Traumatic vertebral fractures involve the anterior end plate more than the posterior end plate: A retrospective study

Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw fixation strength among three different screw trajectories using single vertebrae and one-level functional spinal unit

Three key factors are responsible for the biomechanical performance of pedicle screw fixation: screw mechanical characteristics, bone quality and insertion techniques. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no study has directly compared the biomechanical performance among three trajectories, i.e., the traditional trajectory (TT), modified trajectory (MT) and cortical bone trajectory (CBT), in a porcine model. This study compared the pullout strength and insertion torque of three trajectory methods in single vertebrae, the pullout strength and fixation stiffness including flexion, extension, and lateral bending in a one-level instrumented functional spinal unit (FSU) that mimics the in vivo configuration were clarified. A total of 18 single vertebrae and 18 FSUs were randomly assigned into three screw insertion methods (n = 6 in each trajectory group). In the TT group, the screw converged from its entry point, passed completely inside the pedicle, was parallel to the superior endplate, was located in the superior third of the vertebral body and reached to at least the anterior third of the vertebral body. In the MT group, the convergent angle was similar to that of the TT method but directed caudally to the anterior inferior margin of the vertebral body. The results of insertion torque and pullout strength in single vertebrae were analyzed; in addition, the stiffness and pullout strength in the one-level FSU were also investigated. This study demonstrated that, in single vertebrae, the insertion torque was significantly higher in CBT groups than in TT and MT groups (p < 0.05). The maximal pullout strength was significantly higher in MT groups than in TT and CBT groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in stiffness in the three motions among all groups. The maximal pullout strength in FSUs of MT and CBT groups were significantly higher than the TT groups (p < 0.05). We concluded that either MT or CBT provides better biomechanical performance than TT in single vertebrae or FSUs. The lack of significance of stiffness in FSUs among three methods suggested that MT or CBT could be a reasonable alternative to TT if the traditional trajectory was not feasible.

Are Modic changes 'Primary infective endplatitis'?-insights from multimodal imaging of non-specific low back pain patients and development of a radiological 'Endplate infection probability score'

PURPOSE

To probe the pathophysiological basis of Modic change (MC) by multimodal imaging rather than by MRI alone.

METHODS

Nineteen radiological signs found in mild infections and traumatic endplate fractures were identified by MRI and CT, and by elimination, three signs unique to infection and trauma were distilled. By ranking the Z score, radiological 'Endplate Infection Probability Score' (EIPS) was developed. The score's ability to differentiate infection and traumatic endplate changes (EPC) was validated in a fresh set of 15 patients each, with documented infection and trauma. The EIPS, ESR, CRP, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) were then compared between 115 patients with and 80 patients without MC.

RESULTS

The EIPS had a confidence of 66.4%, 83% and, 100% for scores of 4, 5 and, 6, respectively, for end plate changes suggesting infection. The mean EIPS was 4.85 ± 1.94 in patients with Modic changes compared to - 0.66 ± 0.49 in patients without Modic changes (p < 0.001). Seventy-eight (67.64%) patients with MC had a score of 6, indicating high infection possibility. There was a difference in the NRS (p < 0.01), ESR (p = 0.05), CRP (p < 0.01), and type of pain (p < 0.01) between patients with and without MC.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal imaging showed many radiological signs not easily seen in MRI alone and thus missed in Modic classification. There were distinct radiological differences between EPCs of trauma and infection which allowed the development of an EIPS. The scores showed that 67.64% of our study patients with Modic changes had EPCs resembling infection rather than trauma suggesting the possibility of an infective aetiology and allowing us to propose an alternate theory of 'Primary Endplatitis'.

A retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of bone cement in the treatment of endplate fractures

Background

Endplate fractures is an important factor affecting the curative effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty for spinal fracture. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of sealing endplate fracture with bone cement on minimally invasive treatment of spinal fracture.

Methods

A total of 98 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures combined with endplate fractures treated with bone cement surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. They were grouped according to whether bone cement was involved in the endplate fractures. Group A: bone cement was not only distributed in the fractured vertebral body, but also dispersed into the endplate fractures. Group B: bone cement was confined to the fractured vertebra but did not diffuse into the cracks of the endplate. The basic information, imaging changes of the fractured vertebral body, VAS score, ODI score, bone cement distribution and postoperative complications of the two groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

The height of the injured vertebra and the kyphotic Cobb angle in the two groups were significantly improved after surgery, but the anterior height of the vertebra in group B was lower than that in group A and the kyphotic Cobb angle was higher than that in group A at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). VAS score and ODI score in 2 groups were significantly improved after operation (P < 0.05), but the VAS score and ODI score in group A were lower than those in group B at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The incidence of bone cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fracture in group A was higher than that in group B (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Diffusion of bone cement into the cracks of the endplate may also restore and maintain the height of the injured vertebra, relieve pain and restore lumbar function. However, diffusion of bone cement into the cracks of the endplate can increase the incidence of cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures.