1
|
Zeiser LB, Ruck JM, Segev DL, Angel LF, Stewart DE, Massie AB. The Survival Benefit of Accepting an Older Donor Lung Transplant Compared With Waiting for a Younger Donor Offer. Transplantation 2025:00007890-990000000-01065. [PMID: 40254736 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor pool expansion is critical as lung candidates suffer high mortality, yet older donor lungs remain underutilized. We evaluated whether accepting an older donor (defined 4 ways: donor age 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, or 60-69 y) lung transplant was associated with a survival benefit over waiting for a younger donor offer. METHODS Adult candidates who received a lung offer were identified using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, 2015-2022. Offers were categorized by donor age and candidate lung allocation score (LAS; <40, 40-55, >55). Postoffer mortality was compared between candidates for whom the offer was accepted ("acceptors") versus declined ("decliners") within each age-LAS category using weighted Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 21 426 candidates received an offer from a donor age ≥30 y; 11 679 accepted. For LAS >55 candidates, a survival benefit was observed for acceptors of donors ages 30-39 y (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] of mortality: 0.450.520.59), 40-49 y (wHR: 0.610.700.79), and 50-59 y (wHR: 0.670.770.88); P < 0.001. For candidates with LAS 40-55, results suggest a survival benefit of accepting lung offers from donors age 30-39 y (wHR: 0.770.870.99) and 40-49 y (wHR: 0.760.870.99); P = 0.03. However, for candidates with LAS <40, a survival benefit was not observed for accepting any older donor transplant, with possible harm in accepting an age 50+ donor offer. CONCLUSIONS Compared with declining and waiting for a younger donor offer, accepting an older donor lung transplant was associated with a survival advantage in candidates with high LAS in the precontinuous distribution era. Decision makers should consider these findings while recognizing potential changes in waiting time dynamics in the current era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura B Zeiser
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Jessica M Ruck
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and Langone Health, New York, NY
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Luis F Angel
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Darren E Stewart
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and Langone Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stewart DE, Gragert L, Mankowski MA. Optimizing kidney allocation: challenges and solutions. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2025; 30:61-73. [PMID: 40040564 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With the kidney nonuse rate approaching 30%, one-fifth of kidneys placed out of sequence, and unsatisfactory long-term recipient outcomes, U.S. kidney allocation is at a crossroads. This review highlights recent studies and efforts geared toward improving the system. RECENT FINDINGS The Organ Procurement & Transplantation Network's kidney transplantation committee is tasked with migrating kidney allocation policy, currently based on 250 nautical mile circles, to a fully continuous, points-based system. Challenges in designing a system assured to improve, not worsen, placement efficiency have hampered progress. OPO and transplant center practice patterns have adapted to a rapidly changing donation landscape. Advances in transplant immunology, particularly involving molecular HLA typing methods, are opening doors for more precise donor-recipient matching that appear to hold promise for improved long-term outcomes. SUMMARY The largely one-size-fits-all kidney allocation system is in desperate need of an overhaul. The continuous distribution paradigm is flexible enough to accommodate bold, new ideas for addressing major pain points in an equitable way. The OPTN should use policy variances to conduct time-limited, controlled experiments with various continuous distribution policies and build upon what works. Advances in transplant immunology, such as eplet matching, should increasingly be incorporated into kidney offer decision-making and, eventually, the allocation algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Loren Gragert
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Biomedical Informatics and Genomics, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Los Angeles, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aykut B, Overbey DM, Medina CK, Omer TM, Rajab TK, Ngeve SM, Beckerman Z, Turek JW. Partial Heart Transplantation Promotes Organ Stewardship: Domino Hearts and Split Roots. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY SHORT REPORTS 2025; 3:86-91. [PMID: 40098863 PMCID: PMC11910830 DOI: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
Background Partial heart transplantation (PHT) has emerged as a pioneering approach for treating infants with irreparable heart valve dysfunction. However, the scarcity of suitable donors presents a significant bottleneck to its widespread application. This study introduces and evaluates the novel use of domino and split-root procedures within PHT. Methods We describe 6 pediatric cardiac patients who underwent either domino or split-root PHT at our institution. Results From May to August 2023, our team successfully executed 3 domino and 3 split-root PHTs, including 1 procedure that involved interinstitutional collaboration. These cases highlight the procedural feasibility and the potential for broader application. Conclusions The implementation of PHT represents a significant advance in pediatric heart care. Domino and split-root techniques within the PHT framework have the potential to substantially increase both donor availability and recipient capacity. These strategies usher in a new era of organ stewardship through addressing the challenge of donor organ shortage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berk Aykut
- Duke Congenital Heart Surgery Research and Training Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Douglas M Overbey
- Duke Congenital Heart Surgery Research and Training Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Cathlyn K Medina
- Duke Congenital Heart Surgery Research and Training Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tariq M Omer
- Duke Congenital Heart Surgery Research and Training Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Smith M Ngeve
- Duke Congenital Heart Surgery Research and Training Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ziv Beckerman
- Duke Congenital Heart Surgery Research and Training Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joseph W Turek
- Duke Congenital Heart Surgery Research and Training Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Manjunath A, Maning J, Wu T, Bryner B, Harap R, Ghafourian K, Oputa O, Pham DT, Rasberry K, Raza Y, Tibrewala A, Wilcox J, Youmans QR, Okwuosa IS. Cardiac transplantation with increased-risk donors: Trends and clinical outcomes. Int J Cardiol 2025; 421:132887. [PMID: 39662750 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Revised: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orthotopic Heart transplantation (OHT) is a definitive treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. Despite available evidence, recipients and some clinicians remain hesitant to accept organs from Increased Risk Donors (IRD). This study aims to report trends in acceptance of donors from IRD donors and long-term outcomes. METHODS This study is an analysis of OHT recipients captured in the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry from 2004 to 2021. OHT recipients were dichotomized by IRD status. Primary objectives were to report survival following OHT and trends in IRD use. Secondary objectives included all-cause hospitalizations, hospitalizations for infection, treated rejection, and graft failure. RESULTS Of the 36,989 OHT recipients within the study period, 7779 (21%) were identified as recipients of IRD. Recipients of IRD were older (57 years vs 56 years, p ≤0.001), more likely to be African American (23% vs 21%, p = 0.006), blood group O (40% vs 38%, p = 0.02), have public insurance (52% vs 50%, p = 0.02), and have a BMI >30 (30% vs 29%, p = 0.003). IRD recipients had shorter waitlist time (69 days vs 76 days, p = 0.009) and similar long-term survival. IRD recipients also had lower odds of rehospitalization due to infection (OR 0.893, CI 0.842-0.947; p = 0.0002) and lower odds of rehospitalization due to rejection (OR 0.849, CI 0.782-0.921; p ≤0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this large multicenter study, we report that recipients of IRD had similar long-term survival and incidence of graft failure as recipients of standard risk donors. Further analysis is needed to understand observed differences in outcomes of hospitalizations for infection and treated rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusha Manjunath
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Maning
- Northwestern University, Division of Cardiology, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Tingquing Wu
- Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Benjamin Bryner
- Northwestern University, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Rebecca Harap
- Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Kambiz Ghafourian
- Northwestern University, Division of Cardiology, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Olisemeka Oputa
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Duc T Pham
- Northwestern University, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Kiersten Rasberry
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Yasmin Raza
- Northwestern University, Division of Cardiology, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Anjan Tibrewala
- Northwestern University, Division of Cardiology, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Jane Wilcox
- Northwestern University, Division of Cardiology, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Quentin R Youmans
- Northwestern University, Division of Cardiology, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Ike S Okwuosa
- Northwestern University, Division of Cardiology, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bradbrook K, Klassen D, Massie AB, Stewart DE. Does a changing donor pool explain the recent rise in the United States kidney nonuse rate? Am J Transplant 2025:S1600-6135(25)00080-2. [PMID: 39947400 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 02/09/2025] [Indexed: 03/14/2025]
Abstract
The proportion of deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplantation that are not transplanted reached 28% in 2023. Past research demonstrated that >90% of the nonuse rate (NUR) increase in the 2000s could be explained by the broadening donor pool. We used the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to study kidneys recovered from 2010-2023, applying causal inference methods to assess the degree to which the recent, sharp rise in the NUR could be explained by changes in donor clinical characteristics. Unadjusted odds of kidney nonuse were 63% higher (95% CI: 56%, 70%) in 2023 vs 2018. After adjusting for donor factors, the odds of nonuse were only 12% (9%, 15%) higher in 2023. Both regression and propensity weighting demonstrated that 75% to 80% of the recent NUR increase can be explained by a rapidly expanding donor pool. Encouragingly, the NUR has not increased and remains low for above-average quality kidneys. However, the unexplained risk of nonuse for kidneys in the highest kidney donor risk index quartile increased by ∼ 30%, potentially due to residual confounding and/or system-level, exogenous factors such as allocation policy changes. To improve placement efficiency, allocation policy should adapt to the increasingly heterogeneous donor pool by allocating kidneys differently along the donor quality spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Klassen
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lopez R, Mohan S, Husain SA, Yu M, Arrigain S, Brosi D, Hoffman JRH, McCurry KR, Kaplan B, Pomfret EA, Schold JD. Crossing national borders for transplantation: A focused evaluation of deceased donor lung exports from the United States. Am J Transplant 2025; 25:424-434. [PMID: 39209156 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Organ transplantation is a life-saving treatment for end-stage organ failure patients, but the United States (US) faces a shortage of available organs. US policies incentivize identifying recipients for all recovered organs. Technological advancements have extended donor organ viability, creating new opportunities for long-distance transport and international sharing. We aimed to assess organ exports from deceased US donors to candidates abroad, a component of allocation policy allowed without suitable domestic candidates. Based on the national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from January 2014 to September 2023, 388 342 organs were recovered for transplantation, with 511 (0.13%) exported. Most exported organs were lungs (80%). Exported lung donors were older (41 vs 34 years, P < .001), more likely hepatitis C positive (22% vs 4%, P < .001), and more likely donors after circulatory death (20% vs 7%, P < .001). Lungs that were eventually exported were offered to more US potential transplant recipients (median = 65) than those kept in the US (median = 21 and 41 for lungs recovered by nonexporting and exporting organ procurement organizations, respectively; P < .001). Our study highlights the necessity for further research and clear policy initiatives to balance the benefits of cross-border sharing while considering potential opportunities for more aggressive organ allocation within the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocio Lopez
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Colorado Center for Transplantation Care (CCTCARE), Research and Education, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Seyd Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miko Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susana Arrigain
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Colorado Center for Transplantation Care (CCTCARE), Research and Education, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Deena Brosi
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Colorado Center for Transplantation Care (CCTCARE), Research and Education, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jordan R H Hoffman
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kenneth R McCurry
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Bruce Kaplan
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Colorado Center for Transplantation Care (CCTCARE), Research and Education, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Colorado Center for Transplantation Care (CCTCARE), Research and Education, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Colorado Center for Transplantation Care (CCTCARE), Research and Education, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu Y, Feng H, Li K, Li R, Zhang XJ, Tian Y, Fang Y, Zhou Y, Liu L, Zhang X. Donor MHC-specific thymus vaccination allows for immunocompatible allotransplantation. Cell Res 2025; 35:132-144. [PMID: 39748049 PMCID: PMC11770082 DOI: 10.1038/s41422-024-01049-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Organ transplantation is the last-resort option to treat organ failure. However, less than 10% of patients benefit from this only option due to lack of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched donor organs and 25%-80% of donated organs could not find MHC-matched recipients. T cell allorecognition is the principal mechanism for allogeneic graft rejection. We herein present a "donor MHC-specific thymus vaccination" (DMTV) strategy to induce T cell tolerance to both autologous and allogeneic donor MHC. Allogeneic MHC molecules were expressed in the recipient thymus through adeno-associated virus-mediated delivery, which led to stable expression of allogeneic MHC together with the autologous MHC in the engineered thymus. During local T cell education, those T cells recognizing either autologous MHC or allogeneic MHC were equally depleted. We constructed C57BL/6-MHC and BALB/c-MHC dual immunocompatible mice via thymus vaccination of C57BL/6-MHC into the BALB/c thymus and observed long-term graft tolerance after transplantation of C57BL/6 skin and C57BL/6 mouse embryonic stem cells into the vaccinated BALB/c mice. We also validated our DMTV strategy in a bone marrow, liver, thymus (BLT)-humanized mouse model for immunocompatible allotransplantation of human embryonic stem cells. Our study suggests that the DMTV strategy is a potent avenue to introduce a donor compatible immune system in recipients, which overcomes the clinical dilemma of the extreme shortage of MHC-matched donor organs for treating patients with end-stage organ failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, Shanghai, China
- Stem Cell Research Center and Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Shanghai Universities, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Clinical Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Research, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hexi Feng
- Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, Shanghai, China
- Stem Cell Research Center and Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Shanghai Universities, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Clinical Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Research, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ke Li
- Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, Shanghai, China
- Stem Cell Research Center and Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Shanghai Universities, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Clinical Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Research, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruiyi Li
- Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, Shanghai, China
- Stem Cell Research Center and Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Shanghai Universities, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Clinical Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Research, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Jie Zhang
- Department of Gynaecology, Jing'an District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ye Tian
- School of Foreign Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yujiang Fang
- Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, Shanghai, China
- Stem Cell Research Center and Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Shanghai Universities, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Clinical Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Research, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanjie Zhou
- Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, Shanghai, China
- Stem Cell Research Center and Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Shanghai Universities, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Clinical Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Research, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Liu
- Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
- Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, Shanghai, China.
- Stem Cell Research Center and Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Shanghai Universities, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
- Clinical Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Research, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xiaoqing Zhang
- Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
- Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation, Shanghai, China.
- Stem Cell Research Center and Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Shanghai Universities, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
- Clinical Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Research, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
- Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord Injury Repair and Regeneration of Ministry of Education, Orthopaedic Department of Tongji Hospital, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Green E, Dutcher EG, Schold JD, Stewart D. The dynamics of deceased donor kidney transplant decision making: insights from studying individual clinicians' offer decisions. Am J Transplant 2025:S1600-6135(25)00046-2. [PMID: 39894358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2024] [Revised: 01/08/2025] [Accepted: 01/24/2025] [Indexed: 02/04/2025]
Abstract
Despite the high demand, >7500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians vs centers and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (from January 2016 to December 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level data set with 344 678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians vs centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed-effect logistic regression models. To complement kidney donor profile index as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated expected acceptance probability, adjusting for a broader set of donor characteristics and recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35; 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level (0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) variances were significant, with heterogeneity in the kidney donor profile index-acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Green
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
| | - E Glenn Dutcher
- Department of Economics, University of North Carolina-Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado-Anschutz, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado-Anschutz, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Darren Stewart
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gruessner RWG, Gruessner AC. The Centennial Allograft: Cumulative Kidney and Liver Function for More Than 100 Years. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:1341-1346. [PMID: 39003206 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
The maximum cumulative life span of kidneys and livers first in donors and then in transplant recipients has not been established. The purpose of this study was to determine if cumulative organ function for more than 90 years is possible for transplanted kidneys and livers. This study included kidney and liver transplants from living or deceased donors ≥55 years. Cumulative organ function (COF) = Organ Age at Donation [Years] + Tx Allograft Function [Years]. Univariate and multivariable methods were used to describe characteristics and outcomes. Between 1987 and 2022, a total of 81,807 kidney and 37,099 liver transplants were included in this study. Of all kidney grafts 2.7% but 16.6% of all liver grafts reached the 90-year COF mark. There were only 2 living donor kidneys that surpassed the 100-year mark versus 29 deceased liver grafts. The longest kidney function was 104 years and longest liver function 108 years. Multivariate analysis showed that optimal donor and recipient selection and management are predictors for allograft longevity. COF in organs exceeding 100 physiologic years is possible. Extended organ longevity was 5 times more common for livers than kidneys. These analyses support that age alone should not exclude older kidney and liver donors from consideration for transplantation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Cruz Mususú W, García-Lopez A, Lozano-Suarez N, Gómez-Montero A, Orellano-Salas M, Vargas-Pérez L, Escobar-Chaves X, Girón-Luque F. Understanding the dynamics of deceased organ donation and utilization in Colombia. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2024; 48:e24. [PMID: 38464873 PMCID: PMC10921909 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2024.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To obtain a comprehensive overview of organ donation, organ utilization, and discard in the entire donation process in Colombia. Methods A retrospective study of 1 451 possible donors, distributed in three regions of Colombia, evaluated in 2022. The general characteristics, diagnosis, and causes of contraindication for potential donors were described. Results Among the 1 451 possible donors, 441 (30.4%) fulfilled brain death criteria, constituting the potential donor pool. Families consented to organ donation in 141 medically suitable cases, while 60 instances utilized legal presumption, leading to 201 eligible donors (13.9%). Of those, 160 (11.0%) were actual donors (in whom operative incision was made with the intent of organ recovery or who had at least one organ recovered). Finally, we identified 147 utilized donors (10.1%) (from whom at least one organ was transplanted). Statistically significant differences were found between age, sex, diagnosis of brain death, and donor critical pathway between regions. A total of 411 organs were transplanted from 147 utilized donors, with kidneys being the most frequently procured and transplanted organs, accounting for 280 (68.1%) of the total. This was followed by 85 livers (20.7%), 31 hearts (7.5%), 14 lungs (3.4%), and 1 pancreas (0.2%). The discard rate of procured deceased donors was 8.1%. Conclusions About one-tenth of donors are effectively used for transplantation purposes. Our findings highlight areas of success and challenges, providing a basis for future improvements in Colombia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea García-Lopez
- Colombiana de TrasplantesBogotáColombiaColombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Andrea Gómez-Montero
- Colombiana de TrasplantesBogotáColombiaColombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | | | - Fernando Girón-Luque
- Colombiana de TrasplantesBogotáColombiaColombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|