Carbapenemase-producing organisms in solid organ transplantation

Practical Application of Aztreonam-Avibactam as a Treatment Strategy for Ambler Class B Metallo-β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections are a considerable challenge for clinicians. In recent years, novel antibiotic options have resulted in a tremendous advance in medical therapy; however, current treatment options are primarily effective for resistance derived from serine-based carbapenemases. The Ambler class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) remain a critical challenge with decidedly fewer effective options. One intriguing option for these MBL pathogens is the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam with aztreonam. While clinical experience with this regimen is limited, in vitro studies are promising, and limited case reports describe success with this regimen; however, significant challenges preclude widespread adoption of this novel treatment regimen. A systemic literature review was performed to offer recommendations based on current evidence for a practical strategy on how to best integrate the use of aztreonam with avibactam combination therapy.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infection after solid organ transplantation: Recent trends in epidemiology and therapeutic approaches

Background

Infections caused by multidrug‐resistant gram‐negative bacilli (MDR GNB), in particular extended‐spectrum β‐lactamase‐producing (ESBL‐E) and carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), pose a major threat in solid organ transplantation (SOT). Outcome prediction and therapy are challenging due to the scarcity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or well‐designed observational studies focused on this population.

Methods

Narrative review with a focus on the contributions provided by the ongoing multinational INCREMENT‐SOT consortium (ClinicalTrials identifier NCT02852902) in the fields of epidemiology and clinical management.

Results

The Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), the Group for Study of Infection in Transplantation of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GESITRA‐SEIMC), and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) recently published their recommendations for the management of MDR GNB infections in SOT recipients. We revisit the SET/GESITRA‐SEIMC/REIPI document taking into consideration new evidence that emerged on the molecular epidemiology, prognostic stratification, and treatment of post‐transplant ESBL‐E and CRE infections. Results derived from the INCREMENT‐SOT consortium may support the therapeutic approach to post‐transplant bloodstream infection (BSI). The initiatives devoted to sparing the use of carbapenems in low‐risk ESBL‐E BSI or to repurposing existing non‐β‐lactam antibiotics for CRE in both non‐transplant and transplant patients are reviewed, as well as the eventual positioning in the specific SOT setting of recently approved antibiotics.

Conclusion

Due to the clinical complexity and relative rarity of ESBL‐E and CRE infections in SOT recipients, multinational cooperative efforts such as the INCREMENT‐SOT Project should be encouraged. In addition, RCTs focused on post‐transplant serious infection remain urgently needed.

Molecular Epidemiology, Natural History, and Long-Term Outcomes of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales Colonization and Infections Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales (MDR-E), including carbapenem-resistant and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE, CefR-E), are major pathogens following solid organ transplantation (SOT).

METHODS

We prospectively studied patients who underwent lung, liver, and small bowel transplant from February 2015 through March 2017. Weekly perirectal swabs (up to 100 days post-transplant) were cultured for MDR-E. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on gastrointestinal (GI) tract-colonizing and disease-causing isolates.

RESULTS

Twenty-five percent (40 of 162) of patients were MDR-E GI-colonized. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common CRE and CefR-E. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases and CTX-M were leading causes of CR and CefR, respectively. Thirty-five percent of GI colonizers developed MDR-E infection vs 2% of noncolonizers (P < .0001). The attack rate was higher among CRE colonizers than CefR-E colonizers (53% vs 21%, P = .049). GI colonization and high body mass index were independent risk factors for MDR-E infection (P ≤ .004). Thirty-day mortality among infected patients was 6%. However, 44% of survivors developed recurrent infections; 43% of recurrences were late (285 days to 3.9 years after the initial infection). Long-term survival (median, 4.3 years post-transplant) did not differ significantly between MDR-E-infected and MDR-E-noninfected patients (71% vs 77%, P = .56). WGS phylogenetic analyses revealed that infections were caused by GI-colonizing strains and suggested unrecognized transmission of novel clonal group-258 sublineage CR-K. pneumoniae and horizontal transfer of resistance genes.

CONCLUSIONS

MDR-E GI colonization was common following SOT and predisposed patients to infections by colonizing strains. MDR-E infections were associated with low short- and long-term mortality, but recurrences were frequent and often occurred years after initial infections. Findings provide support for MDR-E surveillance in our SOT program.