Fertility-Sparing Management of Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

Fertility after cancer

Both chemotherapy and radiotherapy can cause infertility in a patient undergoing cancer therapy. As both the ovaries and uterus are involved in female patients, the effects are profound. Where cryopreservation is not used or is unavailable, reproductive options include spontaneous conception if fertility returns, donor gametes, adoption, and surrogacy. Semen, oocyte, embryo, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation all offer an opportunity for a pregnancy after cancer cure if natural fertility is not possible. The risks of fertility preservation are significant for women due to the risks of surgical procedures, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and delay of cancer therapy. Pregnancies that establish in women after cancer cure have specific risks including premature labor, cesarean section, congenital anomalies, and the risk of transmitting disease associated with genetic history. Where ovarian reimplantation is considered, the risk of reimplantation of malignant cells must be considered particularly in hematological and breast disease.

Progesterone induces apoptosis by activation of caspase-8 and calcitriol via activation of caspase-9 pathways in ovarian and endometrial cancer cells in vitro

Previously we have shown inhibition of endometrial cancer cell growth with progesterone and calcitriol. However, the mechanisms by which the two agents attenuate proliferation have not been well characterized yet. Herein, we investigated how progesterone and calcitriol induce apoptosis in cancer cells. DNA fragmentation was upregulated by progesterone and calcitriol in ovarian and endometrial cancer cells. Time-dependent treatment of ovarian cancer cells, ES-2, and TOV-21G with progesterone enhanced caspase -8 activity after 12 h, whereas OV-90, TOV-112D, HEC-1A, and HEC-59 cells showed increased activity after 24 h. Caspase 9 activity was increased in all cell lines after 24 h treatment with calcitriol. Pretreatment of cancer cells with a caspase-8 inhibitor (z-IETD-fmk) or caspase-9 inhibitor (Z-LEHD-fmk) significantly attenuated progesterone and calcitriol induced caspase-8 and caspase-9 expression, respectively. The expression of FasL, Fas, FAD, and pro-caspase-8, which constitute the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), was upregulated in progesterone treated cancer cells. Knockdown of FAS or FADD with specific siRNAs significantly blocked progesterone-induced caspase-8. Cleavage of the BID was not affected by caspase-8 activation suggesting the absence of cross-talk between caspase-8 and caspase-9 pathways. Calcitriol treatment decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and increased the release of cancer cytochrome C. These findings indicate that progesterone induces apoptosis through activation of caspase-8 and calcitriol through caspase-9 activation in cancer cells. A combination of progesterone-calcitriol activates both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways in cancer cells.

Endometrial cancer in an increasingly obese population: Exploring alternative options when surgery may not cut it

OBJECTIVES

The study objectives were to describe outcomes of obese patients with early endometrial cancer following primary non-surgical treatment, assess predictors of response, and estimate the increased surgical risk for these women.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified women with early stage endometrial cancer at a single institution with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 who did not undergo surgery as primary treatment modality due to obesity and medical co-morbidities. Clinicopathologic factors were abstracted, characteristics of responders vs. non-responders compared and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) surgical risk calculator utilized to quantify surgical risks.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were identified, with a mean BMI of 49.0 kg/m2. The NSQIP calculator predicted a significantly higher complication rate for our cohort compared to the expected average risk for hysterectomy (18.8% vs 7.2%, p < .0001). The majority of patients were treated with radiation alone (49%), followed by hormone therapy (45.1%). Response rates were 38.1% for women treated with hormones and 63.6% in the radiation group (p = .063). No significant differences were identified between responders and non-responders with regard to NSQIP scores, BMI, co-morbidities or age. Among those with persistent or progressive disease, 87.5% responded to secondary treatment. Only one death was from cancer progression. Two individuals died following treatment complications (one surgical, one chemotherapy); the remaining twelve deaths were due to pre-existing co-morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Hormone and radiation therapy are both viable options for obese patients deemed to have too significant risk of surgical complications. Pursuing surgical intervention in this population may do more harm than good.

Imiquimod Induces Apoptosis in Human Endometrial Cancer Cells In vitro and Prevents Tumor Progression In vivo

PURPOSE

The increasing incidence of endometrial cancer (EC), in younger age at diagnosis, calls for new tissue-sparing treatment options. This work aims to evaluate the potential of imiquimod (IQ) in the treatment of low-grade EC.

METHODS

Effects of IQ on the viabilities of Ishikawa and HEC-1A cells were evaluated using MTT assay. The ability of IQ to induce apoptosis was evaluated by testing changes in caspase 3/7 levels and expression of cleaved caspase-3, using luminescence assay and western blot. Apoptosis was confirmed by flow cytometry and the expression of cleaved PARP. Western blot was used to evaluate the effect of IQ on expression levels of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and BAX. Finally, the in vivo efficacy of IQ was tested in an EC mouse model.

RESULTS

There was a decrease in EC cell viability following IQ treatment as well as increased caspase 3/7 activities, cleaved caspase-3 expression, and Annexin-V/ 7AAD positive cell population. Western blot results showed the ability of IQ in cleaving PARP, decreasing Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL expressions, but not affecting BAX expression. In vivo study demonstrated IQ's ability to inhibit EC tumor growth and progression without significant toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

IQ induces apoptosis in low-grade EC cells in vitro, probably through its direct effect on Bcl-2 family protein expression. In, vivo, IQ attenuates EC tumor growth and progression, without an obvious toxicity. Our study provides the first building block for the potential role of IQ in the non-surgical management of low-grades EC and encouraging further investigations.

The effects of cancer therapy on women's fertility: what do we know now?

Due to the improvements of cancer treatment, the survival rate of cancer increased over the last decades. One of the detrimental side effects of cytotoxic treatment is the impairment or loss of fertility. Having a family is one of the important aspects for long-time survivors. The impact of gynecologic cancer on fertility depends on the site and kind of the cancer disease, the oncologic therapeutic regimen and additional the age of the patient. In cancer of the internal genital organs, fertility-preserving surgery techniques should be used, if possible. In case, that cytotoxic treatment has to be applied, fertility preservation techniques should be implemented into the oncologic treatment.

Fertility-preserving treatment in complex atypical hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer in young women with oral progestin: Is it effective?

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of oral progestin treatment in women diagnosed with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or grade 1 endometrial cancer (G1EC), who desire to preserve their fertility, as alternative treatment to a hysterectomy.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of women younger than 45 years old that had been diagnosed with CAH or G1EC, who expressed a desire to preserve their fertility using alternative treatment at our institution. Women without evidence of myometrial invasion on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging scans were included. The study period was between 2004 and 2014. Endometrial biopsies were taken at follow-up appointments.

Results

We identified 31 young women with CAH or G1EC. The median age was 33 years old (range, 20 to 41), and the median period of time undertaking the treatment was 5 months (range, 1 to 12). Twenty-three patients (74.2%) achieved complete remission (CR; median time to CR was 3 months; range, 1 to 22), 16 patients (88.9%) with CAH and 7 (53.8%) with G1EC achieved CR. 6 patients (26.1%) who had achieved CR, had recurrence of the disease (median time from CR to recurrence was 12.5 months; range, 4 to 18). Eight patients (25.8%) finally underwent a hysterectomy.

Conclusion

Oral progestin therapy is an alternative treatment for women with CAH or G1EC who desire fertility preservation. However, more prospective studies are needed for standard progestin regimen. Also, there still remains a risk of disease progression and recurrence. Therefore, close follow-up is important during treatment and after CR. In addition, a hysterectomy is recommended as a definitive treatment after completion of childbearing.

Fertility preservation in female cancer patients: An overview

Fertility preservation is becoming increasingly important to improve the quality of life in cancer survivors. Despite guidelines suggesting that discussion of fertility preservation should be done prior to starting cancer therapies, there is a lack of implementation in this area. A number of techniques are available for fertility preservation, and they can be used individually or together in the same patient to maximize efficiency. Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation are now established techniques but have their limitations. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation though considered experimental at present, has a wider clinical application and the advantage of keeping the fertility window open for a longer time. Both chemotherapy and radiotherapy have a major impact on reproductive potential and fertility preservation procedures should be carried out prior to these treatments. The need for fertility preservation has to be weighed against morbidity and mortality associated with cancer. There is thus a need for a multidisciplinary collaboration between oncologists and reproductive specialists to improve awareness and availability.

Progestins in the fertility-sparing treatment and retreatment of patients with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in developed countries. Approximately 3%-14% of endometrial cancers are diagnosed in young women under 40 who want to preserve their fertility. The incidence of endometrial cancer in this age group is increasing, for which fertility-sparing therapy is increasingly used because it is one of the most important quality of life issues in these women. Progestin therapy is the most common type of fertility-sparing therapy. In this review, the most up-to-date findings regarding fertility-sparing progestin therapy for young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer is addressed in terms of diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and oncologic and reproductive outcomes. Fertility-sparing progestin therapy is highly effective in selected young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer. The selection of appropriate patients through comprehensive pretreatment evaluation is of paramount importance to achieve the best outcomes without compromising survival. Because of the high rate of recurrence after successful fertility-sparing therapy, close surveillance is mandatory, and prophylactic hysterectomy is the best option for patients who have completed family planning. Pregnancy outcomes are very promising with the aid of assisted reproductive technologies. Continuous daily oral medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate are the preferred progestins for fertility-sparing therapy, but future studies should be performed to determine the optimal dose and treatment duration of these agents.

Fertility sparing treatment of complex atypical hyperplasia and low grade endometrial cancer using oral progestin

OBJECTIVE

Oral progestin is an alternative to hysterectomy for women with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or grade one endometrial cancer (G1EC) who wish fertility preservation. We evaluated treatment efficacy and fertility outcomes in this population.

METHODS

Women <45 y treated with oral progestin for CAH or G1EC were identified from two cancer centers. Data were obtained from medical records and telephone questionnaires. Time until complete response (CR), and from CR until recurrence was censored for patients without events and analyzed for associations with patient and treatment characteristics; cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate event probability over time.

RESULTS

44 patients were identified, 19 (43%) with CAH and 25 (57%) with G1EC. Median age was 36.5 y (26-44). 24 (55%) achieved CR (median time: 5.7 months). Older age was associated with a lower likelihood of CR (HR 0.84, p=0.0003, 95% CI, 0.8-0.9). CR probability appeared to plateau after 12 months of therapy. Among those with CR, 13 (54%) recurred (median time 3.5 y). 24 patients (55%) underwent hysterectomy; 3 (13%) were upstaged. 11 (25%) underwent fertility treatment with the following outcomes: 6 (55%) no pregnancy, 2 (18%) at least one live infant, and 3 (27%) spontaneous abortion. One achieved a live birth without intervention.

CONCLUSION

Oral progestin is an effective temporizing fertility-sparing treatment for women with CAH/G1EC. Fertility specialist involvement is recommended due to the low live birth rate without intervention. Progestin therapy should be re-evaluated at 1 year in non-responders due to a low probability of success. Hysterectomy is recommended after childbearing due to a high recurrence rate.

Fertility sparing treatment in young patients with early endometrial adenocarcinoma: case series

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate fertility-sparing therapy in young patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Methodology: This prospective study was carried out on 8 patients with clinical and radio-graphic stage IA, well differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium in Alzahra hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Treatment comprised high-dose megestrol acetate. Dilatation and curettage was repeated every three months.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 30 (SD,3.21) years (range 24-35). Of the 8 patients, 7 (87.5%) achieved complete response. The mean time to response was 6.5 months (range 3-9). Of the complete responders, 3 of 7(42.8%) had recurrence; one patient underwent immediate hysterectomy, and 2 were successfully treated with second-line therapy and both subsequently conceived. Conception occurred in 3 of 7 patients (42.8%), in two more than once, However successful pregnancy occurred only in two patients. One patient developed Concomitant ovarian adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions: High dose progestin therapy can be an effective fertility-sparing treatment in young patients with well differentiated stage IA endometrial endometrioid cancer confined to endometrium. However, close follow up is required because of risks of conservative treatment.

Oncofertility in Canada: gonadal protection and fertility-sparing strategies

BACKGROUND

Cancer can be a devastating diagnosis. In particular, malignancy and its indicated treatments have profoundly negative effects on the fertility of young cancer patients. Oncofertility has emerged as a new interdisciplinary field to address the issue of gonadotoxicity associated with cancer therapies and to facilitate fertility preservation. In Canada, fertility issues are often inadequately addressed despite the availability of resources. The goal of this four-part series is to facilitate systemic improvements in fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult Canadians with a new diagnosis of cancer.

METHODS

Here, we review the fertility preservation measures currently available. Medical and surgical strategies are both outlined.

RESULTS

Fertility-preserving strategies and gonadal protection have demonstrated variable success in a number of approaches. The value of hormone suppression is still in question for women. Progestins for endometrial cancer and alternative chemotherapies are other medical approaches. Gonadal shielding and protective surgical approaches have also been attempted.

CONCLUSIONS

The techniques discussed here may be selectively considered and integrated into patient care in an attempt to preserve future fertility before initiating cancer treatment.