Autoimmune Hepatitis in Children: Prednisone Plus Azathioprine Versus Cyclosporine: A Randomized Trial

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology which may affect any patient irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. At baseline, the clinical spectrum of the disease varies largely from asymptomatic cases to acute liver failure with massive hepatocyte necrosis. The aim of these EASL guidelines is to provide updated guidance on the diagnosis and management of AIH both in adults and children. Updated guidance on the management of patients with variants and specific forms of AIH is also provided, as is detailed guidance on the management of AIH-associated cirrhosis, including surveillance for portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

Various Regimens for Autoimmune Hepatitis in Northern European Children Show Equivalent Outcomes at 1 Year: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the remission rates after 1 year of treatment between two regimens: tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) or prednisolone (with or without azathioprine) in children with autoimmune liver disease (AILD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective data from children (n=157) with biopsy-proven AILD in five tertiary northern European centers were included. Data were collected at presentation and after 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Initially, 111 were treated with prednisolone (with or without azathioprine) and 46 received tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) (median start dose prednisolone: 0.99 mg/kg and 0.43 mg/kg, respectively). At diagnosis, alanine transaminase (ALT) levels were similar, but the rate of advanced fibrosis was significantly higher in the tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) group. Lower rates of ALT normalization in the tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) group were found at 3 months (26.8 vs 58.0%, p< 0.001) and 6 months (46.2% vs 68.8, p=0.014), but not at 1 year (68.2 vs. 76.2%, p>0.05). The same pattern was seen for immunoglobulin G.

CONCLUSION

Despite slower treatment response for patients initially started on tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) at 3 and 6 months, biochemical and immunological responses to the two different regimens appeared equivalent at 1 year after treatment initiation.

Natural history and long-term management of autoimmune hepatitis

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively infrequent and complex liver disease characterized by acute or chronic inflammation, interface hepatitis in histology examination, elevation of immunoglobulin G (IgG), production of autoantibodies, and is often responsive to immunosuppression. The incidence of AIH has been increasing worldwide, affecting people of all ages and sexes. AIH represents a diagnostic challenge because of its heterogeneous presentation and the lack of pathognomonic findings. Even when treated, AIH can remain a progressive disease. In this review, we present recent data on the natural history of AIH and the developing evidence on the management of patients with AIH.

AREAS COVERED

This review outlines the clinical presentation, risk factors linked to poorer clinical outcomes, the diagnostic algorithm, and the current management strategies for individuals living with AIH.

EXPERT OPINION

AIH remains a clinical challenge, and new tools for better diagnosis and stratification of risk are needed. In addition, better treatments are needed as a complete response is achieved in less than 60% of cases, and intolerance to first-line treatment is frequent. The use of biological treatment in AIH seems to improve the response rate and minimize the risk of side effects of current medication in this increasingly prevalent disease.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease which, if untreated, often leads to cirrhosis, liver failure and death. The last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline for the management of AIH was published in 2011. Since then, our understanding of AIH has advanced in many areas. This update to the previous guideline was commissioned by the BSG and developed by a multidisciplinary group. The aim of this guideline is to review and summarise the current evidence, in order to inform and guide diagnosis and management of patients with AIH and its variant syndromes. The main focus is on AIH in adults, but the guidelines should also be relevant to older children and adolescents.

Current practice in the management of paediatric autoimmune liver disease in Europe

OBJECTIVE

Paediatric autoimmune liver disease (pAILD) is a rare condition with serious health implications. Notwithstanding treatment advancements, areas of uncertainty and knowledge gaps still exist. We here investigated the real-life approach to pAILD management in Europe.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to members of the European Rare Liver Disease Reference Network (ERN RARE-LIVER) and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Hepatology Interest Group. Information was gathered regarding clinical activity, medications used, and access to paediatric drug formulations at each site.

RESULTS

Thirty-six centres from 22 European countries responded to the survey. The majority are exclusively paediatric units (86%). Among participants, 80% follow <50 children with pAILD, of which 25%-50% are <10 years old in 44% of centres. All centres use predniso(lo)ne as first-line therapy, alone (15/36) or with azathioprine (21/36). Azathioprine and mycophenolate are the preferred second-line options in centres using first-line steroid monotherapy (11/15) or combined steroid-azathioprine (19/21), respectively. Tacrolimus is used as third-line agent in 15/36 centres. Proactive measurement of drug metabolites and target levels vary widely among centres. Paediatric predniso(lo)ne formulations are commercially available in 7/22 European countries, azathioprine in 3, mycophenolate in 14, tacrolimus in 15 and ursodeoxycholic acid in 14. When paediatric formulations are unavailable, children are treated with magisterial preparations or 'solid' formulations (crushed or intact).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of pAILD in Europe varies widely in terms of medications used and treatment monitoring. Availability of paediatric drug formulations across Europe is limited. Collaborative initiatives are needed to define evidence-based strategies for management of pAILD and to promote an equal, age-appropriate treatment for affected children.

Advances in the Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory liver disease caused by autoimmune reactions, with an unknown etiology. If left untreated, it can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, or even death. While most patients respond well to first-line treatments, a significant number experience poor responses or intolerance, requiring the use of second- or third-line therapies. Ongoing research into the pathogenesis of AIH is leading to the development of novel therapeutic approaches. This review summarized recent advancements in the treatment of AIH both domestically and internationally.

B cell depletion for autoimmune liver diseases: A retrospective review of indications and outcomes

Objectives

Pediatric autoimmune hepatitis has an incidence of 0.23/100.000 children in North America, with a bleak prognosis if left untreated. Steroids are the therapy of choice but are not always effective. B cell depletion is a safe and effective therapy that allows for a steroid-sparing protocol, especially in patients who do not tolerate side effects.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed rituximab-treated patients between 2017 and 2022. Demographics, previous treatments, reasons for B cell depletion, response, and adverse effects were noted.

Results

Six patients with a mean age of 10.2 years were included. All patients had comorbidities that rendered treatment with steroids unsuccessful or undesirable. Rituximab was started at a mean follow-up of 8 months. After 6 months, the mean alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels decreased from 575 IU/L and 342 IU/L, respectively, to 28 IU/L (p = 0.02) and 36 IU/L (p = 0.008), respectively. Mean γ-glutamyl transpeptidase decreased from 105 to 25 IU/L (p = 0.01). Immunoglobulin G levels were normalized in all patients (p = 0.01). No severe adverse events were observed. One patient had persistent hypogammaglobulinemia, and another had lymphopenia.

Conclusion

B-cell depletion is an effective and safe treatment for autoimmune liver diseases and should be included as an option, particularly for relapsing patients in whom steroids are undesirable or have shown nonadherence.

Advancements in autoimmune hepatitis management: Perspectives for future guidelines

The first-line treatment for autoimmune hepatitis involves the use of prednisone or prednisolone either as monotherapy or in combination with azathioprine (AZA). Budesonide has shown promise in inducing a complete biochemical response (CBR) with fewer adverse effects and is considered an optional first-line treatment, particularly for patients without cirrhosis; however, it is worth noting that the design of that study favored budesonide. A recent real-life study revealed higher CBR rates with prednisone when equivalent initial doses were administered. Current guidelines recommend mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for patients who are intolerant to AZA. It is important to mention that the evidence supporting this recommendation is weak, primarily consisting of case series. Nevertheless, MMF has demonstrated superiority to AZA in the context of renal transplant. Recent comparative studies have shown higher CBR rates, lower therapeutic failure rates, and reduced intolerance in the MMF group. These findings may influence future guidelines, potentially leading to a significant modification in the first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis. Until recently, the only alternative to corticosteroids was lifelong maintenance treatment with AZA, which comes with notable risks, such as skin cancer and lymphoma. Prospective trials are essential for a more comprehensive assessment of treatment suspension strategies, whether relying on histological criteria, strict biochemical criteria, or a combination of both. Single-center studies using chloroquine diphosphate have shown promising results in significantly reducing relapse rates compared to placebo. However, these interesting findings have yet to be replicated by other research groups. Additionally, second-line drugs, such as tacrolimus, rituximab, and infliximab, should be subjected to controlled trials for further evaluation.

Hepatitis-associated Aplastic Anemia

Hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia (HAAA) accounts for 4% of autoimmune hepatitis in children. An episode of seronegative autoimmune hepatitis is followed a few days or months later by aplastic anemia or full aplasia. This autoimmune disease could be due to a regulation defect in the immune response to a viral trigger, in a genetically predisposed individual. Other causes of hepatitis or aplastic anemia have to be ruled out. Steroids and azathioprine usually control the liver damage but do not prevent the development of aplastic anemia. Aplastic anemia is treated with either hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with a sibling donor or anti-thymocyte globulins and cyclosporine. We propose guidelines to explore and treat this rare disease. We emphasize on the necessary close collaboration between hepatologists and hematologists.

Autoimmmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a T-cell mediated, inflammatory liver disease affecting all ages and characterized by female preponderance, elevated serum transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, positive circulating autoantibodies, and presence of interface hepatitis at liver histology. AIH type 1, affecting both adults and children, is defined by positive anti-nuclear and/or anti-smooth muscle antibodies, while type 2 AIH, affecting mostly children, is defined by positive anti-liver-kidney microsomal type 1 and/or anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibody. While the autoantigens of type 2 AIH are well defined, being the cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) and the formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase (FTCD), in type 1 AIH they remain to be identified. AIH-1 predisposition is conferred by possession of the MHC class II HLA DRB1*03 at all ages, while DRB1*04 predisposes to late onset disease; AIH-2 is associated with possession of DRB1*07 and DRB1*03. The majority of patients responds well to standard immunosuppressive treatment, based on steroid and azathioprine; second- and third-line drugs should be considered in case of intolerance or insufficient response. This review offers a comprehensive overview of pathophysiological and clinical aspects of AIH.

A reasoned approach to the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease affecting all ages, characterised by elevated transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, positive autoantibodies, interface hepatitis on histology and good response to immunosuppressive treatment. If untreated, it has a poor prognosis. The aim of this review is to analyse AIH therapeutic interventions with reference to our knowledge of the pathogenesis of AIH. Standard treatment, based on steroids and azathioprine, leads to disease remission in 80-90% of patients. Alternative first-line treatment with budesonide is effective in adults, but less so in the juvenile form of AIH; first-line treatment with ciclosporin does not provide convincing advantages compared to standard treatment. Second-line treatments are needed for patients not responding or intolerant to first-line standard management. Mycophenolate mofetil is the most widely used second-line drug, and has good efficacy particularly for patients intolerant to azathioprine, but is teratogenic. Only few and heterogeneous data on calcineurin inhibitors and m-TOR inhibitors are available. Biologicals, including anti-tumour necrosis factor- α and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, have given ambivalent results and may have severe side-effects. Clinical trials with new therapeutic options aiming at targeting B lymphocytes and proinflammatory cytokines, or expanding regulatory T cells to restore tolerance are ongoing.

Second-line and third-line therapy for autoimmune hepatitis: A position statement from the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group

Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond well to standard immunosuppressive therapy with steroids and azathioprine, and while untreated disease is usually fatal, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. However, insufficient response to standard therapy or intolerable side effects requiring dose adaptions or treatment changes occur in 10-20% of patients. While there is fairly good agreement on second-line treatment options, there is very wide variation in the indication and use of possible third-line therapies. Herein, the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER) and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) outline a treatment algorithm for both children and adults that should help to standardise treatment approaches, in order to improve patient care and to enable the comparison of treatment results between scientific publications.