Radiofrequency ablation treatment for aldosterone-producing adenomas

Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for aldosterone-producing adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency ablation (Ablation) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for treating patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas (APA).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases from inception to April 2024. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies comparing Ablation and LA for APA were included. Data on efficacy, safety, and other relevant outcomes were extracted and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 887 patients (414 in the Ablation group, 473 in the LA group) were included. Pooled analysis showed comparable clinical success rates (74.2% in Ablation vs. 82% in LA, p = 0.52) but a significantly higher rate of hypertension crises in the Ablation group (16.4 vs. 3%, p < 0.0001). Resolution of hypertension was more frequent in the LA group (44 vs. 27.2%, p = 0.003). Ablation was associated with lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stays. Still, no significant differences were found in the resolution of primary aldosteronism, complication rates, blood pressure reduction, or medication usage.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Ablation and LA demonstrate comparable efficacy in treating APA, with Ablation offering advantages in terms of lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stay. However, Ablation may be associated with a higher rate of hypertension crises during the procedure. The results suggest that Ablation is not yet a substitute for LA. A personalized approach considering patient-specific factors and institutional expertise is warranted when selecting the appropriate treatment.

Endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, radiofrequency ablation of aldosterone-producing adenomas (FABULAS): a UK, multicentre, prospective, proof-of-concept trial

BACKGROUND

Unilateral aldosterone-producing adrenal adenomas (APAs) are the potentially curable cause of 5% of all cases of hypertension. Their localisation (via adrenal vein sampling [AVS]) and removal (by laparoscopic adrenalectomy) require invasive procedures that are unattractive to patients. Molecular imaging-located, endoscopic ultrasound-guided trans-gastric radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is a potential novel, minimally invasive alternative to AVS and total adrenalectomy for the treatment of APAs in the left adrenal gland, which is very close to the stomach. We aimed to determine whether EUS-RFA can safely target a heterogeneous set of such tumours without damaging the rest of the adrenal gland or adjacent organs.

METHODS

We conducted a three-centre feasibility study in the UK of EUS-RFA as a non-surgical, adrenal-sparing treatment for left-sided APAs. Eligible participants were men and women aged 18 years or older, with a diagnosis of primary aldosteronism under the Endocrine Society's criteria, and with evidence of a left-sided APA, diagnosed by AVS or PET-CT. Recruitment was done in three groups, with data from the first four patients in the previously recruited group being reviewed by an independent Safety Committee before proceeding. We performed molecular imaging on two occasions, first to diagnose and locate the APA, and later to quantify the degree of ablation. Following a fine-needle biopsy for later confirmation of APA diagnosis, ablation was performed using a 19G ablation catheter. Its manipulation under continuous ultrasound guidance permitted an incremental number of 10-20 s treatments (also known as burns) as the study progressed. The primary endpoint was safety, judged by the occurrence of prespecified major hazards (gastric and adrenal puncture: perforation, haemorrhage, or infarction of major organs) 24 h or 48 h post-ablation. Secondary endpoints were reductions in the proportion of radiotracer uptake by the ablated APA compared with the contralateral adrenal on molecular imaging at 3 months, and international consensus criteria for biochemical and clinical success (reductions in plasma aldosterone to renin ratio and blood pressure 6 months post-RFA).

FINDINGS

Between Feb 21, 2018, and Feb 10, 2023, 44 patients were screened and 28 participants were recruited (21 [75%] male and seven [25%] female, mean age 57·7 years [SD 10·3]; 16 [57%] White, 11 [39%] Black, and one [4%] Asian). The 28 participants underwent 35 ablations on one (21 [75%]) or two (seven [25%]) occasions. All PET-CT-positive nodules were identified by the endoscopic ultrasound probe and successfully penetrated by biopsy and ablation catheters. None of the prespecified major hazards occurred in any patient. Localised reduction of radiotracer uptake by the PET-CT-positive APAs at 3 months was associated with complete or partial biochemical cure in 21 participants (75% [95% CI 55-91]), and with complete or partial cure of hypertension (clinical cure) in 12 participants (43% [24-61]). In four participants, disappearance of the APA on molecular imaging was associated with a systolic blood pressure under 135 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure under 85 mm Hg off all antihypertensive treatment.

INTERPRETATION

EUS-RFA appears a safe alternative to total adrenalectomy for the treatment of left-sided APAs and has the potential to completely cure primary aldosteronism and hypertension when most of the APA is ablated. These findings have informed the design of a pivotal study of thermal ablation versus surgery, which will determine the full benefits of EUS-RFA.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centres at Barts, University College Hospitals, and Cambridge University Hospitals, Barts Charity, and British Heart Foundation.

Rationality and implication of catheter-based adrenal ablation for bilateral primary aldosteronism

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) for bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) are the mainstay option recommended by guidelines, but poor compliance occurs due to numerous side effects. We aimed to examine whether catheter-based adrenal ablation could be an alternative treatment for bilateral PA.644 PA patients were included from a total of 6054 hypertensive patients. Adrenal CT scan and adrenal venous sampling (AVS) were both performed for PA subtype classification. Clinical and biochemical outcomes were assessed at 6 months after treatment according to the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria.93 patients with PA were recruited to be treated by adrenal ablation, including 25 bilateral PA and 68 unilateral PA according to AVS results. Office SBP and DBP significantly decreased from baseline levels, serum potassium levels increased and ARR significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in both the bilateral and unilateral groups. In the bilateral group, complete, partial and absent clinical success was achieved in 6 (24.0%), 11 (44.0%) and 8(32.0%) patients, respectively. In the unilateral group, complete, partial and absent clinical success was achieved in 12 (17.6%), 37 (54.4%), and 19 (27.9%) patients, respectively. The numbers of patients achieving complete, partial, and absent biochemical success were 15 (60.0%), 6 (24.0%), and 4 (16.0%), respectively, in the bilateral group versus 37 (54.4%), 9 (13.2%), and 22 (32.3%), respectively, in the unilateral group. In conclusion, we provide evidence for the beneficial outcomes of unilateral adrenal ablation for patients with bilateral PA. Our findings provide insight into an alternative option for patients with bilateral excess aldosterone.

The impact of superselective adrenal artery embolization on renal function in patients with primary aldosteronism: a prospective cohort study

Superselective adrenal artery embolization (SAAE) is an effective treatment for patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). However, the impact of SAAE on renal function in the PA population remains uncertain. We investigated the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and age, sex, body mass index, and diabetes-specific percentiles of eGFR residuals in 182 PA patients treated with SAAE in a prospective cohort from Nanchang SAAE in treating PA registry study. Data suggest that SAAE caused a significant decrease in eGFR from 91.9 ± 26.1 to 88.7 ± 24.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.05) after a median follow-up of 8 months in PA patients. Patients experienced a significant decrease in eGFR from 110.6 ± 18.9 to 103.8 ± 18.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.001) and a very slight increase from 71.1 ± 14.8 to 71.8 ± 17.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.770) with baseline eGFR ≥90 and <90 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Patients with high eGFR residuals (glomerular hyperfiltration) experienced a significant decrease in their eGFR levels from 123.1 ± 22.6 to 105.0 ± 18.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no significant impact of SAAE on the eGFR of patients with normal or low eGFR residuals. The very early eGFR changes (24 h after SAAE) best predicted the effect of SAAE on eGFR changes after median of eight months in PA patients. On the whole, SAAE seems to have a beneficial impact on renal function in patients with PA, the results of which vary depending on the patient's baseline eGFR and glomerular hyperfiltration status.

Cost Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation for Adrenal Adenoma in Patients with Primary Aldosteronism and Hypertension: Results from the ADERADHTA Pilot Study and Comparison with Surgical Adrenalectomy

PURPOSE

Primary Aldosteronism (PA) is increasingly considered as a common disease affecting up to 10% of the hypertensive population. Standard of care comprises laparoscopic total adrenalectomy but innovative treatment such as RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA) constitutes an emerging promising alternative to surgery. The main aim of this study is to analyse the cost of RFA versus surgery on aldosterone-producing adenoma patient from the French National Health Insurance (FNHI) perspective.

METHODS

The ADERADHTA study was a prospective pilot study aiming to evaluate both safety and efficacy of the novel use of adrenal RFA on the patients with PA. This study conducted on two French sites and enrolled adult patients, between 2016 and 2018, presenting hypertension and underwent the RFA procedure. Direct medical (inpatient and outpatient) and non-medical (transportation, daily allowance) costs were calculated over a 6-month follow-up period. Moreover, the procedure costs for the RFA were calculated from the hospital perspective. Descriptive statistics were implemented.

RESULTS

Analysis was done on 21 patients in RFA groups and 27 patients in the surgery group. The difference in hospital costs between the RFA and surgery groups was €3774 (RFA: €1923; Surgery: €5697 p < 0.001) in favour of RFA. Inpatient and outpatient costs over the 6-month follow-up period were estimated at €3,48 for patients who underwent RFA. The production cost of implementing the RFA procedure was estimated at €1539 from the hospital perspective.

CONCLUSION

Our study was the first to show that RFA is 2 to 3 times less costly than surgery. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT02756754.

Catheter-based adrenal ablation: an alternative therapy for patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma

Unilateral adrenalectomy is the standard treatment for patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA), but it lacks an option for patients with APA who refuse or are not suitable for surgery. In this study, we studied whether catheter-based adrenal ablation for APA is comparable to adrenalectomy. A total of 2185 hypertensive patients were screened, and 112 patients with APA were recruited and counselled on the treatment options. Fifty-two patients opted for catheter-based adrenal ablation, and 60 opted for adrenalectomy. Clinical and biochemical outcomes were assessed at 6 months after treatment. Factors associated with hypertension remission and the advantages and limitations of this approach were evaluated. According to the primary aldosteronism surgical outcome (PASO) criteria, complete and partial clinical success was achieved in 21 (40.4%) and 23 (44.2%) patients in the ablation group vs. 33 (55.0%) and 23 (38.3%) patients in the adrenalectomy group, respectively. Complete and partial biochemical success was achieved in 30 (57.7%) and 17 (32.7%) patients in the ablation group vs. 51 (85.0%) and 5 (8.3%) patients in the adrenalectomy group, respectively. The complete clinical success rate was not (P > 0.05), but the complete biochemical success rate was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.01). Factors associated with adrenal ablation-mediated hypertension remission were hypertension duration and serum potassium level at baseline. Compared with surgery, adrenal ablation requires a shorter operating time and time to resume physical activity. Catheter-based adrenal ablation may be an alternative and feasible option for APA patients unwilling to receive surgical treatment.

Thermal ablation in adrenal disorders: a discussion of the technology, the clinical evidence and the future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarise the emerging role of thermal ablation as a therapeutic modality in the management of functioning adrenal tumours and metastases to the adrenal gland.

RECENT FINDINGS

Observational evidence has demonstrated the benefit of thermal ablation in (i) resolving adrenal endocrinopathy arising from benign adenomas, (ii) treating solitary metastases to the adrenal and (iii) controlling metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma and phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma.

SUMMARY

Microwave thermal ablation offers a promising, minimally invasive therapeutic modality for the management of functioning adrenocortical adenomas and adrenal metastases. Appropriate technological design, treatment planning and choice of imaging modality are necessary to overcome technical challenges associated with this emerging therapeutic approach.

Radiofrequency ablation for adenoma in patients with primary aldosteronism and hypertension: ADERADHTA, a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation to treat aldosterone-producing adenomas.

METHODS

In an open prospective bicentric pilot study, patients with hypertension on ambulatory blood pressure measurement, a primary aldosteronism, an adenoma measuring less than 4 cm, and confirmation of lateralization by adrenal venous sampling were recruited. The primary endpoint, based on ABPM performed at 6 months after the radiofrequency ablation, was a daytime SBP/DBP less than 135/85 mmHg without any antihypertensive drugs or a reduction of at least 20 mmHg for SBP or 10 mmHg for DBP.

RESULTS

Thirty patients have been included (mean age = 51 ± 11 years; 50% women). Mean baseline daytime SBP and DBP were 144 ± 19 / 95 ± 15 mmHg and 80% received at least two antihypertensive drugs. At 6 months: 47% (95% CI 28-66) of patients reached the primary endpoint, mean daytime SBP and DBP were 131 ± 14 (101-154)/87 ± 10 (71-107) mmHg; 43% of them did not take any antihypertensive drug and 70% of them did not take potassium supplements. Few complications were recorded: four cases of back pain at day 1 postablation; three limited pneumothoraxes, which resolved spontaneously; one lesion of a polar renal artery.

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency ablation for hypertensive patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas seems to be an emerging promising alternative to surgery. Its efficacy and its feasibility have to be confirmed in a larger sample of patients.

Adrenal artery ablation for primary aldosteronism without apparent aldosteronoma: An efficacy and safety, proof-of-principle trial

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is associated with resistant hypertension and cardiovascular events. There are some limitations of current medical and surgical therapies for PA. To determine the efficacy and safety of catheter-based adrenal artery ablation for treatment of PA patients who refused both surgery and medical therapy, we performed this prospective cohort study. Thirty-six PA patients without apparent aldosteronoma were treated by adrenal artery ablation. Primary outcome was postoperative blood pressure and defined daily dose (DDD) of antihypertensive medications after adrenal ablation. Secondary outcome was biochemical success. We assessed outcomes based on Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria. Adrenal CT scan, biochemical evaluation, adrenal artery ablation and adrenal venous sampling (AVS) were underwent. After adrenal ablation, complete clinical success (normotension without antihypertensive medication) was achieved in 9/36 (25.0%) patients and partial clinical success (reduction in blood pressure or less antihypertensive medication) in 13/36 (36.1%) patients. Complete biochemical success (correction of hypokalemia and normalization of aldosterone-to-renin ratio) was achieved in 16/36 (44.4%) patients. Office-based and ambulatory blood pressures were reduced by 17/7 and 11/2 mmHg at 6 months after ablation, respectively. The plasma cortisol level in the ablation group decreased slightly, but no patient developed hypoadrenocorticism. Catheter-based adrenal ablation appears to produce substantial and sustained blood pressure reduction and biochemical improvement, with only minor adverse events in PA patients without apparent aldosteronoma. This therapy could be an important supplement for current PA treatments.

Effectiveness of Thermal Ablation for Aldosterone-Producing Adrenal Adenoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Biochemical Parameters

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of thermal ablation for aldosterone-producing adrenal adenoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed and CINAHL databases was performed to identify studies of thermal ablation for adrenal adenomas. Random effects meta-analysis models were used to compare pre- and post-treatment values of the following outcomes: systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), use of antihypertensive medications, and biochemical parameters (plasma aldosterone levels, aldosterone-to-renin ratio, and potassium levels). The rate of hypertension (HTN) resolution and improvement were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients from 7 studies were included in the analysis. The mean postablation follow-up duration was 45.8 months. Pooled data analysis revealed a statistically significant decrease in SBP (-29.06 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -33.93 to -24.19), DBP (-16.03 mm Hg; 95% CI, -18.33 to -13.73), and the number of antihypertensive medications used (-1.43; 95% CI, -1.97 to -0.89) after ablation. Biochemical parameters had returned to normal ranges after ablation in all studies. The cumulative rate of resolution or improvement in HTN status was 75.3%. On metaregression analysis, there was no statistically significant association between postablation blood pressure changes or serum aldosterone levels and study follow-up duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermal ablation for aldosterone-producing adrenal adenoma can be effective in controlling blood pressure, reducing the need for antihypertensive medications, and normalizing hormone secretion. Further higher-quality evidence is needed to confirm these results.