Epidemiological study of pancreatic diabetes in Japan in 2005: a nationwide study

Characteristics and Clinical Course of Diabetes of the Exocrine Pancreas: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The natural course of diabetes of the exocrine pancreas (DEP) is not well established. We aimed to compare the risk of insulin initiation, diabetic complications, and mortality between DEP and type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort between 2012 and 2017, we divided patients with diabetes into those with diabetes without prior pancreatic disease (indicated type 2 diabetes, n = 153,894) and diabetes with a prior diagnosis of pancreatic disease (indicated DEP, n = 3,629). ICD-10 codes and pharmacy prescription information were used to define type 2 diabetes, DEP, and acute and chronic diabetes complications. Kaplan-Meier curves were produced to compare insulin use over time between groups. We created logistic regression models for odds of progression to diabetic complications and mortality.

RESULTS

DEP was associated with a higher risk of insulin use than type 2 diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38 at 5 years [95% CI 1.30-1.47], P < 0.0001). Individuals with DEP showed higher risks of hypoglycemia (odds ratio 1.85 [1.54-2.21], P < 0.0001), diabetic neuropathy (1.38 [1.28-1.49], P < 0.0001), nephropathy (1.38 [1.27-1.50], P < 0.0001), retinopathy (1.10 [1.01-1.20], P = 0.0347), coronary heart disease (1.59 [1.48-1.70], P < 0.0001), cerebrovascular disease (1.38 [1.28-1.49], P < 0.0001), and peripheral arterial disease (1.34 [1.25-1.44], P < 0.0001). All-cause mortality was higher in those with DEP (1.74 [1.57-1.93], P < 0.0001) than in those with type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

DEP is more likely to require insulin therapy than type 2 diabetes. Hypoglycemia, micro- and macrovascular complications, and all-cause mortality events are higher in DEP compared with type 2 diabetes.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for chronic pancreatitis 2021

BACKGROUND

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is defined according to the recently proposed mechanistic definition as a pathological fibro-inflammatory syndrome of the pancreas in individuals with genetic, environmental, and/or other risk factors who develop persistent pathological responses to parenchymal injury or stress.

METHODS

The clinical practice guidelines for CP in Japan were revised in 2021 based on the 2019 Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria for CP, which incorporate the concept of a pathogenic fibro-inflammatory syndrome in the pancreas. In this third edition, clinical questions are reclassified into clinical questions, background questions, and future research questions.

RESULTS

Based on analysis of newly accumulated evidence, the strength of evidence and recommendations for each clinical question is described in terms of treatment selection, lifestyle guidance, pain control, treatment of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency, and treatment of complications. A flowchart outlining indications, treatment selection, and policies for cases in which treatment is ineffective is provided. For pain control, pharmacological treatment and the indications and timing for endoscopic and surgical treatment have been updated in the revised edition.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated guidelines provide clinicians with useful information to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of CP.

Genetic Risk Score in Diabetes Associated With Chronic Pancreatitis Versus Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complication of chronic pancreatitis (CP). Whether pancreatogenic diabetes associated with CP-DM represents a discrete pathophysiologic entity from type 2 DM (T2DM) remains uncertain. Addressing this question is needed for development of specific measures to manage CP-DM. We approached this question from a unique standpoint, hypothesizing that if CP-DM and T2DM are separate disorders, they should be genetically distinct. To test this hypothesis, we sought to determine whether a genetic risk score (GRS) based on validated single nucleotide polymorphisms for T2DM could distinguish between groups with CP-DM and T2DM.

Risk of Mortality and Hospitalization After Post-Pancreatitis Diabetes Mellitus vs Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the risk of mortality and hospitalization in individuals with post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus (PPDM) compared with those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Using nationwide hospital discharge data on pancreatitis and diabetes in New Zealand (n = 231,943), a total of 959 individuals with PPDM were identified. For each individual with PPDM, 10 age- and sex-matched individuals with T2DM were randomly selected. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted, and the risk was expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 3,867 deaths occurred among 10,549 study individuals. Individuals with PPDM had all-cause mortality rate at 80.5 (95% CI, 70.3-90.6) per 1,000 person-years, which was higher compared with T2DM individuals (adjusted HR, 1.13 (95% CI, 1.00-1.29); absolute excess risk, 14.8 (95% CI, 4.5-25.2) per 1,000 person-years). Compared with T2DM, PPDM was associated with higher risks of mortality from cancer (adjusted HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.13-1.83), infectious disease (adjusted HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.69-3.77), and gastrointestinal disease (adjusted HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.64-4.01). Individuals with PPDM vs T2DM were also at significantly higher risks of hospitalization for chronic pulmonary disease, moderate to severe renal disease, and infectious disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with PPDM have higher risk of mortality and hospitalization compared with individuals with T2DM. Guidelines for management of PPDM need to be developed with a view to preventing excess deaths and hospitalizations in individuals with PPDM.

Efficacy and safety of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy on exocrine pancreatic insufficiency: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is widely applied to patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), but its effect and safety has not been quantified. Therefore we performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and tolerance of PERT on patients with EPI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library database, Evidence-based medicine/clinical trials published before December 2016 were searched by two independent reviewers to identify prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Seven RCTs, randomizing a total of 282 patients, were filtrated and assessed qualitatively (Jadad score). PERT increased CFA (WMD: 26.56, 20.35 to 32.76, I2= 79.6%, P < 0.001) compared with baseline, and CFA (WMD: 17.97, 12.61 to 23.34, I2 = 76.7%, P < 0.001) vs. placebo. Meanwhile, CNA, SFE, SNE and SW were significantly improved in PERT compared with baseline and placebo, with no statistical differences in adverse events. Subgroup analysis indicated that standard forms of PERT displayed more effectiveness with significantly decreased heterogeneity, and large sample size also reduced the heterogeneity to some degree.

CONCLUSIONS

PERT is demonstrated to be effective and tolerable in patients with EPI, especially using standard administration of PERT. Larger and higher quality studies on EPI are demanded to long-term effect of standard PERT treatment.

Defects in α-Cell Function in Patients With Diabetes Due to Chronic Pancreatitis Compared With Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Healthy Individuals

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes frequently develops in patients with chronic pancreatitis. We examined the alterations in the glucagon response to hypoglycemia and to oral glucose administration in patients with diabetes due to chronic pancreatitis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten patients with diabetes secondary to chronic pancreatitis were compared with 13 patients with type 2 diabetes and 10 healthy control subjects. A stepwise hypoglycemic clamp and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were performed.

RESULTS

Glucose levels during the OGTT were higher in patients with diabetes and chronic pancreatitis and lower in control subjects (P < 0.0001). Insulin and C-peptide levels were reduced, and the glucose-induced suppression of glucagon was impaired in both groups with diabetes (all P < 0.0001 vs. control subjects). During hypoglycemia, glucagon concentrations were reduced in patients with chronic pancreatitis and with type 2 diabetes (P < 0.05). The increase in glucagon during the clamp was inversely related to the glucose-induced glucagon suppression and positively related to β-cell function. Growth hormone responses to hypoglycemia were lower in patients with type 2 diabetes (P = 0.0002) but not in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

α-Cell responses to oral glucose ingestion and to hypoglycemia are disturbed in patients with diabetes and chronic pancreatitis and in patients with type 2 diabetes. The similarities between these defects suggest a common etiology.

The nutritional management of type 3c (pancreatogenic) diabetes in chronic pancreatitis

Type 3c diabetes mellitus (T3cDM), also known as pancreatogenic diabetes, refers to diabetes caused by disease of the exocrine pancreas. T3cDM is not commonly recognised by clinicians and frequently it is misclassified as T1DM, or more commonly, T2DM. T3cDM can be difficult to distinguish from T1DM and T2DM, and it often co-exists with the latter. The aim of this review is to describe T3cDM, along with its complications, diagnosis and management. We focus on the nutritional implications of T3cDM for those with chronic pancreatitis, and provide a practical guide to the nutritional management of this condition.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for chronic pancreatitis 2015

Chronic pancreatitis is considered to be an irreversible progressive chronic inflammatory disease. The etiology and pathology of chronic pancreatitis are complex; therefore, it is important to correctly understand the stage and pathology and provide appropriate treatment accordingly. The newly revised Clinical Practice Guidelines of Chronic Pancreatitis 2015 consist of four chapters, i.e., diagnosis, staging, treatment, and prognosis, and includes a total of 65 clinical questions. These guidelines have aimed at providing certain directions and clinically practical contents for the management of chronic pancreatitis, preferentially adopting clinically useful articles. These revised guidelines also refer to early chronic pancreatitis based on the Criteria for the Diagnosis of Chronic Pancreatitis 2009. They include such items as health insurance coverage of high-titer lipase preparations and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, new antidiabetic drugs, and the definition of and treatment approach to pancreatic pseudocyst. The accuracy of these guidelines has been improved by examining and adopting new evidence obtained after the publication of the first edition.

Chronic Pancreatitis and Diabetes Mellitus

OPINION STATEMENT

Patients with chronic pancreatitis should be screening at least annually for diabetes. Lifestyle modifications remain to be an important part of treatment for diabetic control. Unless contraindicated or not tolerated, metformin can be initiated and continued concurrently with other anti-diabetic agents or insulin. All anti-diabetic agents should be used based on their physiology and adverse effect profiles, along with the metabolic status of patients. Insulin therapy should be initiated without delay for any of the following: symptomatic or overt hyperglycemia, catabolic state secondary to uncontrolled diabetes, history of diabetic ketoacidosis, hospitalization or acute exacerbation of pancreatitis, or hyperglycemia that cannot be otherwise controlled. Dose adjustment should be done conservatively as these patients are more likely to be insulin sensitive and have loss of counter regulatory hormones. Insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring should be considered early during therapy in selected patients. For patients undergoing total pancreatectomy or extensive partial pancreatectomy, evaluations to determine the eligibilities for islet cell autotransplantation should be considered.

Diabetes after pancreatic surgery: novel issues

In the developed world, pancreatic surgery is becoming more common, with an increasing number of patients developing diabetes because of either partial or total pancreatectomy, with a significant impact on quality of life and survival. Although these patients are expected to consume increasing health care resources in the near future, many aspects of diabetes after pancreatectomy are still not well defined. The treatment of diabetes in these patients takes advantage of the therapies used in type 1 and 2 diabetes; however, no specific guidelines for its management, both immediately after pancreatic surgery or in the long term, have been developed. In this article, on the basis of both the literature and our clinical experience, we address the open issues and discuss the most appropriate therapeutic options for patients with diabetes after pancreatectomy.

Pancrelipase: an evidence-based review of its use for treating pancreatic exocrine insufficiency

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is often observed in patients with pancreatic diseases, including chronic pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis, and tumors, or after surgical resection. PEI often results in malnutrition, weight loss and steatorrhea, which together increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, nutritional interventions, such as low-fat diets and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), are needed to improve the clinical symptoms, and to address the pathophysiology of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. PERT with delayed-release pancrelipase is now becoming a standard therapy for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency because it significantly improves the coefficients of fat and nitrogen absorption as well as clinical symptoms, without serious treatment-emergent adverse events. The major adverse events were tolerable gastrointestinal tract symptoms, such as stomach pain, nausea, and bloating. Fibrosing colonopathy, a serious complication, is associated with high doses of enzymes. Several pancrelipase products have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in recent years. Although many double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of pancrelipase products have been conducted in recent years, these studies have enrolled relatively few patients and have often been less than a few weeks in duration. Moreover, few studies have addressed the issue of pancreatic diabetes, a type of diabetes that is characterized by frequent hypoglycemia, which is difficult to manage. In addition, it is unclear whether PERT improves morbidity and mortality in such settings. Therefore, large, long-term prospective studies are needed to identify the optimal treatment for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. The studies should also examine the extent to which PERT using pancrelipase improves mortality and morbidity. The etiology and severity of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency often differ among patients with gastrointestinal diseases or diabetes (type 1 and type 2), and among elderly subjects. Finally, although there is currently limited clinical evidence, numerous extrapancreatic diseases and conditions that are highly prevalent in the general population may also be considered potential targets for PERT and related treatments.

The effect of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia on glucose transport and expression of glucose transporters in human lymphocytes B and T: an in vitro study

Glucose transport in lymphocytes is regulated by many agents. It is interesting if only changing glucose concentrations in environment involves the impact on glucose uptake. The aims of this study were to investigate the impact of changing glucose concentrations in medium on deoxy-d-glucose uptake and what these conditions impact on the percent of cells with expression of chosen glucose transporters in human lymphocytes B and T. Isolated lymphocytes B and T obtained from healthy subject were cultivated in different concentrations of glucose. The experiments were carried out using tritium labeled deoxy-d-glucose and flow cytometry. In comparison to normoglycemia, hyperglycemia impairs the uptake of deoxy-d-glucose more than hypoglycemia. Lymphocytes B manifest significantly lower uptake of deoxy-d-glucose than lymphocytes T. Lymphocytes incubated in hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic medium show lower percent cells with expression of GLUT 1 and GLUT 3, and higher percent cells with expression of GLUT 4. The incubation of lymphocytes in hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic medium does not stimulate translocation of glucose transporters 3 and 4 to plasma membrane. Study shows that a change in concentration of glucose in incubation environment influence intracellular expression of glucose transporters in a significant part of lymphocytes B and T.

Improved glycemic control in pancreatic diabetes through intensive conservative insulin therapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectivity and safety of insulin therapy in patients with DM secondary to underlying chronic pancreatitis with initially inappropriate glycemic control.

METHODS

Pancreatic DM patients treated with oral antidiabetics (OAD) or pre-mixed insulin (PMI) with HbA1c ≥7.0% were recruited. Intensive conservative insulin treatment (ICT) (Group A, n = 16) or PMI (Group B, n = 8) was introduced instead of OAD, or the initial PMI therapy was switched to ICT (Group C, n = 10). The changes in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, body weight and hypoglycemic events from baseline to 2 years were followed.

RESULTS

The patients in Group A and B had been treated with oral antidiabetics for 55 ± 68 months before switching to insulin therapy. The level of HbA1c had worsened from 8.3 ± 1.5% to 9.8 ± 1.7% during this period. The ICT had reduced HbA1c significantly from 9.7 ± 1.8% to 7.6 ± 1.4% after 12 weeks, in Group A, and five patients had HbA1c<7.0%. The introduction of PMI in Group B reduced HbA1c from 10.0 ± 1.4% to 9.0 ± 0.6% by 12 weeks. None of the patients had HbA1c<7.0%. By 12 weeks, the introduction of ICT in Group C had reduced the level of HbA1c from 8.8 ± 1.7% to 7.7 ± 1.2%. Two patients reached HbA1c<7.0%. There were two severe hypoglycemic episodes during the 2 years, one-one case in Group A and B.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral medication becomes insufficient early in pancreatic DM. Long-term improvement of glycemic control can be achieved through intensified insulin therapy and in selected cases through PMI with a low risk of hypoglycemia.

Characteristics of pancreatic diabetes in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

Although patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) tend to have concurrent diverse disorders, very few studies have focused on diabetes mellitus (DM) coexisting with AIP.

METHODS

In total 102 AIP patients with DM were divided into three groups. Those with DM before the onset of AIP were labeled group A (n=35), those who developed DM and AIP simultaneously were labeled group B (n=58) and those who developed DM after steroid therapy for AIP were labeled group C (n=9). The characteristics of DM among the three groups were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted in the age of DM onset among the three groups. However, the mean duration of DM was significantly longer in group A (8.7 years) than in groups B and C. AIP developed 6.8 years after DM onset in group A, whereas it developed 1.8 years after steroid therapy in group C. Group A had the highest rate (25.7%) of family members with a history of AIP. Levels of serum albumin, total cholesterol and triglyceride were significantly lower in group A. No correlations were found between glycated hemoglobin and benzoyl-tyrosyl para-aminobenzoic acid. Hypoglycemia was observed in 20% of patients under insulin therapy. Most of them were habitual drinkers and received no pancreatic enzymes. Group A showed a high prevalence of retinopathy, nephropathy and macrovascular disorders than group B.

CONCLUSION

Aspects of AIP-associated pancreatic diabetes were clarified. AIP-associated DM must be controlled by a full assessment of the pancreatic endocrine and exocrine function.