|
1
|
Pelaez-Luna M, Soriano-Rios A, Lira-Treviño AC, Uscanga-Domínguez L. Steroid-responsive pancreatitides. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:3411-3430. [PMID: 32913848 PMCID: PMC7457102 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune pancreatitis has received considerable attention, especially due to the marked effect of corticosteroid therapy on its clinical course. Knowledge, especially regarding type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis, has significantly increased over the last decades, and despite significant differences in pathophysiology and outcomes, both type 1 and 2 autoimmune pancreatitis are still considered different types of the same disease. Some have proposed a different nomenclature reflecting these differences. Although the term steroid-responsive pancreatitides may be interpreted as synonymous to type 1 and 2 autoimmune pancreatitis, these are not the only pancreatic conditions that show a response to steroid therapy. Acute pancreatitis caused by vasculitis and connective tissue diseases and acute pancreatitis secondary to checkpoint inhibitors or programmed cell death receptor antibody-mediated blockage cancer therapy may also benefit from steroid treatment. This review presents current concepts on these disorders, aiming to increase awareness, analyze similarities and differences, and propose a new nomenclature that reflects their specific particularities, clustering them under the term "steroid-responsive pancreatitides".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Pelaez-Luna
- Research Division School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition "Salvador Zubiran" Mexico City 14000, Mexico
| | - Andrea Soriano-Rios
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition "Salvador Zubiran" Mexico City 14000, Mexico
| | - Ana C Lira-Treviño
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition "Salvador Zubiran" Mexico City 14000, Mexico
| | - Luis Uscanga-Domínguez
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition "Salvador Zubiran" Mexico City 14000, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Suzuki R, Konno N, Asama H, Sato Y, Irie H, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Kikuchi H, Takasumi M, Hashimoto M, Kato T, Hikichi T, Notohara K, Ohira H. Can the wet suction technique change the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis type 1? A prospective single-arm study. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:88-96. [PMID: 31970173 PMCID: PMC6962058 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Other than surgery, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the only procedure for histologically diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). However, adequate specimens are difficult to obtain. Recently, more adequate specimens were reported to be obtained with EUS-FNA with a wet suction technique (WEST) than with conventional EUS-FNA. AIM To histologically diagnose AIP by EUS-FNA with a WEST. METHODS Eleven patients with possible type 1 AIP between February 2016 and August 2018 underwent EUS-FNA with a WEST (WEST group), with four punctures by 19 or 22 G needles. As a historical control, 23 type 1 AIP patients who underwent no fewer than four punctures with 19 or 22 G needles were enrolled (DRY group). Patient characteristics and histological findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Three histopathological factors according to the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria were significantly greater in the WEST group than the DRY group [lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate without granulocytic infiltration: 9 (81.8%) vs 6 (26.1%), P = 0.003, storiform fibrosis: 5 (45.5%) vs 1 (4.3%), P = 0.008, abundant (> 10 cells/HPF) IgG4-positive cells: 7 (63.6%) vs 5 (21.7%), P = 0.026]. Level 1 or level 2 histopathological findings were observed more often in the WEST group than in the DRY group [8 (72.7%) vs 3 (13.0%), P = 0.001]. CONCLUSION EUS-FNA with a WEST was more successful than standard EUS-FNA in histologically diagnosing AIP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Sugimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Tadayuki Takagi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Rei Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Naoki Konno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Asama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Yuki Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Hiroki Irie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Ko Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Jun Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Hitomi Kikuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Mika Takasumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Minami Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Tsunetaka Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Takuto Hikichi
- Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Kenji Notohara
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki 710-8602, Japan
| | - Hiromasa Ohira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Matsubayashi H, Ishiwatari H, Imai K, Kishida Y, Ito S, Hotta K, Yabuuchi Y, Yoshida M, Kakushima N, Takizawa K, Kawata N, Ono H. Steroid Therapy and Steroid Response in Autoimmune Pancreatitis. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 21:E257. [PMID: 31905944 PMCID: PMC6981453 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21010257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), a unique subtype of pancreatitis, is often accompanied by systemic inflammatory disorders. AIP is classified into two distinct subtypes on the basis of the histological subtype: immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (type 1) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (type 2). Type 1 AIP is often accompanied by systemic lesions, biliary strictures, hepatic inflammatory pseudotumors, interstitial pneumonia and nephritis, dacryoadenitis, and sialadenitis. Type 2 AIP is associated with inflammatory bowel diseases in approximately 30% of cases. Standard therapy for AIP is oral corticosteroid administration. Steroid treatment is generally indicated for symptomatic cases and is exceptionally applied for cases with diagnostic difficulty (diagnostic steroid trial) after a negative workup for malignancy. More than 90% of patients respond to steroid treatment within 1 month, and most within 2 weeks. The steroid response can be confirmed on clinical images (computed tomography, ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography). Hence, the steroid response is included as an optional diagnostic item of AIP. Steroid treatment results in normalization of serological markers, including IgG4. Short- and long-term corticosteroid treatment may induce adverse events, including chronic glycometabolism, obesity, an immunocompromised status against infection, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and myopathy. AIP is common in old age and is often associated with diabetes mellitus (33-78%). Thus, there is an argument for corticosteroid therapy in diabetes patients with no symptoms. With low-dose steroid treatment or treatment withdrawal, there is a high incidence of AIP recurrence (24-52%). Therefore, there is a need for long-term steroid maintenance therapy and/or steroid-sparing agents (immunomodulators and rituximab). Corticosteroids play a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of AIP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Matsubayashi
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
- Genetic Medicine Promotion, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Ishiwatari
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Kenichiro Imai
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Yoshihiro Kishida
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Sayo Ito
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Kinichi Hotta
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Yohei Yabuuchi
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Masao Yoshida
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Naomi Kakushima
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Kohei Takizawa
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Noboru Kawata
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| | - Hiroyuki Ono
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (H.I.); (K.I.); (Y.K.); (S.I.); (K.H.); (Y.Y.); (M.Y.); (N.K.); (K.T.); (N.K.); (H.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Vujasinovic M, Valente R, Maier P, von Beckerath V, Haas SL, Arnelo U, Del Chiaro M, Kartalis N, Pozzi-Mucelli RM, Fernandez-Moro C, Verbeke CS, Yu J, Ye W, Löhr JM. Diagnosis, treatment and long-term outcome of autoimmune pancreatitis in Sweden. Pancreatology 2018; 18:900-904. [PMID: 30236651 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a pancreatic inflammatory process characterized by a strong inflammatory cell infiltration and two histopathologically distinct subtypes: type 1 and type 2. Diagnosis is often challenging and requires a combination of clinical, laboratory and imaging data. AIP can mimic pancreatic tumours leading to unnecessary resections if not correctly diagnosed. Short- and long-term outcomes of AIP have been poorly investigated so far and no large series have been previously reported from Sweden. METHODS A single-centre, retrospective, cohort study of patients with histologically confirmed or highly probable diagnosis of AIP according to ICDC criteria. Demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics, type of treatment and its outcomes were collected and analysed. RESULTS Seventy-one patients with AIP (87% with type 1), were evaluated at Karolinska University Hospital between 2004 and 2018; 49% males, mean age 49 years (range 44-53). Among them, 28% were histologically confirmed, 35% presented with jaundice, 22% with acute pancreatitis, 39% had non-specific symptoms such as weight loss or abdominal pain, 84% showed other organ involvement (OOI). Radiologically, 76% showed a focal pancreatic enlargement, 27% diffuse enlargement, 27% signs of acute pancreatitis and 10% of chronic pancreatitis. Overall, 58 patients (81%) underwent treatment with different medications: 46 (79%) cortisone, 7 (12%) azathioprine, 5 (8%) other immunosuppressive drugs. Twenty-six (36%) underwent biliary stenting and 12 (16%) were given surgery. In total, 47% of patients developed pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), of whom 76% had a severe form (faecal elastase-1 < 100 μg/g) and 21% of patients developed diabetes mellitus (pancreatic endocrine insufficiency), of whom 73% required insulin. CONCLUSIONS AIP is a challenging disease for diagnosis and treatment. Cortisone treatment is generally successful and provides clinical remission in the large majority of patients (>90%). In the further course of the disease, a considerable number of patients develop PEI and diabetes. Only one-quarter of patients exhibit on imaging the characteristic "sausage-like" pancreas (diffuse enlargement), approximately three-quarters had a focal mass that could be misdiagnosed as pancreatic malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miroslav Vujasinovic
- Department for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roberto Valente
- Department for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department for Digestive Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pia Maier
- Department for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Stephan L Haas
- Department for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Urban Arnelo
- Department for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nikolaos Kartalis
- Department of Abdominal Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Raffaella Maria Pozzi-Mucelli
- Department of Abdominal Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Caroline Sophie Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pathology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jingru Yu
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Weimin Ye
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Matthias Löhr
- Department for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Dong Y, D'Onofrio M, Hocke M, Jenssen C, Potthoff A, Atkinson N, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Autoimmune pancreatitis: Imaging features. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7:196-203. [PMID: 28836516 PMCID: PMC6032703 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_23_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) remains a difficult disease to diagnose before treatment, particularly if presenting as a focal mass lesion. The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study is to analyze imaging features of histologically confirmed AIP to determine the additional diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS), and elastography to B-mode features. PATIENTS AND METHODS We report on a retrospective data collection of 60 histologically confirmed cases of AIP in comparison to 16 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC). All CE (-E) US examinations were assessed by two independent readers in consensus. The role of CEUS and CE-EUS for pancreatic evaluation was defined according to the 2011 European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology guidelines. RESULTS After injection of ultrasound (US) contrast agents, most AIP lesions displayed focal or diffuse isoenhancement (86.6%) in the arterial phase, while most of the PDAC lesions (93.7%) were hypoenhancing (P < 0.01). During the late phase, most AIP lesions were hyper-(65%) or iso-enhancing (35%), while most PDAC lesions were hypoenhancing (93.7%). CE-EUS was performed in a subset of ten patients and showed hyperenhancement in all AIP cases. Most focal AIP lesions (n = 27, 79.4%) were stiffer than the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma. CONCLUSIONS In this study, percutaneous and endoscopic contrast enhanced harmonic US techniques consistently revealed diffuse and focal types of AIP to have features consistent with vascularized lesions. Differentiation from the typically hypovascularized pancreatic adenocarcinoma was possible with CE (-E) US evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032 Shanghai, China
| | - Mirko D'Onofrio
- Department of Radiology, GB Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Michael Hocke
- Medical Department, Helios Klinikum Meiningen, Meiningen, Germany
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg, Germany
| | - Andrej Potthoff
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nathan Atkinson
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Andre Ignee
- Medical Department, Caritas Krankenhaus, Uhlandstr. 7, D-97980, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Christoph F. Dietrich
- Medical Department, Caritas Krankenhaus, Uhlandstr. 7, D-97980, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Schneider A, Michaely H, Rückert F, Weiss C, Ströbel P, Belle S, Hirth M, Wilhelm TJ, Haas SL, Jesenofsky R, Schönberg S, Marx A, Singer MV, Ebert MP, Pfützer RH, Löhr JM. Diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis with the Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria. Pancreatology 2017; 17:381-394. [PMID: 28365128 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Revised: 03/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES We had developed the Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria (U-AIP) to diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis (AiP) within the M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis. In 2011, International-Consensus-Diagnostic-Criteria (ICDC) to diagnose AiP have been published. We had applied the U-AIP long before the ICDC were available. The aims of the study were, first, to describe patients with AiP diagnosed by the U-AIP; second, to compare diagnostic accuracies of the U-AIP and other diagnostic systems; third, to evaluate the clinical applicability of the U-AIP. METHODS From 1998 until 2008, we identified patients with AiP using U-AIP, Japanese-, Korean-, Asian-, Mayo-HISORt-, Revised-Mayo-HISORt- and Italian-criteria. We retrospectively verified the diagnosis by ICDC and Revised-Japanese-2011-criteria, compared diagnostic accuracies of all systems and evaluated all criteria in consecutive patients with pancreatitis (2009 until 2010, Pancreas-Outpatient-Clinic-Cohort, n = 84). We retrospectively validated our diagnostic approach in consecutive patients with a pancreatic lesion requiring surgery (Surgical-Cohort, n = 98). RESULTS Overall, we identified 21 patients with AiP. Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria and ICDC presented the highest diagnostic accuracies (each 98.8%), highest Youden indices (each 0.95238), and highest proportions of diagnosed patients (each n = 20/21, U-AIP/ICDC vs. other diagnostic systems, p < 0.05, McNemar test). In the Pancreas-Outpatient-Clinic-Cohort, seven patients were diagnosed with AiP (n = 6 by U-AIP, n = 1 by Asian-criteria). International-Consensus-Diagnostic-Criteria confirmed the diagnosis in these individuals. Based on partial fulfillment of U-AIP, AiP was initially suspected in 13% (n = 10/77) of remaining patients from the Pancreas-Outpatient-Clinic-Cohort. In the Surgical-cohort, we identified one patient with AiP by U-AIP and ICDC. CONCLUSIONS Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria revealed a satisfactory clinical applicability and offered an additional approach to diagnose AiP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Schneider
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Henrik Michaely
- Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Rückert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christel Weiss
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Belle
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hirth
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Torsten J Wilhelm
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan L Haas
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention & Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ralf Jesenofsky
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Schönberg
- Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Marx
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manfred V Singer
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias P Ebert
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland H Pfützer
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Matthias Löhr
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention & Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There are two distinct steroid responsive chronic fibro-inflammatory diseases of the pancreas, called type 1 and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). We review recent progress in this field. RECENT FINDINGS It has recently been suggested that the term AIP be used to describe type 1 AIP and the term idiopathic duct-centric chronic pancreatitis (IDCP) be used for type 2 AIP. Clinical features and long-term outcomes of AIP and IDCP are well characterized and prognosis of both diseases is excellent. Diagnostic strategies tailored to regional practice patterns have emerged with the application of International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for AIP. Although corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment, management of relapses and strategies for preventing multiple relapses are better understood, including the role of maintenance therapy and B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab. Association studies with malignancies have yielded conflicting results regarding risk of cancer in AIP. SUMMARY The treatment, follow-up guidelines and associations continue to evolve with our increasing experience with both AIP and IDCP. In AIP, rituximab can be used for both induction and maintenance of remission. IDCP responds to steroids without need for maintenance therapy. Both AIP and IDCP have excellent prognosis.
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Bor R, Madácsy L, Fábián A, Szepes A, Szepes Z. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: When should we do it? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7:1023-1031. [PMID: 26322155 PMCID: PMC4549659 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i11.1023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2015] [Revised: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 08/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is an accurate imaging modality in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases. However, its use has been substantially reduced due to the invasiveness of procedure, the risk of complications and the widespread availability of non-invasive cross-section imaging techniques (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound). Since the introduction of endoscopic sphincterotomy, ERP has transformed from diagnostic method to an almost exclusively therapeutic procedure. Pancreatic duct injection substantially increased the risk of post-ERP pancreatitis (1.6%-15.7%); therefore, according to international guidelines ERP is recommended only in cases where biliary intervention is required. However, the role of ERP in the management of pancreatic diseases is currently not clearly defined, but in some cases the filling of pancreatic duct may provide essential information complementing the results of non-invasive imaging techniques. The aim of this publication is to systematically summarize the literature dealing with the diagnostic yield of ERP. We would like to define the precise indications of ERP and overview a diagnostic protocol of pancreatic diseases depending on international guidelines and the opinion of Hungarian experts, because it may improve the diagnostic accuracy, minimize of burden of patients and reduce the risk of procedure related complications.
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy Plays a Central Role for the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis in a Single-Center Study From Denmark. Pancreas 2015; 44:845-58. [PMID: 25872173 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to describe the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) in Denmark and to test the usefulness of the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) on a geographically well-defined cohort. METHODS All patients diagnosed with AIP at Odense University Hospital from 2007 to 2013 were included (n = 30; mean follow-up, 26.2 months). Data from laparoscopic or percutaneous ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB), resection specimens, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), EUS-guided CNB, computed tomography, serum immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), and pancreatography were retrospectively analyzed according to ICDC. RESULTS Twenty patients were diagnosed with type 1, 8 with type 2, and 2 with not otherwise specified AIP. Twenty-eight patients (93%) could correctly be classified when ICDC were retrospectively applied. Serum IgG4 was elevated in 44% of type 1 and 0% of type 2. Other organ involvement was observed in 40% of type 1 and 13% of type 2, but inflammatory bowel disease only in type 2 (P = 0.001). One patient had IgG4-related chronic perisplenitis as a hitherto undescribed manifestation of IgG4-related disease. Nineteen (91%) of 21 biopsied patients had diagnostic CNB features of AIP. Computed tomography, EUS, and pancreatography showed features highly suggestive or supportive of AIP in 68%, 72%, and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic or percutaneous ultrasound-guided CNB had the highest sensitivity for AIP. The ICDC could retrospectively correctly diagnose 93% of the patients.
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Matsubayashi H, Kakushima N, Takizawa K, Tanaka M, Imai K, Hotta K, Ono H. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:16559-16569. [PMID: 25469024 PMCID: PMC4248199 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2014] [Revised: 05/10/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a distinct form of chronic pancreatitis that is increasingly being reported. The presentation and clinical image findings of AIP sometimes resemble those of several pancreatic malignancies, but the therapeutic strategy differs appreciably. Therefore, accurate diagnosis is necessary for cases of AIP. To date, AIP is classified into two distinct subtypes from the viewpoints of etiology, serum markers, histology, other organ involvements, and frequency of relapse: type 1 is related to IgG4 (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis) and type 2 is related to a granulocytic epithelial lesion (idiopathic duct-centric chronic pancreatitis). Both types of AIP are characterized by focal or diffuse pancreatic enlargement accompanied with a narrowing of the main pancreatic duct, and both show dramatic responses to corticosteroid. Unlike type 2, type 1 is characteristically associated with increasing levels of serum IgG4 and positive serum autoantibodies, abundant infiltration of IgG4-positive plasmacytes, frequent extrapancreatic lesions, and relapse. These findings have led several countries to propose diagnostic criteria for AIP, which consist of essentially similar diagnostic items; however, several differences exist for each country, mainly due to differences in the definition of AIP and the modalities used to diagnose this disease. An attempt to unite the diagnostic criteria worldwide was made with the publication in 2011 of the international consensus diagnostic criteria for AIP, established at the 2010 Congress of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP).
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Chang MC, Liang PC, Jan IS, Yang CY, Tien YW, Wei SC, Wong JM, Chang YT. Comparison and validation of International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer in a Taiwanese cohort. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e005900. [PMID: 25138812 PMCID: PMC4139642 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2014] [Revised: 07/12/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) designed to diagnosis autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been proposed recently. The diagnostic performance of ICDC has not been previously evaluated in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP, respectively, in comparison with the revised HISORt and Asian criteria in Taiwan. DESIGN Prospective, consecutive patient cohort. SETTING Largest tertiary referred centre hospital managing pancreatic disease in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS 188 patients with AIP and 130 with tissue proofed pancreatic adenocarcinoma were consecutively recruited. INTERVENTIONS The ICDC, as well as revised HISORt and Asian criteria, was applied for each participant. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP. OUTCOMES Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in AIP and focal-type AIP. RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for all AIP were the best: 89.4%, 100% and 93.7%, respectively, in these three criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for focal-type AIP (84.9%, 100% and 93.8%) were also the best among these three criteria. The area under the curve of receiver-operator characteristic of ICDC was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97) in all AIP and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) in focal-type AIP. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC are higher than the revised HISORt and Asian criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each criterion are higher in diffuse-type AIP compared with focal-type AIP. Under the same specificity, the sensitivity and accuracy of ICDC are higher than other diagnostic criteria in focal-type AIP. ICDC has better diagnostic performance compared with previously proposed diagnostic criteria in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Chu Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Chin Liang
- Department of Radiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Shiow Jan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yao Yang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wen Tien
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Chen Wei
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jau-Min Wong
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ting Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Maruyama M, Watanabe T, Kanai K, Oguchi T, Asano J, Ito T, Ozaki Y, Muraki T, Hamano H, Arakura N, Kawa S. Autoimmune pancreatitis can develop into chronic pancreatitis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014; 9:77. [PMID: 24884922 PMCID: PMC4038704 DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-9-77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been recognized as a distinct type of pancreatitis that is possibly caused by autoimmune mechanisms. AIP is characterized by high serum IgG4 and IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration in affected pancreatic tissue. Acute phase AIP responds favorably to corticosteroid therapy and results in the amelioration of clinical findings. However, the long-term prognosis and outcome of AIP remain unclear. We have proposed a working hypothesis that AIP can develop into ordinary chronic pancreatitis resembling alcoholic pancreatitis over a long-term course based on several clinical findings, most notably frequent pancreatic stone formation. In this review article, we describe a series of study results to confirm our hypothesis and clarify that: 1) pancreatic calcification in AIP is closely associated with disease recurrence; 2) advanced stage AIP might have earlier been included in ordinary chronic pancreatitis; 3) approximately 40% of AIP patients experience pancreatic stone formation over a long-term course, for which a primary risk factor is narrowing of both Wirsung’s and Santorini’s ducts; and 4) nearly 20% of AIP patients progress to confirmed chronic pancreatitis according to the revised Japanese Clinical Diagnostic Criteria, with independent risk factors being pancreatic head swelling and non-narrowing of the pancreatic body duct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shigeyuki Kawa
- Center for Health, Safety, and Environmental Management, Shinshu University, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|