The incidence of spondyloarthritis in Slovenia

High incidence of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in sepsis survivors: A nationwide exposed-nonexposed epidemiological study

OBJECTIVE

Sepsis is characterized by an excessive release of inflammatory cytokines. Cytokine dysregulation is pivotal to the pathophysiology of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We aimed to analyze the incidence of IMIDs in patients who survived sepsis.

METHODS

We performed a matched-cohort study using the National Medico-Administrative Hospital database in order to analyze the association between sepsis and incident IMIDs in 2020 in France. Sepsis was defined by the combination of at least one infection diagnosis code and one organ failure code. Patients with a first sepsis diagnosed in 2020 were randomly matched with patients admitted during the same period for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with an exact matching procedure using age, gender, and comorbidities as matching variables. The main outcome was an IMID diagnosis in a 9-month follow-up period starting the first day of hospitalization for sepsis or AMI.

RESULTS

In France, the incidence rate of IMIDs after a sepsis in 2020-analyzed in 62,257 patients-was of 7956 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 7392-8520) per 100,000 patient-years. As compared to the AMI population, we observed an increased risk for IMIDs of 2.80 (hazard ratio [HR]; 95% CI [2.22-3.54]) starting from day 16 after admission in the sepsis population. The risk of IMIDs onset in sepsis survivors depended on the type of IMIDs and was higher for immune thrombocytopenia (5.51 [1.97-15.4]), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (HR 4.83 [1.45-16.1]), and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (4.66 [2.05-10.6]). Association between sepsis and IMIDs onset appeared well balanced across pathogen categories.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows a high incidence of IMIDs among sepsis survivors.

Increase in axial spondyloarthritis diagnoses after the introduction of the ASAS criteria: a systematic review

To explore the proportion of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) diagnoses within all newly referred patients visiting rheumatology outpatient clinics. And more specifically, to analyze whether there is an effect of the introduction of the ASAS and CASPAR classification criteria for axSpA and PsA. We systematically searched Embase, Medline Ovid, Cochrane Central and Web of Science from database inception to November 2022. Articles that investigated new onsets of axSpA and PsA in adults from rheumatology clinics were included. In total, 170 out of 7139 studies were found eligible for full-text review, after which 33 unique studies were included. Seventeen studies reported new onsets of axSpA, and 20 studies of PsA. The pooled proportion of axSpA within all newly referred patients was 19% (95% CI 15-23%) and 18% (95% CI 14-22%) for PsA. The proportion of axSpA before 2009 was 3% (95% CI 0-6%) and increased up to 21% (95% CI 14-28%) after 2009. For PsA, limited data were available in order to analyze the proportions of PsA before 2006. Overall, heterogeneity was high (I² > 95%, p < 0.001) that was most likely caused by geographical area, study design, setting and use of different referral strategies. The pooled proportion of axSpA and PsA among patients referred to the rheumatology outpatient clinic was 19 and 18%, respectively. Although the proportion of diagnosed axSpA patients seemed to increase after the introduction of the ASAS criteria, due to the large heterogeneity our findings should be interpreted with caution.

Is Axial Spondyloarthritis More Common Than Rheumatoid Arthritis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the disease incidence and prevalence rates of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) relative to those of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

RECENT FINDINGS

According to the most recently published systematic reviews, pooled prevalence estimates for RA are 0.38% in North America, and 0.21 to 0.25% in European subregions, while that of AS is 0.20% in North America and 0.25% in Europe. The estimated prevalence of axSpA has been reported to be approximately twice as common as AS in a study from the USA. This finding has also been supported by studies from northern Norway, central Italy, western Turkey, northern and southern regions of China, and rural Taiwan. These data suggest that axSpA, that encompasses AS, may be more prevalent than RA, at least in some countries. In general, higher occurrences of RA relative to AS have been noted worldwide, both in terms of incidence and prevalence. But axSpA, that encompasses AS, may be more prevalent than RA, at least in some countries. There is a need for concurrently run studies in the same population for a reliable comparison to establish occurrence of RA, AS, and axSpA. It is hoped that the implementation of the ICD-11 codes for axSpA will be helpful in determining a more accurate estimate of its incidence and prevalence.