New hepatitis C virus therapies: drug classes and metabolism, drug interactions relevant in the transplant settings, drug options in decompensated cirrhosis, and drug options in end-stage renal disease. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015;20:235-241. [PMID: 25944238 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000198]

Expanding the liver donor pool worldwide with hepatitis C infected livers, is it the time?

Liver transplantation (LT) provides a life-saving option for cirrhotic patients with complications and hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite the increasing number of liver transplants performed each year, the number of LT candidates on the waitlist remains unchanged due to an imbalance between donor organ supply and the demand which increases the waitlist time and mortality. Living donor liver transplant had a great role in increasing the donor pool and shortened waitlist time for LT candidates. Nevertheless, further strategies can be implemented to increase the pool of potential donors in deceased donor LT, such as reducing the rate of organ discards. Utilizing hepatitis C virus (HCV) seropositive liver grafts is one of the expanded donor organ criteria. A yearly increase of hundreds of transplants is anticipated as a result of maximizing the utilization of HCV-positive organs for HCV-negative recipients. Direct-acting antiviral therapy's efficacy has revolutionized the treatment of HCV infection and the use of HCV-seropositive donors in transplantation. The American Society of Transplantation advises against performing transplants from HCV-infected liver donors (D+) into HCV-negative recipient (R-) unless under Institutional Review Board-approved study rules and with full informed consent of the knowledge gaps associated with such transplants. Proper selection of patients to be transplanted with HCV-infected grafts and confirming their access to direct-acting antivirals if needed is important. National and international consensuses are needed to regulate this process to ensure the maximum benefit and the least adverse events.

Drug Interactions and Safe Prescription Writing for Liver Transplant Recipients

Immunosuppression optimization is central to graft function in liver transplant recipients. Post-transplantation patients develop new onset or worsening metabolic syndrome, are prone to atypical infections, and are at higher risk of developing cardiac and brain-related clinical events. In this context, liver transplant recipients are at risk of using multiple comedications alongside immunosuppressants. It is imperative for the transplant physician to understand the various drug-drug interactions that potentially reduce or promote toxicity of immunosuppression, as well as associated synergistic or antagonistic effects on extrahepatic organ systems. This comprehensive review discusses drug-drug interactions in liver transplant recipients and the impact and role of complementary and alternative medicines among individuals on immunosuppression.

Donation After Circulatory Death Yields Survival Rates Similar to Donation After Brain Death Liver Transplant, Which Effectively Expands the Donor Pool

OBJECTIVES

Liver allograft shortage has necessitated greater use of donations after circulatory death. Limited data are available to compare recipients' health care utilization for donation after circulatory death versus brain death.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Liver transplant data for our center from November 2016 until May 2019 were obtained (208 donations after brain death and 39 after circulatory death). We excluded patients <18 years old and multiorgan transplants; for cost data only, we also excluded retransplants. Primary outcome was recipients' health care utilization in donation after circulatory death versus brain death and included index admission length of stay, readmissions, and charges from transplant to 6 months. Secondary outcomes were patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

Donors from circulatory death were younger than donors from brain death (median age 32 vs 40 years; P < .01). Recipient body mass index (31.23 vs 29.38 kg/m2), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (17 vs 19), portal vein thrombosis (15.8% vs 18.0%), length of stay (7 vs 8 days), and 30-, 90-, and 180-day posttransplant index admissions were not significantly different. Charges for index admission were equivalent for donation after circulatory death ($370771) and brain death ($374272) (P = .01). Charges for readmissions at 30 and 180 days were not significantly different (P = .80 and P = .19, respectively). Rates for graft failure (10.3% vs 4.8%; P = .08) and recipient death (10.3% vs 3.8%; P = .17) at 6 months posttransplant were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Donation after circulatory death versus brain death liver transplant recipients had similar lengths of stay and equivalent index admission charges. Graft and patient survival and charges from transplant to 6 months were similar. Donation after circulatory death liver allografts provide a safe, costequivalent donor pool expansion after careful donorrecipient selection.

Outcomes following liver transplantation from HCV-seropositive donors to HCV-seronegative recipients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Grafts from HCV-seropositive donors can now be considered for liver transplantation (LT) owing to the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). We report on our multicenter experience of transplanting liver grafts from HCV-seropositive donors into HCV-seronegative recipients.

METHODS

This is a prospective multicenter observational study evaluating outcomes in adult HCV-seronegative LT recipients who received grafts from HCV-seropositive donors in 3 US centers.

RESULTS

From 01/18 to 09/19, 34 HCV-seronegative LT recipients received grafts from HCV-seropositive donors (20 HCV-viremic and 14 non-viremic). Seven grafts were from cardiac-dead donors. The median MELD-Na score at allocation was 20. Six recipients underwent simultaneous liver-kidney transplant and 4 repeat LT. No recipient of an HCV-non-viremic graft developed HCV viremia. All 20 patients who received HCV-viremic grafts had HCV viremia confirmed within 3 days after LT. DAA treatment was started at a median of 27.5 days after LT. Median pre-treatment viral load was 723,000 IU/ml. All (20/20) patients completed treatment and achieved SVR12. Treatment was well tolerated with minimal adverse events. One patient developed HCV-related acute membranous nephropathy that resulted in end-stage kidney disease, despite achieving viral clearance. This patient died due to presumed infectious complications. A recipient of an HCV-non-viremic graft died with acute myocardial infarction 610 days post LT.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantation of liver grafts from HCV-seropositive donors into HCV-seronegative recipients resulted in excellent short-term outcomes. Antiviral therapy was effective and well tolerated. Careful ongoing assessment and prompt initiation of antiviral therapy are recommended. Longer term follow-up in carefully conducted clinical trials is still required to confirm these results.

LAY SUMMARY

This study shows that livers from donors exposed to HCV expand the donor pool and can be used safely in patients who are seronegative for hepatitis C infection. Treatment, initiated early post transplantation, is effective and resulted in cure in all patients.

Potential Drug Interactions of Repurposed COVID-19 Drugs with Lung Cancer Pharmacotherapies

Lung cancer patients are at heightened risk for developing COVID-19 infection as well as complications due to multiple risk factors such as underlying malignancy, anti-cancer treatment induced immunosuppression, additional comorbidities and history of smoking. Recent literatures have reported a significant proportion of lung cancer patients coinfected with COVID-19. Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, oseltamivir, remdesivir, favipiravir, and umifenovir represent the major repurposed drugs used as potential experimental agents for COVID-19 whereas azithromycin, dexamethasone, tocilizumab, sarilumab, famotidine and ceftriaxone are some of the supporting agents that are under investigation for COVID-19 management. The rationale of this review is to identify potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) occurring in lung cancer patients receiving lung cancer medications and repurposed COVID-19 drugs using Micromedex and additional literatures. This review has identified several potential DDIs that could occur with the concomitant treatments of COVID-19 repurposed drugs and lung cancer medications. This information may be utilized by the healthcare professionals for screening and identifying potential DDIs with adverse outcomes, based on their severity and documentation levels and consequently design prophylactic and management strategies for their prevention. Identification, reporting and management of DDIs and dissemination of related information should be a major consideration in the delivery of lung cancer care during this ongoing COVID-19 pandemic for better patient outcomes and updating guidelines for safer prescribing practices in this coinfected condition.

Influence of drug-drug interactions on effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals against hepatitis C virus

OBJECTIVES

Direct-acting antivirals are the recommended treatment for hepatitis C-infected patients. Drug-drug interactions with concomitant treatments can cause lack of effectiveness and/or safety. The objective of this study is to characterise drug-drug interactions of direct-acting antivirals and to analyse their influence both on the effectiveness of antiviral treatment and on the overall safety of pharmacological treatment in hepatitis C-infected patients.

METHODS

Observational and prospective cohort study for 3 years in the pharmaceutical care outpatient consultation of a general hospital, undertaking detection, evaluation and management of drug-drug interactions by clinical pharmacists and physicians. The main outcome measures were sustained virologic response at week 12 for effectiveness and serious drug-related adverse events for safety. Multivariate statistical analysis applied to: (a) patient basal characteristics related to presence of drug-drug interactions; (b) previous antiviral treatments, viral genotype, cirrhosis, decompensations and presence of drug-drug interactions related to the effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals.

RESULTS

Of a total of 1092 patients, the majority of them were men, around 60 years old and HCV-genotype 1 mono-infected, with a high basal viral load, naive to antiviral treatment, treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and without cirrhosis. 24.5% had drug-drug interactions. Proton pump inhibitors were the concomitant drugs that caused the most drug-drug interactions. Age ≥65 years and direct-acting antivirals based on protease inhibitors were independently related to the presence of drug-drug interactions (p≤0.012). All (100%) of the therapeutic recommendations based on detected drug-drug interactions were implemented; 97.7% of patients with interactions versus 99.0% without them reached sustained virologic failure (p=0.109). The serious adverse events rates were 1.5% and 1.3% in patients with and without drug-drug interactions, respectively (p=0.841).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-drug interactions are frequent among hepatitis C-infected patients receiving treatment with direct-acting antivirals. However, the collaboration between physicians and clinical pharmacists makes it possible to detect, evaluate, avoid or clinically manage these drug-drug interactions, in order to maintain whole treatment therapeutic safety and the effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals.

Successful Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Using Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents (DAAs) in Adolescents with Kidney Transplantation: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis. The standard treatment for HCV infection has been interferon-ribavirin combination prior to renal transplantation. However, compared to direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs), the risk of graft rejection is higher with interferon therapy. Many recent studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of DAAs for treating HCV infection in kidney disease in adults; however, it has not been established in pediatric patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing successful treatment using the DAAs sofosbuvir/daclatasvir in two pediatric kidney transplant recipients who had HCV genotype 1a infection without liver fibrosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case 1 describes a 13-year-old Indonesian boy who had undergone hemodialysis since 2014 after being diagnosed with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to bilateral renal hypoplasia. Later, he had HCV infection and was treated with interferon-based therapy with ribavirin prior to living-related renal transplantation (LRRT). The HCV was undetected and his liver function normalized six months after treatment initiation. However, 10 months after treatment initiation, he had HCV virological breakthrough, leading to cessation of interferon therapy. Plans for LRRT were continued and HCV treatment using DAAs was set up to be given post LRRT. Case 2 describes a 14-year-old Indonesian girl who also had hemodialysis prior to LRRT after she was diagnosed with ESRD secondary to nephrotic syndrome. Later, she had HCV infection and was treated with interferon and ribavirin prior to the live-unrelated renal transplantation. HCV infection did not resolve, in addition, she experienced thrombocytopenia-which is a side effect of interferon-resulting in termination of interferon treatment. Both cases were treated with DAAs one year following renal transplantation after reaching stable graft function, leading to achievement of sustained virological response at 24 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Post-transplantation treatment of chronic HCV is preferred in KTRs. The sofosbuvir/daclatasvir regimen as an interferon-free therapy is a safe, effective option for HCV infection in pediatric KTRs, who can tolerate sofosbuvir/daclatasvir well and respond favorably without significant adverse events.

Simeprevir, daclatasvir, and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C virus-infected patients: Long-term follow-up results from the open-label, Phase II IMPACT study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have resulted in high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) following 8 to 24 weeks of treatment. However, difficult-to-cure/cirrhotic patients typically require a longer treatment duration and less is known regarding the long-term durability of SVR or effect on liver disease progression; to assess this, the IMPACT study followed patients for a 3-year period after end of treatment.

METHODS

The Phase II, open-label, nonrandomized IMPACT study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of three DAAs (simeprevir, sofosbuvir, and daclatasvir) in HCV genotype 1/4-infected, treatment-naïve/-experienced cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension or decompensated liver disease. Patients from a single site in the United States were assigned to one of two groups by Child-Pugh (CP) score: CP A, CP score less than 7 and evidence of portal hypertension; CP B, CP score of 7 to 9. All patients received simeprevir 150 mg, daclatasvir 60 mg, and sofosbuvir 400 mg once-daily for 12 weeks between September 2014 and August 2015. All 40 patients included in the study (male, 63%; median age, 58.5 years) achieved SVR 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment, and the combination was well tolerated.

RESULTS

All patients who reached the 3-year follow-up timepoint maintained SVR (CP A, 15/15; CP B, 18/18). CP scores and Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores remained relatively stable, and mean FibroScan and FibroTest scores declined. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

In the IMPACT study, virologic response to simeprevir, sofosbuvir, and daclatasvir was durable over 3 years (http://ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02262728).

Effects of Sofosbuvir-Based Hepatitis C Treatment Regimens on Calcineurin Inhibitor Dosing in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

Available data have suggested that directacting antivirals for hepatitis C virus may decrease calcineurin inhibitor concentrations. In this study, our aim was to determine the effects of hepatitis C directacting antivirals on calcineurin inhibitor doses and trough levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, singlecenter study included 52 abdominal transplant recipients treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens between 2014 and 2017. The primary outcome was percent change in calcineurin inhibitor troughs and total daily doses between the week before treatment with direct-acting antivirals, days 21 to 35 oftreatment, and days 21 to 35 aftertreatment. Secondary outcomes included sustained virologic response and biopsyproven acute rejection rates.

RESULTS

The median percent difference in calcineurin inhibitor troughs from pretreatment to during treatment was -20.5% (interquartile range, -36.2% to 13.1%) and from pretreatment to posttreatment was -13.5% (interquartile range, -33.7% to 10.7%). Corresponding percent changes in calcineurin inhibitor doses were 0% (interquartile range, 0%-0%) and 0% (interquartile range, -10.5% to 33.3%), respectively. Patients on tacrolimus experienced statistically significant changes in troughs but not doses. During treatment, 65% of patients required no dose change, 23% underwent a dose increase, and 12% had a dose decrease. The sustained virologic response rate was 98%, and the biopsy-proven acute rejection rate was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis C direct-acting antiviraltherapy may decrease calcineurin inhibitor levels, but this was not associated with clinically different dosing requirements or rejection rates.

Evolution of renal function under direct-acting antivirals treatment for chronic hepatitis C: A real-world experience

Renal toxicity of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients has not been well-characterized. The aim of this study was to assess renal safety of DAAs in an Asian CHC patient cohort. Data from CHC patients (n = 1536) treated with DAAs were used in this retrospective study. Serial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at pretreatment (1-year prior to treatment), baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and 12 weeks after treatment (SVR₁₂ ) was evaluated. While a significant decrease in eGFR from baseline to EOT (84.8 → 81.8 mL/min/1.73 m² , P < .001) was observed; subsequently, a slight rise at SVR₁₂ (84.3 mL/min/1.73 m² ) was also evident. Changes in eGFR after DAA treatment were similar to those seen in PrOD, DCV/ASV and GZP/EBV regimens, except in the SOF-based regimen wherein eGFR remained unchanged from EOT to SVR₁₂ , especially in liver transplant recipients. Multivariate analysis revealed that age >65 years (OR = 1.862, P = .011), baseline eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (OR = 2.684, P = .023), and liver transplant (OR = 3.894, P = .001) were independent risk factors for deteriorating renal function. In conclusion, DAA treatment led to a significant decline in eGFR at EOT but was followed by a slight rise at 12 weeks after treatment. A similar trend was observed with PrOD, DCV/ASV and GZP/EBV, but not in SOF-based regimens. As age >65 years, baseline eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m² and liver transplantation are significant risk factors for deterioration in renal function, we strongly advice close monitoring of renal function in these populations.

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals for treatment-naive patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection

This systematic review was performed on the basis of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Cochrane recommendations to compare sustained virological response (SVR12) and the serious adverse events in patients treated by directing-acting antivirals. We conducted a literature search in PubMed/Medline, EBSCO, Embase and the Cochrane Library until 2018. A consistency model was used to get the relative effect of odds ratio among regimens and the possibility for the efficacy and safety of 13 regimen, and we divided these regimens into DUAL or TRIO regimens to conduct integrated data analysis. The results demonstrated that dual or triple directing-acting antiviral-combined regimens had higher SVR12 rates, Daclatasvir plus Asunaprevir may be a good choice for genotype 1 patients, and regimens without Ribavirin and interferon are safer.

Decreased warfarin sensitivity among patients treated with elbasvir and grazoprevir for hepatitis C infection

PURPOSE

We previously reported an interaction with warfarin anticoagulation when initiating treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents for hepatitis C infection. A decreased warfarin sensitivity led to subtherapeutic anticoagulation. To study this interaction further, we expanded our research to include patients treated with the combination of elbasvir and grazoprevir concurrent with warfarin anticoagulation and investigated changes in warfarin sensitivity during and after treatment.

METHODS

Using electronic health records of the Veterans Health Administration, patients starting treatment with elbasvir-grazoprevir for hepatitis C infection concurrent with warfarin anticoagulation were identified. Inclusion required stable warfarin anticoagulation prior to 12 weeks of treatment with elbasvir-grazoprevir. A warfarin sensitivity index (WSI) was calculated at the start of treatment, after 12 weeks after treatment, and at the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was the difference in WSI from pre- to end-treatment. The secondary endpoint was the WSI difference from before treatment to Changes in International Normalized Ratio, warfarin doses, and time in therapeutic range were measured.

RESULTS

In the final sample of 43 patients, the mean WSI decreased during treatment from 0.53 to 0.40, or 25.2%. After treatment, the mean WSI rose to 0.51. Although the mean weekly warfarin dose increased from 40.3 to 44.6 mg during treatment, the mean International Normalized Ratio decreased from 2.40 to 1.96, recovering to 2.59 after treatment. The time spent in therapeutic range decreased from 74.1% before treatment to 39.8% during treatment and back to 64.9% 12 weeks posttreatment.

CONCLUSION

When elbasvir-grazoprevir was added to stable warfarin anticoagulation, warfarin sensitivity decreased significantly during treatment and returned to baseline after treatment.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) non-viremic recipients with HCV viremic donors

In the context of organ shortage, the opioid epidemic, and effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV), more HCV-infected donor organs may be used for liver transplantation. Current data regarding outcomes after donor-derived HCV in previously non-viremic liver transplant recipients are limited. Clinical data for adult liver transplant recipients with donor-derived HCV infection from March 2017 to January 2018 at our institution were extracted from the medical record. Ten patients received livers from donors known to be infected with HCV based on positive nucleic acid testing. Seven had a prior diagnosis of HCV and were treated before liver transplantation. All recipients were non-viremic at the time of transplantation. All 10 recipients derived hepatitis C infection from their donor and achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment with DAA-based regimens, with a median time from transplant to treatment initiation of 43 days (IQR 20-59). There have been no instances of graft loss or death, with median follow-up of 380 days (IQR 263-434) posttransplant. Transplantation of HCV-viremic livers into non-viremic recipients results in acceptable short-term outcomes. Such strategies may be used to expand the donor pool and increase access to liver transplantation.

Hepatitis C and kidney transplant: The eradication time of the virus has arrived

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a factor that reduces the survival of the patient and the graft in renal transplant (RT). The availability of directly acting antivirals agents (DAAs), very effective and with an excellent safety profile, it allows eradicate HCV from patients with kidney disease, and this is a revolutionary radical change in the natural evolution of this infection, until now without effective and safe treatment for the contraindication use of interferon in kidney transplant patients. The efficiency of some DAAs for all genotypes, even in patients with renal insufficiency constitutes a huge contribution to eradicate HCV in the RT population independently the genotype, severity of kidney failure, progression of liver disease and previous anti HCV therapy. All this is raising, although with controversies, the possibility of use kidneys from infected HCV+ donors for transplant in uninfected receptors and can be treated successfully in the early post-TR, thus increasing the total "pool" of kidneys for RT.

No need to discontinue hepatitis C virus therapy at the time of liver transplantation

Objectives

Direct antiviral agents (DAA) has dramatically improved the therapy outcome of hepatitis C-virus (HCV) infection, both on the waiting-list and post liver transplantation (LT). DAA are generally well-tolerated in patients with mild to moderate liver and kidney failure, but some DAAs are contraindicated in patients with severe dysfunction of these organs. Today there are few studies of peri-LT DAA use and treatment is commonly discontinued at the time of LT. We report here our experience of DAA therapy given continuously in the perioperative LT period in a real-life setting in Sweden.

Material

In total 10 patients with HCV-cirrhosis, with or without hepatocellular carcinoma, and a median age of 60.5 years (range, 52–65) were treated with DAAs on the waiting list for LT, and continued in the early postoperative period without any interruption, on the basis of not having reached a full treatment course at the time of LT. Sofosbuvir and a NS5A inhibitor with or without ribavirin, or sofosbuvir and ribavirin only, were given. The distribution of genotypes was genotype 1 and 3, in 4 and 6 patients, respectively. Six of the 10 patients had previously been treated with IFN-based therapy.

Results

There were no adverse events leading to premature DAA discontinuation. All recipients achieved a sustained viral response 12 weeks after end-of-treatment (SVR12). At the time of LT the median MELD-score was 16.5 (range 7–21), CTP-score 9.0 (range 5–10), creatinine 82.5 μmol/L (range 56–135, reference 60–105), bilirubin 33 μmol/L (range 16–79, reference 5–25) and PK-INR 1.5 (range 1.1–1.8). The median duration of DAA therapy was 60 days (range 18–132) pre-LT, 54 days post-LT (range 8–111 days) and in total 15.5 weeks (range 12–30 weeks).

Conclusion

Interferon-free DAA therapy of HCV-infection given in the immediate pre- and post-operative LT period is safe, well-tolerated and yields high SVR rates.

Evaluation of histological dynamics, kidney function and diabetes in liver transplant patients after antiviral treatment with direct-acting antivirals: Therapy of HCV-recurrence

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antivirals allow efficient and safe treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) before and after liver transplantation (LT). However, the impact of sofosbuvir on the graft, diabetes, and on kidney function is not answered yet. Primary endpoint of this analysis was the evaluation of kidney function after antiviral treatment (AVT). Secondary endpoints were the assessment of extrahepatic manifestation of HCV-infection by diabetes mellitus and the histopathological changes in terms of inflammation, content of fat, and fibrosis stage.

METHODS

From 2014 to 4/2015, 100 patients with HCV-recurrence after LT were successfully treated with AVT. Ninety-eight received a sofosbuvir-based regimen. Indication was based on genotype, transplant fibrosis stage, and urgency. Biopsies were evaluated before and after treatment. Renal function and diabetes were assessed before, during, and after AVT.

RESULTS

All patients achieved sustained virological response. A significant improvement of inflammation (P = 0.001) and fibrosis stage (P = 0.031) were observed. Significantly less insulin was required in 32 patients with diabetes (P < 0.001) to keep Hb1Ac unchanged after AVT. Kidney function was stable during, 12 weeks after and 48 weeks after antiviral therapy. Stages of renal insufficiency were comparable before and after AVT.

CONCLUSION

Successful sofosbuvir-based AVT leads to a variety of positive development in transplant patients including a significant improvement of inflammation, fat content and fibrosis, a significant decrease in daily insulin dose and no significant impairment of kidney function.

Hepatitis C and renal transplantation in era of new antiviral agents

Data from World Health Organization estimates that the hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence is 3% and approximately 71 million persons are infected worldwide. HCV infection is particularly frequent among patients affected by renal diseases and among those in dialysis treatment. In addition to produce a higher rate of any cause of death, HCV in renal patients and in renal transplanted patients produce a deterioration of liver disease and is a recognized cause of transplant glomerulopathy, new onset diabetes mellitus and lymphoproliferative disorders. Treatment of HCV infection with interferon alpha and/or ribavirin had a poor efficacy. The treatment was toxic, expensive and with limited efficacy. In the post-transplant period was also cause of severe humoral rejection. In this review we have highlighted the new direct antiviral agents that have revolutionized the treatment of HCV both in the general population and in the renal patients. Patients on dialysis or with low glomerular filtration rate were particularly resistant to the old therapies, while the direct antiviral agents allowed achieving a sustained viral response in 90%-100% of patients with a short period of treatment. This fact to date allows HCV patients to enter the waiting list for transplantation easier than before. These new agents may be also used in renal transplant patients HCV-positive without relevant clinical risks and achieving a sustained viral response in almost all patients. New drug appears in the pipeline with increased profile of efficacy and safety. These drugs are now the object of several phases II, III clinical trials.

Development of Duodenal Ulcers due to the Discontinuation of Proton Pump Inhibitors After the Induction of Sofosbuvir Plus Ledipasvir Therapy: A Report of Two Cases

Sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir (SOF-LDV) combination therapy is a promising therapy for post-transplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection. It is known that gastric pH elevation induces lower absorption of ledipasvir; therefore, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) should be considered regarding dose reduction after SOF-LDV therapy induction. Here, we report two patients who developed duodenal ulcers due to the discontinuation of PPIs after the induction of SOF-LDV therapy for post-transplant HCV reinfection. The first patient was a 71-year-old man who had undergone living donor liver transplantation due to HCV-related liver cirrhosis. Lansoprazole, 30 mg daily, was discontinued upon SOF-LDV therapy induction. Seven days after SOF-LDV therapy induction, gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed the presence of a duodenal ulcer. The second patient was a 54-year-old man who had undergone living donor liver transplantation due to HCV-related end-stage liver disease. Similar to the first patient, rabeprazole sodium was discontinued upon the induction of SOF-LDV therapy. Eighteen days after SOF-LDV therapy induction, gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed the presence of a duodenal ulcer. In both cases, these duodenal ulcers improved after the resumption of the administration of PPIs, and a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks was achieved by SOF-LDV therapy with PPI use. Thus, PPI use should be continued consistently during SOF-LDV therapy for post-transplant HCV reinfection.

Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin treatment in liver and/or renal transplant patients with chronic hepatitis C: A single-center experience

Objective:

Successful treatment is possible with novel direct-acting oral antiviral agents in solid organ transplant patients with hepatitis C. In this study, the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin treatment in liver and/or renal transplant patients with chronic hepatitis C were evaluated.

Materials and methods:

A total of 23 liver and/or renal transplant patients who received sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C over 12 or 24 weeks were enrolled in the study. The treatment response, clinical and laboratory adverse effects, and effect on immunosuppressive drug levels were assessed.

Results:

A total of 12 patients had undergone renal transplantation and 11 had undergone liver transplantation. All of the renal transplant patients and 91% of liver transplant patients had genotype 1. In total, 10 renal transplant patients and 4 liver transplant patients had treatment experience. Two renal transplant patients and one liver transplant patient had compensated cirrhosis. Nine renal transplant patients were on tacrolimus, and two were on cyclosporine; all of the liver transplant patients were on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy. While hepatitis C RNA was negative in 75% of renal transplant patients and 91% of liver transplant patients at week 4, it was negative in all of the patients at the end of treatment and 12 weeks after treatment. Significantly reduced hemoglobin levels were observed in patients administered ribavirin during treatment (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the baseline and treatment period values of mean creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, bilirubin, and tacrolimus levels. There were no adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion:

Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin is quite safe and effective in hepatitis C treatment after liver and/or renal transplantation.

Managing Drug-Drug Interaction Between Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, Dasabuvir, and Mycophenolate Mofetil

No drug-drug interaction study has been conducted to date for the combination of ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir, dasabuvir (3D), and mycophenolic acid (MPA). We here report the case of a hepatitis C virus-infected patient treated with 3D and MPA for vasculitis. In light of the threat of drug-drug interaction, the concentration of MPA was measured before, during, and 15 days after the end of the 3D treatment. Similar values were found at all 3 time points, thus indicating that there is probably no need to adapt MPA dosage to 3D.

Direct-acting Antiviral Agents in Hepatitis C Virus-infected Renal Allograft Recipients: Treatment and Outcome Experience from Single Center

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal allograft recipient is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. At present, only few studies related to treatment and outcomes of HCV-infected renal allograft recipients with DAAs have been published. We aimed the study to assess the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based regimens in HCV-infected renal allograft recipients. We analyzed data of 22 eligible HCV-infected renal allograft recipients (14 genotype-3, 6 genotype-1, one each genotype-2 and 4) who were treated with DAAs at our institute. DAA regimen included sofosbuvir and ribavirin with or without ledipasvir or daclatasvir for 12–24 weeks. Patients were followed up for 24 weeks after completion of treatment. A rapid viral response of 91%, end of therapy response of 100%, and sustained viral response at 12 and 24 weeks of 100% with rapid normalization of liver enzymes were observed. Therapy was well tolerated except for ribavirin-related anemia. A significant decrease in tacrolimus trough levels was observed and most patients required increase in tacrolimus dose during the study. Treatment with newer DAAs is effective and safe for the treatment of HCV-infected renal allograft recipients.

Severe Hyperbilirubinemia in an HIV-HCV-Coinfected Patient Starting the 3D Regimen That Resolved After TDM-Guided Atazanavir Dose Reduction

The combination of ombitasvir, dasabuvir, and paritaprevir/ritonavir (considered as the 3D regimen) has proven to be associated with high sustained virologic response and optimal tolerability in hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Here, we describe an HIV-HCV-coinfected patient who experienced a grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia and a 2.5-fold increase in the atazanavir plasma trough concentrations few days after the start of 3D-based antiviral therapy who benefited from an atazanavir dose reduction guided by therapeutic drug monitoring.

HCV Antiviral Therapy in Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients With Renal Insufficiency

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains the leading indication for liver transplant in much of the world and has traditionally been associated with diminished posttransplant survival due to recurrent HCV-related liver disease. This field has been dramatically changed by the advent of safe and effective direct-acting antiviral therapy, such that most patients can be cured in the pretransplant or posttransplant setting. In addition, there are now direct-acting antiviral regimens specifically approved for use in patients with severe renal insufficiency. However, patients with pre or posttransplant severe renal insufficiency remain more difficult to treat, due to mechanisms of drug metabolism in hepatic and renal failure, as well as posttransplant drug-drug interactions. Treatment options are even more restricted in non-1 HCV genotypes. Because renal insufficiency is common among patients with HCV, with decompensated cirrhosis, and in the posttransplant setting, this difficult scenario is relatively common. However, ongoing development of pangenotypic regimens with improved safety profiles, as well as additional data on dosing and safety among patients with severe renal insufficiency, will continue to expand options for cure even in these most difficult to treat patients.

Real-world experience with daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir ± ribavirin for post-liver transplant HCV recurrence and severe liver disease

Optimizing therapy of post-transplant HCV recurrence remains important, especially in advanced liver disease. We evaluated daclatasvir (DCV) plus sofosbuvir (SOF), with or without ribavirin (RBV), in patients with post-liver transplant recurrence in a real-world European cohort at high risk of decompensation or death within 12 months. Recommended treatment was DCV 60 mg plus SOF 400 mg once daily for 24 weeks; RBV use/shorter treatment duration was at physicians' discretion. Patients (N = 87) were 70% male, 93% white, and mostly infected with HCV genotypes 1b (48%), 1a (32%), or 3 (9%); 37 (43%) had cirrhosis (16 decompensated), five had fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) was 94% (80/85) in a modified intention-to-treat analysis: 95% (58/61) without RBV and 92% (22/24) with RBV, with no virologic failures. SVR12 was 100% (80/80) in an as-observed analysis excluding five nonvirologic failures. Four patients (5%) discontinued therapy for adverse events (AEs); 16 (18%) experienced serious AEs. One patient died on treatment and five during follow-up. Most AEs were associated with advanced liver disease and unrelated to therapy. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions were observed. DCV + SOF ± RBV was well tolerated and achieved high SVR12 (94%) in patients with post-transplant HCV recurrence, including patients with severe liver disease.

Patch-Clamp Study of Hepatitis C p7 Channels Reveals Genotype-Specific Sensitivity to Inhibitors

Hepatitis C is a major worldwide disease and health hazard, affecting ∼3% of the world population. The p7 protein of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an intracellular ion channel and pH regulator that is involved in the viral replication cycle. It is targeted by various classical ion channel blockers. Here, we generated p7 constructs corresponding to HCV genotypes 1a, 2a, 3a, and 4a for recombinant expression in HEK293 cells, and studied p7 channels using patch-clamp recording techniques. The pH50 values for recombinant p7 channels were between 6.0 and 6.5, as expected for proton-activated channels, and current-voltage dependence did not show any differences between genotypes. Inhibition of p7-mediated currents by amantadine, however, exhibited significant, genotype-specific variation. The IC50 values of p7-1a and p7-4a were 0.7 ± 0.1 nM and 3.2 ± 1.2 nM, whereas p7-2a and p7-3a had 50- to 1000-fold lower sensitivity, with IC50 values of 2402 ± 334 nM and 344 ± 64 nM, respectively. The IC50 values for rimantadine were low across all genotypes, ranging from 0.7 ± 0.1 nM, 1.6 ± 0.6 nM, and 3.0 ± 0.8 nM for p7-1a, p7-3a, and p7-4a, respectively, to 24 ± 4 nM for p7-2a. Results from patch-clamp recordings agreed well with cellular assays of p7 activity, namely, measurements of intracellular pH and hemadsorption assays, which confirmed the much reduced amantadine sensitivity of genotypes 2a and 3a. Thus, our results establish patch-clamp studies of recombinant viroporins as a valid analytical tool that can provide quantitative information about viroporin channel properties, complementing established techniques.

Chronic Hepatitis B, C, and D

Chronic hepatitis B, C, and D virus infections contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of immunocompromised individuals. To contextualize discussion of these infections in immunocompromised patients, this paper provides an overview of aspects of infection in normal hosts. It then describes differences in disease, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic management observed in immunocompromised patients.

Treatment of Real-World HCV Genotype 2-Infected Japanese Patients with Sofosbuvir plus Ribavirin

The aim of this study was to characterize the treatment response and tolerability of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapies in Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT)-2. This retrospective study analyzed 114 Japanese HCV GT-2 patients treated for 12 weeks with 400 mg of sofosbuvir plus weight-based ribavirin daily. This treatment led to higher sustained virologic response at 12-weeks post-treatment (SVR12) rates in both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. The efficacy of this treatment in compensated cirrhotics was the same as that in patients with chronic hepatitis. HCV GT-2a infection and lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) tended to be associated with SVR12. Of 114 patients, 113 completed the combination of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks. Seven patients without SVR12 did not have HCV NS5B-S282 mutations. The overall SVR12 rate was 90.4% (103 of 114). More effective therapeutic options with less adverse events are desired to achieve higher SVR rates in HCV GT-2 Japanese patients.

Simeprevir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C virus-infected patients with decompensated liver disease

Approximately three million individuals in the United States are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Chronic HCV infection may lead to the development of compensated as well as decompensated liver cirrhosis. The Phase II IMPACT study was conducted in HCV genotype 1- or 4-infected cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension or decompensated liver disease and assessed for the first time the combination of the three direct-acting antivirals simeprevir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir. Treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced adults with Child-Pugh (CP) score <7 (CP A) and evidence of portal hypertension, or CP score 7-9 (CP B), received 12 weeks of simeprevir 150 mg, daclatasvir 60 mg and sofosbuvir 400 mg, once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12). Pharmacokinetics and safety were also assessed. Overall, 40 patients were enrolled (CP A: 19; CP B: 21). All 40 patients achieved SVR12. At week 8, the mean pharmacokinetic exposure to simeprevir, sofosbuvir, daclatasvir and GS-331007 (sofosbuvir metabolite) was 2.2-, 1.5-, 1.2- and 1.2-fold higher in patients with CP B than CP A, respectively. Grade 1/2 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26 of 40 (65%) patients. One CP B patient had a Grade 3 AE (gastrointestinal haemorrhage), which was reported as a serious AE but not considered related to study drugs. Treatment for 12 weeks with simeprevir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir was generally safe and well tolerated, and resulted in 100% of cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension or decompensated liver disease achieving SVR12.

Common issues in the management of patients in the waiting list and after liver transplantation

The present document contains the recommendations of an expert panel of transplant hepatologists, appointed by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), on how to manage the most common aspects of liver transplantation: the topics covered include: new treatments for HCV in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation; antiviral treatments in patients with HCV recurrence after liver transplantation; prophylaxis for HBV recurrence after liver transplantation; indications for liver transplantation in alcoholic liver disease; and Immunosuppressive therapy. The statements on each topic were approved by participants at the AISF Transplant Hepatologist Expert Meeting (organized by the Permanent Committee on Liver Transplantation in Mondello on 4-5 October 2015), and are graded according to the Oxford classification of levels of evidence.

Decreased tacrolimus plasma concentrations during HCV therapy: a drug-drug interaction or is there an alternative explanation?

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can cause severe liver cirrhosis, for which liver transplantation is the only therapy. To prevent organ rejection, transplanted patients are treated with immunosuppressive agents. We describe two transplanted patients treated with tacrolimus who were simultaneously treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for their chronic HCV infection. No pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were expected between tacrolimus and the selected DAAs. However, in both patients, tacrolimus plasma concentrations decreased during HCV treatment. We hypothesise that decreased plasma concentrations were not caused by a DDI but were an indirect result of the clearance of the HCV infection. During chronic HCV infection, pro-inflammatory cytokines may inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, which are primarily responsible for tacrolimus metabolism. If this is true, then with clearance of the virus the activity of these enzymes will normalise and tacrolimus metabolism will increase. These changes were clinically relevant because the tacrolimus dosage needed to be adjusted. Therefore, physicians should be aware that CYP substrates with narrow therapeutic ranges might require dose adaption during HCV therapy with DAAs.

Use of Sofosbuvir-Based Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Liver Transplant Recipients on Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The use of direct acting agents has changed the management paradigm of hepatitis C (HCV) in liver transplant (LT) recipients. However, the appropriate antiviral regimen in LT recipients on hemodialysis (HD) remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based LT recipients on HD followed at the University of California Los Angeles.

RESULTS

Twelve LT recipients on HD were treated for recurrent HCV with sofosbuvir-based therapy. Indications for antiviral therapy included fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, symptomatic cryoglobulinemia, and recurrent HCV. The causes of renal failure included hepatorenal syndrome, acute tubular necrosis and cryoglobulinemia. Of those who were not on dialysis at the time of transplantation, the mean creatinine (±SD) was 1.7 (±0.8) mg/dL. The mean age (±SD) of the cohort was 62.2 (±6.0) years. Most recipients were male (67%) and infected with genotype 1 (83%). Baseline alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, hemoglobin and HCV RNA values (±SD) were 53.2 (±59.4) IU/L, 3.2 (±5.5) mg/dL, 10.5 (±1.8) g/dL, and 30,499,500 (±29,655,754) IU/mL. HCV RNA levels were undetectable in all recipients at the end of therapy. The trough mean (±SD) hemoglobin of patients on treatment and on HD was 8.4 (±2.3). The sustained viral response was 58% (7/12), and the overall patient survival was 42%. All the deaths occurred a mean (±SD) after 5.4 (±3.6) months after treatment was completed.

CONCLUSIONS

All patients achieved viral suppression from therapy, and over half the recipients achieved a sustained virological response. A high mortality underscores the necessity of starting antiviral treatment sooner in LT recipients and the need for larger cohort studies.

Hepatitis C Treatment in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Perspective

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a very common infection found among hemodialysis (HD) and kidney transplant patients. It is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have much better efficacy (sustained viral response (SVR)) and tolerance than interferon-based regimens. Very recent studies extend this breakthrough finding to chronic kidney disease (CKD) populations.

SUMMARY

CKD patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >30 ml/min/1.73 m2 can be treated with any licensed DAA regimen. In CKD stages 4-5 (mostly HD), the combination of grazoprevir (100 mg) and elbasvir (50 mg), a once-daily oral regimen active against genotypes 1 and 4, induced in a very recent RCT an SVR rate >95%, with tolerance similar to that of placebo. Case series suggest that other DAA regimens are also very effective and well tolerated in HD patients. In kidney transplant recipients, 2 case series have reported 100% SVR with good tolerance of sofosbuvir-based regimens. Importantly, there is a risk of drug-drug interaction of several DAAs including calcineurin inhibitors. Finally, the availability of HCV+ grafts may markedly shorten the waiting time for transplantation. Key Messages: (1) In patients with an eGFR >30, all licensed DAAs regimens can be used. (2) Cure of HCV appears at hand in CKD stages 4-5, including dialysis patients, and in kidney transplant recipients. (3) The choice of DAA regimen in CKD should be based on HCV genotype, viral load, eGFR, concomitant medications, transplant candidacy and comorbidities. (4) The timing of treatment in potential kidney transplantation candidates (before versus after transplantation) should be decided in collaboration with the transplant center. Video Journal Club 'Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco' at http://www.karger.com/?doi=452730.

Successful Anti-HCV Therapy of a Former Intravenous Drug User with Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir in a Peritranspant Setting: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) represent a new hallmark in antiviral therapy of hepatitis C virus (HCV). DAAs have been shown to be safe and effective after liver transplantation (LT), but there is little information about their use in peritransplant settings. Former intravenous drug users represent an increasing group seeking HCV treatment. This case report demonstrates the successful peritransplant antiviral treatment of a former intravenous drug user who had been treated in a methadone maintenance program. CASE REPORT The patient was diagnosed with Child B cirrhosis for the first time in 2009. He had a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 21 and started antiviral therapy with sofosbuvir (SOF) and daclatasvir (DCV) in March 2014. Due to hepatic decompensation, he received a LT in April 2014. Immunosuppression was performed with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF), and boosted with prednisolone in the initial stage. Four weeks after his LT, the patient presented with an acute renal injury. The patient was discharged one week later after sufficient hydration, discontinuation of non-steroidal anti-phlogistics therapy, and adjustments to his immunosuppressive regimen. At the beginning of his therapy, the number of RNA copies was 13,000 IU/mL. He received 24 weeks of anti-HCV treatment with SOF and DCV; the antiviral treatment was successful and his LT was well tolerated.  CONCLUSIONS Treatment of HCV is feasible in a peritransplant setting. The antiviral regimen we used did not seem to have any relevant interactions with the patient's immunosuppressive regimens. Still, the peritransplant setting is a very demanding environment for anti-HCV therapy, and further studies are needed.

Evaluation of a Potential Interaction Between New Regimens to Treat Hepatitis C and Warfarin

OBJECTIVE

New regimens to treat hepatitis C virus infection have expanded the eligible patient population to include more patients receiving concurrent warfarin. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether a drug interaction occurs when these regimens are added to warfarin therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort design using a nationwide database of the Veterans Affairs Health System. Patients on warfarin therapy treated with sofosbuvir or ombitasvir, paritaprevir-ritonavir, and dasabuvir (OBV-PTV/r-DSV) from March 2014 through October 2015 were identified. The warfarin dose response was calculated using a warfarin sensitivity index (WSI) defined as the steady-state INR divided by the mean daily warfarin dose. The primary outcome was the change in WSI from hepatitis C treatment initiation to completion.

RESULTS

The final sample consisted of 271 patients. The WSI decreased 23% from a mean baseline value of 0.53 to 0.39 (decrease of 0.14; 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.16; P < 0.001). OBV-PTV/r-DSV produced a significantly greater decrease than any sofosbuvir regimen. Concurrent ribavirin accounted for an additional decrease in warfarin sensitivity of -0.09 (95% CI = -0.06 to -0.12; P < 0.001). The percentage of subtherapeutic INR results increased from 26% prior to hepatitis C treatment to 58% during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate a clinically significant reduction in warfarin dose-response when hepatitis C treatment regimens were added to warfarin. They were most profound with OBV-PTV/r-DSV. Ribavirin was associated with an additive effect. Clinicians should be aware of this potential drug interaction to closely monitor and minimize subtherapeutic levels of anticoagulation.

New perspectives for preventing hepatitis C virus liver graft infection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of end-stage liver disease that necessitates liver transplantation. The incidence of virus-induced cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma continues to increase, making liver transplantation increasingly common. Infection of the engrafted liver is universal and accelerates progression to advanced liver disease, with 20-30% of patients having cirrhosis within 5 years of transplantation. Treatments of chronic HCV infection have improved dramatically, albeit with remaining challenges of failure and access, and therapeutic options to prevent graft infection during liver transplantation are emerging. Developments in directed use of new direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) to eliminate circulating HCV before or after transplantation in the past 5 years provide renewed hope for prevention and treatment of liver graft infection. Identification of the ideal regimen and use of DAAs reveals new ways to treat this specific population of patients. Complementing DAAs, viral entry inhibitors have been shown to prevent liver graft infection in animal models and delay graft infection in clinical trials, which shows their potential for use concomitant to transplantation. We review the challenges and pathology associated with HCV liver graft infection, highlight current and future strategies of DAA treatment timing, and discuss the potential role of entry inhibitors that might be used synergistically with DAAs to prevent or treat graft infection.

Two-Year Follow-Up Analysis of Telaprevir-Based Antiviral Triple Therapy for HCV Recurrence in Genotype 1 Infected Liver Graft Recipients as a First Step towards Modern HCV Therapy

Objective. The introduction of protease inhibitors telaprevir and boceprevir in 2011 had extended the antiviral treatment options especially in genotype 1 infected hepatitis C relapsers and nonresponders to interferon/ribavirin therapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term treatment efficiency of telaprevir-based triple therapy for patients with hepatitis C reinfection after orthotopic liver transplantation. Patients and Methods. We included 12 patients with histologically confirmed graft fibrosis due to hepatitis C reinfection. The treatment duration was scheduled as 12 weeks of telaprevir-based antiviral triple therapy followed by 36 weeks of dual therapy with pegylated interferon/ribavirin. The patients were followed up for two years after the end of triple therapy. Results. Of the 12 patients, 6 (50%) completed the full 48 weeks of antiviral treatment. An end of treatment response and a sustained virological response 52 weeks after the end of the antiviral treatment course were achieved in 8/12 (67%) and 7/12 (58%) patients, respectively. Conclusion. Telaprevir-based triple therapy was shown to be a long-term effective but complex treatment option for individual patients with hepatitis C graft. With the recent improvements in hepatitis C therapy options telaprevir may not be recommended as a standard therapy for this indication anymore.

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for treatment of post- renal transplant hepatitis C infection: A case report with review of literature

Liver disease due to hepatitis C infection in renal transplant recipients is difficult to treat and often associated with reduced patient survival. A 43-year-old male, a renal allograft recipient, presented at 6 years follow-up with significant weight loss over 3 months. He was detected to have new onset diabetes mellitus together with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (genotype 1). His HCV load remained high despite the change of immuno-suppression from tacrolimus to cyclosporine. A decision to treat with a new anti-viral combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks was taken. Within 3 weeks, his raised serum transaminases levels normalized and viral load became undetectable. At the end of 16 weeks, he continues to do well with normal renal function, has sustained remission from hepatitis C infection and resolution of diabetes.

New hepatitis C therapies for special patient populations

INTRODUCTION

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has become a curable disease. More than 90% sustained virologic response rates have been obtained with 8-24 weeks of treatment with distinct combinations of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) in most registration trials. However, outcomes in real-world patients tend to be lower and treatment of special patient populations is often challenging.

AREAS COVERED

We address the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with DAA in major special patient populations, such as HIV-positive persons, transplant recipients, patients with advanced cirrhosis, renal insufficiency, hepatitis B or D coinfection, injection drug users (IDUs) and prior DAA failures.

EXPERT OPINION

Drug interactions between DAA and medications given to persons with HIV infection or transplant recipients can result in treatment failure and adverse events. Severe organ dysfunction as in kidney insufficiency or decompensated cirrhosis may lead to DAA overexposure and toxicities. Dysfunctional social circumstances and behavior are associated to poor drug adherence and increased risk for HCV re-infection in active IDUs. Finally, DAA response might be impaired by viral interference in patients with hepatitis B or D coinfection or drug resistance in HCV either at baseline or after prior DAA failures.

Novel human anti-claudin 1 mAbs inhibit hepatitis C virus infection and may synergize with anti-SRB1 mAb

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of chronic hepatitis and liver carcinoma and new therapies based on novel targets are needed. The tight junction protein claudin 1 (CLDN-1) is essential for HCV cell entry and spread, and anti-CLDN-1 rat and mouse mAbs are safe and effective in preventing and treating HCV infection in a human liver chimeric mouse model. To accelerate translation of these observations into a novel approach to treat HCV infection and disease in humans, we screened a phage display library of human single-chain antibody fragments by using a panel of CLDN-1-positive and -negative cell lines and identified phage specifically binding to CLDN-1. The 12 clones showing the highest levels of binding were converted into human IgG4. Some of these mAbs displayed low-nanomolar affinity, and inhibited infection of human hepatoma Huh7.5 cells by different HCV isolates in a dose-dependent manner. Cross-competition experiments identified six inhibitory mAbs that recognized distinct epitopes. Combination of the human anti-SRB1 mAb C-1671 with these anti-CLDN-1 mAbs could either increase or reduce inhibition of cell culture-derived HCV infection in vitro. These novel human anti-CLDN-1 mAbs are potentially useful to develop a new strategy for anti-HCV therapy and lend support to the combined use of antibodies targeting the HCV receptors CLDN-1 and SRB1, but indicate that care must be taken in selecting the proper combination.

Dual antiviral therapy for HIV and hepatitis C - drug interactions and side effects

INTRODUCTION

Roughly 20% of HIV-positive persons worldwide are coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The recent advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) that cure most hepatitis C patients has attracted much attention. Knowledge on drug interactions between DAA and antiretrovirals (ARV) may allow maximizing antiviral efficacy while minimizing drug-related toxicities.

AREAS COVERED

We review the most frequent side effects and clinically significant drug interactions between DAA and ARV. We further discuss how they can be prevented and managed in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The safety profile of current DAA and the most recently approved ARV is quite favorable. Interactions between DAA and ARV could be frequent in clinical practice. The most common drug interactions affect drug metabolism by inducing or inhibiting the cytochrome P450 system, leading to abnormal drug exposures. Throughout this mechanism HCV and HIV protease inhibitors interact, especially when co-formulated with ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer, and non-nucleoside HCV and HIV polymerase inhibitors. In contrast, HIV and HCV nucleos(t)ide polymerase inhibitors, and most HCV NS5A inhibitors (i.e., ledipasvir) and HIV integrase inhibitors (i.e., dolutegravir), do not or only marginally affect CYP450, and therefore are free of significant drug interactions. Exposure to HIV and HCV nucleos(t)ide analogues (i.e., tenofovir and sofosbuvir, respectively) is subject to induction/inhibition of drug transporters (i.e., P-glycoprotein).