Effect of proton pump inhibitors on the clinical outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in solid cancer patients

Effect of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Immunotherapy Clinical Response in Advanced Cancer Patients: Real-Life Setting

The alteration of the gut microbiota mediated by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs could be involved in the clinical response associated with immunotherapy [immunocheckpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] in cancer patients. Due to the current controversy in the scientific evidence, it has been proposed to evaluate the correlation between the concomitant use of PPIs and the effectiveness of immunotherapy in a real clinical practice setting. Single-center retrospective cohort study that included patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA4, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or the combination ipilimumab-nivolumab in metastatic neoplastic disease. The clinical effectiveness of ICI, measured in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), was compared between the PPI-use versus PPI-no-use group. PPI-use group was associated with lower PFS [hazard ratio (HR):1.89 (1.38-2.59), P<0.001] and OS [HR: 2.02 (1.45-2.82), P<0.001] versus PPI-no-use group. However, this difference was not observed for pembrolizumab PFS [HR: 1.38 (0.93-2.39), P=0.160] and OS [HR: 1.41 (0.81-2.44), P=0.187]. The study showed significantly lower PFS and OS in the chronic PPI-use group (P<0.001), recent PPI-use group (P<0.001) and concomitant PPI-use group (P=0.001, 0.007) versus PPI-no-use group. However, late PPI use >30 days after the onset of ICI has no significant effect on the efficacy of treatment [HR: 0.92 (0.49-1.70), P=0.791; HR: 1.10 (0.59-2.05), P=0.756]. The concomitant use of PPIs in immunotherapy is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared with the group without PPI use. In addition, the study shows how the late use of PPIs does not have a significant effect on clinical benefit.

Prognostic value of hematologic parameters in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving anti-PD-1 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The association between hematologic parameters and anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors was generally examined without considering therapy lines and medicine types. The study was aimed to identify potential hematologic biomarkers associated with clinical outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line pembrolizumab and subsequent-line nivolumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

161 NSCLC patients were categorized into first-line pembrolizumab group (pembrolizumab group) and subsequent-line nivolumab group (nivolumab group). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic value of hematologic parameters for clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9.6 months in the pembrolizumab group and 4.1 months in the nivolumab group (HR =1.61; P = 0.012); the median overall survival (mOS) was not reached in the pembrolizumab group and 17.7 months in the nivolumab group (HR =1.37; P = 0.23). Of the 79 patients in the pembrolizumab group, baseline PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS)≥1% was an independent factor of longer PFS and OS. Age≥60 years, absolute platelet count (APC)≥220×109/L and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)≥120 were associated with inferior PFS. Of the 82 patients in the nivolumab group, absolute neutrophil count (ANC)≥3×109/L was associated with longer PFS, while LDH (lactate dehydrogenase)≥160 U/L was associated with inferior PFS and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)≥1.2 was associated with longer OS.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified multiple clinically accessible prognostic biomarkers in the peripheral blood in both the pembrolizumab and nivolumab subgroups.