Effectiveness of sentinel lymph node scintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probing with gold standard elective neck dissection in patients with N0 oral squamous cell cancers

Omitting elective neck dissection in cT1/2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma with sentinel lymph node metastasis: A prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the distribution of non-sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and to determine the feasibility of omitting elective neck dissection (END) in cases of cT1/2N0 oral cancer presenting with SLN metastasis.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients with cT1/2N0 oral cancer underwent SLN biopsy using a γ-probe alongside methylene blue staining, followed by subsequent END. The primary outcome variable was non-SLN metastasis, with its predictors evaluated through logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients with detectable SLNs were analyzed. Logistic regression revealed a significant odds ratio of 4.28 [95 % confidence interval: 2.11-14.56] for predicting non-SLN metastasis when comparing a depth of invasion greater than 4.0 mm to a DOI of 4.0 mm or less. Among the six cases of non-SLN metastasis, three patients with negative SLN biopsy results exhibited metastasis; one was found in ipsilateral level V and two in contralateral level Ib. In contrast, all three patients with positive SLN biopsy results had a DOI surpassing 4.0 mm, presenting with at least two positive SLNs. Non-SLN metastasis was detected in ipsilateral level III for one patient and at level IV for two others.

CONCLUSION

END may be judiciously omitted in cases where only one positive SLN is identified in early-stage oral cancer with a depth of invasion of ≤ 4.0 mm.

Evaluation of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells in node-negative early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a cross-sectional study in tertiary-level hospitals in eastern India

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to investigate the incidence of micrometastasis (MMs) and isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in node-negative early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (T1-T2 N0). The secondary objective was to correlate the incidence with the clinicopathologic parameters of age, sex, depth of invasion, pattern of invasion, host lymphocytic response, and size and grade of primary tumor.

STUDY DESIGN

Micrometastasis and ITCs in cervical nodes of 30 patients with early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma were detected and compared using 3 methods: routine hematoxylin and eosin staining, serial-sectioning at intervals of 150 microns employing hematoxylin and eosin, and serial sectioning pan-cytokeratin immunostaining. Associations with clinicopathological variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

Metastatic tumor cells were detected in the cervical nodes of 2 patients using serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry, resulting in upstaging of 6.6% of all cases. Level I and II lymph nodes were primarily involved.

CONCLUSIONS

Early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma has a significant potential for MMs that frequently go undetected in routine histopathologic examination. However, laborious and technique-sensitive, serial sectioning in combination with pan-cytokeratin staining (AE1/AE3) may aid in detecting MMs and ITCs in patients with early-stage OTSCC.

Management of clinically node-negative early-stage oral cancer: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

The best treatments for the clinically node-negative (cN0) neck in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients are a subject of ongoing debate and there is no consensus. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the most effective treatment and to rank treatments based on their effectiveness. A systematic search was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to retrieve RCTs that compared therapeutic neck dissection (TND), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and elective neck dissection (END). The outcomes analysed were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and nodal recurrence. Hazard ratios and risk ratios were calculated by direct meta-analysis and NMA. Ten RCTs with a total of 1858 patients were eligible for inclusion. Direct meta-analysis showed END to be superior to TND and comparable to SLNB. The NMA revealed no statistically significant difference between END and SLNB (very low quality evidence) regarding OS, DSS, DFS, and nodal recurrence. However, END was found to significantly improve OS and DFS, and reduce nodal recurrence when compared to TND (moderate quality evidence). END ranked as probably the top treatment option for maximizing OS and DSS, and reducing nodal recurrence in early-stage OSCC, followed by SLNB and TND. There was very low quality evidence supporting SLNB as non-inferior to END for patients with early-stage OSCC. This NMA yielded favourable results for the use of END (with moderate quality evidence) in early-stage OSCC patients, although excellent results have also been obtained with SLNB. However, data in the literature for SLNB are scarce, as this technique has not yet been formalized in many countries. There is a need to further explore SLNB for early-stage OSCC patients, as well as its value in detecting occult lymph node metastases on the contralateral side. More studies comparing morbidity, quality of life, and costs between the different management strategies for the clinically negative neck in early-stage OSCC patients are needed.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in management of the clinically negative (cN0) neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most prevalent type of head and neck cancer, and lymph node metastasis is a crucial prognostic factor that has a direct correlation with the survival rate. The standard procedure for managing clinically negative (cN0) neck in OSCC patients is elective neck dissection (END), but it can lead to various complications that affect the patient's quality of life. Therefore, medical professionals are exploring the use of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to manage cN0 neck in OSCC patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients undergoing SLNB and END in the surgical management of early cN0 neck in OSCC patients. To conduct this study, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was used to report the systematic reviews. The study included all comparative clinical studies, including randomized clinical trials (RCTs), clinical perspective studies, and retrospective studies that compared END to SLNB for early cN0 neck in OSCC patients. The hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using comprehensive meta-analysis. The primary outcome variables were OS, DFS, and disease-specific survival (DSS). The secondary outcome variable was the nodal recurrence rate without local or distant metastasis. The GRADE system was used to assess the evidence's certainty. The meta-analysis included 12 clinical studies, comprising three RCTs and seven non-RCTs. The results showed no statistically significant difference between END and SLNB concerning OS (HR = 0.993, CI: 0.814 to 1.211, P = 0.947, low-quality evidence), DFS (HR = 0.705, CI: 0.408 to 1.29, P = 0.21, low-quality evidence), and nodal recurrence (RR = 1.028, CI: 0.969 to 1.090, P = 0.907, low-quality evidence). Additionally, SLNB was non-inferior to END regarding DSS (RR = 1.028, CI: 0.969 to 1.090, P = 0.907, low-quality evidence). In conclusion, this research affirms the safety and precision of SLNB as a means to stage cN0 OSCC patients, with outcomes that are comparable to END in terms of survival and nodal recurrence. Nevertheless, it's crucial to acknowledge that the quality of evidence in this study was relatively low. Therefore, additional RCTs comparing END to SLNB are warranted to validate these results and offer more robust guidance for managing cN0 OSCC patients.

Cost-Effectiveness of [99mTc]Tilmanocept Relative to [99mTc]Sulfur Colloid for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stage Oral Cavity Cancer

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated varying rates of efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in identifying occult nodal disease for early stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) depending on the radionuclide agent utilized. No head-to-head comparison of cost or clinical outcomes of SLNB when utilizing [99mTc]tilmanocept versus [99mTc]sulfur colloid has been performed. The goal of this study was to develop a decision model to compare the cost-effectiveness of [99mTc]tilmanocept versus [99mTc]sulfur colloid in early stage OCSCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A decision model of disease and treatment as a function of SLNB was created. Patients with a negative SLNB entered a Markov model of the natural history of OCSCC parameterized with published data to simulate five states of health and iterated over a 30-year time horizon. Treatment costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each health state were included. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was then estimated using $100,000 per additional QALY as the threshold for determining cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

The base case cost-effectiveness analysis suggested [99mTc]tilmanocept was more effective than [99mTc]sulfur colloid by 0.12 QALYs (7.06 versus 6.94 QALYs). [99mTc]Tilmanocept was more costly, with a lifetime cost of $84,961 in comparison with $84,264 for sulfur colloid, however, the overall base case ICER was $5859 per additional QALY, well under the threshold for cost-effectiveness. Multiple one-way sensitivity analyses were performed, and demonstrated the model was robust to alternative parameter values.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis showed that while [99mTc]tilmanocept is more costly upfront, these costs are worth the additional QALYs gained by the use of [99mTc]tilmanocept.

The Applications and Potential Developments of Ultrasound in Oral Cancer Management

Oral cancer is endemic and causes a great burden in Southern Asia. It is preferably treated by surgery with/without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy, depending on the stage of the disease. Close or positive resection margin and cervical lymph node (LN) metastasis are important prognostic factors that have been presented to be related to undesirable locoregional recurrence and poor survival. Ultrasound (US) is a simple, noninvasive, time-saving, and inexpensive diagnostic modality. It can depict soft tissues very clearly without the risk of radiation exposure. Additionally, it is real-time and continuous image is demonstrated during the exam. Furthermore, the clinician can perform US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) at the same time. US with/without US-guided FNA/CNB is reported to be of value in determining tumor thickness (TT), depth of invasion (DOI), and cervical LN metastasis, and in aiding the staging of oral cancer. DOI has a relevant prognostic value as reported in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging of oral cancer. In the present review, we describe the clinical applications of US in oral cancer management in different phases and potential applications in the future. In the pretreatment and surgical phase, US can be used to evaluate TT/DOI and surgical margins of oral cancer in vivo and ex vivo. The prediction of a malignant cervical LN (nodal metastasis) by the US-based prediction model can guide the necessity of FNA/CNB and elective neck dissection in clinical early-stage oral cancer. In the posttreatment surveillance phase, US with/without US-guided FNA or CNB is helpful in the detection of nodal persistence or LN recurrence, and can assess the possibility and extent of carotid artery stenosis after irradiation therapy. Both US elastography and US swallowing assessment are potentially helpful to the management of oral cancer.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing elective neck dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage clinically node-negative oral and/or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Evidence-base for practice and implications for research

PURPOSE

Management of clinically node-negative (N0) neck in early-stage (T1-T2) oral and/or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) has been controversial. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with elective neck dissection (END) in early-stage OOSCC.

METHODS

Studies comparing SLNB versus END in early-stage clinically node-negative OOSCC were identified using validated search strategy. To be considered eligible, trials had to include patients with early-stage, clinically node-negative OOSCC who had been randomly assigned to either SLNB or END. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included isolated neck nodal recurrence (NNR), loco-regional recurrence (LRR), and neck-shoulder function. Outcome data was pooled using random-effects model and reported as hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Any p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 608 patients from three trials comparing SLNB versus END in early-stage clinically node-negative OOSCC were included. The pooled HR of death for SLNB versus END was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.79-1.78, p = 0.41) which was not statistically significant. The rates of isolated NNR (pooled RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.69-1.80, p = 0.66) and LRR (pooled RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.81-1.72, p = 0.39) were also similar. Pooled analysis of the neck-shoulder function significantly favoured SLNB arm (pooled RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12-1.32, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

There is low-certainty evidence that SLNB is oncologically non-inferior to END and is associated with potentially lesser functional morbidity making it an emerging alternative standard of care in patients with early-stage clinically node-negative OOSCC.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Elective Node Dissection in Stage cT1-2N0 Oral Cavity Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) and elective neck dissection (END) in the surgical management of cT1-2N0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

METHODS

English full-text articles were searched in PubMed and Embase on May 9, 2021. Articles had to compare SNB with END in cT1-T2N0 OCSCC patients; report hazard ratios (HRs), Kaplan-Meier curves, or P-values with total number of events for survival outcomes; be from a clinical trial, cohort, or case-control study. Two reviewers reviewed articles and a third settled disagreements. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool and revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials were used. The generic inverse variance method with a random-effect model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies, five retrospective, three prospective, and two randomized controlled trials, were included (total number of patients [n] = 10,498, END n = 9102, SNB n = 1396). No significant differences were found in OS (HR = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.31) or DFS (HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.41-1.20). Heterogeneity was not detected in pooled OS analysis (P = .18; I²  = 30%), but was in pooled DFS analysis (P = .003; I²  = 66%).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences in OS or DFS were observed between SNB and END in cT1-2N0 OCSCC, suggesting that SNB might be an alternative to END in the management of early-stage, clinically node-negative OCSCC. Laryngoscope, 2021.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity with a clinically N0 neck: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an emerging strategy for managing early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with a clinically N0 (cN0) neck. However, the role of SLNB in this scenario is debatable. Herein, relevant literature was systematically reviewed, and a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the potential dividends of SLNB compared to elective neck dissection (END) for these patients. The meta-analysis, including six prospective studies, showed comparable results of the two management strategies in terms of regional recurrence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.70), 5-year disease-free survival (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.11), and 5-year overall survival (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.13). Fewer adverse events occurred in the SLNB arm than in the END arm (RR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.70). Overall, SLNB results in as favorable an oncologic prognosis for patients with cN0 oral SCC as END, while significantly lessening side effects and unnecessary surgeries.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stages of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using the Receptor-Targeted Radiotracer 99mTc-Tilmanocept

Neck management in patients with early-stage, clinically node-negative oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains a matter of discussion. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) represents a treatment alternative to avoid elective neck dissection (END) in this cohort and different protocols and tracers exist. Here we present the clinical outcome of SLNB using ^99mTc-tilmanocept in a two-day protocol in patients suffering from early-stage OSCC. A total of 13 patients (males: 6; females: 7; mean age: 65.7 years, ranging from 47 to 89 years) were included in this study. Most of the patients suffered from an OSCC of the floor of mouth (n = 6), followed by tongue (n = 5) and upper alveolar crest/hard palate (n = 2). Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were successfully identified in all cases (range: 1–7). The average length of hospital stay was 4.7 days (range: 3–8 days) and mean duration of surgical intervention was 121 min (range: 74–233 min). One patient who suffered from an OSCC of the tongue was sentinel lymph node positive (SLN+). The mean follow-up for all sentinel lymph node negative (SLN-) patients (n = 12) was 20.3 months (range: 10–28 months). No local or nodal recurrences were observed within the observation period. In our patient cohort, SLNB using ^99mTc-tilmanocept in a two-day protocol proved to be a reliable and safe staging method for patients suffering from early-stage, clinically node-negative OSCC. These results and their possible superiority to colloid tracers have to be confirmed in a prospective randomized controlled study.

How is neck dissection performed in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery? Results of a representative nationwide survey among university and non-university hospitals in Germany

Introduction

Neck dissection (ND) is a surgical procedure addressing cervical lymph nodes and metastases in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The aim of this study was to analyze clinical decisions regarding indications and variations of ND in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) in Germany.

Material and methods

A nationwide survey of the German Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery was performed using dynamic online questionnaires including 38 questions. Data about oncological centers, case numbers, and staging procedures were collected. Relevant aspects, such as inclusion of level IIb and levels IV and V to ND, uni- vs. bilateral ND, and the influence of extra-nodal extension (ENE) of metastases on extension of ND were evaluated.

Results

Eighty-four OMFS of university and non-university hospitals participated in the study (responding rate 21.4%). Sixty-six (78.57%) stated to work at certified cancer centers and 53.57% of the hospitals treated between 50 and 100 OSCC cases per year. CT and/or MRI of the head and neck was performed in most of the staging procedures. Level IIb was included by 71 (93.42%) of the participants in selective ND. Levels IV and V were included by 53 (69.74%) in node-positive neck. In solitary ipsilateral metastases (ENE−), 49 participants (62.82%) stated to perform exclusively an ipsilateral ND and 40 (51.95%) stated to perform only an ipsilateral ND in ENE+.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated a high rate of certified cancer centers in Germany showing differences regarding staging procedures, indications, and extension of ND, especially in increasingly complex cases.

Clinical relevance

Clinical decisions regarding ND are dependent on case-individual aspects and must be decided individually.

Variability in Recommendations for Cervical Lymph Node Pathology for Staging of Canine Oral Neoplasia: A Survey Study

There is no clear guideline regarding the indication for routine lymph node extirpation and pathologic evaluation during staging of canine oral tumors, despite a relatively high reported nodal metastatic rate for select tumor types. It is particularly unclear if clinicians recommend removal of lymph nodes only when there is confirmation of metastasis, defined as the N+ neck, or if elective neck dissection (END) is routinely recommended to confirm the true pathologic metastatic status of lymph nodes in the clinical N0 neck (no evidence of metastasis on clinical staging with diagnostic imaging or cytology). When clinicians are recommending END as a staging tool to confirm nodal status, there is also ambiguity regarding the surgical extent for subsequent histopathologic evaluation. The objective of this cross-sectional survey study was to determine the current recommendations given by practicing specialists regarding lymph node removal for dogs with oral tumors. Overall, 87 responses were obtained from 49 private practices (56%) and 38 academic institutions (44%). Respondents identified as oncologists (44%, N = 38), soft tissue surgeons (40%, N = 35), and dentists (16%, N = 14). Regardless of tumor type and stage, extirpation and histopathology were most commonly recommended in the clinical N+ neck only. The recommendation to routinely perform END in the N0 neck was significantly associated with tumor type. Bilateral removal of the mandibular and retropharyngeal lymph nodes was recommended more often for oral malignant melanoma (OMM) than for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC; p ≤ 0.0039) or for oral fibrosarcoma (OFSA; p ≤ 0.0007). The likelihood of recommending END increased with increasing tumor size. Academic clinicians were significantly (p < 0.01) more likely to recommend END compared to private practitioners for canine T1-T3 OMM, T3 OSCC, T2 OFSA, and MCT. This study highlights the variability in recommendations for lymph node pathology for dogs with oral tumors. While tumor type and size influenced the decision to pursue END, it was not routinely recommended, even for tumor types with a known propensity for metastasis. Prospective studies are warranted to determine the potential diagnostic and therapeutic value of END in the N0 neck in veterinary patients such that a consensus approach can be made.