Nutritional Assessment and Status of Hospitalized Infants

Nutritional screening tool for critically ill children: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Nutritional screening tools (NSTs) are used to identify patients who are at risk of nutritional status (NS) deterioration and associated clinical outcomes. Several NSTs have been developed for hospitalized children; however, none of these were specifically developed for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) patients.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of studies describing the development, application, and validation of NSTs in hospitalized children was conducted to critically appraise their role in PICU patients.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to December 11, 2020.

DATA EXTRACTION

The review included 103 studies that applied NSTs at hospital admission. The NST characteristics collected included the aims, clinical setting, variables, and outcomes. The suitability of the NSTs in PICU patients was assessed based on a list of variables deemed relevant for this population.

DATA ANALYSIS

From 19 NSTs identified, 13 aimed to predict NS deterioration. Five NSTs were applied in PICU patients, but none was validated for this population. NSTs did not include clinical, NS, laboratory, or dietary variables that were deemed relevant for the PICU population.

CONCLUSION

None of the available NSTs were found to be suitable for critically ill children, so a new NST should be developed for this population. AQ6.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020167898.

Description of a Nutrition Screening and Assessment Tool and Associations with Clinical Outcomes in Preterm Newborns

BACKGROUND

Preterm newborns have higher nutrition risk and mortality. Nutrition risk screening enables early intervention. This article evaluates a nutrition screening tool in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHOD

Retrospective longitudinal study of preterm newborns (aged <37 weeks) in a NICU in Brazil from May 2018 to January 2019. Weight, length, and head circumference (HC) were analyzed. Nutrition screening was defined by care levels (CLs). Outcomes analyzed were bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), peri-intraventricular hemorrhage (PIVH), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), late sepsis, length of stay, mortality, and time receiving enteral and parenteral nutrition.

RESULTS

Data on 110 newborns were studied, with median gestational age 34 (31-35) weeks, mean weight 1914.92 g (±657.7), length 42.2 cm (±4.45), and HC 29.9 cm (±2.97). Most (82.7%) of them were adequate for gestational age. Screening classifications were 41.8% (n = 46) at CL 2, 41.8% (n = 46) at CL 3, and 16.4% (n = 18) at CL 4. CL 3 and CL 4 patients had higher frequencies of BPD (P = .003), ROP (P = .027), and PIVH (P = .006) and longer enteral time (P < .001) and length of stay (P < .001). All mortality occurred in CL 4 patients (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

CL 3 and CL 4 patients had more BPD, ROP, PIVH, and mortality and longer enteral nutrition. Hospital stay was longer for CL ≥3 than CL 2 patients. Patients classified as CL 3 and CL 4 by the nutrition screening tool may have higher nutrition risk.

Achieving enteral nutrition during the acute phase in critically ill children: Associations with patient characteristics and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In the absence of methodologically sound randomized controlled trials (RCTs), current recommendations for timing and amount of enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill children are based on observational studies. These studies have associated achievement of a higher EN intake in critically ill children with improved outcome. Inherent to the observational design of these underlying studies, thorough insight in possible confounding factors to correct for is essential. We evaluated the associations between EN intake and 1) patient and daily clinical characteristics and 2) clinical outcomes adjusted for these patient and clinical characteristics during the first week of critical illness with a multivariable mixed model.

METHODS

This secondary analysis of the multicentre PEPaNIC RCT investigated a subgroup of critically ill children with daily prospectively recorded gastrointestinal symptoms and EN intake during the first week with multivariable analyses using two-part mixed effect models, including multiple testing corrections using Holm's method. These models combined a mixed-effects logistic regression for the dichotomous outcome EN versus no EN, and a linear mixed-effects model for the patients who received any EN intake. EN intake per patient was expressed as mean daily EN as % of predicted resting energy expenditure (% of EN/REE). Model 1 included 40 fixed effect baseline patient characteristics, and daily parameters of illness severity, feeding, medication and gastrointestinal symptoms. Model 2 included these patient and daily variables as well as clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 690 children. EN was provided in 503 (73%) patients with a start after a median of 2 (IQR 2-3) days and a median % of EN/REE of 38.8 (IQR 14.1-79.5) over the first week. Multivariable mixed model analyses including all patients showed that admission after gastrointestinal surgery (-49%EN/REE; p = 0.002), gastric feeding (-31% EN/REE; p < 0.001), treatment with inotropic agents (-22%EN/REE; p = 0.026) and large gastric residual volume (-64%EN/REE; p < 0.001) were independently associated with a low mean EN intake. In univariable analysis, low mean EN intake was associated with new acquired infections, hypoglycaemia, duration of PICU and hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. However, after adjustment for confounders, these associations were no longer present, except for low EN and hypoglycaemia (-39%EN/REE; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient and clinical characteristics during the first week of critical illness were associated with EN intake. No independent associations were found between EN intake and clinical outcomes such as mortality, new acquired infection and duration of stay. These data emphasize the necessity of adequate multivariable adjustment in nutritional support research and the need for future RCTs investigating optimal EN intake.

Pediatric screening tools for malnutrition: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is ongoing interest in nutritional screening tools in pediatrics to facilitate the identification of children at risk for malnutrition who need further assessment and possible nutritional intervention. The choice for a specific tool depends on various factors. This review aims to provide an overview of recent progress in pediatric nutritional screening methods.

RECENT FINDINGS

We present recent studies about newly developed or adjusted tools, the applicability of nutritional screening tools in specific populations, and how to implement screening in the overall process of improving nutritional care in the pediatric hospital setting.

SUMMARY

Three new screening tools have been developed for use on admission to hospital: two for the mixed pediatric hospitalized population and one for infants. A simple weekly rescreening tool to identify hospital-acquired nutritional deterioration was developed for use in children with prolonged hospital stay. Different from most previous studies that only assessed the relationship between the nutritional risk score and anthropometric parameters of malnutrition, new studies in children with cancer, burns, and biliary atresia show significant associations between high nutritional risk and short-term outcome measures such as increased complication rate and weight loss. For implementation of a nutritional care process incorporating nutritional screening in daily practice, simplicity seems to be of great importance.