Preventive infusion of donor-derived CAR-T cells after haploidentical transplantation: Two cases report

The role of MSCs and CAR-MSCs in cellular immunotherapy

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are widely used by T cells (CAR-T cells), natural killer cells dendritic cells and macrophages, and they are of great importance in cellular immunotherapy. However, the use of CAR-related products faces several challenges, including the poor persistence of cells carrying CARs, cell dysfunction or exhaustion, relapse of disease, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, cytokine release syndrome, low efficacy against solid tumors and immunosuppression by the tumor microenvironment. Another important cell therapy regimen involves mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Recent studies have shown that MSCs can improve the anticancer functions of CAR-related products. CAR-MSCs can overcome the flaws of cellular immunotherapy. Thus, MSCs can be used as a biological vehicle for CARs. In this review, we first discuss the characteristics and immunomodulatory functions of MSCs. Then, the role of MSCs as a source of exosomes, including the characteristics of MSC-derived exosomes and their immunomodulatory functions, is discussed. The role of MSCs in CAR-related products, CAR-related product-derived exosomes and the effect of MSCs on CAR-related products are reviewed. Finally, the use of MSCs as CAR vehicles is discussed. Video Abstract.

Novel CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells manufactured next-day for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T (CAR-T) cells have shown promising efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, challenges remain including long manufacturing processes that need to be overcome. We presented the CD19-targeting CAR-T cell product GC007F manufactured next-day (FasTCAR-T cells) and administered to patients with R/R B-ALL. A total of 21 patients over 14 years of age with CD19⁺  R/R B-ALL were screened, enrolled and infused with a single infusion of GC007F CAR-T at three different dose levels. The primary objective of the study was to assess safety, secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics of GC007F cells in patients with R/R B-ALL and preliminary efficacy. We were able to demonstrate in preclinical studies that GC007F cells exhibited better proliferation and tumor killing than conventional CAR-T (C-CAR-T) cells. In this investigator-initiated study all 18 efficacy-evaluable patients achieved a complete remission (CR) (18/18, 100.00%) by day 28, with 17 of the patients (94.4%) achieving CR with minimal residual disease (MRD) negative. Fifteen (83.3%) remained disease free at the 3-month assessment, 14 patients (77.8%) maintaining MRD negative at month 3. Among all 21 enrolled patients, the median peak of CAR-T cell was on day 10, with a median peak copy number of 104899.5/µg DNA and a median persistence period of 56 days (range: 7–327 days). The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 95.2% (n = 20), with severe CRS occurring in 52.4% (n = 11) of the patients. Six patients (28.6%) developed neurotoxicity of any grade. GC007F demonstrated superior expansion capacity and a less exhausted phenotype as compared to (C-CAR-T) cells. Moreover, this first-in-human clinical study showed that the novel, next-day manufacturing FasTCAR-T cells was feasible with a manageable toxicity profile in patients with R/R B-ALL.

HSCT with mismatched unrelated donors: Bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells sources in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from an unrelated HLA-mismatched donor (MMUD) is one of the alternatives where an HLA-matched donor is not found. The aim of this study was to compare bone marrow (BM) versus peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) as hematopoietic rescue following allogeneic unrelated mismatched stem cell transplantation (MMUD).

METHODS

The patients were divided into two groups: 43 pediatric patients were treated with BM and 17 pediatric patients with PBSC. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04598789.

RESULTS

The 3-year Overall Survival (OS) was 74% versus 31% (p = .0011). Transplant related mortality (TRM) was 16% versus 33% (p = .025), and relapse incidence (RI) was 16% versus 35% (p = .005). The day-100 acute Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) incidence grade II-IV and III-IV was 30% versus 28% (p = NS) and 17% versus 17% (p = NS). The 3-year chronic GvHD incidence was 22% versus 33% (p = NS).

CONCLUSION

Despite all the limits of this retrospective study we were able to show how the combination of BM and ATG is able to prevent GvHDs and guarantee a high OS. Future studies addressing the issue of a post-transplant cellular therapy approach may potentially reduce relapses when GvHD is absent.

HSCT with Mismatched Unrelated Donors (MMUD): A Comparison of Different Platforms for GvHD Prophylaxis

HSCT from an unrelated HLA-mismatched donor (MMUD) is one of the alternatives where an HLA-matched donor is not found. The aim of this study was to compare GvHD prophylaxis with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) vs. post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). Thirty-nine adult patients were uniformly treated with rabbit ATG-Cy-A-MTX and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and 40 adult patients with PT-Cy-MMF-tacrolimus and PBSC. This retrospective study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04598789. Three-year overall survival was 42% vs. 64% for ATG and PT-Cy (p < 0.0005), three-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 36% vs. 8% (p = 0.0033) and the three-year relapse incidence (RI) was 15% vs. 28% (p = NS), respectively. The incidences of day-100 GvHD graded II–IV and III–IV were 39% vs. 7% (p = 0.0006) and 11% vs. 0% (p = 0.04), respectively, whereas the three-year cGvHD incidences were 48% vs. 13% (p = 0.0005), respectively. We were able to show how PT-Cy can reduce the incidence of GvHDs and TRM in adults, but relapse remains an issue.

Role of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in the era of immunotherapy

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is currently the standard of care for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. In recent years, with the continuous development of immunotherapy, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells, blinatumomab, and inotuzumab ozogamicin, a series of vital clinical studies have confirmed its high response rate and favorable outcomes for ALL. Although the emergence of immunotherapy has expanded relapsed or refractory (r/r) ALL patients' opportunities to receive allo-HSCT, allo-HSCT is associated with potential challenges. In this review, the role of allo-HSCT in the treatment of adult ALL in the era of immunotherapy will be discussed.

The evolving role of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in the era of chimaeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Chimaeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has revolutionized the management of many haematological malignancies. It is associated with impressive disease responses in relapsed or refractory high-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) with durable remissions in a subset of patients. Historically, haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been the standard consolidation strategy for many of these patients who are now being treated with CAR T. Relapses are frequent after CD19 CAR T therapy in B-ALL and consolidation with allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) may improve survival of patients with high-risk disease. There appears to be a clear difference in B-ALL outcomes between paediatric and adult patients, with the latter having a much higher risk of relapse after CAR T therapy. Late relapses are infrequent in patients with B-NHL and consolidation with allo-HCT may not be needed in patients who achieve a complete remission after CAR T therapy. Future registry-based and prospective studies will hopefully provide the needed data in the future to risk-stratify the recipients of CAR T therapy. Meanwhile, we provide guidance on patient selection and practical issues with performing allo-HCT after CAR T therapy.

Contemporary haploidentical stem cell transplant strategies in children with hematological malignancies

The barriers to HLA-mismatched or haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), namely GvHD and graft failure, have been overcome with novel transplant platforms. Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is widely available, feasible and easy to implement. TCRαβ T and B cell depletion comes with consistent GvHD preventive benefits irrespective of age and indication. Naive T-cell depletion helps prevention of severe viral reactivations. The Beijing protocol shows promising outcomes in patients with poor remission status at the time of transplantation. For children, the toxicities and late outcomes related to these transplants are truly relevant as they suffer the most in the long run from transplant-related toxicities, especially chronic GvHD. While comparing the outcomes of different Haplo-HSCT approaches, one must understand the transplant immunobiology and factors affecting the transplant outcomes. Leukemia remission status at the time of conditioning is a consistent factor affecting the transplant outcomes using any of these platforms. Prospective comparison of these platforms lacks in a homogenous population; however, the evidence is growing, and this review highlights the areas of research gaps.

Current Use of Total Body Irradiation in Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Total body irradiation (TBI) is included in the conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with unique advantages such as uniform distribution over the whole body and decreased exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. For individuals who lack matched sibling or matched unrelated donors, the use of haploidentical donors has been increasing despite challenges such as graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Although a limited number of studies have been performed to assess the clinical role of TBI in haploidentical HSCT, TBI-based conditioning showed comparable results in terms of survival outcomes, rate of relapse, and GVHD in diverse hematologic malignancies such as leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Advances in supportive care, along with recent technical improvements such as restriction of maximum tolerated dose, appropriate fractionation, and organ shielding, help to overcome diverse adverse events related to TBI. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide was used in most studies to reduce the risk of GVHD. Additionally, it was found that post-transplantation rituximab may improve outcomes in TBI-based haploidentical HSCT, especially in patients with B-cell lymphoma. Along with the advances of techniques and strategies, the expansion of age restriction would be another important issue for TBI-based haploidentical HSCT considering the current tendency toward increasing age limitation and lack of matched donors. This review article summarizes the current use and future perspectives of TBI in haploidentical HSCT.

HLA-Haploidentical Family Donors: The New Promise for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia?

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is indicated in children with high-risk, relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). HLA-matched grafts from cord blood and stem cell repositories have allowed patients without suitable sibling donors to undergo HSCT. However, challenges in procuring matched unrelated donor (MUD) grafts due to high cost, ethnic disparity and time constraints have led to the exponential rise in the use of stem cells from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical family donors. Whilst HLA-haploidentical HSCT (hHSCT) performed in adult patients with acute leukaemia has produced outcomes similar to MUD transplants, experience in children is limited. Over the last 5 years, more data have emerged on hHSCT in the childhood ALL setting, allowing comparisons with matched donor transplants. The feasibility of hHSCT using adult family donors in childhood ALL may also address the ethical issues related to selection of minor siblings in matched sibling donor transplants. Here, we review hHSCT in paediatric recipients with ALL and highlight the emergence of hHSCT as a promising therapeutic option for patients lacking a suitable matched donor. Recent issues related to conditioning regimens, donor selection and graft-vs.-host disease prophylaxis are discussed. We also identify areas for future research to address transplant-related complications and improve post-transplant disease-free survival.

How to Combine the Two Landmark Treatment Methods-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Together to Cure High-Risk B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has made tremendous progress in the last few decades and is increasingly being used worldwide. The success of haploidentical HSCT has made it possible to have "a donor for everyone". Patients who received transplantation in remission may have a favorable outcome, while those who were transplanted in advanced stages of disease have a poor prognosis. Although chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is currently a milestone in the immunotherapy of relapsed or refractory (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and has demonstrated high remission rates in patients previously treated in multiple lines, the relatively high relapse rate remains a barrier to CAR-T cell therapy becoming an excellent cure option. Therefore, combining these two approaches (allo-HSCT and CAR-T cell therapy) is an attractive area of research to further improve the prognosis of R/R B-ALL. In this review, we will discuss the current clinical practices of combining allo-HSCT with CAR-T cell therapy based on available data, including CAR-T cells as a bridge to allo-HSCT for R/R B-ALL and CAR-T cell infusion for post-transplant relapse. We will further explore not only other possible ways to combine the two approaches, including CAR-T cell therapy to clear minimal residual disease peri-transplantation and incorporation of CAR technology to treat graft-versus-host disease, but also the potential of CAR-T cells as a part of allo-HSCT.