Recent advances in dialysis membranes

On the total albumin losses during haemocatharsis

Excessive albumin losses during HC (haemocatharsis) are considered a potential cause of hypoalbuminemia-a key risk factor for mortality. This review on total albumin losses considers albumin "leaking" into the dialysate and losses due to protein/membrane interactions (i.e. adsorption, "secondary membrane formation" and denaturation). The former are fairly easy to determine, usually varying at the level of ~ 2 g to ~ 7 g albumin loss per session. Such values, commonly accepted as representative of the total albumin losses, are often quoted as limits/standards of permissible albumin loss per session. On albumin mass lost due to adsorption/deposition, which is the result of complicated interactions and rather difficult to determine, scant in vivo data exist and there is great uncertainty and confusion regarding their magnitude; this is possibly responsible for neglecting their contribution to the total losses at present. Yet, many relevant in vitro studies suggest that losses of albumin due to protein/membrane interactions are likely comparable to (or even greater than) those due to leaking, particularly in the currently favoured high-convection HDF (haemodiafiltration) treatment. Therefore, it is emphasised that top research priority should be given to resolve these issues, primarily by developing appropriate/facile in vivo test-methods and related analytical techniques.

Hydrophilic Modification of Dialysis Membranes Sustains Middle Molecule Removal and Filtration Characteristics

While efficient removal of uremic toxins and accumulated water is pivotal for the well-being of dialysis patients, protein adsorption to the dialyzer membrane reduces the performance of a dialyzer. Hydrophilic membrane modification with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) has been shown to reduce protein adsorption and to stabilize membrane permeability. In this study we compared middle molecule clearance and filtration performance of nine polysulfone-, polyethersulfone-, and cellulose-based dialyzers over time. Protein adsorption was simulated in recirculation experiments, while β2-microglobulin clearance as well as transmembrane pressure (TMP) and filtrate flow were determined over time. The results of this study showed that β2-microglobulin clearance (-7.2 mL/min/m2) and filtrate flow (-54.4 mL/min) decreased strongly during the first 30 min and slowly afterwards (-0.7 mL/min/m2 and -6.8 mL/min, respectively, for the next 30 min); the TMP increase (+37.2 mmHg and +8.6 mmHg, respectively) showed comparable kinetics. Across all tested dialyzers, the dialyzer with a hydrophilic modified membrane (FX CorAL) had the highest β2-microglobulin clearance after protein fouling and the most stable filtration characteristics. In conclusion, hydrophilic membrane modification with PVP stabilizes the removal capacity of middle molecules and filtration performance over time. Such dialyzers may have benefits during hemodiafiltration treatments which aim to achieve high exchange volumes.

Controversy on the CONVINCE study findings: the PRO take

The CONVINCE study, recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, reveals a groundbreaking 23% reduction in the relative risk of all-cause mortality among end-stage kidney patients undergoing high convective volume hemodiafiltration. This significant finding challenges the conventional use of high-flux hemodialysis and offers hope for improving outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients. While some controversies surround the study's findings, including concerns about generalizability and the causes of death, it is essential to acknowledge the study's design and its main outcomes. The CONVINCE study, part of the HORIZON 2020 project, enrolled 1360 patients and demonstrated the superiority of hemodiafiltration in reducing all-cause mortality overall, as well as in specific patient subgroups (elderly, short vintage, non-diabetic, and those without cardiac issues). Interestingly, it was shown that hemodiafiltration had a protective effect against infection, including COVID-19. Future research will address sustainability, dose scaling effects, identification of subgroups especially likely to benefit and cost-effectiveness. However, for now, the findings strongly support a broader adoption of hemodiafiltration in renal replacement therapy, marking a significant advancement in the field.

Trial design of the MOTheR HDx study: a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized study to explore the morbidity and mortality in patients dialyzed with the Theranova HDx in comparison with online hemodiafiltration

Background

Dialysis patients have been maintaining a high rate of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. For this reason, it is to introduce necessary new technical advances in clinical practice. There is a relation between toxins retention and inflammation, mortality and morbidity. Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes are a new generation of membranes that allow the removal of a greater number of medium-sized molecules compared with high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD), but retaining albumin. MCO membranes have an increased permeability and the presence of internal filtration. Because of these special properties, MCO generated a new concept of therapy called expanded HD (HDx). Until now, online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has demonstrated its superiority, in terms of survival, compared with HF-HD. However, the comparison between OL-HDF and HDx remains an unsolved question.

Methods

The MOTheR HDx study trial (NCT03714386) is an open-label, multicenter, prospective, 1:1 randomized, parallel-group trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HDx compared with OL-HDF in patients treated for dialysis in Spain for up to 36 months. The main endpoint is to determinate whether HDx is non inferior to OL-HDF at reducing the combined outcome of all-cause death and stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), acute coronary syndrome (angina and myocardial infarction), peripheral arterial disease (amputation or revascularization) and ischemic colitis (mesenteric thrombosis).

Results

The trial has already started.

Alleviation of Oxidative Stress during Hemodialysis Sessions by Hemodialysis Membrane Innovation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective

Oxidative stress is prevalent in end-stage kidney disease patients receiving chronic hemodialysis and is associated with heavy cardiovascular disease burdens and increased mortality risks. Hemoincompatible hemodialysis membranes per se contribute to the activation of oxidative reactions and the generation of oxygen free radicals. Since the early 1990s, vitamin E-coated membranes have been extensively used in hemodialysis patients to reduce oxidative stress during hemodialysis sessions. However, the beneficial effects of vitamin E-coated membranes versus unmodified synthetic membranes on long-term patient-centered outcomes, such as survival, quality of life, and prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, remain controversial. Accordingly, novel antioxidant hemodialysis membranes were prepared to replace the use of vitamin E-coated membranes despite the translational research on these membranes unfortunately coming to a standstill. In this review, we first summarize the state-of-the-art on the use of vitamin E-coated membranes in hemodialysis patients to highlight their strengths and limitations. Then, we discuss the latest advances in fabricating antioxidant hemodialysis membranes and provide perspectives to bridge knowledge gaps between laboratorial investigations and clinical practice in fabricating antioxidant hemodialysis membranes.

Liver replacement therapy with extracorporeal blood purification techniques current knowledge and future directions

Clinically, it is highly challenging to promote recovery in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Despite recent advances in understanding the underlying mechanisms of ALF and ACLF, standard medical therapy remains the primary therapeutic approach. Liver transplantation (LT) is considered the last option, and in several cases, it is the only intervention that can be lifesaving. Unfortunately, this intervention is limited by organ donation shortage or exclusion criteria such that not all patients in need can receive a transplant. Another option is to restore impaired liver function with artificial extracorporeal blood purification systems. The first such systems were developed at the end of the 20^th century, providing solutions as bridging therapy, either for liver recovery or LT. They enhance the elimination of metabolites and substances that accumulate due to compromised liver function. In addition, they aid in clearance of molecules released during acute liver decompensation, which can initiate an excessive inflammatory response in these patients causing hepatic encephalopathy, multiple-organ failure, and other complications of liver failure. As compared to renal replacement therapies, we have been unsuccessful in using artificial extracorporeal blood purification systems to completely replace liver function despite the outstanding technological evolution of these systems. Extracting middle to high-molecular-weight and hydrophobic/protein-bound molecules remains extremely challenging. The majority of the currently available systems include a combination of methods that cleanse different ranges and types of molecules and toxins. Furthermore, conventional methods such as plasma exchange are being re-evaluated, and novel adsorption filters are increasingly being used for liver indications. These strategies are very promising for the treatment of liver failure. Nevertheless, the best method, system, or device has not been developed yet, and its probability of getting developed in the near future is also low. Furthermore, little is known about the effects of liver support systems on the overall and transplant-free survival of these patients, and further investigation using randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses is needed. This review presents the most popular extracorporeal blood purification techniques for liver replacement therapy. It focuses on general principles of their function, and on evidence regarding their effectiveness in detoxification and in supporting patients with ALF and ACLF. In addition, we have outlined the basic advantages and disadvantages of each system.

Systematic review to compare the outcomes associated with the modalities of expanded hemodialysis (HDx) versus high-flux hemodialysis and/or hemodiafiltration (HDF) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)

BACKGROUND

This systematic review was performed to identify recent published comparative evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of expanded hemodialysis (HDx) versus high-flux HD and/or hemodiafiltration (HDF) for long-term outcomes in end-stage kidney disease.

METHODS

Systematic literature review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Medline, Medline® Epub Ahead of Print, EconLit, Embase, and EBM reviews were searched to identify relevant publications from 2013 onwards. Eligibility criteria included clinical studies reporting mortality, hospitalizations, cardiovascular outcomes, economic evaluations, cost studies, and quality of life (QoL) studies.

RESULTS

A total of 79 relevant studies were identified with 29 prioritized for detailed analysis; four compared HDx to HD, one compared HDF and HDx, and 24 compared HDF with HD. A total of 13 randomized controlled trial (RCT)-based studies were identified; 11 compared HDF with HD, one compared HDx with HD, and one compared HDF with HDx. Follow-up duration ranged from 16 weeks to 7 years for HDF studies and from 12 weeks to 1 year for HDx studies. HDF showed significant improvements in mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, hospitalizations, and QoL versus high-flux HD. One study reported mortality outcomes for HDx and found no difference versus HDF. QoL benefits with HDx were reported in a small number of studies.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of HDF is supported by a robust evidence base that includes several RCTs. While HDx may offer benefits over high-flux HD, long-term studies are required to compare HDx with online high volume HDF.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022301009.

Assessment of the Influence of Asymmetric Triacetate Cellulose Membrane on the Rate of Removal of Middle Molecular Weight Uremic Toxins in Patients Treated with Postdilution Online Hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND: Postdilution online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) effectively removes uremic toxins of middle molecular weight from the blood of patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease. The rate of removal of uremic toxins depends on the type of dialysis membrane, blood flow rate (Qb), net ultrafiltration flow rate (Qnuf), and total convective volume (Vconv). AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of asymmetric triacetate cellulose dialysis membrane in patients on post-dilution OL-HDF. METHODS: Thirty-five patients treated with post-dilution OL-HDF hemodiafiltration for at least 3 months were examined. The main parameters for assessing the efficiency of removal of uremic toxins of middle molecular weight are the concentration of β2-microglobulin (β2-M) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in serum before and after a single session of post-dilution OL-HDF. The followings were used for statistical analysis: Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Student’s T test for bound samples and Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The average Vconv was 20.90 ± 3.30 liters/session. The β2-M reduction index during a single session of postdilution OL-HDF was 71.10 ± 6.39%, the IL-6 reduction index was 43.75 ± 15.60%, and the albumin reduction index was 4.55 ± 2.31%. CONCLUSION: The asymmetric triacetate cellulose dialysis membrane effectively removes β2-M and IL-6 during a single session of postdilution OL-HDF. The β2-M reduction index is ∼70%, the IL-6 reduction index is ∼40%, and albumin loss is <4.0 g/4 h. The examined dialysis membrane and dialysis modality prevent the development of amyloidosis associated with dialysis, microinflammation and reduce the risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in the population of patients treated with regular hemodiafiltration.

Impact of Hydrophilic Modification of Synthetic Dialysis Membranes on Hemocompatibility and Performance

The dialyzer is the core element in the hemodialysis treatment of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). During hemodialysis treatment, the dialyzer replaces the function of the kidney by removing small and middle-molecular weight uremic toxins, while retaining essential proteins. Meanwhile, a dialyzer should have the best possible hemocompatibility profile as the perpetuated contact of blood with artificial surfaces triggers complement activation, coagulation and immune cell activation, and even low-level activation repeated chronically over years may lead to undesired effects. During hemodialysis, the adsorption of plasma proteins to the dialyzer membrane leads to a formation of a secondary membrane, which can compromise both the uremic toxin removal and hemocompatibility of the dialyzer. Hydrophilic modifications of novel dialysis membranes have been shown to reduce protein adsorption, leading to better hemocompatibility profile and performance stability during dialysis treatments. This review article focuses on the importance of performance and hemocompatibility of dialysis membranes for the treatment of dialysis patients and summarizes recent studies on the impact of protein adsorption and hydrophilic modifications of membranes on these two core elements of a dialyzer.