1
|
Derdzakyan NA, Lava CX, Hakimi AA, Johns JD, Kim HJ, Hoa M. Variability in Perioperative Steroid Therapy Regimen for Cochlear Implantation as It Relates to Hearing Preservation. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:e28-e35. [PMID: 38085763 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS We aimed to identify practice trends and association between physician training and administration of perioperative steroids for cochlear implantation (CI) as it relates to hearing preservation. BACKGROUND Perioperative steroid therapy regimens are postulated to protect residual hearing and improve hearing preservation outcomes in CI. METHODS A 27-question online survey was developed by the senior authors using the Qualtrics Survey Tool, then distributed via email from September to November 2022 to otolaryngologists specializing in otology or neurotology and who practice in the United States or Canada. RESULTS The survey was sent to 463 physicians, 162 (35.0%) of whom completed the survey. One hundred forty-four (31.1%) responses underwent analysis. All physicians administering preoperative steroids (n = 31) prefer preoperative oral prednisone. Of 143 physicians administering intraoperative steroids, 54.5% prefer intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone. More than half (77.6%) of 85 physicians administering postoperative steroids prefer postoperative oral prednisone. Postoperative steroid administration (p < 0.006) and taper utilization (p < 0.041) were greater among physicians who complete greater than 40 CIs annually (n = 47 [71.2%]; n = 30 [49.2%]) than physicians who complete up to 40 CIs annually (n = 37 [48.7%]; n = 20 [31.3%]), respectively. Physicians practicing for 5 to 20 years after residency are more prevalent in using postoperative steroid tapers than physicians practicing for fewer than 5 years after and more than 20 years after residency (n = 37 [51.4%] versus n = 14 [25.5%], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Consensus is needed about the optimal steroid treatment for CI patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amir A Hakimi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - J Dixon Johns
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - H Jeffrey Kim
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Michael Hoa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Polymeric fiber sensors for insertion forces and trajectory determination of cochlear implants in hearing preservation. Biosens Bioelectron 2023; 222:114866. [PMID: 36463651 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The level of hearing restoration in patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss by means of cochlear implants (CIs) has drastically risen since the introduction of these neuroprosthetics. The proposed CI integrated with polymer optical fiber Bragg gratings (POFBGs) enables real-time evaluation of insertion forces and trajectory determination during implantation irrespective of the speed of insertion, as well as provides high signal quality, low stiffness levels, minimum induced stress even under forces of high magnitudes and exhibits significant reduction of the risk of fiber breakage inside the constricted cochlear geometry. As such, the proposed device opens new avenues towards atraumatic cochlear implantations and provides a direct route for the next generation of CIs with intraoperative insertion force assessment and path planning capacity crucial for surgical navigation. Hence, adaptation of this technology to clinical reality holds promising prospects for the hearing impaired.
Collapse
|
3
|
Topsakal V, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Bruce IA, Dazert S, Hagen R, Lassaletta L, Mlynski R, Raine CH, Rajan GP, Schmutzhard J, Sprinzl GM, Staecker H, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Zernotti M, van de Heyning P. Minimally Traumatic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Expert Opinion in 2010 and 2020. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12101551. [PMID: 36294690 PMCID: PMC9605439 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to discover expert opinion on the surgical techniques and materials most likely to achieve maximum postoperative residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant (CI) surgery and to determine how these opinions have changed since 2010. A previously published questionnaire used in a study published in 2010 was adapted and expanded. The questionnaire was distributed to an international group of experienced CI surgeons. Present results were compared, via descriptive statistics, to those from the 2010 survey. Eighteen surgeons completed the questionnaire. Respondents clearly favored the following: round window insertion, slow array insertion, and the peri- and postoperative use of systematic antibiotics. Insertion depth was regarded as important, and electrode arrays less likely to induce trauma were preferred. The usefulness of dedicated soft-surgery training was also recognized. A lack of agreement was found on whether the middle ear cavity should be flushed with a non-aminoglycoside antibiotic solution or whether a sheath or insertion tube should be used to avoid contaminating the array with blood or bone dust. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates how beliefs about CI soft surgery have changed since 2010 and shows areas of current consensus and disagreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Brussels Health Campus, University Hospital Brussels (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Jette, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), University of Antwerp, 2610 Edegem, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-2477-6882; Fax: +32-2477-6880
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- London Canada Health Sciences Centre, Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON N6G 2M3, Canada
| | - Marcus Atlas
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Brown
- UNC Ear & Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Iain A. Bruce
- Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M15 6JA, UK
| | - Stefan Dazert
- St. Elisabeth Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery “Otto Körner”, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Christopher H. Raine
- Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK
| | | | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Hinrich Staecker
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Shin-ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), University of Antwerp, 2610 Edegem, Belgium
| | | | - Paul van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), University of Antwerp, 2610 Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buechner A, Bardt M, Haumann S, Geissler G, Salcher R, Lenarz T. Clinical experiences with intraoperative electrocochleography in cochlear implant recipients and its potential to reduce insertion trauma and improve postoperative hearing preservation. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266077. [PMID: 35452461 PMCID: PMC9032378 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Access to low-frequency acoustic information in cochlear implant patients leads to better speech understanding in noise. Electrocochleography (ECochG) can provide real-time feedback about the health of the cochlea during the insertion process with the potential to reduce insertion trauma. We describe our experiences of using this technique. Data from 47 adult subjects with measurable residual hearing and an Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) SlimJ (46) or MidScala (1) electrode array were analyzed. ECochGs were recorded intraoperatively via the implant. The surgeon adjusted the course of the electrode insertion based on drops in the ECochG. The final array position was assessed using postoperative imaging and pure tone thresholds were measured before and after surgery. Three different patterns of ECochG response amplitude were observed: Growth, Fluctuating and Total Loss. Subjects in the growth group showed the smallest postoperative hearing loss. However, the group with fluctuating amplitudes showed no meaningful correlation between the ECochG responses and the postoperative hearing loss, indicating that amplitude alone is insufficient for detecting damage. Considering the phase of the signal additionally to the amplitude and reclassifying the data by both the phase and amplitude of the response into three groups Type I–Type III produced statistically significant correlations between postoperative hearing loss and the grouping based on amplitude and phase respectively. We showed significantly better hearing preservation for Type I (no drop in amplitude) and Type II (drop with a concurrent phase shift), while Type III (drop without concurrent phase shift) had more surgery induced hearing loss. ECochG potentials measured through the implant could provide valuable feedback during the electrode insertion. Both the amplitude and phase of the ECochG response are important to consider. More data needs to be evaluated to better understand the impact of the different signal components to design an automated system to alert the surgeon ahead of damaging the cochlea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Buechner
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Michael Bardt
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sabine Haumann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gunnar Geissler
- European Research Center, Advanced Bionics GmbH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rolf Salcher
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aebischer P, Mantokoudis G, Weder S, Anschuetz L, Caversaccio M, Wimmer W. In-Vitro Study of Speed and Alignment Angle in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2021; 69:129-137. [PMID: 34110987 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2021.3088232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The insertion of the electrode array is a critical step in cochlear implantation. Herein we comprehensively investigate the impact of the alignment angle and feed-forward speed on deep insertions in artificial scala tympani models with accurate macro-anatomy and controlled frictional properties. METHODS Motorized insertions (n=1033) were performed in six scala tympani models with varying speeds and alignment angles. We evaluated reaction forces and micrographs of the insertion process and developed a mathematical model to estimate the normal force distribution along the electrode arrays. RESULTS Insertions parallel to the cochlear base significantly reduce insertion energies and lead to smoother array movement. Non-constant insertion speeds allow to reduce insertion forces for a fixed total insertion time compared to a constant feed rate. CONCLUSION In cochlear implantation, smoothness and peak forces can be reduced with alignment angles parallel to the scala tympani centerline and with non-constant feed-forward speed profiles. SIGNIFICANCE Our results may help to provide clinical guidelines and improve surgical tools for manual and automated cochlear implantation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Fabrication of human anatomy-based scala tympani models with a hydrophilic coating for cochlear implant insertion experiments. Hear Res 2021; 404:108205. [PMID: 33618163 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Electrode array insertion into the inner ear is a critical step in cochlear implantation, and artificial scala tympani models can be a valuable tool for studying the dynamics of this process. This technical note describes the fabrication of electrode array dummies and scala tympani models that address shortcomings of previously published cochlear models. In particular, we improve the reproduction of frictional properties with an easy-to-apply polymer brush coating that creates hydrophilic surfaces, and produce geometries with accurate macro-anatomy based on microtomographic scans. The presented methods rely only on commonly available materials and tools and are based on publicly available data. Our validation shows very good agreement of insertion forces both in terms of linear insertion depth and insertion speed compared to previously published measurements of insertions in cadaveric temporal bones.
Collapse
|
7
|
Cochlear Implantation With a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode Array: Functional and Anatomical Changes in Non-Human Primates. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e812-e822. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
8
|
Lim J, Kim Y, Kim N. Mechanical Effects of Cochlear Implants on Residual Hearing Loss: A Finite Element Analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2020; 67:3253-3261. [PMID: 32191879 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2020.2981863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The effects of cochlear implants on residual hearing loss is investigated through a finite element model of human auditory periphery consisting of the cochlea and middle ear. The simulation results show that a round window stiffness is the dominant factor in residual hearing loss. The increased round window stiffness to five times caused over 4 dB residual hearing loss at low frequencies below 500 Hz. Without considering round window ossification, inserting a cochlear implant can show at most 4 dB difference of residual hearing loss in magnitude from the no-implant case although the cochlear implant's geometry and position has been varied. If the stiffness of the round window is the same, the simulation results suggest to use a thin-straight-cochlear implant inserted into the lateral side in order to preserve residual hearing at frequencies below 700 Hz. In addition, when the distance between the basilar membrane and a cochlear implant is closer, the residual hearing loss becomes severe at high frequencies above 1 kHz. The results would be helpful for choice of a cochlear implant depending on a patient's condition.
Collapse
|
9
|
Manrique-Huarte R, Calavia D, Gallego MA, Manrique M. Cochlear Implant Electrode Array From Partial to Full Insertion in Non-Human Primate Model. J Int Adv Otol 2019; 14:5-9. [PMID: 29764773 DOI: 10.5152/iao.2018.5233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the feasibility of progressive insertion (two sequential surgeries: partial to full insertion) of an electrode array and to compare functional outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS 8 normal-hearing animals (Macaca fascicularis (MF)) were included. A 14 contact electrode array, which is suitably sized for the MF cochlea was partially inserted (PI) in 16 ears. After 3 months of follow-up revision surgery the electrode was advanced to a full insertion (FI) in 8 ears. Radiological examination and auditory testing was performed monthly for 6 months. In order to compare the values a two way repeated measures ANOVA was used. A p-value below 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. IBM SPSS Statistics V20 was used. RESULTS Surgical procedure was completed in all cases with no complications. Mean auditory threshold shift (ABR click tones) after 6 months follow-up is 19 dB and 27 dB for PI and FI group. For frequencies 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16 kHz in the FI group, tone burst auditory thresholds increased after the revision surgery showing no recovery thereafter. Mean threshold shift at 6 months of follow- up is 19.8 dB ranging from 2 to 36dB for PI group and 33.14dB ranging from 8 to 48dB for FI group. Statistical analysis yields no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION It is feasible to perform a partial insertion of an electrode array and progress on a second surgical time to a full insertion (up to 270º). Hearing preservation is feasible for both procedures. Note that a minimal threshold deterioration is depicted among full insertion group, especially among high frequencies, with no statistical differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Manrique-Huarte
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona/Navarra, Spain
| | - Diego Calavia
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona/Navarra, Spain
| | - Maria Antonia Gallego
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona/Navarra, Spain
| | - Manuel Manrique
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona/Navarra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ansó J, Dür C, Apelt M, Venail F, Scheidegger O, Seidel K, Rohrbach H, Forterre F, Dettmer MS, Zlobec I, Weber K, Matulic M, Zoka-Assadi M, Huth M, Caversaccio M, Weber S. Prospective Validation of Facial Nerve Monitoring to Prevent Nerve Damage During Robotic Drilling. Front Surg 2019; 6:58. [PMID: 31632981 PMCID: PMC6781655 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Facial nerve damage has a detrimental effect on a patient's life, therefore safety mechanisms to ensure its preservation are essential during lateral skull base surgery. During robotic cochlear implantation a trajectory passing the facial nerve at <0.5 mm is needed. Recently a stimulation probe and nerve monitoring approach were developed and introduced clinically, however for patient safety no trajectory was drilled closer than 0.4 mm. Here we assess the performance of the nerve monitoring system at closer distances. In a sheep model eight trajectories were drilled to test the setup followed by 12 trajectories during which the ENT surgeon relied solely on the nerve monitoring system and aborted the robotic drilling process if intraoperative nerve monitoring alerted of a distance <0.1 mm. Microcomputed tomography images and histopathology showed prospective use of the technology prevented facial nerve damage. Facial nerve monitoring integrated in a robotic system supports the surgeon's ability to proactively avoid damage to the facial nerve during robotic drilling in the mastoid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ansó
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cilgia Dür
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mareike Apelt
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Frederic Venail
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Kathleen Seidel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Helene Rohrbach
- Vetsuisse Faculty, Veterinary Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Franck Forterre
- Vetsuisse Faculty, Veterinary Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Inti Zlobec
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Markus Huth
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Weber
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Perenyi A, Toth F, Dimak B, Nagy R, Schoerg P, Jori J, Kiss JG, Sprinzl G, Csanady M, Rovo L. Electrophysiological measurements with electrode types of different perimodiolar properties and the same cochlear implant electronics - a retrospective comparison study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 48:46. [PMID: 31492190 PMCID: PMC6731597 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-019-0361-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Perenyi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 111, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary.
| | - F Toth
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 111, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
| | - B Dimak
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 111, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
| | - R Nagy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 111, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
| | - P Schoerg
- Karl Landsteiner University Hospital of StPölten, Propst-Führer-Straße 4, 3100, St. Pölten, Austria
| | - J Jori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 111, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
| | - J G Kiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 111, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
| | - G Sprinzl
- Karl Landsteiner University Hospital of StPölten, Propst-Führer-Straße 4, 3100, St. Pölten, Austria
| | - M Csanady
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 111, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
| | - L Rovo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 111, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ramos-Macías A, Borkoski-Barreiro SA, Falcón-González JC, Ramos-de Miguel A. Hearing Preservation with the Slim Modiolar Electrode Nucleus CI532® Cochlear Implant: A Preliminary Experience. Audiol Neurootol 2018; 22:317-325. [PMID: 29486475 DOI: 10.1159/000486409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
As the indications for cochlear implant have expanded to include younger patients and individuals with greater degrees of residual hearing, increasing emphasis has been placed on atraumatic surgery and the preservation of the cochlear structure. Here, a descriptive prospective randomized study was performed. It was shown that residual hearing preservation is possible 12 months postoperatively with an atraumatic perimodiolar flexible electrode array CI532® (Cochlear Ltd, Sydney, Australia). Residual hearing preservation, considered as < 15 dB, was obtained in 70% of the cases. Better clinical outcomes and performance could be obtained compared with the previous perimodiolar CI512®, but further research and a longer follow-up are necessary to verify the impact of outcomes.
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Electrode Impedance Fluctuations as a Biomarker for Inner Ear Pathology After Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38:1433-1439. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
16
|
Mirsalehi M, Mohebbi S, Ghajarzadeh M, Lenarz T, Majdani O. Impact of the round window membrane accessibility on hearing preservation in adult cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274:3049-3056. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4628-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
17
|
Kesler K, Dillon NP, Fichera L, Labadie RF. Human Kinematics of Cochlear Implant Surgery: An Investigation of Insertion Micro-Motions and Speed Limitations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 157:493-498. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599817704391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Document human motions associated with cochlear implant electrode insertion at different speeds and determine the lower limit of continuous insertion speed by a human. Study Design Observational. Setting Academic medical center. Subjects and Methods Cochlear implant forceps were coupled to a frame containing reflective fiducials, which enabled optical tracking of the forceps’ tip position in real time. Otolaryngologists (n = 14) performed mock electrode insertions at different speeds based on recommendations from the literature: “fast” (96 mm/min), “stable” (as slow as possible without stopping), and “slow” (15 mm/min). For each insertion, the following metrics were calculated from the tracked position data: percentage of time at prescribed speed, percentage of time the surgeon stopped moving forward, and number of direction reversals (ie, going from forward to backward motion). Results Fast insertion trials resulted in better adherence to the prescribed speed (45.4% of the overall time), no motion interruptions, and no reversals, as compared with slow insertions (18.6% of time at prescribed speed, 15.7% stopped time, and an average of 18.6 reversals per trial). These differences were statistically significant for all metrics ( P < .01). The metrics for the fast and stable insertions were comparable; however, stable insertions were performed 44% slower on average. The mean stable insertion speed was 52 ± 19.3 mm/min. Conclusion Results indicate that continuous insertion of a cochlear implant electrode at 15 mm/min is not feasible for human operators. The lower limit of continuous forward insertion is 52 mm/min on average. Guidelines on manual insertion kinematics should consider this practical limit of human motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Kesler
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Neal P. Dillon
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Loris Fichera
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert F. Labadie
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Weber S, Gavaghan K, Wimmer W, Williamson T, Gerber N, Anso J, Bell B, Feldmann A, Rathgeb C, Matulic M, Stebinger M, Schneider D, Mantokoudis G, Scheidegger O, Wagner F, Kompis M, Caversaccio M. Instrument flight to the inner ear. Sci Robot 2017; 2:eaal4916. [PMID: 30246168 PMCID: PMC6150423 DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aal4916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Surgical robot systems can work beyond the limits of human perception, dexterity and scale making them inherently suitable for use in microsurgical procedures. However, despite extensive research, image-guided robotics applications for microsurgery have seen limited introduction into clinical care to date. Among others, challenges are geometric scale and haptic resolution at which the surgeon cannot sufficiently control a device outside the range of human faculties. Mechanisms are required to ascertain redundant control on process variables that ensure safety of the device, much like instrument-flight in avionics. Cochlear implantation surgery is a microsurgical procedure, in which specific tasks are at sub-millimetric scale and exceed reliable visuo-tactile feedback. Cochlear implantation is subject to intra- and inter-operative variations, leading to potentially inconsistent clinical and audiological outcomes for patients. The concept of robotic cochlear implantation aims to increase consistency of surgical outcomes such as preservation of residual hearing and reduce invasiveness of the procedure. We report successful image-guided, robotic CI in human. The robotic treatment model encompasses: computer-assisted surgery planning, precision stereotactic image-guidance, in-situ assessment of tissue properties and multipolar neuromonitoring (NM), all based on in vitro, in vivo and pilot data. The model is expandable to integrate additional robotic functionalities such as cochlear access and electrode insertion. Our results demonstrate the feasibility and possibilities of using robotic technology for microsurgery on the lateral skull base. It has the potential for benefit in other microsurgical domains for which there is no task-oriented, robotic technology available at present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Weber
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Kate Gavaghan
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, lnselspital, Bern University Hospital
| | - Tom Williamson
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Nicolas Gerber
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Juan Anso
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Brett Bell
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Arne Feldmann
- Institute for Surgical Technologies and Biomechanics, University of Bern
| | - Christoph Rathgeb
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Marco Matulic
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Manuel Stebinger
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Daniel Schneider
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | - Georgios Mantokoudis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, lnselspital, Bern University Hospital
| | | | - Franca Wagner
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital
| | - Martin Kompis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, lnselspital, Bern University Hospital
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, lnselspital, Bern University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Cochlear implants treat severe hearing loss by providing direct electrical stimulation to auditory nerve endings. This article reviews the clinical assessment, surgical procedure and outcomes, and looks at newer developments such as preservation of residual hearing and bilateral implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hajioff
- Consultant Ear, Nose and Throat Surgeon, Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol BS2 8EG
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Patterns of Long-term Hearing Loss in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Surgery. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37:478-86. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
21
|
Quesnel AM, Nakajima HH, Rosowski JJ, Hansen MR, Gantz BJ, Nadol JB. Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology. Hear Res 2016; 333:225-234. [PMID: 26341474 PMCID: PMC4775460 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Revised: 08/04/2015] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
After initially successful preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation, some patients experience subsequent delayed hearing loss. The etiology of such delayed hearing loss is unknown. Human temporal bone pathology is critically important in investigating the etiology, and directing future efforts to maximize long term hearing preservation in cochlear implant patients. Here we present the temporal bone pathology from a patient implanted during life with an Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid S8 implant, with initially preserved residual hearing and subsequent hearing loss. Both temporal bones were removed for histologic processing and evaluated. Complete clinical and audiologic records were available. He had bilateral symmetric high frequency severe to profound hearing loss prior to implantation. Since he was implanted unilaterally, the unimplanted ear was presumed to be representative of the pre-implantation pathology related to his hearing loss. The implanted and contralateral unimplanted temporal bones both showed complete degeneration of inner hair cells and outer hair cells in the basal half of the cochleae, and only mild patchy loss of inner hair cells and outer hair cells in the apical half. The total spiral ganglion neuron counts were similar in both ears: 15,138 (56% of normal for age) in the unimplanted right ear and 13,722 (51% of normal for age) in the implanted left ear. In the basal turn of the implanted left cochlea, loose fibrous tissue and new bone formation filled the scala tympani, and part of the scala vestibuli. Delayed loss of initially preserved hearing after cochlear implantation was not explained by additional post-implantation degeneration of hair cells or spiral ganglion neurons in this patient. Decreased compliance at the round window and increased damping in the scala tympani due to intracochlear fibrosis and new bone formation might explain part of the post-implantation hearing loss. Reduction of the inflammatory and immune response to cochlear implantation may lead to better long term hearing preservation post-implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia M Quesnel
- Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Hideko Heidi Nakajima
- Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - John J Rosowski
- Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Marlan R Hansen
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Otolaryngology, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242-1078, USA.
| | - Bruce J Gantz
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Otolaryngology, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242-1078, USA.
| | - Joseph B Nadol
- Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|