Diverting Ileostomy in Children With Functional Constipation: A Study Evaluating the Utility of Colon Manometry

Colonic Manometry in Pediatric Patients with Spina Bifida: Results from a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Patients with spina bifida (SB) commonly experience neurogenic bowel dysfunction, characterized by defecation-related symptoms. While anorectal dysfunction and slow transit constipation (STC) have been implicated, the role of colonic motility in SB remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate colonic motility in SB patients with refractory bowel dysfunction.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included SB patients who failed the repeated optimization of a bowel regimen including stimulant laxatives and subsequently underwent anorectal manometry (ARM), colonic transit time (CTT) studies, or colonic manometry (CM). Diagnostic findings were analyzed alongside treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients with myelomeningocele were included; one declined further treatment, and 12 underwent treatment optimization, with four achieving bowel continence. Of the five patients who proceeded with advanced motility testing, two had abnormal ARM findings, one of three had abnormal CTT results, and all five had normal CM findings.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that anorectal dysfunction or STC may play a larger role in refractory bowel symptoms, while colonic motility appears to be preserved, and this highlights the importance of maximizing conservative therapies, particularly with stimulant laxatives, before pursuing invasive tests or surgical interventions for bowel dysfunction in this population.

Functional Constipation: Pathophysiology, evaluation, and management

BACKGROUND

Functional constipation (FC), a disorder of the gut-brain interaction of multifactorial pathophysiology that is prevalent in paediatrics. It is associated with bothersome symptoms, increased healthcare costs, disgruntled caregivers and impaired health-related quality of life. Paediatric FC is a clinical diagnosis based on the Rome IV criteria and is characterised by decreased bowel movement frequency and/or hard, painful stools and can be complicated by retentive faecal incontinence. Stressful life events, difficult temperaments and emotional and behavioural challenges have been implicated in increasing risk of developing paediatric FC.

AIMS

To provide current concepts in pathophysiology, evaluation and management of paediatric FC.

METHODS

We reviewed pertinent literature after a comprehensive search utilising PubMed with keywords FC, chronic childhood constipation and paediatric FC.

RESULTS

In the last decade, advances in our understanding of paediatric FC have changed the landscape of diagnosing and treating this disorder. Although polyethylene glycol is the first-line treatment for maintenance of FC, the armamentarium of therapeutics has expanded including the first Food and Drug Administration- agent, linaclotide, for children 6-17 years of age in conjunction with more emphasis on behavioural and physical therapy interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment approach to paediatric FC should be individualised and integrated focusing on parental education, lifestyle and behavioural modifications, and pharmacological therapy to maximise therapeutic success. This review highlights advances in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of FC in children.

Testing in functional constipation-What's new and what works

BACKGROUND

Constipation is among the most common symptoms prompting a consultation with a paediatric gastroenterologist. While most patients will respond to lifestyle and dietary changes and conventional therapy, some may require diagnostic studies.

AIM

To review the diagnostics studies used to evaluate children with functional constipation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There is no evidence to support the routine use of abdominal X-rays in the evaluation of paediatric constipation. Colon transit by radiopaque markers (ROM) should be indicated when medical history does not match clinical findings, to guide colon manometry (CM) performance and to discriminate between faecal incontinence from functional constipation and non-retentive faecal incontinence. Colon scintigraphy may be useful as an alternative to ROM. Lumbar spine MRI may be indicated to evaluate for spinal abnormalities. The role of defecography has not been properly evaluated in children. Anorectal manometry in children is indicated primarily to evaluate anal resting pressure, presence and quality of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex and simulated defecation manoeuvres. The CM is indicated to guide surgical interventions after failing medical therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The goal of these studies is to identify treatable causes of constipation. Most of these studies are designed to evaluate anatomy, transit and/or colon/rectum motility function and are primarily indicated in those who fail to respond to conventional therapy.

Management of the child with refractory constipation

BACKGROUND

Caring for children with constipation refractory to conventional treatment can be challenging and management practices vary widely.

AIMS

To review recent advances in the evaluation and treatment of children with refractory constipation and to propose an algorithm that incorporates the latest evidence and our institutional experience.

METHODS

We performed a literature review on diagnostic tests and treatment options for children with refractory constipation.

RESULTS

Evaluation of a child with refractory constipation seeks to better understand factors contributing to an individual child's presentation. Anorectal manometry evaluating for a rectal evacuation disorder and colonic manometry evaluating for colonic dysmotility can guide subsequent treatment. For the child who has not responded to conventional treatment, a trial of newer medications like linaclotide can be helpful. Transanal irrigation offers a safe and effective alternative for families able to administer daily rectal treatment. Despite mixed evidence in children, pelvic floor biofeedback therapy can help some children with pelvic floor dyssynergia. For younger children unable to cooperate with pelvic floor therapy, or older children with refractory symptoms, internal anal sphincter botulinum toxin injection can be beneficial. Antegrade continence enema treatment can be effective for children with either normal colonic motility or segmental dysmotility. Sacral nerve stimulation is generally reserved for symptoms that persist despite antegrade continence enemas, particularly if faecal incontinence is prominent. In more severe cases, temporary or permanent colonic diversion and segmental colonic resection may be needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent advances offer hope for children with refractory constipation.

Exploring Diagnostic Priorities: The Role of Colonic Manometry in Evaluating Pediatric Patients with Intractable Idiopathic Constipation Prior to Sacral Nerve Stimulation

BACKGROUND

Despite the limited understanding of its precise mechanism of action, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has proven to be helpful for pediatric patients with constipation, particularly those with fecal incontinence. It is unclear whether the outcome of SNS is impacted by normal or abnormal colonic motility. Our study aimed to determine whether colonic manometry results had an impact on the outcome of SNS as a treatment in pediatric patients with refractory idiopathic constipation.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of patients with idiopathic constipation who underwent colonic manometry and SNS placement at our center over 6 years were reviewed. A comparison of post-SNS outcomes was performed between patients with normal and abnormal colonic manometry studies.

RESULTS

Twenty patients [12 (60%) females, median age of 10.2 years] met inclusion criteria, with fecal incontinence in 12 (60%) and abnormal colonic manometry in 6 (30%). Significantly more patients had an improvement in fecal incontinence following SNS placement (p = 0.045). There were no significant differences in post-SNS constipation outcome measures between patients with normal versus abnormal colonic manometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonic manometry did not help with patient selection for those being considered for SNS therapy. Our findings do not support performing colonic manometry as a screening prior to SNS placement.

Diagnostic yield of left-sided colonic manometry in identifying colonic dysmotility in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Colonic manometry (CM) is a diagnostic procedure utilized in the evaluation of intractable constipation and involves endoscopic insertion of a manometry catheter with the tip placed in the cecum. Difficulty in advancing the colonic manometry catheter to the right colon and/or distal displacement of the catheter after appropriate placement can result in partial evaluation of the colon. Our study aimed to assess the value of limited left CM in identifying motility disorders.

METHODS

We evaluated CM studies conducted at a tertiary pediatric center (2019-2022). Abnormal CM studies with catheter tips located in the cecum or ascending colon were included.

KEY RESULTS

Of 161 CM studied, 68 with abnormal CM studies met inclusion criteria (29 [42.7%] females, median age 10.3 years). Pan-colonic dysmotility was noted in 29 (42.7%) studies and segmental dysmotility in 39 (57.4%) studies. Dysmotility of the descending and/or sigmoid colon was the most common segmental dysmotility (30, 76.9%). Isolated dysmotility of the ascending colon was noted only in patients with a cecostomy (6/13, 46.2%). The diagnostic sensitivity for dysmotility by left CM was 91.2%, which increased to 100% when excluding patients with cecostomy.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Left CM is a valuable and sensitive diagnostic tool for identifying abnormal colonic motility in most pediatric patients with constipation without cecostomy. Our study results provide reassurance when the manometry catheter becomes dislodged from the cecum and moves distally. Those with cecostomy have a high prevalence of dysmotility in the ascending colon and need a complete CM to identify it.

Clinical Utility of Ileal Motility in Children With Defecation Disorders and Children With Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction

BACKGROUND

Little is known about ileal motility patterns and their utility in children. Here, we present our experience with children undergoing ileal manometry (IM).

METHODS

A retrospective review of children with ileostomy comparing IM between 2 groups: A [chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO)] and B (feasibility of ileostomy closure in children with defecation disorders). We also compared the IM findings with those from antroduodenal manometry (ADM), and evaluated the joint effect of age, sex, and study indication group on IM results.

RESULTS

A total of 27 children (median age 5.8 years old, range 0.5-16.74 years, 16 were female) were included (12 in group A and 15 in group B). There was no association between IM interpretation and sex; however younger age was associated with abnormal IM ( P = 0.021). We found a significantly higher proportion of patients with presence of phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC) during fasting and normal postprandial response in group B than in group A ( P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that only Group B was associated with normal IM ( P < 0.001). We found a moderate agreement for the presence of phase III MMC and postprandial response between IM and ADM (kappa = 0.698, P = 0.008 and kappa = 0.683, P = 0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSION

IM is abnormal in patients with CIPO and normal in patients with defecation disorders, suggesting that IM may be not needed for ostomy closure in those with defecation disorders. IM has a moderate agreement with ADM and could be used as a surrogate for small bowel motility.

State of the Art Bowel Management for Pediatric Colorectal Problems: Functional Constipation

BACKGROUND

Functional constipation (FC) affects up to 32% of the pediatric population, and some of these patients are referred to pediatric surgery units to manage their constipation and/or fecal incontinence. The aim of the current paper is to report the recent updates on the evaluation and management of children with FC as a part of a manuscript series on bowel management in patients with anorectal malformations, Hirschsprung disease, spinal anomalies, and FC.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases and focusing on the manuscripts published within the last 5-10 years.

RESULTS

The first step of management of children with FC is to exclude Hirschsprung disease with a contrast study, examination under anesthesia, anorectal manometry (AMAN). If AMAN shows absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex, a rectal biopsy is performed. Internal sphincter achalasia or high resting pressures indicate botulinum toxin injection. Medical management options include laxatives, rectal enemas, transanal irrigations, and antegrade flushes. Those who fail conservative treatment require further assessment of colonic motility and can be candidates for colonic resection. The type of resection (subtotal colonic resection vs. Deloyer's procedure) can be guided with a balloon expulsion test.

CONCLUSION

Most of the patients with FC referred for surgical evaluation can be managed conservatively. Further studies are required to determine an optimal strategy of surgical resection in children unresponsive to medical treatment.