Performance of an Alternative Laboratory-Based HIV Diagnostic Testing Algorithm Using HIV-1 RNA Viral Load

Incidence and Risks of HIV Infection, Medication Options, and Adverse Effects in Accidental Needle Stick Injuries: A Narrative Review

Accidental needle sticks can lead to infections, including HIV. As scientists have learned more about HIV and its replicative physiology, identification of target sites and novel medications have been developed. HIV is spread throughout the population through contact with blood, semen, and rectal or vaginal secretions of infected individuals. Therefore, it is important in general for healthcare workers to be aware of its transmission modes and ways to minimize exposure. In this regard, even with hospitals providing education, training, and safety protocols, there is a continued infection spread with HIV, especially by accidental needle sticks. There is also a wide variety of testing that can be used for HIV utilizing different methodologies, allowing for improved measurement of infection status. Any person with HIV should be tested to clarify infection status and be educated to minimize future virus spread. The current CDC recommendations for HIV infection treatment are antiretroviral therapies, such as an HIV postexposure prophylaxis regimen, which consists of a cocktail of antiretrovirals and postexposure prophylaxis immediately for occupational exposures, such as accidental needlestick exposure from an HIV infected patient. To decrease accidental HIV stick injuries, there are safety precautions in place, that if followed, would help reduce this incidence. HIV accidental needle stick injuries still happen in the hospital workplace, but with proper education and treatment, if exposed, there is hope to minimize the effects.

Reflex Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Type 1 RNA Testing Enables Timely Differentiation of False-Positive Results From Acute HIV Infection

Accurate, timely human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnosis is critical. Routine HIV screening program data were examined before and after reflex HIV type 1 RNA testing. Reflex testing facilitated confirmation of reactive HIV screening assays (as true or false positives) (odds ratio, 23.7 [95% confidence interval, 6.7-83.4]; P < .0001), improving detection of acute HIV and reducing unconfirmed discordant results.

Assessment of the performance regarding confirmatory diagnosis and initiation of antiretroviral therapy under a modified national HIV testing algorithm and pay-for-performance program in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

A pay-for-performance plan for rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) commencement was initiated in 2018, while a modified testing algorithm offers immunochromatographic test (ICT) to replace Western blot (WB), and simultaneous testing with ICT and Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) for HIV-positive sera was adopted in 2019 in Taiwan.

METHODS

Serum specimens collected from 1117 suspected or confirmed HIV infection cases in 2016-2019 were reassessed the performance of WB, ICT, and NAAT. We reviewed the medical records of 10,732 individuals diagnosed with HIV in 2015-2021 to determine the time from screening to confirmatory diagnosis, followed by ART commencement.

RESULTS

All 860 WB-positives were also positive by ICT and NAAT. The positive detection percentages were 37.0% by ICT and 51.4% by NAAT for 257 WB-indeterminate and -negative sera. The sensitivity for WB and ICT was 93.8% and 95.5%, respectively. In the people living with HIV (PLHIV) cohort, the median time from initial positive to confirmatory diagnosis decreased from 5 to 6 days before 2019 to 1 day in 2021. The median time from initial positive to ART initiation decreased from 37 days in 2015, 14 days in 2018, to 6 days in 2021. Compared to 2015-2017, the time to ART initiation was 91.48 days lower in 2018 (P < 0.001) and 100.66 days lower in 2019-2021 (P < 0.001) by the adjusted linear regression model.

CONCLUSION

A significant decrease in the time to ART initiation was observed after initiation of the pay-for-performance program and optimized testing algorithm in Taiwan.

Laboratory diagnosis of HIV: a contemporary overview in the Australian context

Over the past decade there have been technical advances in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) assays and updates to testing regulations that have substantially changed the landscape of laboratory testing for HIV. In addition, there have been significant changes in the epidemiology of HIV in Australia in the context of highly effective contemporary biomedical treatment and prevention strategies. Here, we provide an update on contemporary issues for the laboratory detection and confirmation of HIV in Australia. These include (1) the impact of early treatment and biological prevention strategies on the serological and virological detection of HIV; (2) the updated national HIV laboratory case definition and its interaction with testing regulations, public health and clinical guidelines; and (3) novel strategies for the laboratory detection of HIV, including the incorporation of HIV nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) into testing algorithms. These developments present an opportunity to develop a nationally consistent contemporary HIV testing algorithm that would result in optimisation and standardisation of HIV testing in Australia.

HIV and Drug-Resistant Subtypes

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a human viral infectious disease caused by the positive-sense single-stranded (ss) RNA Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (Retroviridae family, Ortervirales order). HIV-1 can be distinguished into various worldwide spread groups and subtypes. HIV-2 also causes human immunodeficiency, which develops slowly and tends to be less aggressive. HIV-2 only partially homologates to HIV-1 despite the similar derivation. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is the treatment approved to control HIV infection, based on multiple antiretroviral drugs that belong to different classes: (i) NNRTIs, (ii) NRTIs, (iii) PIs, (iv) INSTIs, and (v) entry inhibitors. These drugs, acting on different stages of the HIV life cycle, decrease the patient's total burden of HIV, maintain the function of the immune system, and prevent opportunistic infections. The appearance of several strains resistant to these drugs, however, represents a problem today that needs to be addressed as best as we can. New outbreaks of strains show a widespread geographic distribution and a highly variable mortality rate, even affecting treated patients significantly. Therefore, novel treatment approaches should be explored. The present review discusses updated information on HIV-1- and HIV-2-resistant strains, including details on different mutations responsible for drug resistance.

An HIV Diagnostic Testing Algorithm Using the cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 Qualitative Assay for HIV Type Differentiation and Confirmation

Human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2) diagnostic testing algorithms recommended by the Centers for Disease Control involve up to three tests and rely mostly on detection of viral antigen and host antibody responses. HIV-1 p24 antigen/HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody-reactive specimens are confirmed with an immunochromatographic HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation assay, and negative or indeterminate results from the differentiation assay are resolved by an HIV-1-specific nucleic acid amplification test (NAT). The performance of a proposed alternative algorithm using the cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative NAT as the differentiation assay was evaluated in subjects known to be infected with HIV-1 (n = 876) or HIV-2 (n = 139), at low (n = 6,017) or high (n = 1,020) risk of HIV-1 infection, or at high-risk for HIV-2 infection (n = 498) (study A). The performance of the cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative test was also evaluated by comparison to an HIV-1 or HIV-2 alternative NAT (study B). The HIV-1 and HIV-2 overall percent agreements (OPA) in study A ranged from 95% to 100% in all groups. The positive percent agreements (PPA) for HIV-1 and HIV-2 were 100% (876/876) and 99.4% (167/168), respectively, for known positive groups. The negative percent agreement in the HIV low-risk group was 100% for both HIV-1 and HIV-2. In study B, the HIV-1 and HIV-2 OPA ranged from 99% to 100% in all groups evaluated (n = 183 to 1,030), and the PPA for HIV-1 and HIV-2 were 100% and 99.5%, respectively, for known positive groups. The cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative assay can discriminate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 based on HIV RNA and can be included in an alternative diagnostic algorithm for HIV.