Antidepressants, pregnancy, and stigma: how we are failing mothers and babies

Safety in treatment: Classical pharmacotherapeutics and new avenues for addressing maternal depression and anxiety during pregnancy

We aimed to review clinical research on the safety profiles of antidepressant drugs and associations with maternal depression and neonatal outcomes. We focused on neuroendocrine changes during pregnancy and their effects on antidepressant pharmacokinetics. Pregnancy-induced alterations in drug disposition and metabolism impacting mothers and their fetuses are discussed. We considered evidence for the risks of antidepressant use during pregnancy. Teratogenicity associated with ongoing treatment, new prescriptions during pregnancy, or pausing medication while pregnant was examined. The Food and Drug Administration advises caution regarding prenatal exposure to most drugs, including antidepressants, largely owing to a dearth of safety studies caused by the common exclusion of pregnant individuals in clinical trials. We contrasted findings on antidepressant use with the lack of treatment where detrimental effects to mothers and children are well researched. Overall, drug classes such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors appear to have limited adverse effects on fetal health and child development. In the face of an increasing prevalence of major mood and anxiety disorders, we assert that individuals should be counseled before and during pregnancy about the risks and benefits of antidepressant treatment given that withholding treatment has possible negative outcomes. Moreover, newer therapeutics, such as ketamine and κ-opioid receptor antagonists, warrant further investigation for use during pregnancy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The safety of antidepressant use during pregnancy remains controversial owing to an incomplete understanding of how drug exposure affects fetal development, brain maturation, and behavior in offspring. This leaves pregnant people especially vulnerable, as pregnancy can be a highly stressful experience for many individuals, with stress being the biggest known risk factor for developing a mood or anxiety disorder. This review focuses on perinatal pharmacotherapy for treating mood and anxiety disorders, highlighting the current knowledge and gaps in our understanding of consequences of treatment.

Psychiatric medication use among pregnant and breastfeeding mothers who used cannabis for mental health concerns: A cross-sectional survey study

BACKGROUND

Use of cannabis during pregnancy and breastfeeding is increasing. Mental health concerns are reported as common reasons for maternal cannabis use, but little is known about the use of psychiatric medications in this population.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe psychiatric medication use among pregnant and breastfeeding mothers who used cannabis for mental health concerns.

DESIGN

Anonymous, online cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

Data were collected from May 2018 to August 2019 among pregnant and breastfeeding mothers who used cannabis. This study included mothers who reported cannabis use for mental health concerns (n = 1363). The survey assessed the timing of cannabis use (during pregnancy and/or lactation); use of cannabis to address depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, or anxiety; use of psychiatric medications; psychiatric distress (Patient Health Questionnaire-4); and demographic information. Differences between groups were examined using t-test and chi-square test in SPSS.

RESULTS

The mean age was 29.7 years; most were married (62%); 74% were White non-Hispanic, 9% Hispanic, and 17% Black, Indigenous or other People of Color. Mental health symptoms prompting cannabis use included anxiety (96%), depression (75%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (36%). Only 24% of respondents (n = 322) reported concomitant use of psychiatric medications, primarily selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (72%, n = 232) and benzodiazepines (21%, n = 68). The composite Patient Health Questionnaire-4 showed most respondents had no (61%) or mild (27%) psychological distress; 14% screened positive for depression; and 17% screened positive for anxiety. Respondents who used psychiatric medications more often screened positive mental health concerns.

CONCLUSION

Most mothers who used cannabis for mental health concerns were not taking psychiatric medications. This may be due to a mismatch between perceived mental health and screening results, un- or under-treated mental illness, or preference for cannabis over psychiatric medications. Improved management of perinatal mental health and effective patient education about risks of cannabis versus medication use are needed.

Antidepressant use During Pregnancy: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Decision-Making of Patients and Providers

INTRODUCTION

Despite the risks associated with untreated perinatal depression and anxiety, both patients and clinicians are less likely to follow evidence-based guidelines including the use of antidepressants during pregnancy. The aim of this integrative review was to describe the perspectives of both patients and prescribing health care providers regarding the use of antidepressants during pregnancy.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest Central, and PsychINFO. Inclusion criteria were English language, original peer-reviewed research published within the previous 10 years that described perspectives regarding the use of antidepressants of pregnant patients or prescribing providers during pregnancy. Studies were excluded if their focus was on screening practices, treatment guidelines, or evaluation of decision support tool; medication or treatment broadly; bipolar disorder or serious mental illness; or they did not provide patient or provider perspective. This review was limited to professionals with scopes of practice that include prescriptive authority (eg, physicians, advanced practices nurses, midwives). Included articles were critically appraised and read in an iterative process to extract methodological details and synthesize findings.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies met criteria for inclusion and varied by design, sample, and quality. Together, the reviewed articles suggest that patients and prescribing providers hold a range of beliefs regarding the safety of antidepressant during pregnancy. Patients and providers appear to value different sources of information and varied in awareness of the negative impacts of untreated depression and anxiety during pregnancy. Many patients report dissatisfaction with available information and distress throughout the decision-making experience. Notably, patients and providers had incongruent perceptions of the others' experience.

DISCUSSION

Inconsistencies between knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making highlight the need for improved dissemination of evidence-based treatments and support increased training for psychopharmacology during pregnancy. Efforts to reduce patient distress regarding their decisions, such as adequate time and information, are indicated.

Neuroactive Steroids and Perinatal Depression: a Review of Recent Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide a theoretical explanation and a review of the recent literature concerning the role of neuroactive steroids in perinatal depression, and to use this information to suggest future directions of research.

RECENT FINDINGS

The bulk of the evidence on neuroactive steroids in perinatal depression concerns allopregnanolone. Recent studies have been mixed, with some studies finding a direct correlation between lower levels of allopregnanolone and increased depressive symptoms but other studies finding no relationship. Evidence concerning other neuroactive steroids and perinatal depression is sparse. Additional research is needed with larger sample sizes and better characterization across the perinatal period (rather than cross-sectionally). Because some studies point to a lag between neuroactive steroid dysregulation and subsequent symptoms, future research should consider interactions with other aspects of neuroactive steroid physiology, such as synthetic enzymes or receptor plasticity.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors as First-Line Antidepressant Therapy for Perinatal Depression

One in 7 women experience depression during the prenatal and/or postpartum period. Nonpharmacologic approaches are known to be as effective as pharmacologic therapies for mild to moderate depression. However, for women who suffer from moderate to severe depression, antidepressant therapy may be the best option, in combination with nonpharmacologic approaches. Considering the substantial negative impact of untreated perinatal depression, providers of prenatal care need to be prepared to diagnose depression, prescribe first-line antidepressants, and refer to other professionals. The purpose of this article is to assist providers to select the safest, most effective selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) as the first-line antidepressant during pregnancy and lactation. Information about side effects, adverse effects, contraindications, and clinical considerations associated with the use of SSRIs is provided. A brief discussion of nonpharmacologic therapies is provided but is not the focus of this article.