Insurance Coverage and Utilization Improve for Latino Youth but Disparities by Heritage Group Persist Following the ACA

Insurance coverage change and survivorship care among young adult survivors of childhood cancer

OBJECTIVE

To (1) characterize change in type of insurance coverage among childhood cancer survivors from diagnosis to survivorship and (2) examine whether insurance change is associated with cancer-related follow-up care utilization.

DATA SOURCES

Participants in this study were derived from the Project Forward study, a population-based, observational study of childhood cancer survivors in Los Angeles County that used California Cancer Registry data to identify participants.

STUDY DESIGN

Multivariable logistic regression models incorporating survey nonresponse weights estimated the change in the marginal predicted probabilities of insurance change and survivorship care, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical covariates and clustering by treating hospital.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Study participants were diagnosed with cancer who were younger than age 20 years while living in Los Angeles County from 1996 to 2010 and were older than the age 18 years at the time of survey participation, from 2015 to 2017 (N = 1106).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Most participants were 18-26 years of age, male, diagnosed before 2004, Hispanic/Latino race/ethnicity, single, without children, highly educated, not employed full time, and lived with their parents at survey. Almost half (N = 529) of participants experienced insurance change from diagnosis to survivorship. Insurance change was associated with insurance coverage at diagnosis, as those who were uninsured were most likely to experience change and gain coverage during survivorship (by 51 percentage points [ppt], standard error [SE] of 0.05). Survivors who experienced any change had decreased probability of reporting a recent cancer-related follow-up care visit, a disparity that was magnified for those who lost insurance coverage (-5 ppt, SE 0.02 for those who gained coverage; -15 ppt, SE 0.04 for those who lost coverage).

CONCLUSIONS

Insurance coverage change was associated with lower cancer-related follow-up care utilization. Indeed, survivors who experienced any insurance coverage change had decreased probability of having a cancer-related follow-up care visit, and this was magnified for those who lost their insurance coverage.

Narrowing Insurance Disparities Among Children and Adolescents With Cancer Following the Affordable Care Act

Despite advances toward universal health insurance coverage for children, coverage gaps remain. Using a nationwide sample of pediatric and adolescent cancer patients from the National Cancer Database, we examined effects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation in 2014 with multinomial logistic regressions to evaluate insurance changes between 2010-2013 (pre-ACA) and 2014-2017 (post-ACA) in patients aged younger than 18 years (n = 63 377). All statistical tests were 2-sided. Following the ACA, the overall percentage of Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program-covered patients increased (from 35.1% to 36.9%; adjusted absolute percentage change [APC] = 2.01 percentage points [ppt], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31 to 2.71; P < .001), partly offset by declined percentage of privately insured (from 62.7% to 61.2%; adjusted APC = -1.67 ppt, 95% CI = -2.37 to -0.97; P < .001), leading to a reduction by 15% in uninsured status (from 2.2% to 1.9%; adjusted APC = -0.34 ppt, 95% CI = -0.56 to -0.12 ppt; P = .003). The largest declines in uninsured status were observed among Hispanic patients (by 23%; adjusted APC = -0.95 ppt, 95% CI = -1.67 to -0.23 ppt; P = .009) and patients residing in low-income areas (by 35%; adjusted APC = -1.22 ppt, 95% CI = -2.22 to -0.21 ppt; P = .02). We showed nationwide insurance gains among pediatric and adolescent cancer patients following ACA implementation, with greater gains in racial and ethnic minorities and those living in low-income areas.

Bridging the Gap between Sexual Health Education and Clinical Services: Adolescent Perspectives and Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Adolescents often lack access to accurate and appropriate sexual health information and services. Providing information about local clinical services during sexual health education classes is one strategy to increase awareness, yet many programs miss this opportunity. This study aims to learn about adolescents' experiences with sexual health education and their perceptions of barriers and facilitators to clinical care.

METHODS

Nine focus groups were conducted between April to July 2018 with 69 adolescents who had recently attended a comprehensive sexual health education program in California. Topics included information received about local clinics during class and barriers and facilitators to access care. Qualitative data were coded and analyzed for key themes and compared by sex and geographic location.

RESULTS

The majority of participants (89%) were Latino and most reported receiving relevant information about clinical services and had positive impressions of local services. Several mentioned that this information increased the likelihood that they would access services if needed. Common barriers to clinic services included parental disapproval, stigma, embarrassment, and confidentiality concerns. Facilitators included peer and family support, confidentiality of services, awareness and education, and accessibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Sexual health education programs can provide an important bridge to local clinic services and address adolescents' concerns.

The Affordable Care Act and Health Care Access and Utilization Among White, Asian, and Latino Immigrants in California

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine changes in health care access and utilization for White, Asian, and Latino immigrants associated with the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in California.

STUDY DESIGN

Using the 2011-2013 and 2015-2017 California Health Interview Survey, we examined changes in 2 health care access and 2 utilization measures among 3 immigrant racial/ethnic groups. We estimated the unadjusted and adjusted percentage point changes in the pre-ACA and post-ACA periods. Adjusted estimates were obtained using linear probability models controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need factors.

RESULTS

After the ACA was nationally implemented in 2014, rates of insurance increased for non-Latino (NL) White, NL Asian, and Latino immigrant groups in California. Latino immigrants had the largest increase in insurance coverage (14.3 percentage points), followed by NL Asian immigrants (9.9 percentage points) and NL White immigrants (9.2 percentage points). Despite benefitting from the largest increase in insurance coverage, the proportion of insured Latino immigrants was still lower than that of NL White and NL Asian immigrants. Latino immigrants reported a small but significant decrease in the usual source of care (-2.8 percentage points) and an increase in emergency department utilization (2.9 percentage points) after the ACA. No significant changes were found after the ACA in health care access and utilization among NL White and NL Asian immigrants.

CONCLUSIONS

Insurance coverage increased significantly for these 3 immigrant groups after the ACA. While Latino immigrants had the largest gain in insurance coverage, the proportion of Latino immigrants with insurance remained the lowest among the 3 immigrant racial/ethnic groups.

Insurance Coverage and Health Care Utilization Among Asian Youth Before and After the Affordable Care Act

OBJECTIVE

We examined changes in insurance coverage and health care utilization associated with the Affordable Care Act (ACA) among subgroups of Asian youth relative to non-Latino white youth.

METHODS

Data were from the 2010 to 2017 American Community Survey and National Health Interview Survey. Difference-in-difference models were used to examine changes in insurance coverage and health care utilization associated with the ACA among subgroups of Asian youth relative to white youth and subgroups of Asian youth in households below 200% of the federal poverty level relative to comparable white youth.

RESULTS

Since the implementation of the ACA, insurance coverage increased among all Asian subgroups and white youth. The magnitude of the increase in insurance coverage was larger among Asian subgroups than white youth. More pronounced increases were found among almost all Asian subgroups in households below 200% federal poverty level. Changes in health care utilization were limited and varied by subgroup. Increases in well-child visits were observed only among Chinese and "other" Asian youth.

CONCLUSIONS

Insurance coverage increased among Asian youth after the implementation of the ACA. Improvements in health care utilization were limited and differed by subgroups. Programs to improve health care utilization should be tailored to Asian youth according to subgroup.

State-Level Immigrant Prenatal Health Care Policy and Inequities in Health Insurance Among Children in Mixed-Status Families

Children in immigrant families are twice as likely to be uninsured as their counterparts, and states may influence these inequities by facilitating or restricting immigrant families' access to coverage. Our objective was to measure differences in insurance by mother's documentation status among a nationally representative sample of US-born children in immigrant families and to examine the role of state-level immigrant health care policy-namely, state-level immigrant access to prenatal coverage. Compared with US-born children in immigrant families with citizen mothers, children with undocumented immigrant mothers had a 17.0 percentage point (P < .001) higher uninsurance rate (8.8 percentage points higher in adjusted models, P < .05). However, in states with nonrestrictive prenatal coverage for immigrants, there were no differences in children's insurance by mother's documentation status, while large inequities were observed within states with restrictive policies. Our findings demonstrate the potential for state-level immigrant health care policy to mitigate or exacerbate inequities in children's insurance.