Comparative Effectiveness of Mesalamine, Sulfasalazine, Corticosteroids, and Budesonide for the Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis: Republished

Substantial Reduction of Systemic Corticosteroid Use After Primary Ileocaecal Resection in Swedish Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The corticosteroid-sparing effects of ileocaecal resection have not been thoroughly investigated in a population-based cohort.

AIM

To investigate systemic corticosteroid use before and after primary ileocaecal resection in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Through nationwide registries, we identified 1565 patients with Crohn's disease undergoing primary ileocaecal resection in Sweden 2006-2019. We stratified patients according to mean annual systemic corticosteroid (prednisolone equivalents) use in the last 5 years before surgery and compared Crohn's disease treatment after surgery.

RESULTS

Some 19% (290/1565) of the patients had a mean annual corticosteroid use of ≥ 1000 mg up to 5 years pre-operatively, of whom 33% (97/290) had ≥ 2000 mg. Mean annual pre-operative CS use did not decrease during the study period (p = 0.35). Compared with patients with < 1000 mg/year pre-operative steroid use, patients with ≥ 1000 mg/year had more frequent previous bowel surgery (10% vs. 16%), exposure to biologics (29% vs. 38%), and immunomodulators (56% vs. 83%). Patients with a pre-operative mean annual corticosteroid use of ≥ 1000 mg had a mean annual reduction in corticosteroid use of 1354 mg after ileocaecal resection (1847 mg pre-operative versus 493 mg post-operative). During follow-up (median 6.8 years), exposure to biologics was similar among patients with different levels of pre-operative corticosteroid use.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest a significant corticosteroid-sparing effect of ileocaecal resection in Crohn's disease patients with high pre-operative use, indicating a beneficial outcome of earlier surgical intervention. Despite increasing use of biologics, pre-operative corticosteroid use was consistent over the study period.

Medical Management of Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease-Strategies for Inducing and Maintaining Remission

Medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and crohn's sisease (CD) is complex. While there is significant overlap in medical therapies used for UC and CD, there remain few distinct differences in their management. The overall goals of therapy are to achieve disease remission, prevent complications, decrease the need for surgical interventions, and restore patients' quality of life. In the current article, we discuss currently available therapies and their mechanisms, limitations and side effects, followed by a comprehensive discussion of key consideration points in regards to the medical management.

[Efficient treatment of mild Crohn's disease and mild ulcerative colitis]

The cornerstone of treatment for mild ulcerative colitis is still the oral or topical (rectal) application of aminosalicylates (5-ASA). 5‑ASA preparations are often only administered orally in mild ulcerative colitis. Study data show that in ulcerative proctitis and left-sided colitis, rectal 5‑ASA preparations are even more effective than oral administration. In a next step, steroid-containing topical therapies should be used. Topical steroids such as budesonide are also primarily used in mild Crohn's disease. However, it is controversial whether treatment is necessary in symptom-free patients. There is still a lack of evidence to prove that more aggressive treatment (using immunosuppressants, biologics or small molecules) has a long-term benefit in these patients. Most guidelines are critical of the use of 5‑ASA in mild Crohn's disease. Nevertheless, there is some evidence for sufficiently high-dose treatment with 5‑ASA, although one must be aware of its limited effectiveness. However, there is clear evidence for the postoperative use of 5‑ASA in cases of mild recurrence.

Oral Budesonide and low serum albumin levels at surgery are associated with a higher risk of postoperative intra-abdominal septic complications after primary ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease: A retrospective analysis of 853 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The terminal ileum is the most frequent site of Crohn's Disease (CD) that necessitates surgery. Of the postoperative complications (POCs) associated with ileocaecal resection for CD, intra-abdominal septic complications (IASCs) include anastomotic leak, abscesses, and entero-cutaneous fistula. We aimed to identify predictors of IASCs and severe POCs (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) after primary ileocaecal resection for CD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-centre cohort study including all consecutive primary ileocaecal resection for CD in a tertiary IBD centre between 2004 and 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 853 patients underwent primary ileocaecal resection for CD. 307 (36.6 %) patients were receiving antibiotics, 253 (29.8 %), systemic steroids, and 178 (21.0 %) oral budesonide at surgery. At 90 days, 260 (30.8 %) patients developed POCs, 62 (7.3 %) severe POCs, and 56 (6.6 %) IASCs. At multivariate analysis, severe POCs were associated with lower preoperative albumin levels (OR1.58, 95 %CI 1.02-2.50, p = 0.040) and a history of cardiovascular diseases (OR2.36, 95 %CI 1.08-7.84, p = 0.030). IASCs were associated with lower preoperative albumin levels (OR1.81, 95 %CI 1.15-2.94, p = 0.011) and oral budesonide (OR2.07, 95 %CI 1.12-3.83, p = 0.021) with a dose-dependent effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The independent association, dose-dependent effect, and biological plausibility of budesonide and IASCs suggest a robust causal effect. Oral budesonide should be carefully assessed before primary ileocaecal resection for CD.

Common Mistakes in Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction: Errors are very common in medical practice and in particular, in the healthcare of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, most of these can be prevented. Aim: To address common errors in the management of IBD. Methods: Our approach to this problem consists in identifying mistakes frequently observed in clinical practice (according to our experience) in the management of patients with IBD, then reviewing the scientific evidence available on the subject, and finally proposing the most appropriate recommendation for each case. Results: The most common mistakes in the management of IBD include those related to diagnosis and differential diagnosis, prevention, nutrition and diet, treatment with different drugs (mainly 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and anti-TNF agents), extraintestinal manifestations, anemia, elderly patients, pregnancy, and surgery. Conclusions: Despite the availability of guidelines for both disease management and preventive aspects of IBD care, a considerable variation in clinical practice still remains. In this review, we have identified common mistakes in the management of patients with IBD in clinical practice. There is a clear need for a greater dissemination of clinical practice guidelines among gastroenterologists and for the implementation of ongoing training activities supported by scientific societies. Finally, it is desirable to follow IBD patients in specialized units, which would undoubtedly be associated with higher-quality healthcare and a lower likelihood of errors in managing these patients.

Guidelines for the management of patients with Crohn's disease. Recommendations of the Polish Society of Gastroenterology and the Polish National Consultant in Gastroenterology

This paper is an update of the diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of the National Consultant for Gastroenterology and the Polish Society of Gastroenterology from 2012. It contains 46 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment, both pharmacological and surgical, of Crohn's disease in adults. The guidelines were developed by a group of experts appointed by the Polish Society of Gastroenterology and the National Consultant in the field of Gastroenterology. The methodology related to the GRADE methodology was used to assess the quality and strength of the available recommendations. The degree of expert support for the proposed statement, assessment of the quality of evidence and the strength of the recommendation was assessed on a 6-point Likert scale. Voting results, quality and strength ratings with comments are included with each statement.

Smoking May Reduce the Effectiveness of Anti-TNF Therapies to Induce Clinical Response and Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cigarette smoking worsens prognosis of Crohn's disease [CD]. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between smoking and induction of clinical response or remission with anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane CENTRAL [June 2019] were searched for studies reporting the effect of smoking on short-term clinical response and remission to anti-TNF therapy [≤16 weeks following the first treatment] in patients with CD. Risk ratios [RR] with 95% confidence intervals [CI] were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Eighteen observational studies and three randomised controlled trials [RCT] were included. Current smokers and non-smokers [never or former] had similar rates of clinical response [observational studies RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.88, 1.05; RCTs RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.41]. When restricted to studies clearly defining the smoking exposure, smokers treated with anti-TNF were less likely to achieve clinical response than non-smokers [smokers defined as having ≥5 cigarettes/day for ≥6 months RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.83; lifetime never smokers vs ever smokers excluding former smokers RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.93]. Current smokers were also less likely to achieve clinical remission in observational studies [RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.98], though this association was not seen in RCTs [RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.21].

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking is significantly associated with a reduction in the ability of infliximab or adalimumab to induce short-term clinical response and remission when pooling studies where smoking status was clearly defined. When patients with CD are treated with highly effective therapy, including anti-TNF agents, concurrent smoking cessation may improve clinical outcomes.

First United Arab Emirates consensus on diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases: A 2020 Delphi consensus

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the main entities of inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic remittent inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The incidence and prevalence are on the rise worldwide, and the heterogeneity between patients and within individuals over time is striking. The progressive advance in our understanding of the etiopathogenesis coupled with an unprecedented increase in therapeutic options have changed the management towards evidence-based interventions by clinicians with patients. This guideline was stimulated and supported by the Emirates Gastroenterology and Hepatology Society following a systematic review and a Delphi consensus process that provided evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding diagnosis, evaluation of disease severity, appropriate and timely use of different investigations, choice of appropriate therapy for induction and remission phase according to disease severity, and management of main complications.

Systems biology in inflammatory bowel diseases: on the way to precision medicine

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic and recurrent inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. The elucidation of their etiopathology requires complex and multiple approaches. Systems biology has come to fulfill this need in approaching the pathogenetic mechanisms of IBD and its etiopathology, in a comprehensive way, by combining data from different scientific sources. In combination with bioinformatics and network medicine, it uses principles from computer science, mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, medicine and computational tools to achieve its purposes. Systems biology utilizes scientific sources that provide data from omics studies (e.g., genomics, transcriptomics, etc.) and clinical observations, whose combined analysis leads to network formation and ultimately to a more integrative image of disease etiopathogenesis. In this review, we analyze the current literature on the methods and the tools utilized by systems biology in order to cover an innovative and exciting field: IBD-omics.