1
|
Nie F, Pei X, Du J, Shi W, Wang J, Feng L, Liu Y. Multiomics-Based Deep Learning Prediction of Prognosis and Therapeutic Response in Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemoimmunotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int J Gen Med 2025; 18:981-996. [PMID: 40026810 PMCID: PMC11869764 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s506485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to develop a clinical early warning prediction model to evaluate the prognosis and response to chemoimmunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), thereby guiding clinical decision-making. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data and radiomics parameters of 309 patients with ES-SCLC hospitalized at Baotou Cancer Hospital from February 2020 to September 2024. Patients were divided into reactive and non-reactive groups based on their response to chemoimmunotherapy.Machine learning algorithms (including random forests, decision trees, artificial neural networks, and generalized linear regression) were used to predict the combined treatment response. The model's predictive ability was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and clinical decision curve analysis(DCA). The prognostic evaluation of patients receiving combination therapy was based on the COX regression model, with predictive performance assessed through nomogram visualization and calibration curves. Results Out of 309 patients with ES-SCLC, 248 (80.26%) responded to combination therapy. Logistic regression and Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses identified Energy, sum of squares(SOS), mean sum(MES), sum variance(SUV), sum entropy(SUE), difference variance(DIV), and pathomics score as independent risk factors for treatment response. The area under the ROC curve for predicting treatment response using machine learning were 0.764 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.707~0.821) and 0.901 (95% CI: 0.846~0.956) in the training and validation sets. The C-index of the radiomics and pathomics prognostic nomogram model based on the COX prognostic model was 0.766 and 0.812 in those sets, respectively. Conclusion We developed prediction model based on multi-omics demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting chemoimmunotherapy response in patients with ES-SCLC. The random forest prediction model, in particular, provides accurate response and prognostic risk assessments, thereby assisting clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Nie
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiufeng Pei
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiale Du
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wanting Shi
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianying Wang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lu Feng
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yonggang Liu
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li MY, Pan Y, Lv Y, Ma H, Sun PL, Gao HW. Digital pathology and artificial intelligence in renal cell carcinoma focusing on feature extraction: a literature review. Front Oncol 2025; 15:1516264. [PMID: 39926279 PMCID: PMC11802434 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1516264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 02/11/2025] Open
Abstract
The integrated application of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital pathology (DP) technology has opened new avenues for advancements in oncology and molecular pathology. Consequently, studies in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have emerged, highlighting potential in histological subtype classification, molecular aberration identification, and outcome prediction by extracting high-throughput features. However, reviews of these studies are still rare. To address this gap, we conducted a thorough literature review on DP and AI applications in RCC through database searches. Notably, we found that AI models based on deep learning achieved area under the curve (AUC) of over 0.93 in subtype classification, 0.89-0.96 in grading of clear cell RCC, 0.70-0,89 in molecular prediction, and over 0.78 in survival prediction. This review finally discussed the current state of researches and potential future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Yue Li
- Department of Pathology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yu Pan
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yang Lv
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - He Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Ping-Li Sun
- Department of Pathology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Hong-Wen Gao
- Department of Pathology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chu TN, Wong EY, Ma R, Yang CH, Dalieh IS, Hung AJ. Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Prostate Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2023; 24:231-240. [PMID: 36808595 PMCID: PMC10090000 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-023-01149-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to explore the current state of research on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the management of prostate cancer. We examine the various applications of AI in prostate cancer, including image analysis, prediction of treatment outcomes, and patient stratification. Additionally, the review will evaluate the current limitations and challenges faced in the implementation of AI in prostate cancer management. RECENT FINDINGS Recent literature has focused particularly on the use of AI in radiomics, pathomics, the evaluation of surgical skills, and patient outcomes. AI has the potential to revolutionize the future of prostate cancer management by improving diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and patient outcomes. Studies have shown improved accuracy and efficiency of AI models in the detection and treatment of prostate cancer, but further research is needed to understand its full potential as well as limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy N Chu
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Elyssa Y Wong
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Runzhuo Ma
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Cherine H Yang
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Istabraq S Dalieh
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Andrew J Hung
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Machine learning-based pathomics signature could act as a novel prognostic marker for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2021; 126:771-777. [PMID: 34824449 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01640-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists through naked eyes is insufficient for accurate survival prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS A total of 483 whole slide images (WSIs) data from three patient cohorts were retrospectively analyzed. We performed machine learning algorithm to identify optimal digital pathological features and constructed machine learning-based pathomics signature (MLPS) for ccRCC patients. Prognostic performance of the prognostic model was also verified in two independent validation cohorts. RESULTS MLPS could significantly distinguish ccRCC patients with high survival risk, with hazard ratio of 15.05, 4.49 and 1.65 in three independent cohorts, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed that the MLPS could act as an independent prognostic factor for ccRCC patients. Integration nomogram based on MLPS, tumour stage system and tumour grade system improved the current survival prediction accuracy for ccRCC patients, with area under curve value of 89.5%, 90.0%, 88.5% and 85.9% for 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year disease-free survival prediction. DISCUSSION The machine learning-based pathomics signature could act as a novel prognostic marker for patients with ccRCC. Nevertheless, prospective studies with multicentric patient cohorts are still needed for further verifications.
Collapse
|
5
|
Thenault R, Gasmi A, Khene ZE, Bensalah K, Mathieu R. Radiogenomics in prostate cancer evaluation. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:424-429. [PMID: 34009176 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radiogenomics, fusion between radiomics and genomics, represents a new field of research to improve cancer comprehension and evaluation. In this review, we give an overview of radiogenomics and its most recent and relevant applications in prostate cancer management. RECENT FINDINGS Literature about radiogenomics in prostate cancer emerged last 5 years but remains scarce. Radiogenomics in prostate cancer mainly rely on MRI-based features. Several imaging biomarkers, mostly based on the identification of radiomic features from deep learning studies, have been studied for the prediction of genomic profiles, such as PTEN Decipher Oncotype DX or Prolaris expression. However, despite promising results, several limitations still preclude any integration of radiogenomics in daily practice. SUMMARY In the future, the emergence of artificial intelligence in urology, with an increasing use of radiomics and genomics data, may enable radiogenomics to assume a growing role in the evaluation of prostate cancer, with a noninvasive and personal approach in the field of personalized medicine. Further efforts are necessary for integration of this promising approach in prostate cancer decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronan Thenault
- Department of Urology, Service d'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou
| | - Anis Gasmi
- Department of Urology, Service d'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou
| | - Zine-Edine Khene
- Department of Urology, Service d'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Service d'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Service d'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou
- IRSET, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Compérat E, Abufaraj M, Shariat SF. Novel transurethral resection technologies and training modalities in the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:324-331. [PMID: 33973535 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Conventional transurethral resection (TURBT) with tumor fragmentation is the primary step in the surgical treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Recently, new surgical techniques and training modalities have emerged with the aim to overcome short-comings of TURBT and improve oncologic outcomes. In this review, we provide a comprehensive update of recent techniques/techniques that aim to improve upon conventional TURBT and beyond. RECENT FINDINGS A systemic approach during conventional TURBT that features the use of a surgical checklist has been shown to improve recurrence-free survival. Several simulators have been developed and validated to provide additional training opportunities. However, transfer of improved simulator performance into real world surgery still requires validation. While there is no convincing data that demonstrate superior outcomes with bipolar TURBT, en-bloc resection already promises to offer lower rates of complications as well as potentially lower recurrence probabilities in select patients. SUMMARY TURBT remains the quintessential procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. Urologists need to be aware of the importance and challenges of this procedure. Aside of embracing new resection techniques and a conceptual-systematic approach, training opportunities should be expanded upon to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee M, Wei S, Anaokar J, Uzzo R, Kutikov A. Kidney cancer management 3.0: can artificial intelligence make us better? Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:409-415. [PMID: 33882560 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Artificial intelligence holds tremendous potential for disrupting clinical medicine. Here we review the current role of artificial intelligence in the kidney cancer space. RECENT FINDINGS Machine learning and deep learning algorithms have been developed using information extracted from radiomic, histopathologic, and genomic datasets of patients with renal masses. SUMMARY Although artificial intelligence applications in medicine are still in their infancy, they already hold immediate promise to improve accuracy of renal mass characterization, grade, and prognostication. As algorithms become more robust and generalizable, artificial intelligence is poised to significantly disrupt kidney cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jordan Anaokar
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen S, Jiang L, Zhang E, Hu S, Wang T, Gao F, Zhang N, Wang X, Zheng J. A Novel Nomogram Based on Machine Learning-Pathomics Signature and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio for Survival Prediction of Bladder Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:703033. [PMID: 34222026 PMCID: PMC8247435 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.703033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists through naked eyes is insufficient for accurate survival prediction of bladder cancer (BCa). In addition, how neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could be used for prognosis prediction of BCa patients has not been fully understood. In this study, we collected 508 whole slide images (WSIs) of hematoxylin-eosin strained BCa slices and NLR value from the Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), which were further processed for nuclear segmentation. Cross-verified prediction models for predicting clinical prognosis were constructed based on machine learning methods. Six WSIs features were selected for the construction of pathomics-based prognosis model, which could automatically distinguish BCa patients with worse survival outcomes, with hazard ratio value of 2.19 in TCGA cohort (95% confidence interval: 1.63-2.94, p <0.0001) and 3.20 in General cohort (95% confidence interval: 1.75-5.87, p = 0.0014). Patients in TCGA cohort with high NLR exhibited significantly worse clinical survival outcome when compared with patients with low NLR (HR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.29-3.27, p <0.0001). External validation in General cohort also revealed significantly poor prognosis in BCa patients with high NLR (HR = 3.69, 95% CI: 1.83-7.44 p <0.0001). Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis proved that both the MLPS and the NLR could act as independent prognostic factor for overall survival of BCa patients. Finally, a novel nomogram based on MLPS and NLR was constructed to improve their clinical practicability, which had excellent agreement with actual observation in 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival prediction. Decision curve analyses both in the TCGA cohort and General cohort revealed that the novel nomogram acted better than both the tumor grade system in prognosis prediction. Our novel nomogram based on MLPS and NLR could act as an excellent survival predictor and provide a scalable and cost-effective method for clinicians to facilitate individualized therapy. Nevertheless, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siteng Chen
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Liren Jiang
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Encheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanshan Hu
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Junhua Zheng
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Mori K, Moschini M, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, Soria F, Mari A, Krajewski W, Albisinni S, Teoh JYC, Quhal F, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Katayama S, Grossmann NC, Enikeev D, Zimmermann K, Fajkovic H, Glybochko P, Shariat SF, Pradere B. Accuracy of Frozen Section Analysis of Urethral and Ureteral Margins During Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:752-760. [PMID: 34127436 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The question of the ability of frozen section analysis (FSA) to accurately detect malignant pathology intraoperatively has been discussed for many decades. OBJECTIVE We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diagnostic estimates of FSA of the urethral and ureteral margins in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched in February 2021 for studies analyzing the association between FSA and the final urethral and ureteral margin status in patients treated with RC for BCa. The primary endpoint was the value of pathologic detection of urethral and ureteral malignant involvement with FSA during RC compared with the final margin status. We included studies that provided true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative values for FSA, which allowed us to calculate the diagnostic estimates. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Fourteen studies, comprising 8208 patients, were included in the quantitative synthesis. Forest plots revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity for FSA of urethral margins during RC were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.97), respectively. While for the FSA of ureteral margins, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.84) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), respectively. Calculated diagnostic odds ratios indicated high FSA effectiveness, and patients with a positive urethral or ureteral margin at final pathology are over 100 times more likely to have positive FSA than patients without margin involvement at final pathology. Area under the curves of 96.6% and 96.7% were reached for FSA detection of urethral and ureteral tumor involvement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative FSA demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting both urethral and ureteral malignant involvement at the time of RC for BCa. FSA of both urethral and ureteral margins during RC is accurate enough to be of great value in the routine management of BCa patients treated with RC. While its specificity was great to guide intraoperative decision-making, its sensitivity remains suboptimal yet. PATIENT SUMMARY We believe that the frozen section analysis of both urethral and ureteral margins during radical cystectomy should be considered more often in urologic practice, until quality of life-based cost-effectiveness studies can identify patients within each institution who are unlikely to benefit from it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kristin Zimmermann
- Department of Urology, Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Petr Glybochko
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schuettfort VM, D'Andrea D, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Mori K, König F, Rink M, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Luzzago S, Rouprêt M, Enikeev D, Zimmermann K, Deuker M, Moschini M, Sari Motlagh R, Grossmann NC, Katayama S, Pradere B, Shariat SF. A panel of systemic inflammatory response biomarkers for outcome prediction in patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 2021; 129:182-193. [PMID: 33650265 PMCID: PMC9291893 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To determine the predictive and prognostic value of a panel of systemic inflammatory response (SIR) biomarkers relative to established clinicopathological variables in order to improve patient selection and facilitate more efficient delivery of peri‐operative systemic therapy. Materials and Methods The preoperative serum levels of a panel of SIR biomarkers, including albumin–globulin ratio, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, De Ritis ratio, monocyte–lymphocyte ratio and modified Glasgow prognostic score were assessed in 4199 patients treated with radical cystectomy for clinically non‐metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Patients were randomly divided into a training and a testing cohort. A machine‐learning‐based variable selection approach (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression) was used for the fitting of several multivariable predictive and prognostic models. The outcomes of interest included prediction of upstaging to carcinoma invading bladder muscle (MIBC), lymph node involvement, pT3/4 disease, cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS). The discriminatory ability of each model was either quantified by area under the receiver‐operating curves or by the C‐index. After validation and calibration of each model, a nomogram was created and decision‐curve analysis was used to evaluate the clinical net benefit. Results For all outcome variables, at least one SIR biomarker was selected by the machine‐learning process to be of high discriminative power during the fitting of the models. In the testing cohort, model performance evaluation for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis, ≥pT3 disease and upstaging to MIBC showed a 200‐fold bootstrap‐corrected area under the curve of 67.3%, 73% and 65.8%, respectively. For postoperative prognosis of CSS and RFS, a 200‐fold bootstrap corrected C‐index of 73.3% and 72.2%, respectively, was found. However, even the most predictive combinations of SIR biomarkers only marginally increased the discriminative ability of the respective model in comparison to established clinicopathological variables. Conclusion While our machine‐learning approach for fitting of the models with the highest discriminative ability incorporated several previously validated SIR biomarkers, these failed to improve the discriminative ability of the models to a clinically meaningful degree. While the prognostic and predictive value of such cheap and readily available biomarkers warrants further evaluation in the age of immunotherapy, additional novel biomarkers are still needed to improve risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Urology Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Marina Deuker
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Centre, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|