Quality use of medicines in patients with chronic kidney disease

Renal drug dosage adjustments and adverse drug events in patients with chronic kidney disease admitted to the hospital: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to evaluate the agreement of prescribed drug dosages with renal dosing recommendations and describe adverse drug events (ADEs) contributing to hospital admissions of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study focused on CKD patients admitted to University Hospital Hradec Králové, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min. The necessity for renal dosage adjustments was determined using the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). For medications requiring renal dosage adjustment according to SmPC, agreement between the prescribed and recommended renal dosage was assessed. ADEs were adjudicated using the OPERAM drug-related hospital admissions adjudication guide.

RESULTS

Of 375 CKD patients, 112 (30%, 95% CI 25-34) were prescribed drug dosages in disagreement with SmPC renal dosage recommendations. Perindopril, metformin, and ramipril were most frequently dosed in disagreement with SmPC. ADE-related hospital admissions occurred in 20% (95% CI 16-24) of CKD patients.

CONCLUSION

CKD patients are often prescribed medication dosages in disagreement with SmPC renal dosing recommendations. Besides explicit factors, treatment goals, feasibility of monitoring and alternative treatment must be weighed when assessing drug and dosage appropriateness. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most frequent ADE that contributed to hospital admissions of CKD patients.

Impact of a pharmacy-led screening and intervention in people at risk of or living with chronic kidney disease in a primary care setting: a cluster randomised trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly recognised as a growing global public health problem. Early detection and management can significantly reduce the loss of kidney function. The proposed trial aims to evaluate the impact of a community pharmacy-led intervention combining CKD screening and medication review on CKD detection and quality use of medicines (QUM) for patients with CKD. We hypothesise that the proposed intervention will enhance detection of newly diagnosed CKD cases and reduce potentially inappropriate medications use by people at risk of or living with CKD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a multicentre, pragmatic, two-level cluster randomised controlled trial which will be conducted across different regions in Australia. Clusters of community pharmacies from geographical groups of co-located postcodes will be randomised. The project will be conducted in 122 community pharmacies distributed across metropolitan and rural areas. The trial consists of two arms: (1) Control Group: a risk assessment using the QKidney CKD risk assessment tool, and (2) Intervention Group: a risk assessment using the QKidney CKD plus Point-of-Care Testing for kidney function markers (serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate), followed by a QUM service. The primary outcomes of the study are the proportion of patients newly diagnosed with CKD at the end of the study period (12 months); and rates of changes in the number of medications considered problematic in kidney disease (number of medications prescribed at inappropriate doses based on kidney function and/or number of nephrotoxic medications) over the same period. Secondary outcomes include proportion of people on potentially inappropriate medications, types of recommendations provided by the pharmacist (and acceptance rate by general practitioners), proportion of people who were screened, referred, and took up the referral to visit their general practitioners, and economic and other patient-centred outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Sydney (2022/044) and the findings of the study will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journal(s).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000329763).

The association between polypharmacy and health-related quality of life among non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The United States government spends over $85 billion annually on treating non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with CKD are prescribed a multitude of medications to manage numerous comorbidities associated with CKD. Thus, this study aims to investigate the association between polypharmacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in non-dialysis CKD patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study utilized data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2010 through 2019. We classified polypharmacy into three groups based on the number of medication classes: ≤ 4 (minor polypharmacy), 5 through 9 (major polypharmacy), and ≥ 10 (hyperpolypharmacy). To measure HRQoL, a Physical Component Summary (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) were obtained from the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 and Veteran's Rand 12 item. We applied multivariable ordinary least squares regression to assess the association between polypharmacy and HRQoL in non-dialysis CKD patients.

RESULTS

A total of 649 CKD patients (weighted n = 667,989) were included. Patients with minor polypharmacy, major polypharmacy, and hyperpolypharmacy were 22.27%, 48.24%, and 29.48%, respectively. Major polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were significantly and negatively associated with lower PCS scores when compared with minor polypharmacy [Beta = -3.12 (95% CI: -3.62, -2.62), p-value<0.001; Beta = -4.13 (95CI: -4.74, -3.52), p-value<0.001]. Similarly, major polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were significantly and negatively associated with lower MCS scores when compared to minor polypharmacy [Beta = -0.38 (95% CI: -0.55, -0.20), p-value<0.001; Beta = -1.70 (95% CI: -2.01, -1.40), p-value<0.001]. The top 5 classes of medications used by CKD patients were antihyperlipidemic (56.31%), beta-adrenergic blockers (49.71%), antidiabetics (42.14%), analgesics (42.17%), and diuretics (39.65%).

CONCLUSION

Our study found that both major polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were associated with lower HRQoL among non-dialysis CKD patients. This study highlights the need for further evaluation of the combination of medications taken by non-dialysis CKD patients to minimize unnecessary and inappropriate medication use.

The association between renal impairment and polypharmacy among older Palestinian patients: a multi-center cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the association between renal impairment and polypharmacy among older Palestinian patients visiting primary healthcare centers and to examine potentially inappropriate medications among older patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among PHC clinic attendees aged 65 and older. We used medical records and an interviewer-administered questionnaire for data collection. Participants with eGFR less than 60mls/min/1.73 m2 were categorized as renal impaired; we then calculated the prevalence of renal impairment and used Poisson multivariable regression model with robust variance to identify associated factors. Beer's criteria and literature reviews were used to evaluate renal impairment patients' medication and to determine the frequency of PIPs.

RESULTS

The study included 421 participants (224 female, 197 male), and 66.3% were between the ages of 65 and 75. The prevalence of renal impairment was 30.2% (95%CI: 25.8-34.6%). Polypharmacy [aPR = 2.7, 95%CI: 1.7-4.3], stroke [aPR = 2.6, 95%CI: 1.1-2.3], females [aPR = 1.7, 95%CI: 1.2-2.5], and older patients over the age of 80 [aPR = 2.4, 95%CI: 1.6-3.5] were the main factors associated with renal impairment. RAAS (54.3%), metformin (39.3%), and sulfonylurea (20.4%) were the most frequently reported PIP in renal impairment patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a relationship between polypharmacy and renal impairment. Some people with renal impairment receive drugs that those with kidney illness should avoid or use with caution. It is important to prescribe only necessary medication, choose non-nephrotoxic alternatives, and frequently monitor renal function.

Appropriateness of drug prescriptions in patients with chronic kidney disease in primary care: a double-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a highly prevalent disease worldwide. A basic pillar for the management of a patient with CKD is the safe use of drugs. Inadequate dosing of medication or contraindicated drugs in renal impairment can lead to negative outcomes. The primary objective was to analyse the drug prescriptions of patients with CKD from two primary care centres to see if they were optimally adapted to the patient's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted in two urban primary care centres. The study period was between September-October 2019. Patients over 18 years of age, with established CKD and with an eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73m² for at least three months were included. Their demographic data (age and sex) and clinical variables such as associated comorbidities, eGFR value were retrospectively registered. Finally, their medication plans were reviewed in order to detect: inappropriate prescribing (IP), defined as an incorrect dose/frequency or contraindicated drug according to the renal function of the patient; nephrotoxic drugs and drugs with a high sodium content.

RESULTS

A total of 273 patients were included. The most common patient profile was an elderly woman, polymedicated, with other concomitant diseases and with mild CKD. Two hundred and one IPs were detected, 13.9% of which were contraindicated drugs. Of all patients, 49.1% had been prescribed at least one IP on their medication plan, 93.8% had some potentially nephrotoxic drug and 8.4% had drugs with a high sodium content prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CKD are at increased risk of medication-related problems. It is necessary to implement measures to improve the safety in the prescription of drugs in patients with CKD.

Pharmacotherapy Problems in Best Possible Medication History of Hospital Admission in the Elderly

Transfer of care is a sensitive process, especially for the elderly. Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and renal risk drugs (RRDs) are important issues in the elderly. The aim of the study was to expand the use of the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) and to evaluate polypharmacy, PIMs, DDIs, and inappropriately prescribed RRDs on hospital admission, as well as to determine their mutual relationship and association with patients’ characteristics. An observational prospective study was conducted at the Internal Medicine Clinic of Clinical Hospital Dubrava. The study included 383 elderly patients. Overall, 49.9% of patients used 5−9 prescription medications and 31.8% used 10 or more medications. EU(7)-PIMs occurred in 80.7% (n = 309) of the participants. In total, 90.6% of participants had ≥1 potential DDI. In total, 43.6% of patients were found to have estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, of which 64.7% of patients had one or more inappropriately prescribed RRDs. The clinical pharmacist detected a high incidence of polypharmacy, PIMs, DDIs, and inappropriately prescribed RRDs on hospital admission. This study highlights the importance of early detection of pharmacotherapy problems by using the BPMH in order to prevent their circulation during a hospital stay. The positive correlations between polypharmacy, PIMs, DDIs, and inappropriately prescribed RRDs indicate that they are not independent, but rather occur simultaneously.

Comparing the renal outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare renal function changes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) prescribed different oral anticoagulants (OACs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of Australian national primary care data. A total of 12,562 patients with AF and initiated OAC between 1 Jan 2013 and 31 Dec 2017 were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for balancing baseline characteristics and the risks of decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients prescribed each OAC were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Compared with warfarin, prescribing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was associated with a lower risk of renal function decline per 1000 person-years: hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.81, p<0.001 for ≥30% decline in eGFR; HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.20-0.41, p<0.001 for eGFR decline to ≤30 mL/min/1.73m²; and HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, p<0.001 for serum creatinine doubling. Compared with dabigatran, rivaroxaban use had a significantly lowered risk of decline in eGFR to ≤30 mL/min/1.73m² (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66, p=0.003) and risk of doubling of serum creatinine (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.95, p=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of renal function decline appeared to be lower in patients prescribed DOACs versus warfarin.

Oral Anticoagulant Treatment and the Risk of Dementia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background

We compared the dementia incidence rate between users and nonusers of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in a large cohort of primary care patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods and Results

We performed a retrospective study using an Australia‐wide primary care data set, MedicineInsight. Patients aged ≥18 years and newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, and with no recorded history of dementia or stroke were included and followed until December 31, 2018. We applied a propensity score for 1:1 pair matching of baseline covariates and Cox regression for comparing the dementia incidence rates for OAC users and nonusers. Data were analyzed for 18 813 patients with atrial fibrillation (aged 71.9±12.6 years, 47.1% women); 11 419 had a recorded OAC prescription for at least 80% of their follow‐up time. During the mean follow‐up time of 3.7±2.0 years, 425 patients (2.3%; 95% CI, 2.1%–2.5%) had a documented diagnosis of dementia. After propensity matching, the incidence of dementia was significantly lower in OAC users (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.80; P<0.001) compared with nonusers. Direct‐acting oral anticoagulant users had a lower incidence of dementia than non‐OAC users (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33–0.73; P<0.001) or warfarin users (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28–0.74; P=0.002). No significant difference was seen between warfarin users and non‐OAC users (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.70–1.70; P=0.723).

Conclusions

In patients with atrial fibrillation, direct‐acting oral anticoagulant use may result in a lower incidence of dementia compared with treatment with either warfarin or no anticoagulant.

Ten-year trends in prescribing of antiarrhythmic drugs in Australian primary care patients with atrial fibrillation

Despite changes in antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) choice in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), trends in AAD prescribing remain not investigated. We aimed to examine these changes using a nationwide Australian general practice data from 2009 to 2018. Over the 10 years, AAD prescribing in patients with AF decreased, which was mainly due to a reduction in the use of amiodarone, sotalol and digoxin. In contrast, the use of beta-blockers and flecainide increased.

Evaluation of Renal Function Testing in Older Australian Veterans Dispensed Medicines that Require Renal Function Monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Renal function testing should be performed prior to initiating medicines that require dose adjustment in renal impairment, with ongoing monitoring in continued use, particularly in older people. There is little evidence regarding the extent to which renal function monitoring is performed in older Australians dispensed medicines requiring renal function monitoring.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the extent of renal function testing in older people dispensed medicines requiring renal function monitoring.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of administrative claims data from the Australian Government Department of Veterans' Affairs was conducted for people aged 65 years or older who were dispensed one or more medicines requiring renal function monitoring, from 1 June 2019 to 30 September 2019, to investigate the proportion of people with a claim for a pathology test that included creatinine levels in the 6-12 months before or after dispensing of a medicine requiring renal function monitoring.

RESULTS

There were 100,113 people who were dispensed at least one medicine requiring renal function monitoring during the study period, of whom 15% had a history of renal impairment and 16% had diabetes mellitus. Sixty-one percent had a claim for a test in the prior 6 months; this increased to 80% of participants with a claim for a test in the prior 12 months. The rate of claims for testing was lower in aged care facility residents compared with people living in the community (54% vs 62% in the previous 6 months; p < 0.001), and was higher in people with diabetes (75% vs 58%; p < 0.001), history of renal impairment (91% vs 59%; p < 0.001) or heart failure (77% vs 60%; p < 0.001) compared with those without these conditions.

CONCLUSION

Medicines that require renal function monitoring are commonly used in older Australians, and while the majority have claims for tests that include renal function, some are missing out.

Stroke risk reassessment and oral anticoagulant initiation in primary care patients with atrial fibrillation: A ten-year follow-up

AIM

To examine the change in stroke risk over time and determine the proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were initiated on an oral anticoagulant (OAC) as their stroke risk increased from low/moderate to high, using the Australian general practice data set, MedicineInsight.

METHODS

A total of 2296 patients diagnosed with AF between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2008, aged 18 years or older and not initiated on an OAC before 2009, were included. We assessed the change in stroke risk and the proportion of patients who had a recorded prescription of an OAC, each year from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018.

RESULTS

At baseline, 23.9%, 22.9% and 53.2% were categorised as being at low (score = 0), moderate (score = 1) and high stroke risk (score ≥ 2), respectively, using the sexless CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc (CHA₂ DS₂ -VA) score. Overall, the CHA₂ DS₂ -VA score increased by a mean of 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.39) points over the study period. Nearly two-thirds of patients (65%, 412/632) whose stroke risk changed from baseline low/moderate to high were subsequently prescribed an OAC. The median (interquartile range) lag time from becoming high stroke risk to having OAC initiation was 2 (5) years.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one-third of patients reclassified as being at high risk of stroke during the study period were not prescribed OAC therapy. Furthermore, the delay in OAC initiation following classification as being at high risk was a median of 2 years, suggesting that more frequent stroke reassessment is needed.

Factors influencing oral anticoagulant use in patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

We investigated factors that influenced oral anticoagulant (OAC) initiation and choice in Australian general practice patients newly diagnosed with AF.

METHODS

Using an Australian nationally representative general practice dataset, MedicineInsight, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF between January 2009 and April 2019. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with OAC initiation and choice.

RESULTS

A total of 63 212 patients with AF (53.7% males, mean age 72.4 years) were identified. Nearly two-thirds of these patients (40 854 [64.6%]) were initiated on an OAC, at a median time of 6 days after the documented diagnosis date. The proportion of patients who were initiated an OAC increased from 44.8% in 2009 to 72.2% in 2019 (P < .001). High risk of stroke (CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc, adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 4.39 [95% CI, 3.99-4.83]), low risk of bleeding (ORBIT, AOR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.72-2.03]), not having a recorded history of dementia (AOR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.65-1.98]) and male sex (AOR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.22-1.35]) were independently associated with OAC initiation. Direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use increased from 11.9% in 2011 to 94.0% of all OAC initiations in April 2019 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of newly diagnosed patients with AF initiated on OAC increased markedly following the introduction of the DOACs. Of those initiated, 9 in 10 were receiving a DOAC at the end of the study period. There is potential underuse in women and individuals with dementia.

Five-Year Trends in Potential Drug Interactions with Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: An Australian-Wide Study

Background: Co-prescribing medications that can interact with direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may decrease their safety and efficacy. The aim of this study was to examine the co-prescribing of such medications with DOACs using the Australian national general practice dataset, MedicineInsight, over a five-year period. Methods: We performed five sequential cross-sectional analyses in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a recorded DOAC prescription. Patients were defined as having a drug interaction if they had a recorded prescription of an interacting medication while they had had a recorded prescription of DOAC in the previous six months. The sample size for the cross-sectional analyses ranged from 5333 in 2014 to 19,196 in 2018. Results: The proportion of patients who had potential drug interactions with a DOAC decreased from 45.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 44.6%–47.4%) in 2014 to 39.9% (95% CI 39.2%–40.6%) in 2018, p for trend < 0.001. During this period, the most frequent interacting class of medication recorded as having been prescribed with DOACs was selective serotonin/serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) antidepressants, followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and amiodarone. Conclusions: Overall, potential drug interactions with DOACs have decreased slightly over the last five years; however, the rate of possible interaction with SSRIs/SNRIs has remained relatively unchanged and warrants awareness-raising amongst prescribers.