516, RDG n=2260). Majority of studies were conducted in East Asia (n=68/71). Majority (76.1%) of data sets used non-arbitrary methods of analyses. The overall NLC for RDG was significantly lower compared to LDG (RDG 22.4 (95% CI: 20.4-24.5); LDG 46.7 (95% CI: 44.1-49.4); incidence rate ratio 0.48, p<0.001). The median number of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) cases prior was 0 (interquartile range (IQR) 0-105) for LDG and 159 (IQR 101-305.3) for RDG. Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant impact prior experience in LG, extent of lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis had on overall NLC for LDG and RDG. CONCLUSION NLC for RDG is shorter compared to LDG, but this may be due to prior experience in LG and ergonomic advantages of RDG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Siang Chan
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
| | - Aung Myint Oo
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lou S, Yin X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Xue Y. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2022; 102:106678. [PMID: 35589049 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has been widely used for advanced gastric cancer (GC), and its resection extent is not limited to distal gastrectomy. However, the superiority of this minimally invasive approach remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits and risks of LG on the short- and long-term outcomes compared with open gastrectomy (OG) for GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LG and OG for treatment of GC. The primary outcomes were adverse events, recurrence, mortality, and the quality of life. The secondary outcomes included operation-relevant outcomes and postoperative recovery outcomes. We employed random-effects meta-analyses to pool results with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. The prediction interval (PI) was used to quantify the between-study heterogeneity. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to examine the potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies involving 7643 patients were included. Most studies (22 out of 28) reported results from experienced surgeons. Compared to OG, LG was found to have the advantages of less blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and faster recovery, but at the expense of lesser proximal resection margin length, longer operation time, and fewer retrieved lymph nodes. There were no significant differences for anastomosis-related complications, recurrence and survival and other outcomes between LG and OG. Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed. Body mass index (BMI) and age were two major sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS For experienced surgeons, LG is an alternative approach to OG for patients with GC. Patients with lower BMI and older age may benefit most from LG. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings in low-volume hospitals and for less-experienced surgeons. Future trials focusing on patient-important outcomes are warranted for clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenghan Lou
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150081, China
| | - Xin Yin
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150081, China
| | - Yufei Wang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150081, China
| | - Yao Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150081, China
| | - Yingwei Xue
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150081, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Usui Y, Miura T, Kawaguchi T, Kosugi K, Uehara Y, Kato M, Kosugi T, Sone M, Nakamura N, Mizushima A, Miyashita M, Morita T, Yamaguchi T, Matsumoto Y, Satomi E. Palliative care physicians' recognition of patients after immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-related adverse events. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:775-784. [PMID: 34383113 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06482-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated the experience of palliative care physicians (PCPs) and their knowledge and recognition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in clinical practice as well as the need to provide palliative care services for patients after ICI treatments. METHODS A cross-sectional survey with self-administered questionnaires was conducted between February and April 2020. A total of 759 questionnaires were sent to PCPs in Japan. The changes in the PCPs' knowledge and recognition of ICIs and irAEs due to the increased experiences of treating patients after ICI treatments were analyzed. RESULTS Four hundred ninety-two responses (64.8%) were analyzed. Only 15.0% of respondents had no experience of patients after ICI treatments, while 53.9% had experience of more than six patients. On the other hand, 40% of respondents had no experience of patients with suspected irAEs, while only 13.4% had experience of more than six patients. Respondents with more experience of patients after ICI treatments or those with suspected irAEs had extensive knowledge of ICIs and irAEs, were more confident in treating these patients, and tended to consider irAEs as therapeutic indications. The majority of respondents required guidelines and efficient consultation systems with oncologists. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that PCPs with experience had extensive knowledge and confidence of ICIs and irAEs and tended to recognize irAEs as therapeutic indications. The establishment of a more intimate relationship between PCPs and oncologists is important for providing better treatment for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Usui
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.,Division of Palliative Therapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomofumi Miura
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
| | - Takashi Kawaguchi
- Department of Practical Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Kosugi
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Yuko Uehara
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.,Department of Palliative Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Kato
- Division of Medical Support and Partnership, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Kosugi
- Department of Palliative Care, Ken Medical Centre Koseikan, SagaSaga, Japan
| | - Miyuki Sone
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Akio Mizushima
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsunori Miyashita
- Department of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Morita
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Takuhiro Yamaguchi
- Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Matsumoto
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Eriko Satomi
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Postolov MP, Kovalenko NV, Zhavoronkova VV, Panin SI, Tolstopyatov SE, Ivanov AI. [Laparoscopic subtotal distal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2021:34-38. [PMID: 34363443 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202106134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the primary results of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with distal gastric cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 21 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies in patients with distal gastric cancer. Mean age of patients was 63.7±6.3 years. According to TNM staging system, cancer stage 1 was detected in 90% of patients (n=19), stage 2a - in 10% (n=2) of patients. RESULTS Time of distal gastrectomy was 190.4±51.6 min, blood loss - 90.3±51.2 ml. The number of excised lymph nodes was 21.2±5.1. We were able to achieve R0 resection edge in all patients. Length of hospital-stay was 7.6±2.3 days, incidence of postoperative complications - 23.8%. Complications Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb-V were observed in 9.5% of patients (n=2). Overall postoperative mortality was 4.7% (n=1). No progression of the underlying disease has been revealed in any patient throughout the follow-up period (since May 2018). To date, the maximum median follow-up is 25 months of overall and disease-free survival. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic subtotal distal resection is an appropriate intervention ensuring R0 resection edge in most cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Postolov
- Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Volgograd, Russian Federation
| | - N V Kovalenko
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russian Federation.,Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Volgograd, Russian Federation
| | - V V Zhavoronkova
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russian Federation
| | - S I Panin
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russian Federation
| | - S E Tolstopyatov
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russian Federation
| | - A I Ivanov
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Postolov MP, Kovalenko NV, Zhavoronkova VV, Panin SI, Tolstopyatov SE, Ivanov AI. [Laparoscopic subtotal distal resection for distal gastric cancer]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2021:19-23. [PMID: 34029031 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202106119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the primary experience of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with distal gastric cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 21 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies in patients with antrum malignancies. Mean age of patients was 63.7±6.3 years. According to TNM staging system, cancer stage I was detected in 90% of patients (n=19), stage IIa - in 10% (n=2) of patients. RESULTS Duration of distal gastrectomy was 190.4±51.6 minutes, blood loss - 90.3±51.2 ml. The number of harvested lymph nodes was 21.2±5.1. We were able to reach R0 resection edge in all patients. Length of hospital-stay was 7.6±2.3 days, incidence of postoperative complications - 23.8%. Complications Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb-V were observed in 9.5% of patients (n=2). Overall postoperative mortality was 4.7% (n=1). No progression of the underlying disease has been revealed in any patient throughout the follow-up period (since May 2018). To date, the maximum median follow-up is 25 months of overall and disease-free survival. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic subtotal distal resection is appropriate intervention ensuring R0 resection edge in most cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Postolov
- Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Volgograd, Russia
| | - N V Kovalenko
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia.,Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Volgograd, Russia
| | | | - S I Panin
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
| | | | - A I Ivanov
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
| |
Collapse
|