Medial and lateral dual plating of native distal femur fractures: a systematic literature review

Double plating and iliac crest bone graft can safely fix femoral shaft nonunion

Introduction Femoral shaft nonunion can be extremely vexing and result in significant morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with nonunion of the femoral shaft fracture undergoing double plating and bone grafts from the iliac crest and femoral canal. Methods This retrospective study included 44 patients with femoral shaft nonunion between March 2020 to March 2022. Patients underwent dual plating, bone grafting from the iliac crest, and the utilization of the femoral canal. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), the two surgical interventions interval, union time after the second surgery, hip range of motion (ROM), limb length discrepancy (LLD), infections, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were evaluated. Results Patients comprised 21 males (47.7%) and 23 females (52.3%), with a mean age of 42.3 ± 15.2 years. The mean BMI was 26.7 ± 3.77 kg/m2. The mean duration between the two surgical interventions for the patients was 17.07 ± 6.6 months. The patients were followed for ≥ 12 months. All patients achieved successful union and fracture healing, with an average time of 5 months. The mean hip flexion and extension were 112.84 ± 7.7˚ and 14.8 ± 5.2˚ degrees, respectively. Thirteen patients showed LLD after the first surgery, with a mean LLD of 7.15 ± 5.04 millimeters. LLDs were successfully rectified in all patients following the surgical intervention. No patients experienced postoperative infections or DVT. Conclusion According to our findings, the utilization of double-plate fixation in combination with iliac crest and femoral canal bone graft has proven to be a secure, productive, and straightforward surgical alternative for the management of femoral nonunion.

Outcomes of operatively managed periprosthetic distal femur fractures compared to fractures in patients with native knees

Introduction

With the increasing incidence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is an expected rise in rate of periprosthetic fractures in the coming years. It is unclear how the outcomes of patients with distal femur fractures (DFF) and a total knee arthroplasty compare to patients of the same age group with native knees (NK).

Materials and methods

A retrospective review was completed for distal femur fractures treated with surgical fixation from January 2019-March 2021. We excluded patients <50 years old, non-ambulatory patients, revision surgeries, and patients with less than 90 days of follow-up. A chart review was performed to collect age, gender, BMI, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, fracture type, fixation method, time to full weight bearing, and complications. Comparisons between the TKA vs native knee groups were performed using t-test, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test where appropriate.

Results

138 patients were included in our study with a mean age of 74 years. 69 DFF ipsilateral to a TKA were included in the study group and 71 DFF were included in the native knee group. Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and ASA class were similar between the groups. All patients with periprosthetic femur fractures had 33A AO/OTA fracture classification. Patients with native knees were more likely to receive dual implant fixation, 15.5% compared to 4.3% (p = 0.02). Full weight bearing was achieved at 8.5 vs 8.6 weeks between the NK and TKA groups (p = 0.64). The complication rate was 16.9% in the NK group vs. 7.2% in the TKA group (p = 0.21).

Conclusion

Patients with periprosthetic femur fractures have similar time to weight bearing and complications rate with patients with distal femur fracture in native knees. We found a higher utilization rate of dual implant fixation in the native knee group.

Distal femur fractures: basic science and international perspectives

Distal femur fractures are challenging injuries to manage, and complication rates remain high. This article summarizes the international and basic science perspectives regarding distal femoral fractures that were presented at the 2022 Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting. We review a number of critical concepts that can be considered to optimize the treatment of these difficult fractures. These include biomechanical considerations for distal femur fixation constructs, emerging treatments to prevent post-traumatic arthritis, both systemic and local biologic treatments to optimize nonunion management, the relative advantages and disadvantages of plate versus nail versus dual-implant constructs, and finally important factors which determine outcomes. A robust understanding of these principles can significantly improve success rates and minimize complications in the treatment of these challenging injuries.

Management of segmental defects post open distal femur fracture using a titanium cage combined with the Masquelet technique A single-centre report of 23 cases

INTRODUCTION

The segmental bone defects post open distal femur fracture presents a reconstructive challenge, which often requires extreme solutions. The present study reviewed a new treatment strategy which used a cylindrical titanium mesh cage as an adjunct to the Masquelet technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 23 patients treated for segmental bone defects post open distal femur fracture using a titanium mesh cage combined with the Masquelet technique under a 2-staged protocol in our institution from 2017 to 2021. The study group consisted of 13 men and 10 women with an average age of 44.1 years. The surgical debridement was performed with antibiotic polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement spacer implanted into the bone defect combined with cement-wrapped plate stabilization, or antibiotic beads with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) to cover the wound. The second stage of the Masquelet technique for bone defect repair began at least 4-6 weeks after the first stage, once all signs of possible infection were eliminated. After the cement spacer was removed, the definitive reconstruction was completed with exchange to a cylindrical titanium mesh cage filled with cancellous autograft within the induced membrane. The bone defect with cage was stabilized with a distal femoral Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). The radiological and clinical records of the enrolled patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 38.6 months. The average number of operations before the second stage was 1.3. The mean interval between the two stages was 12.7 weeks. The average length of the defect measured 8.3 cm (ranging from 6.1 to 12.4 cm). All the defects filled with autograft within the cage achieved bony union, with a mean healing time of 8.4 months. At the latest follow-up, the mean knee extension measured 6.2° (ranging from 0° to 20°), and the mean flexion measured 101.8° (ranging from 60° to 120°). Complications included two instances of superficial stitch abscess, which eventually healed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a titanium cage implanted into an induced membrane in a 2-staged Masquelet protocol could achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes in cases of segmental defects following open distal femur fractures.

The double-plate fixation technique prevents varus collapse in AO type C3 supra-intercondylar fracture of the distal femur

INTRODUCTION

Varus collapse followed by osteosynthesis for distal femoral fractures with conventional implants has been well documented but is seldom mentioned in fractures managed with locking plates. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of varus collapse after treating complex supra-intercondylar fractures of the distal femur (AO type C3) using a Single Plate (SP) or Double Plate (DP) fixation technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 357 patients with distal femoral fractures who were treated at our hospital between 2006 and 2017. After excluding cases of infection, malignancy, periprosthetic fracture, revision surgery, pediatric fracture, and extra-articular fracture, 54 patients were included in the study. All demographic data and radiological and clinical outcomes were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 54 patients enrolled into this study with age from 15 to 85 years old (mean 41.6, SD = 19.9), and 32 of them were open fractures (59%). The patients were further divided into either an SP (n = 15) or a DP group (n = 39). Demographics, including age, sex, injury severity score, and open fracture type, were all compatible between the two groups. The overall nonunion rate was 25.9% (n = 14; 6 from the SP and 8 from the DP group; p = 0.175). The varus collapse rate was 9.3% (n = 5; 4 from the SP and 1 from the DP group (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

The varus collapse rate after osteosynthesis with a single lateral locking plate could be as high as 26.7% in AO type C3 fractures of the distal femur, which would be decreased to 2.6% by adding a medial buttress plate. Surgeons should consider DP fixation to avoid varus collapse in severely comminuted complete intra-articular fractures of the distal femur.