1
|
Meel R, Kulkarni S, Singh L, Chinnaswamy G, Radhakrishnan V, Madan R, Sasi A, Kaur T, Dhaliwal RS, Bakhshi S. Management of Intraocular Retinoblastoma: ICMR Consensus Guidelines. Indian J Pediatr 2024; 91:1166-1176. [PMID: 38609685 DOI: 10.1007/s12098-024-05095-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common childhood intraocular malignancy. Delayed presentation due to a lack of awareness and advanced intraocular tumors are a common scenario in low-middle income countries (LMICs). Remarkable treatment advances have been made in the past few decades allowing globe salvage in advanced intraocular RB (IORB) including systemic chemotherapy with focal consolidation and targeted treatments like intraarterial chemotherapy and intravitreal chemotherapy. However, a lack of availability and affordability limits the use of such advances in LMICs. External beam radiotherapy, despite risk of second cancers in RB with germline mutations, still remains useful for recalcitrant RB not responding to any other treatment. When choosing conservative treatment for advanced IORB, the cost and long duration of treatment, morbidity from multiple evaluation under anesthesias (EUAs), side effects of treatment and risk of treatment failure need to be taken into account and discussed with the parents. In this article, the authors discuss the ICMR consensus guidelines on the management of IORB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachna Meel
- Department of Oculoplasty and Ocular Oncology Services, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre of Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
| | - Suyash Kulkarni
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Lata Singh
- Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Girish Chinnaswamy
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Venkatraman Radhakrishnan
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Institute (W.I.A), Adyar, Chennai, India
| | - Renu Madan
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Archana Sasi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Tanvir Kaur
- Division of Non-communicable Diseases (NCD Division), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India
| | - R S Dhaliwal
- Division of Non-communicable Diseases (NCD Division), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India
| | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ke F, Li J, Wang N, Zhang X, Ren T, Liu R, Yan H, Guo Q, Ma J. Clinical characterization and long-term postoperative outcomes of retinoblastoma patients receiving enucleation and primary orbital implantation in early infancy: an observational study. BMC Ophthalmol 2024; 24:360. [PMID: 39169340 PMCID: PMC11337790 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03641-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To retrospectively investigate clinical characterization and the long-term postoperative outcomes of retinoblastoma (RB) patients receiving enucleation with primary orbital implantation in early infancy (0-6 months old). METHODS The clinical and follow-up data of 42 RB patients receiving enucleation with primary orbital implantation in early infancy at Beijing Tongren Hospital from December 2009 to January 2020 were analysed. The average follow-up time was 83 months. The patient group included 24 males and 18 females, 30 unilateral and 12 bilateral cases. A total of 44 eyes with 10 in stage D and 34 in stage E underwent 40 unilateral and 2 bilateral surgeries. 17 RB eyes received hydrogel and 27 RB eyes received hydroxyapatite implants. This study was performed by following the guideline of STROBE. RESULTS Enucleation combined with primary orbital implantation promoted survival and was safe with few and minor complications such as increased secretion, upper eyelid ptosis, and sunken eye sockets which were not affected by stages, lateralities, or implant materials. 55-80% RB patients exhibited satisfactory appearance and obvious or moderate motility of orbital implants according to the evaluation by doctors and family members. Family members were likely more optimistic about the appearance and more pessimistic about motility of the orbital implantation than doctors did.The quality of life was high as indicated by PedsQL3.0 or PedsQL4.0 scores ( ≧ 90 for > 75% patients). It was not affected by the stages, laterality, and implant materials, nor affected by the appearance and motility of the implants. CONCLUSIONS The outcomes of the combination of enucleation and primary orbital implantation for pertinent RB patients in early infancy are generally satisfactory with few and minor complications, high safety, appearance, and overall quality of life. Enucleation combined with primary orbital implantation in early infancy benefits pertinent RB patients in appearance, survival, and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Ke
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
- Department of ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442000, Hubei, China
| | - Jing Li
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Xuan Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center, Jinan, 250100, Shandong, China
| | - Tingting Ren
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Liu
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Haihan Yan
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Qihan Guo
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Jianmin Ma
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|