Risk factors for reporting poor cultural competency among patients with diabetes in safety net clinics

Socioeconomic and demographic factors influencing interpersonal communication between patients with chronic conditions and family physicians: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review assessed the socioeconomic and demographic factors influencing interpersonal communication between family physicians and patients with chronic diseases.

METHODS

We searched three databases (Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane) for published empirical studies reporting interpersonal communication between adults with chronic conditions and their family physicians. Gender, sex, race or ethnicity, low levels of literacy and/or health knowledge, and lower level of education or income were the factors of interest. Pairs of independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and appraised quality of the studies using MMAT-2018. We conducted descriptive and content analyses with a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

From 7579 identified deduped studies, we included 12 with a total of 22266 participants. Suboptimal interpersonal communication in several domains was more incident amongst ethnic minorities (p < 0.01) and individuals with lower language proficiency (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Studies used sex and gender interchangeably. The classifications of racial and ethnic origin, income, and education levels were inconsistent. Our findings suggest that socioeconomic and demographic factors can affect deleteriously in-encounter interpersonal communication.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This review might help guide a communication curriculum for medical students and increase awareness of potential health inequalities pathways in clinical practice.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023411895 (PROSPERO platform).

Shared Decision-Making and Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Shared decision-making is increasingly embraced in health care and recommended in cardiovascular guidelines. Patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-clinician communication, and models of patient-centered care are critical to improve health outcomes and to promote equity, but formal models and evaluation in cardiovascular care are nascent. Shared decision-making promotes equity by involving clinicians and patients, sharing the best available evidence, and recognizing the needs, values, and experiences of individuals and their families when faced with the task of making decisions. Broad endorsement of shared decision-making as a critical component of high-quality, value-based care has raised our awareness, although uptake in clinical practice remains suboptimal for a range of patient, clinician, and system issues. Strategies effective in promoting shared decision-making include educating clinicians on communication techniques, engaging multidisciplinary medical teams, incorporating trained decision coaches, and using tools (ie, patient decision aids) at appropriate literacy and numeracy levels to support patients in their cardiovascular decisions. This scientific statement shines a light on the limited but growing body of evidence of the impact of shared decision-making on cardiovascular outcomes and the potential of shared decision-making as a driver of health equity so that everyone has just opportunities. Multilevel solutions must align to address challenges in policies and reimbursement, system-level leadership and infrastructure, clinician training, access to decision aids, and patient engagement to fully support patients and clinicians to engage in the shared decision-making process and to drive equity and improvement in cardiovascular outcomes.

Narrowing the Divide: The Role of Telehealth in Type 1 Diabetes Care for Marginalized Communities

Widespread uptake of telehealth in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted geographic, demographic, and economic disparities in access to virtual care. However, research studies and clinical programs that predate the pandemic demonstrate the potential for telehealth-based interventions to improve access to and outcomes of type 1 diabetes (T1D) care for individuals in geographically or socially marginalized communities. In this expert commentary, we discuss telehealth-based care models that have been successful in improving care for marginalized T1D populations. We also outline the policy changes needed to expand access to such interventions to reduce established disparities in T1D care and promote better health equity among people living with T1D.

Insights Into the Relationships Between Health Communication and Doctor-patient Relationship: A Scientometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace and Validation of Questionnaires

In order to understand the research status of the relationship between health communication and doctor-patient relationship, and to explore a new path of the impact of health communication on doctor-patient relationship, this paper adopted qualitative methods to quantize the literature over the past 10 years in the Web of Science database and carried out Co-Authorship Analysis, Co-Citation Analysis and Co-Occurrence Analysis based on CiteSpace. In addition, according to the results of bibliometric research, self-designed questionnaires were used to verify the result. A convenience sampling survey was conducted through the online "Questionnaire Star" platform (https://www.wjx.cn) on May 8, 2022, and a total of 254 questionnaires were collected. Interviewees were asked to use social software to acquire health knowledge. Participants come from 21 provinces, 4 municipalities, and 4 autonomous regions across the country, which is geographically representative. The results show that uncertainty of social media information and the particularity of the epidemic make the research on health communication and doctor-patient relationship in social media become a new hot spot. Social media health information quality (source credibility and content trust perception), information asymmetry perception, doctor-patient communication, doctor-patient consistency, doctor-patient trust, doctor-patient relationship may be the key variables for constructing theoretical models.

Identifying and Reducing Disparities in Young Adults With Diabetes

This article outlines how social and health care determinants can affect young adults with diabetes. The authors provide a detailed description of each determinant's influence on diabetes self-management and offer solutions to help mitigate these harmful effects.

Physician-patient interactions in African American patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Demographic characteristics and relationship with disease activity and depression

OBJECTIVE

African American patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at high risk for poor outcomes. Both patient characteristics and the severity of the disease may influence physician-patient interactions, which in turn can impact disease outcomes. We aimed to examine whether patient perceptions of interpersonal processes of care (i.e. physician-patient interactions) varied by demographic characteristics, disease activity, and/or depression in African American patients with SLE.

METHODS

The Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL) is a cohort drawn from a population-based registry of people with SLE. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported data collected in 2016-17 among 698 African American participants (out of 863 GOAL participants). We assessed physician-patient interactions (communication, patient-centered decision making, and physician interpersonal style) through the Interpersonal Processes of Care survey (IPC-29), disease activity through the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire, and depression through the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Mean scores of the IPC-29 scales were compared by gender, age and educational attainment with Wilcoxon rank-sum 2-sample test or Kruskal Wallis test. We conducted linear trend test to examine demographic-adjusted scores of IPC across severity of disease activity and depression, and multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine the association of disease activity and depression with suboptimal IPC scores.

RESULTS

Overall, the lowest mean scores were observed for the patient-centered decision making domain, and specifically about how often doctors assessed patients' problems to follow recommendations and treatment among females compared with males (mean scores 3.13 ± 1.42 and 3.64 ± 1.38, respectively; p = 0.015). Mean scores for the assumed socioeconomic level subdomain (how often doctors make assumptions about a patient's socioeconomic level) were worse in individuals aged 18-34 (mean score 1.59 ± 0.94), compared to those aged 35-55 (mean score 1.47 ± 0.94; p = 0.033). Patients with some college or higher educational attainment reported poorer mean scores for most communication and interpersonal style scales than those who reported high-school or less. We found significant linear trends of poorer scores for all communication scales across more severe disease activity and depression symptoms, and poorer scores for all interpersonal style scales across more severe disease activity. Multivariate models revealed that while depression was associated with suboptimal quality of both communication (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.04-1.39) and interpersonal style (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.01-1.25), disease activity only increased the odds of suboptimal interpersonal style (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.25).

CONCLUSION

In the African American population with SLE, suboptimal interactions with providers may be explained in part by the mental and physical symptoms of the patient, regardless of age, gender and education. In addition to standard of care treatment, SLE patients with more severe disease activity and depression might need provider-based interventions focused on communication and interpersonal style.

Disparities in Care Delivery and Outcomes in Young Adults With Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the literature on care and outcome disparities in young adults (YA) with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and outlines remaining needs and suggestions to reduce disparities and improve care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite well-documented disparities and data from large national and international diabetes populations, the role that social determinants of health play in disease management is largely unstudied. Further, mechanisms of how these risk factors interact with the unique developmental needs of racial-ethnic minority and economically vulnerable young adults with diabetes remain unknown. Little intervention research has focused on improving outcomes in this vulnerable population. More research needs to focus on identifying and addressing risk factors in racial-ethnic minority and economically vulnerable young adults with diabetes. Interventions need to be adapted and developed to meet the unique needs of this high-risk population. Clinicians and healthcare systems must recognize the inequity in care and outcomes for this group and structure clinical programs and policies to promote their optimal care.

The Effects of Race and Racial Concordance on Patient-Physician Communication: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Racial disparities exist in health care, even when controlling for relevant sociodemographic variables. Recent data suggest disparities in patient-physician communication may also contribute to racial disparities in health care. This study aimed to systematically review studies examining the effect of black race and racial concordance on patient-physician communication.

METHODS

A comprehensive search using the PRISMA guidelines was conducted across seven online databases between 1995 and 2016. The search resulted in 4672 records for review and 40 articles for final inclusion in the review. Studies were included when the sample consisted of black patients in healthcare contexts and the communication measure was observational or patient-reported. Data were extracted by pairs of authors who independently coded articles and reconciled discrepancies. Results were synthesized according to predictor (race or racial concordance) and communication domain.

RESULTS

Studies were heterogeneous in health contexts and communication measures. Results indicated that black patients consistently experienced poorer communication quality, information-giving, patient participation, and participatory decision-making than white patients. Results were mixed for satisfaction, partnership building, length of visit, and talk-time ratio. Racial concordance was more clearly associated with better communication across all domains except quality, for which there was no effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite mixed results due to measurement heterogeneity, results of the present review highlight the importance of training physicians and patients to engage in higher quality communication with black and racially discordant patients by focusing on improving patient-centeredness, information-giving, partnership building, and patient engagement in communication processes.

Perceptions of Provider Communication Among Vulnerable Patients With Diabetes: Influences of Medical Mistrust and Health Literacy

Patient-provider communication is modifiable and is linked to diabetes outcomes. The association of communication quality with medical mistrust is unknown. We examined these factors within the context of a low-literacy/numeracy-focused intervention to improve diabetes care, using baseline data from diverse patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a health communication intervention. Demographics, measures of health communication (Communication Assessment Tool [CAT], Interpersonal Processes of Care survey [IPC-18]), health literacy (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults), depression, medical mistrust, and glycemic control were ascertained. Adjusted proportional odds models were used to test the association of mistrust with patient-reported communication quality. The interaction effect of health literacy on mistrust and communication quality was also assessed. A total of 410 patients were analyzed. High levels of mistrust were observed. In multivariable modeling, patients with higher mistrust had lower adjusted odds of reporting a higher CAT score (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.52, 0.86], p = .003) and higher scores on the Communication (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55, 0.88], p = .008), Decided Together (AOR = 0.74, 95% CI [0.59, 0.93], p = .02), and Interpersonal Style (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.53, 0.90], p = .015) subscales of the IPC-18. We observed evidence of an interaction effect of health literacy for the association between mistrust and the Decided Together subscale of the IPC-18 such that patients with higher mistrust and lower literacy perceived worse communication relative to mistrustful patients with higher literacy. In conclusion, medical mistrust was associated with poorer communication with providers in this public health setting. Patients' health literacy level may vary the effect of mistrust on interactional aspects of communication. Providers should consider the impact of mistrust on communication with vulnerable diabetes populations and focus efforts on mitigating its influence.