Use of estimated glomerular filtration rate for drug dosing in the chronic kidney disease patient

Glomerular filtration rate measurement during platinum treatment for urothelial carcinoma: optimal methods for clinical practice

BACKGROUND

We assessed the accuracy of four estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) methods: MDRD, Cockcroft-Gault, CKD-EPI, and Wright.

METHOD

The four methods were compared to measure GFR (mGFR) in patients with urothelial urinary tract cancer (T2-T4bNxMx) receiving platinum-based chemotherapy at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, from January 2019 to December 2021. Using standardized assays, creatinine values were measured, and mGFR was determined using Technetium-99 m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc-99 m-DTPA) or Cr-51-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Cr-51-EDTA) plasma clearance. Patients (n = 146) with both mGFR and corresponding creatinine values available were included (n = 345 measurements).

RESULTS

The CKD-EPI method consistently demonstrated superior accuracy, with the lowest Total Deviation Index of 21.8% at baseline and 22.9% for all measurements compared to Wright (23.4% /24.1%), MDRD (26.2%/25.5%), and Cockcroft-Gault (25.x%/25.1%). Bland Altman Limits of agreement (LOA) ranged from - 32 ml/min (Cockcroft-Gault) to + 33 ml/min (MDRD), with CKD-EPI showing the narrowest LOA (- 27 ml/min to + 24 ml/min and lowest bias (0.3 ml/min). Establishing an eGFR threshold at 85 ml/min-considering both the lower limit of agreement (LOA) and the minimum cisplatin limit at 60 ml/min-allows for the safe omission of mGFR in 30% of patients in this cohort.

CONCLUSION

CKD-EPI equation emerged as the most suitable for estimating kidney function in this patient group although not meeting benchmark criteria. We recommend its use for initial assessment and ongoing monitoring, and suggest mGFR for patients with a CKD-EPI estimated GFR below 85 ml/min. This approach could reduce costs and decrease laboratory time for 30% of our UC patients.

Advanced Oxidative Protein Products Had a Diagnostic Accuracy for Identifying Chronic Kidney Disease in Adult Population

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a serious public health problem. Hyperglycemia stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species that cause oxidative damage to proteins. AOPPs constitute a group of oxidized dityrosine-containing proteins that are generated during periods of oxidative stress. They have proved to be a valuable early marker of oxidative tissue damage and active mediators of inflammation associated with the uremic state. To analyze if advanced oxidative protein products (AOPPs) have diagnostic accuracy for identifying chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the adult population. We conducted a diagnostic test validation study in 302 adults ≥20 years old, of both sexes, with and without T2D. After obtaining informed consent, a comprehensive clinical history, anthropometric measurements (weight, BMI) and blood pressure were recorded. Glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-c, LDL-c and AOPPs were determinates. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) corrected by body surface area (BSA, mL/min/1.73 m2), CKD-EPI and MDRD equations to identify five stages of CKD. This study follows the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD). The median value of AOPPs was 198.32 µmol/L (minimum-maximum value: 113.48-522.42 µmol/L). The group with patients diagnosed with T2D exhibited higher concentrations (median: 487.39 µmol/L) compared to the non-diabetic group (median: 158.50 µmol/L, p = 0.0001). The selected cut-off point was ≥200 µmol/L using the closest to the median value of AOPPs with sensitivity and specificity as follows: C-G: sensitivity 96.58%; specificity 80%; likelihood ratio: 4.83; CKD-EPI: sensitivity 95.76%; specificity 79.89%; likelihood ratio: 4.76; MDRD: sensitivity 86.55%; specificity: 73.22%; likelihood ratio: 3.23. A difference was observed between AOPPs and chronic kidney disease stage. This study provides evidence that AOPPs ≥ 200 µmol/L have diagnostic accuracy in identifying stage 4-5 CKD by C-G, MDRD and CKD-EPI equations in adults with and without T2D.

Quality use of medicines in patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects drug elimination and patients with CKD require appropriate adjustment of renally cleared medications to ensure safe and effective pharmacotherapy. The main objective of this study was to determine the extent of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP; defined as the use of a contraindicated medication or inappropriately high dose according to the kidney function) of renally-cleared medications commonly prescribed in Australian primary care, based on two measures of kidney function. A secondary aim was to assess agreement between the two measures.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of routinely collected de-identified Australian general practice patient data (NPS MedicineWise MedicineInsight from January 1, 2013, to June 1, 2016; collected from 329 general practices). All adults (aged ≥18 years) with CKD presenting to general practices across Australia were included in the analysis. Patients were considered to have CKD if they had two or more estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) recorded values < 60 mL/min/1.73m², and/or two urinary albumin/creatinine ratios ≥3.5 mg/mmol in females (≥2.5 mg/mmol in males) at least 90 days apart. PIP was assessed for 49 commonly prescribed medications using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation/eGFR as per the instructions in the Australian Medicines Handbook.

RESULTS

A total of 48,731 patients met the Kidney Health Australia (KHA) definition for CKD and had prescriptions recorded within 90 days of measuring serum creatinine (SCr)/estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Overall, 28,729 patients were prescribed one or more of the 49 medications of interest. Approximately 35% (n = 9926) of these patients had at least one PIP based on either the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation or eGFR (CKD-EPI; CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration Equation). There was good agreement between CG and eGFR while determining the appropriateness of medications, with approximately 97% of the medications classified as appropriate by eGFR also being considered appropriate by the CG equation.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that PIP commonly occurs in primary care patients with CKD and the need for further research to understand why and how this can be minimised. The findings also show that the eGFR provides clinicians a potential alternative to the CG formula when estimating kidney function to guide drug appropriateness and dosing.

Prediction Of Serum Digoxin Concentration Using Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate In Thai Population

PURPOSE

Serum digoxin concentration (SDC) monitoring may be unavailable in some healthcare settings. Predicted SDC comes into play in the efficacy and toxicity monitoring of digoxin. Renal function is the important parameter for predicting SDC. This study was conducted to compare measured and predicted SDC when using creatinine clearance (CrCl) from Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated from CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), re-expressed Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (Re-MDRD4), Thai-MDRD4, and Thai-eGFR equations in Sheiner's and Konishi's pharmacokinetic models.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with cardiovascular disease with a steady-state of SDC within 0.5-2.0 mcg/L were enrolled. CrCl and studied eGFR adjusted for body surface area (BSA) were used in the models to determine the predicted SDC. The discrepancies of the measured and the predicted SDC were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four patients ranging in age from 22 to 88 years (median 60 years, IQR 50.2, 69.2) were studied. Their serum creatinine ranged from 0.40 to 1.80 mg/dL (median 0.90 mg/dL, IQR 0.79, 1.10). The mean±SD of measured SDC was 1.12±0.34 mcg/L. In the Sheiner's model, the mean predicted SDC was calculated by using the CG and the BSA adjusted CKD-EPI equations and was not different when compared with the measured levels (1.10±0.36 mcg/L (p=0.669) and 1.08±0.42 mcg/L (p=0.374), respectively). The CG, CKD-EPI, and Re-MDRD4 equations were a better fit for patients with creatinine ≥0.9 mg/dL for prediction with minimal errors. In the Konishi's model, the predicted SDC using the CG and the studied eGFR equation was lower than the measured SDC (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In Sheiner's model, the CG and the BSA adjusted CKD-EPI equations should be used for predicting SDC, especially in patients with serum creatinine ≥0.9 mg/dL. The other studied eGFRs underestimated SDC in both Sheiner's and Konishi's model.

Comparison of equations for dosing of medications in renal impairment

AIM

The aim of this study is to determine the concordance among the Cockcroft-Gault, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in hypothetical dosing of renally cleared medications.

METHODS

A total of 2163 patients prescribed at least one of the 31 renally cleared drugs under review were included in the study. Kidney function was estimated using the three equations. We compared actual prescribed dosages of the same drug with recommended dosages based on the kidney function as calculated by each of the equations and applying dosing recommendations in the Australian Medicines Handbook.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the kidney function values estimated from the three equations (P < 0.001). Despite the good overall agreement in renal drug dosing, we found selected but potentially important discrepancies among the doses rendered from the equations. The CKD-EPI equation non-normalized for body surface area had a greater rate of concordance with the Cockcroft-Gault equation than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation for renal drug dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

There is need for a long-term multi-centre study in a diverse population to define the clinical effects of the discrepancies among the equations for drug dosing. Given the greater concordance of the non-normalized CKD-EPI equation with the Cockcroft-Gault equation for dosing, the recommendation by Kidney Health Australia and the United States National Kidney Disease Education Program that 'dosing based on either eCrCl or an eGFR with body surface area normalization removed are acceptable' seems suitable and practicable for the purpose of dosing of non-critical drugs in the primary care setting.

Disagreement in Estimates of Kidney Function for Drug Dosing in Obese Inpatients

BACKGROUND:

The Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations are used to estimate kidney function. However, utility has been questioned in the obese population.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate differences in estimates of kidney function in obese patients and implications for drug dosing.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective study of adult inpatients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m² and stable kidney function. Patients were categorized based on creatinine clearance (CrCl): group 1-CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min and group 2-CrCl 15 to 59 mL/min. Mean estimates of kidney function and recommended doses of 8 renally eliminated medications were compared.

RESULTS:

For the 166 patients included, mean estimates using CG, MDRD, and CKD-EPI for group 1 were 87 (23) mL/min, 91 (21) mL/min, and 96 (23) mL/min, respectively. Group 2 estimates were 42 (13) mL/min, 51 (15) mL/min, and 51 (16) mL/min, respectively. MDRD and CKD-EPI estimates were significantly higher than CG in 125 (75%) and 140 (84%) patients, respectively. Dose discrepancies were most often due to higher dose recommendations using MDRD or CKD-EPI compared to CG.

CONCLUSION:

Careful consideration of the method used to estimate kidney function, the method used for developing dosing recommendations, and the risk-benefit profile is warranted when designing drug regimens in obese individuals.

No Evidence for an Association Between Renal Function and Serious Bleeding Events in Patients Treated With Coumarins: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Although anticoagulation therapy is closely monitored in the Netherlands, coumarin-induced serious bleeding events are still observed. Current literature suggests that renal impairment may contribute to this.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between renal function and bleeding events during coumarin treatment.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was conducted using data from the PHARMO Database Network. Patients hospitalized for a bleeding event during coumarin treatment were selected as cases and matched on sex, birth year, and geographic region to up to 2 controls using coumarins without hospitalization for bleeding. All values of estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were selected in the year before index date (case hospitalization date) and compared between cases and controls using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 2224 cases were matched to 4398 controls (61% male; mean ± SD age 75 ± 11 and 78 ± 11 years among cases and controls, respectively). Availability of eGFR values was higher among cases compared with controls (mean ± SD eGFR values 4.5 ± 7.1 vs 3.2 ± 5.5), reflected in the significantly shorter time since last eGFR value (at index date, mean ± SD = 2.7 ± 3.0 vs 3.8 ± 3.1 months; odds ratio [OR] = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.89-0.92). No statistically significant difference was found for the mean eGFR value in the year before index date (mean ± SD 65.7 ± 22.8 vs 64.6 ± 20.9 mL/min/1.73 m²; OR per 10 units [95%CI] = 0.99 [0.96-1.02]).

CONCLUSIONS

No association between renal function and serious bleeding events during coumarin treatment was observed.

Drug therapy management in patients with renal impairment: how to use creatinine-based formulas in clinical practice

Purpose

The use of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in daily clinical practice.

Methods

eGFR is a key component in drug therapy management (DTM) in patients with renal impairment. eGFR is routinely reported by laboratories whenever a serum creatinine testing is ordered. In this paper, we will discuss how to use eGFR knowing the limitations of serum creatinine-based formulas.

Results

Before starting a renally excreted drug, an equally effective drug which can be used more safely in patients with renal impairment should be considered. If a renally excreted drug is needed, the reliability of the eGFR should be assessed and when needed, a 24-h urine creatinine clearance collection should be performed. After achieving the best approximation of the true GFR, we suggest a gradual drug dose adaptation according to the renal function. A different approach for drugs with a narrow therapeutic window (NTW) is recommended compared to drugs with a broad therapeutic window. For practical purposes, a therapeutic window of 5 or less was defined as a NTW and a list of NTW drugs is presented. Considerations about the drug dose may be different at the start of the therapy or during the therapy and depending on the indication. Monitoring effectiveness and adverse drug reactions are important, especially for NTW drugs. Dose adjustment should be based on an ongoing assessment of clinical status and risk versus the benefit of the used regimen.

Conclusion

When determining the most appropriate dosing regimen serum creatinine-based formulas should never be used naively but always in combination with clinical and pharmacological assessment of the individual patient.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-016-2113-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Renal Drug Dosing. Effectiveness of Outpatient Pharmacist-Based vs. Prescriber-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an outpatient renal dose adjustment alert via a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) clinical decision support system (CDSS) versus a CDSS with alerts made to dispensing pharmacists.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with renal impairment and 30 medications that are contraindicated or require dose-adjustment in such patients. The primary outcome was the rate of renal dosing errors for study medications that were dispensed between August and December 2013, when a pharmacist-based CDSS was in place, versus August through December 2014, when a prescriber-based CDSS was in place. A dosing error was defined as a prescription for one of the study medications dispensed to a patient where the medication was contraindicated or improperly dosed based on the patient's renal function. The denominator was all prescriptions for the study medications dispensed during each respective study period.

RESULTS

During the pharmacist- and prescriber-based CDSS study periods, 49,054 and 50,678 prescriptions, respectively, were dispensed for one of the included medications. Of these, 878 (1.8%) and 758 (1.5%) prescriptions were dispensed to patients with renal impairment in the respective study periods. Patients in each group were similar with respect to age, sex, and renal function stage. Overall, the five-month error rate was 0.38%. Error rates were similar between the two groups: 0.36% and 0.40% in the pharmacist- and prescriber-based CDSS, respectively (p=0.523). The medication with the highest error rate was dofetilide (0.51% overall) while the medications with the lowest error rate were dabigatran, fondaparinux, and spironolactone (0.00% overall).

CONCLUSIONS

Prescriber- and pharmacist-based CDSS provided comparable, low rates of potential medication errors. Future studies should be undertaken to examine patient benefits of the prescriber-based CDSS.

Clinical Decision Making in a Patient with Stage 5 CKD--Is eGFR Good Enough?

The development and widespread use of serum creatinine concentration-based prediction equations to calculate eGFR have been major advances for detection of patients with CKD and the epidemiologic study of CKD and its outcomes. However, these equations as well as those that also incorporate serum cystatin C concentration provide GFR estimates that, although reasonably precise on average, can differ markedly and in clinically important ways from actual GFR. Thus, it is important that clinicians who use these equations for clinical decision-making be familiar with their strengths and weaknesses and have an appreciation of their potential for error. More precise knowledge of actual GFR is important in certain clinical circumstances, including, as presented in this Attending Rounds, patients with stage 5 CKD, in whom decisions regarding dialysis initiation are necessary. Nephrologists should have the ability to accurately determine GFR when needed if clinical circumstances suggest inaccuracy of the calculated eGFR reported by the clinical laboratory.

Individualizing pharmacotherapy in patients with renal impairment: the validity of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula in specific patient populations with a glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min. A systematic review

Background

The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula is widely used in clinical practice to assess the correct drug dose. This formula is based on serum creatinine levels which might be influenced by chronic diseases itself or the effects of the chronic diseases. We conducted a systematic review to determine the validity of the MDRD formula in specific patient populations with renal impairment: elderly, hospitalized and obese patients, patients with cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis and human immunodeficiency virus.

Methods and Findings

We searched for articles in Pubmed published from January 1999 through January 2014. Selection criteria were (1) patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min (/1.73m²), (2) MDRD formula compared with a gold standard and (3) statistical analysis focused on bias, precision and/or accuracy. Data extraction was done by the first author and checked by a second author. A bias of 20% or less, a precision of 30% or less and an accuracy expressed as P₃₀% of 80% or higher were indicators of the validity of the MDRD formula. In total we included 27 studies. The number of patients included ranged from 8 to 1831. The gold standard and measurement method used varied across the studies. For none of the specific patient populations the studies provided sufficient evidence of validity of the MDRD formula regarding the three parameters. For patients with diabetes mellitus and liver cirrhosis, hospitalized patients and elderly with moderate to severe renal impairment we concluded that the MDRD formula is not valid. Limitations of the review are the lack of considering the method of measuring serum creatinine levels and the type of gold standard used.

Conclusion

In several specific patient populations with renal impairment the use of the MDRD formula is not valid or has uncertain validity.

Contrast Volume/Raw eGFR Ratio for Predicting Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Considering that contrast medium is excreted through the whole kidney in a similar manner to drug excretion, the use of raw estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rather than body surface area (BSA)-normalized eGFR is thought to be more appropriate for evaluating the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI).

METHODS

This study included 2,189 myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent risk factors. We used receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare the ratios of contrast volume (CV) to eGFR with and without BSA normalization in predicting CI-AKI.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve for the model including all the significant variables such as diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction, preprocedural glucose, and the CV/raw modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) eGFR ratio was 0.768 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.720-0.816; p < 0.001]. When the CV/raw MDRD eGFR ratio was used as a single risk value, the AUC of the ROC curve was 0.650 (95% CI, 0.590-0.711; p < 0.001). When the CV/MDRD eGFR ratio with BSA normalization ratio was used, the AUC of the ROC curve further decreased to 0.635 (95% CI, 0.574-0.696; p < 0.001). The difference between the two AUCs was significant (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Raw eGFR is a better predictor for CI-AKI than BSA-normalized eGFR.

Evaluation of acute kidney injury in the hospital setting

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is becoming more prevalent in the hospital setting and is associated with the worst prognostic outcomes, including increased mortality. Many different factors contribute to the development of AKI in hospitalized patients, including medications, older age, sepsis, and comorbid conditions. Correct evaluation and management of AKI requires investigation and understanding of important causative factors for each of the 3 pathophysiologic categories of renal failure. Preventative efforts rely on prompt recognition of AKI while avoiding iatrogenic insults in the hospital setting.

Drug dosing in patients with renal insufficiency in a hospital setting using electronic prescribing and automated reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate

In patients with impaired renal function, drug dose adjustment is often required. Non-adherence to clinical prescribing recommendations may result in severe adverse events. In previous studies, the prevalence rate of non-adherence to recommended dosing has been reported to be 19-67%. Using the clinical support system Renbase(®) as reference, we investigated the use and dosing of drugs in patients with impaired renal function in a university hospital setting using electronic prescription and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In all, 232 patients with an eGFR in the range of 10-49 ml/min./1.73 m(2) were included. We identified 436 episodes with administration of renal risk drugs (prescribed to 183 patients): 410 drugs required dose adjustment according to the eGFR and 26 should be avoided. In total, the use or dosing of 66 (15%) of the 436 renal risk drugs was not in agreement with recommendations in Renbase(®) . This reflects less disagreement with expert guidelines than reported previously, indicating a possible beneficial effect of electronic prescribing and reporting of eGFR. However, we also found that disagreement to some extent reflected inappropriate drug use. We conclude that despite implementation of electronic prescribing and automated reporting of eGFR, patients with renal insufficiency may still be exposed to inappropriate drug use, with potential increased risk of adverse effects. Initiatives to reduce medication errors such as the use of electronic decision support systems should be explored.

The validity of the modification of diet in renal disease formula in HIV-infected patients: a systematic review

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Renal dysfunction is highly prevalent in HIV-infected patients and may require dose adjustment of renally excreted antiretroviral drugs. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-4 formula is frequently used in daily practice to estimate patients' renal function. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the validity of the MDRD-4 formula in HIV-infected patients.

METHOD

A systematic search in Pubmed and EMBASE was done to identify studies which compared MDRD-4 with measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) in HIV-infected patients.

RESULTS

Five studies were included, which provided data from 464 HIV-infected patients with mean mGFR ranging from 87 to 118 ml/min/1.73 m(2). In all studies, results from the MDRD-4 gave an underestimation of the mGFR. Mean bias ((MDRD-4) - mGFR) ranged from -6 to -11 ml/min/1.73 m(2) across studies. The accuracy expressed in terms of P 30 ranged from 64 to 89 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The MDRD-4 formula is as valid in HIV-positive as in HIV-negative patients. Because the available studies comprised mainly HIV-infected patients with mildly impaired to good renal function (GFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), more research is needed to validate the MDRD-4 formula in HIV-infected patients with moderate to severe renal impairment.

The use of absolute values improves performance of estimation formulae: a retrospective cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by equations such as Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) or Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) is usually expressed as a Body Surface Area (BSA) indexed value (ml/min per 1.73 m²). This can have severe clinical consequences in patients with extreme body sizes, resulting in an underestimation in the case of obesity or an overestimation of GFR in the case of underweight patients. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of both estimation formula expressed in ml/min, instead of ml/min per 1.73 m², with a reference method.

METHODS

Retrospective single centre cross sectional study of 185 patients. GFR was measured with 51Cr-EDTA and estimated with CKD-EPI and MDRD. Bias, precision and accuracy of absolute estimated GFR was calculated.

RESULTS

Bias of CKD-EPI and MDRD formulae expressed as an absolute value was 0.49 and 0.27 ml/min respectively, which is lower than previously reported. Precision was 12.95 and 16.33 and accuracy expressed as P30 was over 92.43% for CKD-EPI. There were no significant differences in GFR between the reference method and the estimation formulae.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of CKD-EPI and MDRD formulae can be significantly improved in the individual patient if the absolute values are used by removing the BSA normalization factor. Absolute estimated GFR by CKD-EPI is comparable to measured GFR, improving the performance of this formula in the assessment of individual kidney function, thus providing clinicians with an alternative to reference methods.

Patient safety and estimation of renal function in patients prescribed new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

In clinical trials of dabigatran and rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), drug eligibility and dosing were determined using the Cockcroft-Gault equation to estimate creatine clearance as a measure of renal function. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare whether using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the widely available and widely used Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation would alter prescribing or dosing of the renally excreted new oral anticoagulants.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 4712 patients with known AF within a general practitioner-registered population of 930 079 in east London, data were available enabling renal function to be calculated by both Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD methods in 4120 (87.4%).

RESULTS

Of 4120 patients, 2706 were <80 years and 1414 were ≥80 years of age. Among those ≥80 years, 14.9% were ineligible for dabigatran according to Cockcroft-Gault equation but would have been judged eligible applying MDRD method. For those <80 years, 0.8% would have been incorrectly judged eligible for dabigatran and 5.3% would have received too high a dose. For rivaroxaban, 0.3% would have been incorrectly judged eligible for treatment and 13.5% would have received too high a dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Were the MDRD-derived eGFR to be used instead of Cockcroft-Gault in prescribing these new agents, many elderly patients with AF would either incorrectly become eligible for them or would receive too high a dose. Safety has not been established using the MDRD equation, a concern since the risk of major bleeding would be increased in patients with unsuspected renal impairment. Given the potentially widespread use of these agents, particularly in primary care, regulatory authorities and drug companies should alert UK doctors of the need to use the Cockcroft-Gault formula to calculate eligibility for and dosing of the new oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with AF and not rely on the MDRD-derived eGFR.

Estimating renal function to reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions

The aging process is characterized by relevant changes in pharmacokinetics. Renal function is known to decline with aging. However, as a result of reduced muscle mass, older individuals frequently have a depressed glomerular filtration rate (GFR) despite normal serum creatinine, and such a concealed renal insufficiency may impact significantly on the clearance of hydrosoluble drugs, as well as the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from hydrosoluble drugs. The assessment of renal function should thus be a mandatory item in the global examination of patient characteristics. Equations for estimating GFR have become very popular in recent years. However, different equations may yield significantly different estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values, which have important implications in dosing drugs cleared by the kidney. Current knowledge suggests that eGFR based on the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiological Collaboration (CKD-EPI) study equation outperformed eGFR based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation and creatinine clearance estimate based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula as a predictor of ADRs from kidney cleared drugs. More recently, the combined creatinine-cystatin C equation was shown to perform better than equations based on either of these markers alone in diagnosing CKD, even in older patients. However, its accuracy in predicting ADRs and usefulness in drug dosing is still to be investigated.

Monitoring renal function during chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Renal function is monitored during chemotherapy because chemotherapeutic drugs are excreted by the kidneys and are potentially nephrotoxic. Doses are adjusted according to the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), i.e. the more reduced the GFR, the lower the treatment dose. Plasma clearance of (51)Cr-EDTA is a reliable indicator of GFR before and during treatment with potentially nephrotoxic drugs, but its measurement is costly. GFR can also be estimated using an algorithm that converts plasma creatinine concentration to GFR, e.g. the MDRD equation. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the reliability of estimated GFR (eGFR) in detecting changes in GFR as assessed by the MDRD equation in cancer patients treated with nephrotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs.

METHODS

We included all patients from the Department of Oncology undergoing chemotherapy who were referred to the Department of Nuclear Medicine for measurement of GFR by the (51)Cr-EDTA plasma clearance technique at least four times during the study period of 12 months. The eGFR was calculated from plasma creatinine concentration and the MDRD formula. GFR was determined by the (51)Cr-EDTA plasma clearance method.

RESULTS

In 48 patients with a mean age of 47 years, GFR decreased from 86 to 73 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (mean values, p < 0.002) from the first to the last measurement, whereas plasma creatinine concentration and eGFR remained unchanged. In 13 patients (27 %) the finding of a decreased GFR led to adjustment of the dose of the chemotherapy drug. Eight of the 13 patients with decreased GFR also had a reduced eGFR but five patients had a normal eGFR. These five patients would have been treated with the nephrotoxic drug at a dose that was too high.

CONCLUSION

Neither creatinine plasma concentration nor eGFR (MDRD) can be recommended as a replacement for measurement of GFR with the (51)Cr-EDTA plasma clearance method in patients treated with nephrotoxic cytostatic drugs.

Preeclampsia in women with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

Women with chronic kidney disease have an increased risk of developing preeclampsia and its severe complications. Currently, there are no assessments available in order to quantify such risk. The aim of the study is to establish the incidence of superimposed preeclampsia in women with chronic kidney disease according to Serum creatinine (SCr) level.

METHODS

Pregnant women with chronic kidney disease were retrospectively identified from January 2000 to July 2010. We defined two groups according to SCr: Group 1: SCr ≤ 125 µmol/l; Group 2: SCr > 125 µmol/l. Incidence of preeclampsia, early preeclampsia (delivery <34 weeks), gestational age (GA) at diagnosis and delivery outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety-three nephropatic women were considered for the analysis. Group 2 (n = 14) compared with Group 1 (n = 79) had an increased incidence of preeclampsia (78.6% vs. 25.3%; p < 0.0001), an increased rate of pregnancy complications as early preeclampsia (82% vs. 38%; p < 0.03), a lower GA at diagnosis (29 ± 2 vs. 33 ± 1 weeks; p < 0.04) and a lower GA at delivery (30 ± 2 weeks vs. 34 ± 1; p < 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Women with chronic kidney disease and an increased creatinine threshold have a high risk of developing preeclampsia and delivering preterm.